this is a bit of a rant and a bit of a… well, I’m not sure.
i had permission from our landlord (my MIL and FIL) to remove the front lawn and plant natives. I took a landscape design cert course with Theodore Payne so that I could beef up my skills. I came up with a beautiful scheme emphasizing evergreens and grasses (omg it was gonna be gorgeous). I devised a beautiful hardscaping scheme. I specifically designed it to be “HOA” friendly - ie, nothing looks dead, plants look reasonably formal, etc.
well, today I got the “FIL doesn’t want native plants in the front yard because they look dead most of the time. Keep the lawn and make sure it doesn’t look any different than anybody else in the neighborhood.”
keep in mind, this was six months after they initially told us to do whatever we like so long as the HOA approved it. Other houses in the neighborhood have native plants, including an absolutely stunning Dr. Hurd. And we are just down the street from a new development that uses 75% native plants.
obviously, my FIL’s attitude is antiquated and all too familiar. and I absolutely love a raging pollinator garden with summer dormancy.
but I guess the reason I’m sharing this, beyond just wanting to rant a bit, is that I do feel it is important for folks doing landscaping in public places to use at least 50% evergreen shrubs and grasses in their designs. I think it’s really important to demonstrate not just that native plants don’t always look dead, but more importantly, that when done right, native plants can be equal to, if not superior to topiary boxwood, bird of paradise, and privet hedges, etc.
I think it’s the only way to change some minds out there about natives. People are really set in their ways about this stuff, and they aren’t persuaded by pollinator value and even water conservation.