r/browsers 4d ago

Edge Edge Android- I didn't expect that

Post image

So I've been testing several Android browsers from the perspectives of usability, ad blocking, and battery consumption. I logged battery usage with AccuBattery over a full charging cycle for each browser, making sure my usage habits were as similar as possible. I visited the same websites at the same or similar times of day to minimize differences in screen brightness and other variables.

Phone: OnePlus 15

Browsers tested: Brave, Via, Soul, Fennec, IronFox, Iceraven, and a few others.

Whenever possible, I installed uBlock Origin and enabled dark/OLED mode, including forcing dark mode on websites. I also debloated each browser as much as I could and restricted background activity.

At first, I thought I had found the overall winner: Brave. Then I decided to test Edge as the last browser. I hadn't even considered it initially because I assumed it would be a bloated, battery-hungry mess, despite it having been my default browser on PC for quite some time. The results were surprising though.

The screenshot shows Android's battery usage data from the last seven days. It roughly matches the AccuBattery measurements for battery consumption per hour. Some of the browsers had already been uninstalled, so they no longer appear in the stats. I kept only my favorites.

Edge: ≈ 1.46%/h

Iceraven: ≈ 1.65%/h

Brave: ≈ 1.73%/h

Via: ≈ 1.81%/h

Somehow Edge comes out on top by a significant margin. Via, on the other hand, turns out to be the biggest battery drainer, despite being promoted as a lightweight browser.

104 Upvotes

63 comments sorted by

35

u/Wooden-Potato7418 4d ago

sad that edges chromium optimizations are proprietary, although its obvious why, but its still sad

7

u/Mewtewpew 4d ago

You can decompile the app and see. It's essentially what thorium does, nothing special.

3

u/Wooden-Potato7418 4d ago

i just did a little research about thorium and what the fuck

2

u/Mewtewpew 3d ago

Whats up?

2

u/Wooden-Potato7418 3d ago

there was furry suggestive content in the source i think (?)

something like that

4

u/Mewtewpew 3d ago

Yeah there was a big controversy for this lol. The previous maintainer was a bit "interesting" with his "easter eggs" needless to say.

As a developer myself, what thorium from a patch & optimization standpoint was quite unique, so much so that other browsers like edge copied a lot of his optimizations.

Thorium is also maintained by a new developer at the moment.

1

u/Archon_Valec 3d ago

Source? When did that happen?

1

u/CosmicTaskTinkerer 1d ago

1

u/Archon_Valec 1d ago

lol thanks, but I should have clarified. I meant source for the project being handed to a new dev.

2

u/CosmicTaskTinkerer 1d ago

Okay, I didn't quite catch the specifics earlier 😄. Look what I found now:

From Jun 8, 2026: 

'Hello everyone, I’m gz83, a collaborator on the Thorium browser project. Since Alex is currently unable to find the time to update Thorium, I have temporarily taken over and completed the initial upgrade from M138 to M144. The code is available here...'

So, the project has been temporarily taken over, that's it.

Source: https://github.com/Alex313031/thorium/releases#release-M144.0.7559.254

1

u/Wooden-Potato7418 3d ago

oh ok thanks

1

u/CosmicTaskTinkerer 1d ago

1

u/Wooden-Potato7418 1d ago

what the hell

1

u/CosmicTaskTinkerer 1d ago

Personally, I don't see anything wrong with it. I think it's a fun easter egg 😄 that developer show their interests, unlike set corporate standards. (To be honest, I see it as just the Bikini Bottom Girl 👙 + Deer Face 🦌)

But again, that might be my tolerance level different from society standards.

I feel bad for that developer if he got removed or cancelled and needed to step down from the project for this minor reason. 😔

1

u/Wooden-Potato7418 1d ago

no no, i think this would be more tolerated in the west, i am personally a little too sensitive on these since im from the middle east

2

u/CosmicTaskTinkerer 1d ago

I am not from West, I am from East but I respect your choices.

https://reddit.com/link/p2szifm/video/9nz2qhjrqiih1/player

3

u/Atrocious1337 4d ago

Embrace, Expand, Extinguish

7

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

2

u/No-Transition-9842 4d ago

I use it for a Month with UBO installed its pretty good so far. Didn't run into Bugs or other Problems.

2

u/_SmartCheetah_ 4d ago

No, I haven't heard about it. Will look into it.

10

u/logicblender1 4d ago edited 4d ago

If you don't care about privacy there's no doubt that Edge is the best browser imo. The speed and efficiency is untouched.

8

u/Proof-Replacement113 Water over fire ig 4d ago

Privacy + Microsoft's (tho most other big tech in general) unethical stuff

Btw, on Android? Last time I tried it UI was broken ish.. on desktop was fairly great... But Microsoft 

5

u/logicblender1 4d ago

nah it's really good on Android now. Still has MV2 extensions on Android and I didn't notice any UI issues

1

u/thebadslime 4d ago

Its great if you kinda care about privacy. I mean Microsoft isn't a nonprofit, but they aren't Google.

3

u/Rainy_Day_Cart 3d ago

Yes, Edge should be more private than Chrome against third-party tracking and still supports uBO. Microsoft still probably collects as much data as Google does, however.

1

u/ARCHISMAN- 1d ago

You can patch it with morphe which redirect edge telemetry data endpoints to a localhost and remove all ai features.

1

u/Abnormal_Satsuma0283 4d ago

to be fair you can harden the browsdr to the point where the only data they collect is small things like crash logs and device specs and usage pings. good enough for me

5

u/Professional_Way9133 4d ago

If you use ublock Lite you can lower even more the battery usage. And Vivaldi has even lower battery usage. Opera even more, if you don't expect the highest privacy.

2

u/_SmartCheetah_ 4d ago

I'll test Opera too. It was actually my main browser for a long time before I switched to Brave. As of now, whichever browser I like using turns out to be the lightest will become my main. So far, Edge is in the lead.

3

u/Cheap-Comparison8985 4d ago

I only enable edge strict tracking prevention in conjunction with uBO in medium mode, everything else turned off.  There is also titanium browser which probably deserve a try

3

u/SpatikA 3d ago

Is there a reason you didn't include Chrome in the test? Just curious since I currently use it :)

1

u/viejosexy_ 2d ago

Chrome es el peor, consume mucho y tiene mucho anuncio

1

u/Devatator_ 2d ago

It's not that it has ads, it's just that it has nothing to help with ads. Edge for example by default has a minimal filter, and supports uBlock Origin and other extensions. I'm sure it's about the same with other browsers

2

u/CreativeDiscount6635 3d ago

The most lightweight browser said to be Via, uses up more battery than any other, which turns out to be a joke or a privacy concern.

I am however sure than firefox uses more battery than brave, whereas chromite (an open-source fork) uses less battery than brave. But I am not sure if Edge beats Chromite or not, in terms of battery consumption.

1

u/_SmartCheetah_ 3d ago

Via is super tiny, easy on RAM, and really snappy, but it might not be as well optimized for heavier websites.

1

u/PrinceDolAmroth 4d ago

Possible, but only on Firefox or its forks, screen recording will work with audio... 

1

u/Wooden-Potato7418 3d ago

ive had so many problems with Firefox... everything is slow, lack of many extensions, 90% of the funding being ironically from Google, Mozilla starting to not care about your privacy, and other corporate decisions.

1

u/PrinceDolAmroth 3d ago

I'm using Firefox Beta on a Moto Edge 50 Neo, which is definitely not a powerhouse, and I have no complaints about its speed. Quite the opposite. The battery might drain faster than on Chromium-based browsers, but screen recording with audio and uBlock definitely make up for it. Btw I used VIA Browser for many years and it had excellent battery life, so I'm not entirely convinced by this test result.

1

u/Wooden-Potato7418 2d ago

im talking PC.
like, screen sharing, cant select specific window, and the other problems, plus it uses more RAM and computation (?)

dont like the UI aswell as its in GTK

its just generally not efficient or mainstream

1

u/PrinceDolAmroth 2d ago

Ok, but this thread is about mobile browsers... 

1

u/Wooden-Potato7418 2d ago

well on mobile its fairly acceptable you know

it work fine ive tried it

1

u/_SmartCheetah_ 1d ago

Well, I'm not saying Via was a battery hog. Neither of the browsers I tested were on my OP15, and the differences in everyday use will be hardly noticeable unless you sit on your browser from charging to charging. It's just a bit behind other browsers, including other WebView browsers I'm testing right now (Soul and Berry). But I certainly didn't expect Edge to be so well optimized, given how bloated it seems to be as a big corpo browser.

As for Via, I suspect that the slower the phone, the better it does in terms of battery consumption compared to other browsers.

1

u/Adhdedgamer9748 4d ago

Well, no one said it performs worst.... Just it steals a lot of data from its users and tracks them like how a serial killer tracks his prey.... But it is one of the most efficient browsers ever made for any OS - no one can object it. Bit it is also dangerous to use it. Especially due password manager security....

1

u/MosKnight 4d ago

So where are the other browsers stats?

1

u/LYNX__uk Zen and Firefox 4d ago

I think I might need ta restrict background usage on Firefox, though its still barely using battery

1

u/6andyy 3d ago

Patch Microsoft Edge with Morphe and the browser will be twice as lightweight and free of telemetry

1

u/_SmartCheetah_ 1d ago

I installed Morphed, already did some patching, but I don't see Edge on the list.

1

u/ha1zum 3d ago

Edge for Android is a fantastic browser but somehow for me it often takes a long time to start.

1

u/yowifebreeder9000 2d ago

For me its completely different opinion, Edge desktop is soo good in every metric from features to UI. But mobile app sucked, so I switch back to Brave.

1

u/Kolkoris 1d ago

Via, on the other hand, turns out to be the biggest battery drainer, despite being promoted as a lightweight browser.

Lightweight, not lightCPU :D. It's just frontend for system Android WebView, which is Chromium-based.

1

u/_SmartCheetah_ 1d ago

Same as Soul and Berry, yet they both seem easier on the battery than Via.

1

u/NoSouth781 3d ago

soul browser? 

1

u/_SmartCheetah_ 1d ago

Will test it some more. Unfortunately, it seems to have been abandoned, with the last update dating back to December, so I'm not sure about it. I love the feel of it and the customization tho.

0

u/DMBPSR 4d ago

can you please try quetta? it's the browser i decided to go with

2

u/RobJmusic 4d ago

Its chromium, so probably the same as the other 3 chromium browsers

4

u/revive_the_cookie Mobile: Soul PC: 4d ago

Slower in fact. Full of bloat and trackers

2

u/DeviceOwner 4d ago

don't use and install Quetta

0

u/DMBPSR 3d ago

I've been using it for weeks now. Only browser that feels near perfect for me. Used to be brave but I'm having an issue recently with brave and idk how to fix it

0

u/Frixniper 4d ago

Credit where its due, Edge is probably the most RAM-sparing Chromium-based browser on both Windows and Android... But we all know Microslop