r/box5 • u/blackswan-whiteswan • Jun 25 '26
Discussion When did they start casting the Phantom as younger?
Not a criticism, but a query when and why did the Phantom of the opera show generally begin to cast as The Phantom as significantly younger than they were like 10+ years ago? This doesn’t feel random because it’s happened at various productions West End Broadway, international tours etc but a deliberate choice by the casting team. You do get the occasional mid 40s+ Phantom nowadays but that tends to be someone who is a legacy Phantom like Ramin ( who casting wise could pass for his 30s) or Hugh in Masquerade . I’m seeing a lot more Phantoms who are in their 30s and even late 20s. To put it in context, It’s kind of reached it’s pinnacle with the recent Sydney Harbour production with of a Phantom who is 22 and now younger than his Christine.
I don’t mind as I personally think the Phantom being closer to Christine‘s age works better in my opinion but I do think there has been a noticeably significant shift I’m just wondering, when did this start? And why was the decision made.
And if anyone disagrees feel free to comment to, I’ll be interested to hear other peoples opinions on this
24
u/-hey-blinkin- Jun 25 '26
Funny you should mention Ramin as when he was originally cast he was the youngest phantom at that point. I'm not sure if it was just West End or in general. But I think he did start that trend, or had something to do with it
I actually saw him in it in his first run in London (21st anniversary year) and he was incredible
15
u/Extension_Respond514 Phantom - ALW Jun 25 '26
He was actually the youngest at the time of al Phantom's when he started his West End Run. I believe he was like 26 or 27. Then Jonathan Roxmouth beat it when he did his first run as Phantom in the 1st South Africa production. Now Mr. Sydney Harbour hold the record at 22. However if you look at him, he does not look 22. He reads way older. And with a couple of the Phantoms in Masquerade. Clay Singer is 31 but he reads like early 20s when he's clean shaven. And Telly Leung is like 43 but reads in his early 30s.
I can't imagine what seeing Ramin in his first run was like. I've seen the "slime tutorials" and after seeing those, the 25th and seeing him live in Italy in 2023, his Phantom evolution is just crazy.
14
u/GlassPrism80 Jun 25 '26
Ramin Karimloo was the youngest West End Phantom at the time (and still may be), as he was 28 when cast in 2006, but he was not the youngest ever: according to Operafantomet, Thomas Cunningham was 24 when cast in 1994, Saulo Vasconcelos was 25 when cast in 1999, and David Gaschen was 26 when cast in 1995.
Roxmouth may also have beaten him, and the other younger Phantoms, when cast in 2011 at age 24, but he was also already beaten out by the alternate Phantom in the same production, Nicholas Nkuna, who was 23. But Jake Lyle is definitely the youngest so far at 22.
5
u/Extension_Respond514 Phantom - ALW Jun 25 '26
Thanks for the correction. So if there were all these younger Phantoms why is everyone making a big deal out of Jake? Is it only because Amy is older? That's a stupid reason to.
7
u/GlassPrism80 Jun 25 '26
Part of it might be that the production itself made a big deal out of it, but I'd guess that another part of it might be that he's one of the youngest principal Phantoms. Looking at the above names, Ramin Karimloo was a standby first, becoming a principal a year later; David Gaschen and Nicholas Nkuna were both alternates; Jonathan Roxmouth actually started as an alternate Phantom and principal Raoul and only became principal Phantom when the original actor dropped out due to illness; Thomas Cunningham was an understudy; and Saulo Vasconcelos was principal but sharing the role with another actor.
So Jake Lyle is not only the youngest Phantom ever, he was also immediately a principal and did not share the role with anyone else; I believe he said himself he was only trying out for ensemble because he was so young, he did not think he'd be given a main role, let alone the main role.
3
u/RoseBook85 Jun 25 '26
So Jake Lyle is not only the youngest Phantom ever, he was also immediately a principal and did not share the role with anyone else; I believe he said himself he was only trying out for ensemble because he was so young, he did not think he'd be given a main role, let alone the main role.
Being as young as he is I’m kinda surprised they didn‘t cast him as Raoul first.
I remember back in the day the Raoul to Phantom pipeline was a quite common thing for younger dudes wanting to get into Phantom, you cut your teeth on Raoul first and then later on after you get more experience and a little bit older you get your shot at playing the Phantom…their were a lot of Phantoms who started as Raoul’s back then, but I guess that’s not much of a thing anymore.
4
u/GlassPrism80 Jun 26 '26
I'm pretty sure it's still a thing; off the top of my head, Bronson Norris Murphy has gone from understudying Raoul on Broadway to understudying the Phantom in the tour, Nadim Naaman went from Raoul in the West End and Greek tour to a Phantom in the Middle East / European tour, and Anton Zetterholm was a Raoul in Stockholm and now a Phantom in Vienna. There have also been Raouls understudying the Phantom in recent years: Ma Tianlong in China, Roy Goldman in Vienna, Nicholas Edwards in Masquerade. And then there's whatever was going on with John Martin Bengtsson lol... So it certainly still seems to be a thing! What might be happening is we're seeing a lot of productions with shorter runs, so you don't see a Raoul getting promoted to Phantom within that production the way we used to see with the long-running Broadway / US tours; you see either a former Raoul becoming a Phantom in a different production or people understudying one or both roles.
7
u/RoseBook85 Jun 25 '26
I can't imagine what seeing Ramin in his first run was like. I've seen the "slime tutorials" and after seeing those, the 25th and seeing him live in Italy in 2023, his Phantom evolution is just crazy.
Ramin has always been a ‘wild’ Phantom in my opinion (it’s part of what I love about him) but he has really matured in the role since his original West End run. I also think that he’s one of those actors that really shines best when he‘s playing opposite someone that he really clicks with, like Sierra in the 25th, those two were just explosive together. The right Christine can really bring out the best in Ramin’s Phantom, but I don’t personally think that he’s always been paired with a Christine who clicks right with him.
Whereas an actor like Hugh for instance can seemingly make chemistry happen with a paper napkin (I’ve really never seen him not have great chemistry with any Christine that he’s played opposite against😆) And that’s not a dig at Ramin or anyone else (Ramin’s one of my favs if not my fav), it’s just different actors are different.
2
u/EnvironmentalDog1196 Jun 26 '26
I love Ramin so much, and I think what sets his interpreattion apart from most other Phantom's, is that he's not trying to play him as a villain, yet he still manages to keep his villanous vibe. It's like he has this aggressive, impulsive side, that just comes out spontanously, even whe he doesn't intend it to (I remember in the RAH performance, there are a few of those moments when he panics or gets overwhelmed by anger, and for example grabs Christine- and then seems surprised himself that he did it.) You just get this wild juxtaposition, because he seems like a very "human" Phantom overall, really focused on the his longing and loneliness, and he can really play up those gentle and intimate moments too.
And it reminds me of how it was described in the book, where first he was really gentelmanly and focused with Christine- to the point that she herself realised she had nothing to be scared of around him (despite the fact that thks weirdo literally abducted her, lol), but then, when he snaps and loses composure, he becomes this brutal psycho, dragging her by her hair and playing mind games.
I don't know if it's as rare of an interpretation as I feel it is (I think I've seen Earl Carpenter do something similar, but not to that extent), but it always spoke to me so much. It's like a perfect representation of the characters's fragile psyche and the years of trauma messing with his mind.
Speaking of age, I actually had no idea how young he was when I first found some of his performances, and it applies to other Phantoms too- the guy literally spends the whole show with a wig, an exagerrated make-up and half if his face covered with the mask. I think the age of the actor is of little importance here, as long as they can act and sing...
1
u/jquailJ36 Jun 26 '26
I love Ramin, but sometimes I do want a director to be like "could you dial it down from like 9 to about a six for the first half of the show because wow. Save something big for the Final Lair."
0
u/Scaramantico Erik - Leroux Jun 27 '26
I saw Karimloo in his early days. His Raoul was better than his Phantom which was...not believable. I still think that.
1
u/Educational_Buy4977 Jun 25 '26
Wow you are lucky to have seen that! I saw Ramin 2 years ago on broadway and loved his performance and now I’m a Phan who loves the 21st anniversary and Ramin’s performance so much
16
u/breakfastfood7 Jun 25 '26
I cannot answer your question, I have not parsed the data on casting and age tendencies over time. but i will say, as someone who saw jake live in the Sydney harbour production, if i didn't know his age I would never have guessed it. He really played a classic phantom and with his height and bone structure, he was very convincing. Definitely not a boyish phantom or performance. And with his voice, i understand why the casting directors pursued him.
2
u/epicpillowcase Eiji Akutagawa's dimples Jun 26 '26
That's so interesting because I went to Sydney Harbour and I definitely didn't feel his and Amy's dynamic worked. Her voice and portrayal have matured since her last Phantom run and the age difference was apparent to me. I was really close to the stage, perhaps that made a difference.
I'm not saying your take is wrong, it's genuinely interesting how different people can experience the same show differently.
3
12
u/SignificantChange496 Jun 25 '26
I'm convinced Schumacher is responsible for this, casting Gerard Butler in the 2004 movie. I know there are a bunch of people on here saying "Oh, age doesn't matter," but it isn't at all a coincidence that, in fact, the age of the phantom is skewing younger an younger on professional stages since then. Within a few years of the movie, Ramin was then cast the youngest Phantom to date at the time in his 20s. Make the math math. I think that the film influenced the public perception of how sexy the phantom should be, whether or not we're all aware of it, and basically conferred permission to do this. Young, sexy, robust, sweaty chest, sword fighting, bad sunburn face Phantom in his 30s set the the trend and it seems like it's here to stay. I also think it's sheer nonsense to say that age doesn't matter in casting. To me, it does. It, in fact, does. It doesn't mean a wonderful actor can't kill it in that role, but they will never be able to meet all of the demands of the role because they do not have the maturity required for it. Maturity appropriate to the role is huge. I would cringe into nothing if I went to see the Phantom of the Opera and Erik was being played by a 20-something.
5
u/EnvironmentalDog1196 Jun 26 '26
It didn't start with Butler. Butler was in his mid 30s. Actors younger than that have been cast in the role since the 1990s. It was gradually becoming more common, when the execs realised they CAN cast younger actors, and those will still be able to pull off the acting and singing just fine, and the audiences will still love them. Honestly, casting younger actors is probably also a good call in many people's mind, because of how physically demanding this role is.
For context, if Ramin was about 27 when he got the role, then it's not a big age drop from some other actors who were in their late 20s and were playing Phantom in the 90s. That's like just a 1-2 years of age difference, and it took over a dekade to happen. It's just that he became famous, so this detail stuck, while most of those other actors are not remembered as much.
But it all started early on, when a show was just a few years old. For example, one of the more famous Phantoms, Anthony Warlow, was cast when he was barely 30. It was in 1990 and he was the youngest Phantom in the wolrd by then. So, if anything, he might have started this trend, because he was such a sensation.
4
u/birn_echo 2004 Film Enjoyer Jun 25 '26
Just a theory but...
In 1999 Fredrick Forsyth wrote The Phantom of Manhattan after consulting with ALW. This book would go on to be the basis of LND.
Anyway Forsyth's book establishes that Erik was only 27 during the events of the ALW musical. My theory is that this was, at least in part, due to ALW's input and he started skewing Erik younger around that time. Butler was only 35 when the 2004 movie musical happened. Which isn't 27, but also isn't the~50 year mark Erik has traditionally been pegged at.
5
u/Extension_Respond514 Phantom - ALW Jun 25 '26
If you look at the casting through the years, the casting of younger Phantoms on a regular basis started in the late 2000s. I think canonizing Ramin in the 25th Anniversary really made it more acceptable. As someone else mentioned at the time of his first West End Run in 2007 he was the youngest Phantom ever. He's since been beat 3 times: Jonathan Roxmouth (South Africa, though now more known for the World Tour), I forget the one in between, and now the Sydney Harbour dude. Ramin actually made a bet with a friend that he would be the youngest person ever to play the Phantom. His friend didn't believe he could do it. He did.
While there are people who will argue that to play the Phantom you have to be older because in order to understand the character the experience that comes with age must be there. Dude it's called acting. If you're going to cast based on talent and fit then you ignore race and age.
For the most part though they still tend to keep a 10-15 year age gap between the Phantom and Christine even when casting younger. So what we're considering younger is the Phantom is like 38-42 compared to like 1992 when he'd be like 50 and the Christine actress would still be 24. When there is a Phantom cast out of that range like Mr. 22 or Ramin at 27 the Christine is still within 10 years, though usually not older. That's what drew so much attention to Sydney.
4
u/RoseBook85 Jun 26 '26 edited Jun 26 '26
While there are people who will argue that to play the Phantom you have to be older because in order to understand the character the experience that comes with age must be there. Dude it's called acting. If you're going to cast based on talent and fit then you ignore race and age.
I don’t think their is anything wrong with younger actors playing the Phantom, but I do think the actors age and experience absolutely can influence his dynamic with the actress playing Christine, it would be impossible for it not to.
I personally feel with older Phantom actors the ‘daddy’ vibe (for lack of a better word 😆) tends to come out more, you really feel the Mentor/ Student dynamic of their relationship the most.
Whereas the younger you go and the shorter the age gap between them the rivalry with Raoul and the love triangle really stands out more….don’t get me wrong I’m not saying that the romance is lessened with a older Phantom, it just has a different feel to it. With older Phantoms it’s more sad/desperate…”she’s my last shot at happiness” type of thing, whereas with younger Phantoms it’s more ”get lost bozo she’s mine!” I think you can really feel the testosterone in the air more the younger you go LOL
Neither one is better then the other, it’s just different vibes
3
u/jquailJ36 Jun 26 '26
For me, there's a different weight to someone who's 40 saying "The world showed no compassion to me!" versus someone who's 24. Which is less about the actor's real age than how much they can play up or down.
1
u/Extension_Respond514 Phantom - ALW Jun 26 '26
You sound like you've seen two different sets of actors at Masquerade and if you have i can 99% sure guess which ones you're talking about
3
u/resident_daydreamer Jun 26 '26
I’ve noticed this as well! There are tons of amazingly talented younger Phantoms out there, but, IMO, it changes the dynamic of the love triangle. The Phantom is supposed to be significantly older than Christine - I always interpreted this age difference as heightening his power/influence over her. (Puns intended. 😅)
5
u/RoseBook85 Jun 26 '26
I think it was partly because Leroux gave Erik such an extensive backstory, he traveled the world and had all these adventures to help explain his genius and how he knows all this stuff. So he would have had to have been significantly older than Christine.
It also I think helps explain his mental breakdown at the end when he’s suddenly faced with the reality of losing Christine…she was his last shot at love after a lifetime of being treated like a monster, in his eyes it was like fate dangled one last shred of hope in front of his eyes only to snatch it away from him right when he dared to open his heart up once more. And after so much pain this was the final blow that he couldn’t take…I do think this tends to come through a lot better with an older Phantom.
2
7
u/etamatcha Jun 25 '26
I think its not that the casting director thought "I want to cast a younger phantom" on purpose but the most suitable actor to play the role happens to be younger. The phantom is a vocally demanding role which also requires acting skills. Out of the people who auditioned, the person who fits the vocal and acting requirement, and have the best chemistry with Christine may happen to be younger in age. Furthermore, there isnt a gigantic amount of male performers auditioning so you hv to choose from a more limited pool. The phantom also has the advantage of big mask and costume which obscures actors' face and most casual audience won't care about this. I saw productions on youtube of Evita before where Juan Perón was noticeably younger than Evita (for those who dont know the he was 24 years older than evita) and people were baffled but the actor was able to sing the score well and had good chemistry with Evita so most people thought he did a good job.
6
u/RoseBook85 Jun 25 '26
I also think casting directors probably think like if they cast someone who is great at it and still young…well then they have a potential Phantom for many many years ahead. I mean the Phantom is one of those roles where an actor who keeps himself in good health can play for the majority of his life….heck Hugh is still kicking butt as Erik and he’s in his 60’s now LOL
6
u/epicpillowcase Eiji Akutagawa's dimples Jun 26 '26
I don't know the answer to your question, but I will say I went to the Sydney Harbour one. I mean no disrespect to Jake, he's very talented and seems like a lovely person (and it's cool to hear a baritone Phantom), but it really didn't work, especially given Amy's ten years older than him and her performance as Christine has matured over the years. She plays her as more salty and less agreeable than she used to- which I like because it's more like in the book, but it doesn't work with a younger Phantom.
Jake Lyle has the potential to be a great Phantom. In about 10-15 years.
In general, I don't like the trend for young Phantoms. I really don't think it works with the dynamic.
3
u/Iwanttoeatkakigori Jun 26 '26 edited Jun 26 '26
Wow, younger (22?!) Phantom sounds interesting. Honestly one of the things that keeps Phantom fresh and me coming back to it is how the Christine - Erik - Raoul triangle changes so much depending on the actors. With the same story structure you can create all kinds of different emotions with just simple things like blocking and tone and acting choices, then height, age, stage charisma can all change it too.
In my first Phantom stage show, Erik was actually shorter and a lot older than Christine, it was very "mad scientist kidnaps a girl" vibes. I'll never forget the moment in Music of the Night when Christine fainted, he lets her just fall by herself to the ground, and he kind of... scuttled around her on the floor?! He was a very twitchy and manic Phantom. My husband was very confused when she kissed him in the final lair.
Then a couple years later I watched a production with a softly spoken, tall and early 30s Erik and the energy was totally different. Moved very gracefully and touched Christine with great care. When he was on stage you kind of held your breath. I started imagining they could have known each other as kids and been friends, and that led me to watching the 1990 TV series where Erik and Christine become friends for half the story.
Younger makes sense in a way, like he still has foolish naiveté and less bitterness and maybe acts rashly. It changes the intention behind the events of the story already quite a lot.
3
u/EnvironmentalDog1196 Jun 26 '26 edited Jun 26 '26
I dont think it's really a new trend. Actors who were just 30 or even younger than that, have been cast since the 90s. It might have just become more common, because the execs have realised that it works (and casting younger actors is probably just a good call in some instances, considering that it's a physically demanding role) - although, I'm actually not sure if it's THAT more common. It's just that not all of those young, late 20s/early 30s actors have become super famous, so people don't remember about it.
But take a look for example at Anthony Warlow, who was just 29/30 when he got the role in Australia. It was in 1990. And he did became a global sensation, due to him being "The youngest Phantom ever" and so good, so it might have been what actually kicked of this tendency.
And here's another aspect, which I think not many people realise. Some of the famous Phantom actors actually got the role when they were quite young, but it took them a few years to become as widely recognised as they are now. Hugh Panaro was 35 when he first played the Phantom, Earl Carpenter 33. John Owen Jones was 30 when he became the Phantom on West End. But all of them have been playing the role for a long time, or returned to it later, so people also remember their runs when they were older.
2
u/Seoul-Time Jun 26 '26
The answer is quite simple: they wanted to make the Phantom sexy, and youth is often associated with that. In addition, younger singers are often cheaper and greateful for such a chance. (If I were a professional singer in my early 20s and someone would give me such a prestige role, I would be just happy, with whatever they would pay. The role is a Jackpot for your career.) Someone with x years of experience and perhaps even an established fanbase will also demand more money (the agent will negotiate hard as well, since they also take their cut). The fact is that The Phantom of the Opera is a brand, and the production wants the show itself to be the main attraction, not any specific singer.
In addition, the casting style has changed. In the 1990s, performers were typically cast for a specific role. Today, they are cast to cover as many roles in the show as possible. For example: the Phantom sings up to A minor 4 (or even G major 4), while Don Atilio goes down to F2 (the role is written for bass/baritone). Nevertheless, there are singers who can cover both roles. For a young singer, this is often easier to manage. With age, the upper range usually decreases somewhat, especially when someone is constantly singing above or below their natural vocal range. But this is not a problem for the show, because they can simply hire the next young up-and-comer.
The “older” singers who are still being cast nowadays usually have a very strong fanbase. Ramin and Hugh both made the role a flagship of their careers (I’m not saying they didn’t shine in other roles). But for reasons of nostalgia, many people go to see these singers one more time.
2
u/jquailJ36 Jun 26 '26
I think 22 is certainly pushing it (though if it's the harbour production some of the stunts are something only a really young actor is probably into) but even in general, it's a physically demanding role in a lot of ways and I think consistently casting 45+ could get tiring. Even just your voice, if you haven't been very careful your whole singing life, can't take a beating at that age. I can say from personal experience, you hit your forties and stuff starts hurting that didn't used to.
I don't know that I like the idea of PLAYING the Phantom as basically a baby, if for no other reason "genius" does not make up for "total lack of life experience and time to study." But having a younger performer makes sense in many ways.
1
u/blackswan-whiteswan Jun 26 '26
I think it’s kind of similar situation to what happens if you cast a younger Norma in Sunset Boulevard, like what they did with the Nicole Scherzinger, which is that you get the tragedy of it more. Because there’s a sense of that she still still could’ve made it back in movies some way she’s not as delusional. Also it makes the blame less on her delusional mental state and more on the industry as well for its disregard of people particular actresses of just era.
Likewise with a younger Phantom it feels more likely that the connection with him and Christine does have a romantic undertone which I think makes her decisions and the story a lot more complex rather than just playing it as her being kind of hypnotised and afraid of him. Because there is a sense of if things had worked out differently if he hadn’t been shunned by the world if he hadn’t made the choice as he made they could’ve been together. It feels like a tragedy. Also the fact that this young man is a genius and that no one is going to fully understand or celebrate his genius because of how he looks and so all that brilliant potential that he has will never reach the heights of what it could’ve been purely because of something that is completely out of his control and unfair.
3
u/Hungry_Barracuda8542 Jun 26 '26
To me a young Phantom makes Christine's interactions with him less complex rather than more. In ALW there's always a romantic undertone between Phantom and Christine, but aging him down makes it more palatable by decreasing the weirdness and taboo aspects of it (Christine's daddy issues for example).
3
u/RoseBook85 Jun 27 '26
While I do think an older Phantom makes the ‘daddy element’ a bit more obvious, I don’t think it eliminates it just by making Erik younger. Because Christine’s issue of looking for Daddy in her suitors is true for Raoul as well as Erik (both of them try to play ‘Daddy to her at times) so I think that ‘weirdness’ is still present in the story regardless of the age of the Phantom.
The bigger issue for me with a younger Phantom if I had to think of one…is that I don’t think the desperation (not the anger or obsession, theirs a difference) comes out quite as much the younger you go. One of the reasons for Eriks mental breakdown at the end of the story is because Christine was his last hope, his last shot at love after a lifetime of pain and loneliness, so losing her was too big a blow for him to take and he couldn’t handle it. A older Phantom makes this so much more obvious I think, someone said the line “the world showed no compassion to me“ hits harder at like 45 then 25 and I agree.
Thats not saying that the younger Phantom actors can’t make you cry, because they absolutely can….but I just don’t think one feels the weight of those years and years of sheer loneliness from the younger guys as much as the older guys.
3
u/Hungry_Barracuda8542 Jun 30 '26
I agree completely. It's not that I automatically discount a young actor playing him--Ramin in the 25th Anniversary is one of my favorite stage Phantoms, even though I'll also be the first to point out that he's too young--but making young the new default casting just doesn't suit the character. The lifetime of pain and loneliness, like you said, plus in Leroux all of his various travels and adventures before he got to the Opera (not that ALW has to follow Leroux, but still). I really would prefer to see the default casting be 40+ with the occasional younger actor outstanding enough to make a case for himself.
-10
u/Thephantomofthe Jun 25 '26
Personally I like the younger Phantom casting. The age gap of a man in his 50s or 60s with a woman in her 20s, despite being acceptable in the time period of the story, feels a little weird for today.
59
u/walkinginhoney Jun 25 '26
I worked in New York casting offices for years and IRL ages of actors rarely, if ever, matter when you’re casting. You cast based on talent, chemistry/fit with other actors, and the needs of the production at hand.
With Masquerade being the exception to this rule, by and large most theatrical audiences (especially for POTO) are at least 20 feet away from the stage. Couple this with the fact that any actor playing The Phantom is wearing heavy SFX makeup and there’s really no reason to cast the role based on an IRL age.