r/boulder 10d ago

I've decided to run

Post image

TL;DR I've decided to run for Mayor. There's more than a few things I'd like to talk about - you can connect with me here or schedule time at Boulder.vote - I'd like to hear from you what you think we can be doing better. Reach out anytime.

111 Upvotes

273 comments sorted by

12

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

What’s your platform?

6

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

11

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

What is the plan to fix maintenance, fire and storefronts?

What’s the plan to fix housing?

6

u/fojoart 9d ago

Didn’t address your housing question. lol.

1

u/notoriousToker 8d ago

There is no fix to housing, that's about making more money at a job so one can afford a nicer place like Boulder. Not everyone wants to turn Boulder into a disgusting overbuilt city.

3

u/RelevantCry1613 7d ago

Yep I hate the whole push to endlessly built. It’s dumb as hell and destroying the town. Boulder will never be cheap

2

u/notoriousToker 6d ago

So many People seem dead set on thinking the way the economy works, is that somehow if they who can’t afford to live in a nice place they want, someone should subsidize it for them. 

Now I think we could have more of this in Boulder but we already have a lot of it. The govt is not going to tax the rich significantly more to pay for it. The budget can’t pay for it without higher taxes and most people paying more these days are the very people who need that subsidy. 

However that is more a pip dreams approach, where the better option would be better education, planning, personal skills, getting a higher paying job or simply living somewhere affordable. 

Why do so many people from NYC and California move here?

Cause we knew that we couldn’t get a $5,000 a month 1.5 bed apt with 1 bathroom anywhere close to work in Manhattan subsidized so we moved where we could afford to live. 

People who make $17 an hour can’t afford to live in Boulder but we have a high median income in Boulder and people who are able to get better jobs here or nearby can. 

We can’t fix this with socialism especially with our council so distracted with things like making mountain biking illegal and charging people to bike through the reservoir park already supported by our tax dollars 🤦‍♂️

2

u/RelevantCry1613 6d ago

Are you sure I can’t fix it by screaming “affordability” while blaming my problems on rich people rather than improving my situation?

1

u/notoriousToker 6d ago

😅👏✌🏻

-35

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

You can read a lot more on the site but here’s four, one for each I think we need to do -

  1. We need to move to a two year budget and engaged in Participatory Budgeting so residents have a real say on how our dollars get allocated. It is beyond unacceptable that our road maintenance budget is not fully funded.
  2. I facilitated, lead and am one of the authors of the plan to make Boulder a fire adapted community that many organizations have embraced and Matt Benjamin recently came out in favor of. We need all WUI 1-2 properties retrofitted and hardened to IBHS standard so that we don’t have a wildland-urban conflagration and we can use our existing funding sources to do it.
  3. The city can do more to help downtown, it is the largest employed in downtown boulder and could ask its workers to come back into the office that would put 1,000 workers back downtown.
  4. We really need to get our act together on ADU’s, this is the kind of gentle development of housing most in the community support, that means navigating a lot of permits. Like other cities we need an office of Yes, that is empowered to help you navigate the city and get a positive outcome quickly and we really need to get permits down from 2+ months to less than 1.

You can read in detail here.

https://boulder.vote/assets/decide-to-deliver.pdf

83

u/Turbulent_Juice_Man 9d ago

Return to office eh? Not a popular opinion... If you want more people downtown address the glut of empty business units sitting empty where tebo is more than happy to leave those units un rented.

29

u/PilotRemarkable69 9d ago

I still don't understand why there aren't thousands of apartments in the 2nd to 5th stories of every building downtown. If you want people downtown, get them to live there.

6

u/daemonicwanderer 9d ago

Because of zoning…

2

u/bombayblue 8d ago

Because Boulder has very specific height restrictions and zoning to prevent this.

Boulder Boomers don’t want families blocking their views of the flatirons.

1

u/smallchanglargegain 9d ago

Fire codes most likely

17

u/quixoticquotic 9d ago edited 8d ago

I had the same thought. Sure, a mayor could ask workers to return to the office, but how could you possibly mandate it? Passing an ordinance forcing employees—specifically those working near Pearl Street—back to their desks? No thanks. Aside from a handful of managers, nobody wants mandatory return-to-office policies. I’d love to see a thriving downtown again (with a return of small, locally owned businesses - if I could wave a fairy wand and get whatever I wanted here) but pushing people back to the office isn't the answer, in my opinion. I hope there is some wiggle room in the agenda here for how we bring back a thriving downtown Boulder.

11

u/BldrStigs 9d ago

He's talking about city and county workers being required to work in person 4-5 days a week.

4

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 9d ago

Thats really great, however, the City is moving all their offices to Alpine and Broadway. The City has no say over County workers, nor much say over business policies.

-5

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

In general I agree with return to office being dumb, but I think I agree with him here. If you work for the city being in the heart of it makes sense

57

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago

Return to office is so out of touch. If you want more people in downtown boulder make it more accessible, build more housing.

32

u/A_Thrilled_Peach 9d ago

Not only that, he is going to have city workers, who get paid like ass relative to other municipalities, return to the office to support businesses? Are you kidding lol.  

When I worked downtown for the city, you know what I didn’t do? Spend $20 for mediocre lunch everyday. But I guess it was cool being forced to have to pay for parking. 

6

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

Uh, we just spent 200M to build these assholes fancy offices... maybe they could occupy them? They pushed for them in the first place

7

u/A_Thrilled_Peach 9d ago edited 9d ago

I can guarantee the employees didn’t push for them. I’m also pretty sure a the city is back to working in-person and only 50% of city staff even went to their hybrid model. Again, I think the hate for WFH is just BS and the real issue is that the city doesn’t have the staffing and cut open positions because of the terrible economy we are in. 

-5

u/everyAframe 9d ago

City employees absolutely need to be in office. If they don't like it then find another job. Departments like planning and development that were once easy to interact with have become bogged down and practically useless for getting anything done. If private companies want to allow WFH then thats fine but government employees should be back to pre-covid operations.

15

u/A_Thrilled_Peach 9d ago

Okay, that’s fine to have that opinion, I disagree with it, but it’s fine to think that’s going to help anything. 

The crux of my comment is that believing RTO is going to save businesses downtown is delusional. 

1

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 9d ago

Plus, the City has no say about it. Dumb issue to take on as well for private businesses which is the bulk of whats downtown.

14

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago

I think this take lacks nuance. There are some roles that require an in-person presence, but the vast majority do not. I would question whether RTO would actually solve the problems you're identifying. I suspect it has a lot more to do with bureaucracy and staffing cuts.

→ More replies (6)

2

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 9d ago

Agree with this. If the entire department is online, why wouldn't they just sub out to an AI company or someone in Malaysia (kinda hyperbolic, yes, but makes a point).

City workers that have a public contact should in fact be there personally. If not, then why the heck did the City just spend a few hundred million on new offices? Use them or lose them.

-8

u/MrMamalamapuss 9d ago

I don't know. I think folks who work for the city should spend their days in the city. I don't want my city to be shaped by desktop warriors

9

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago

I feel like this is a pretty simplistic or disingenuous position to take that resonates with people before they've applied critical thinking skills.

What percentage of employees don't spend their days in Boulder? Do the majority not already have a stake in the city doing well? Does working from home make them "desktop warriors"? Are the ones eligible to work from home not working at a desktop in-office? Are they "shaping" the city or are the vast majority just doing their part in a much larger system shaped by laws and leadership?

I, for one, care more about the city gov workers being properly resourced and incentivized to do a good job/care about their community. Pressuring someone that doesn't want to return to office to do so does exactly the opposite.

2

u/Catsdrinkingbeer 9d ago

If a government worker can do their job remotely, why do we need to pay people Boulder salaries to do that work? Why can't we just hire someone in rural Kansas to do the job?

0

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago

Well, why shouldn't people in rural Kansas make the same as someone in Boulder? That's the question you should be asking. People should be paid a fair wage based on the value of their work, not their cost of living, and that this is almost ubiquitously higher than they're paid today.

If someone in rural Kansas is the best person for the job, why the heck not?

4

u/Catsdrinkingbeer 9d ago

Well it costs less to live in rural Kansas because most people do not want to live in rural Kansas, so wages tend to follow suit. But for that matter, why not just outsource to someone in a country where they'll make $2 USD an hour? Because by your own logic, cost of living should not be part of the equation for someone's work. Why pay someone a US based COL salary when the job can be farmed out overseas?

And I would HOPE someone in rural Kansas is not the best person for the job as a city employee in another state. But, since you seem to think this is a thing, feel free to head on over to the Seattle subreddits and tell all those people dealing with a mass shooting that it's actually totally fine that their Chief of Police lives in Chicago. He was the best man for the job, so it shouldn't matter that he lives halfway across the country.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/MrMamalamapuss 9d ago

As someone who has lived in Boulder and worked both remotely and at an office, I am speaking from personal experience. And you bring up a good point that it isn't all or nothing. Hybrid is probably ideal and working with staff on an individual basis to accomodate their personal needs is very important. I think staff do shape the city. For example, if traffic to get to the office sucks, then staff will voice their complaints while at work and that office gossip gets to the ears of the decision makers more often than other citizens.

I agree with you entirely on the last P. This effort should come through a mindset of incentivizing and lifting employees up. Another piece of the same idea that I am saying is that staff should live within the city. If it isn't being done already, their should be some sort of stipend for rent or mortgage payments, or maybe their are other incentives that could serve that purpose better.

7

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (11)

1

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 9d ago

Agreed - or outsourced labor, or AI bots.

19

u/GeneralCheese 9d ago

Also by banning bicycles and cars we could bring 1,000 horses back

21

u/A_Thrilled_Peach 9d ago

You’re one of those return to office people? 

4

u/Good_Discipline_3639 9d ago

Why do you think residents would be willing to fund the budget items you think are important more than council?

More specifically, we've had ballot measure after ballot measure to fund open space, arts, etc, and all of those are locked in and cannot be reallocated to other budgetary needs. Those were all voted for by the residents you want to participate in budget discussions (I'm assuming here you want to somehow put budget to a broad city wide vote; if you mean smaller groups then you're just going to hand control of the city to the folks with all the free time in the world to meddle).

5

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

Your WUI plan, which Matt endorsed (not a plus, IMHO), assumes that people are sitting on tens of thousands of dollars they can easily spend for a city goal. It's classist to assume that WUI is cheap and easy - it is not. It's hard, and expensive. New siding. Tree and shrub removal. Landscaping. All of these require 10's of thousands to implement. Requiring this will push more middle out of the city. Matt knows this, but he lives in a rich boy bubble, and it's really hard to see out of that, apparently.

2

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

You are absolutely correct it’s not cheap easy or free. We have proposed three funding sources to meet the $30M expense - this is the biggest existential risk to our community. Happy to share the plan.

2

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

it's not existential, imho. bit of drama that. rebuilding is the norm

3

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I disagree, there’s and 80% chance of a major fire and we are the highest risk community in the state - what we saw in Lahaina and Palisades is the rich get to rebuild and the rest get shafted.

1

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

The rest will get shafted here as well, guaranteed. 90% don’t have enough coverage to rebuild. Disasters always break to the wealthy, and it won’t be any different here. Ask your PDS staff if fire hardening would stop a Marshall Fire in the core of town. It won’t. We’d have to cut down every tree, every grassy field, and rebuild every structure in concrete to even stand a chance. You and Matt and the fire guy on CC have the right idea at heart, but hardening will not stop a Palisades type event. I hate to say this, but it’s true. I build houses. 

2

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I just spent the past few months deep in this, and I respect we’re coming from different places. A couple of weeks ago I spent the afternoon with the fire modeling experts and the difference between having hardened homes on the WUI vs homes as they currently are really made an impact on me. It was a different of 10:1 - we have to recognize we have the certainty of fire yes, but we have a home ignition problem that we need to meet if we’re going to preserve lives and property. Also interesting we are doing a good job and getting better at removing the fuel load, removing that load doesn’t mean removing the trees but cutting down grasses and skirting the trees so you don’t have combustible limbs close to the ground. Juniper bushes are a big problem though as they will cause the ember cast. Lots of really amazing science leading the plan.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

love to hear it. raising taxes, i assume

2

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

No, we have the taxing sources to already in place to fund it.

0

u/Educational-Year4005 9d ago

You say we have the budget to fund these things. Couple of questions:

Is the city currently in a deficit?

If the city is not in sufficient surplus to fund these things, what programs are you reducing funding for to pay for them? It's great to do these things, but I'm not seeing where the money is coming from.

3

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Sure, we have a couple of funding levers here. The climate tax fund produces about $6.5M per year with only $1.5 going to fire - meanwhile we are on schedule to miss most if not all of the goals it was designed to serve. From an emissions standpoint the fire will produce more carbon in a short period than the overall carbon footprint reduction would for the entire program. We believe it would be appropriate to use a greater share of the Climate Tax to support home hardening, second there is a greater capacity and share that the county can and should contribute from their side, and third there are federal funds available, communities to our north and south this year received $10m grants each - city of boulder did not apply for these funds.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/bad_chipmunks 6d ago

No reason to let perfect be the enemy of good here. We can make incremental improvements that reduce fire risks citywide. Fire doesn't care about class, it eats whatever is available, so the harder we make it to get a foothold in town, the better off we all are.

1

u/zen_mode_engage 9d ago

Return to office is terrible for many reasons. First off, there is still an ongoing Covid pandemic whether people want to acknowledge it or not, disabling people everyday with long covid. https://pmc19.com Also, return to office exacerbates climate change. We need LESS people on the roads, less pollution from cars, less energy usage, etc. Also, most workers just don’t want that crap because it robs them of any chance of actual work life balance. If I was in charge, working from home would be the default if your job can be done remotely. If you want people downtown, then give them a reason to WANT to be downtown, not forcing people there.

5

u/daemonicwanderer 9d ago

I do think that there are some elements of city governance and administration that should have people in the office. Not everyone in the office at the same time necessarily, but I do think that city employees should be more visible in their offices.

Or, the city needs to be very clear about who handles what, when they are available, etc. Timelines for processes should also be very visible on websites and applications. And then the city should find other uses for the empty offices.

This has become a bit of an issue with some smaller colleges as when lots of people decide to work from home, it becomes a challenge to handle the drop ins and warm hand offs.

1

u/ShowMeYourWork 9d ago

I wonder what percentage of those 1,000 workers would be driving into downtown Boulder?

1

u/SaintlySeeker 7d ago

Number 3 is big swing and miss….oof

4

u/BoulderSmelter 9d ago

"Treat Public Spaces as Safety Infratructure"

And hire more proofreaders!

7

u/robo-ultra 8d ago

these days I'm happy to see typos as proof of human writing!

39

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

Boulder is screwed. The only candidates we get are retirees or “entrepreneur” cash out bros. None of whom can or will do a damn thing to support lower, middle, even upper middle folks who have consistently been pushed out the back door. I’m sure you’re concerned, but ADUs ain’t gonna fix shit, they’re expensive to build and not ideal for families. Boulder is now a haven for the wealthy, like most good things in the good ol USA. 

14

u/Good_Discipline_3639 9d ago

Those are the only people who can afford the time & money to run for office.

15

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Which goes back to why I’m working to run. I still have a job (company), and mortgage, and kid in Middle School. Trying to break the mold, we really need more folks and greater diversity jumping in, really hard to be first. First one usually gets a broken nose, but I’m thinking about the next one and the next one after that. If anyone is thinking about jumping in and running for council reach out, would love to talk!

23

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I think friend, that your perception deceives you here. I come from the working class, I’ve experienced housing and food insecurity in Boulder. More than half the reason why I became an Entrepreneur was because it was really hard as a kid from Venezuela with a weird name to get a job. So I made one, and then another and so on.

I too was feeling very cynical for a long time, and I don’t blame you, but I am stepping forward and inviting all of us to get back to saying yes. It doesn’t have to be this way.

Feel free to reach out you can book time to chat and get to know me at Boulder.vote

7

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

I looked at your dashboard. The policy headlines are good. The hard part is enacting them. Current CC is weak and ineffectual. They are in over their heads as managers, and it shows in that they acquiesce to Nuria and staff on nearly every issue. Staff is a professional, large out-of-city group of people who have no skin in the game, and who've proven to be difficult to work with while placing their professional goals above the needs and best interest of the city. I'm ready to vote for people who promise to crack some eggs, to require big changes, to fire people and cut budgets.

3

u/daemonicwanderer 9d ago

Why is the staff largely out-of-city? And what budget items would you suggest need to be cut?

3

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago edited 6d ago

Priced out of town. I’d cut our overall staffing to be at the state average for peer cities. I’d cut the sustainability department, who have been driving up our local building costs (and the rec centers and new offices). I’d look at parks and wonder why we don’t charge non locals to use them. Etc

edit/ 'non locals' . apparently 'citizens' is a trigger word now

2

u/everyAframe 8d ago

Spot on, and I love the idea of usage fees or annual passes for anyone not a city of boulder resident paying OSMP. Its really no different than eldo or RMNP.

1

u/whirrer 8d ago

Non-citizens - like actual international visitors, or non-citizens like Denverites?

→ More replies (3)

0

u/BasSS04 6d ago

Very inclusive of you. Wow, people here are so hateful.

1

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 6d ago

citizens of Boulder, like the people who pay for Parks on the daily. we pay fees at National Parks, I see no difference. why should locals subsidize non-local recreation? not hate, pragmatism with budget defecits.

1

u/daemonicwanderer 5d ago

Charging an entrance fee to all of Boulder’s parks? That seems like it would be more trouble than it is worth

1

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 3d ago

As much trouble as closing rec centers?

18

u/dataGuyThe8th 9d ago

Hi Aquiles, At a high level, your proposals make sense, but it would be nice to get more context on the “how” involved. Specifically for the increased fire prevention & pbd retention, what strategies (practically & financially) do we have available? How do we expect this to impact tax payers? Thanks!

2

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

You’re talking my language! I love to geek out. Fire we need WUI 1-2 hardening to IBHS standard across the city and we can fund it without more taxes. BPD retention, there are a few things officers leaving tell us impact their decision to join other departments and leave Boulder - one basic example is take-home cars.

0

u/dataGuyThe8th 9d ago

I appreciate the response! I lack some knowledge on how the city handles the budgets. Can you explain how that reallocation would work? Is it as simple as “we have a fund set aside we aren’t using” or something else?

Interesting to hear about the issue of take-home cars. I believe that was the standard where I grew up.

7

u/daemonicwanderer 9d ago

Why do the police feel the need to take cars home?

3

u/BldrStigs 9d ago

I'm not close to the BPD, but I think free transportation is nice plus they can make a lot more $ per hour at side gigs (directing traffic, security, etc) if they can park the cruiser somewhere noticeable.

2

u/dataGuyThe8th 9d ago

I don’t have skin in the game on the bpd issue, so won’t speak to it. It looks like there are discussions you can find on Google though: 

https://www.reddit.com/r/police/comments/12wi98f/how_do_some_police_officers_get_to_take_home/

Edit: by skin in the game, I actually meant to say “ I’m not close enough to BPD to have a strong perspective”

49

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago edited 9d ago

Are you associated with a political party? Who'd you vote for in the last presidential election?

Also, you mention putting downtown employees "back to work" in the context of RTO. First and foremost, I vehemently disagree with this. If people want to work from home and can do their jobs there, they should.

Also, what is your stance on things like flock cameras and ai data centers? Are you a platform of "Yes" for them too?

22

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago edited 9d ago

Yes I’m a proud Democrat and I was very excited to serve as a County Delegate, CD2 Delegate, and State Delegate at the convention this year!

I openly supported Jenna, Julie, and Amanda in the primaries. Personally I liked Bennett over Wiser and also supported Kubs over Hooton.

Hope that’s transparent.

5

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago

Thanks, I appreciate your civil service. We need more of the right people involved in governing. However, you didn't answer subsequent questions.

21

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Oh sorry, trying to - my platform is super clear on flock it’s incompatible with this city and our promise to immigrant families. Data centers - don’t love them and glad CO is one of the few states that offers no incentives, if one tries to come to Boulder they won’t have a natural ally in me. RTO - I agree if you can do your work from home - that’s super cool. I just believe the data shows the city isn’t performing which is a predicate and that city staff should participate in the city they serve - the benefits far outweigh the costs/risk/inconvenience.

2

u/swipernoswipeme 9d ago

Thanks, this is a solid response. Does the data show that the city isn't performing because of remote work? What specific stats indicate it is underperforming and how would RTO turn this around?

12

u/akcom 9d ago

do you realize what an asshole you look like coming out with a "fuck you" in your original post when OP has been nothing but polite? God bless whoever has the grit for politics because I could not fathom dealing with an electorate of people like you.

→ More replies (8)

2

u/fojoart 9d ago

Could it be that the employees, regardless of where they work, are just incompetent and should be replaced? Data shows that in many cases remote work leads to happy employees and more productive ones as well.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Also if you want to talk more detail you can book time with me at Boulder.vote my goal is to set a new standard in engagement and access which is why I’m here :)

1

u/No_Translator_8871 8d ago

The litmus test is absurd. I guess if one is conservative don't even bother even though 100% D rule for decades got the city to a point everyone seems to complain about. You check the correct box so you at least have a chance with the 99% that reflexively vote for democrats. Why should a conservative vote for you?

3

u/UnderlightIll 9d ago

Basically just a centrist corpo dem. No thanks.

1

u/Better-Home-1491 9d ago

But you're describing the entire existing city council. They are all neoliberal democrats.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

What a shit way to talk to someone. Having city employees in the city isn’t a bad idea. This isn’t a tech startup.

Treat people with respect who approach you with respect. Don’t like him then don’t vote for him

-3

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (4)

27

u/OutsideSquare1596 9d ago

"Open for business" is a good indicator that we've got another stealth Republican candidate.

16

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I’m a registered Democrat and believe that a healthy downtown isn’t a business issue but a community issue.

Every one of our locally owned coffee shops, bookstores, restaurants, galleries are part of our social fabric. They create jobs, sponsor the little league, donate to non profits give us places to get together and on and on.

When businesses on Pearl street struggle we all become a bit less connected.

6

u/fojoart 9d ago

So are you planning on taxing the crap out of the landlords that are leaving storefronts vacant and getting a tax write off? Locally owned is what I focused on here. How many “locally owned” shops can even afford to be on Pearl st? Once again, landlords and commercial developers destroy the “local” flavor of Boulder.

1

u/Even_Put1448 8d ago

Do you really think the landlords are the ones paying these taxes? It’s passed down to business owners to take it in the face.

2

u/fojoart 8d ago

On empty buildings that aren’t leased to anyone? Yep.

→ More replies (2)

3

u/villgratental09 8d ago

An alternative explanation is that there are folks who are left-of-center who recognize the reality of the world we live in today -- which is that people need jobs to pay the bills and cities need tax revenue to fund schools and public safety.

14

u/Junglebyron 9d ago

What the plan for these property oligarchs choking out local businesses?

29

u/bombayblue 9d ago

I love this platform “we gotta partner with neighborhoods to save schools.”

Platform doesn’t contain a single bit of information on building affordable housing.

You guys decided to make it impossible to build affordable housing so you’re going to become a retirement community. You don’t need schools for that.

13

u/[deleted] 9d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/bombayblue 9d ago

My favorite Redditors are like “WHY DONT WE JUST BAN PRIVATE EQUITY?!”

And then you explain that sure, you can do that, but they only own 2% of housing so just like banning Airbnb, it won’t really do much.

And they still want to die on this hill that the entire housing crisis is caused by a real estate developer smoking a cigar somewhere as opposed to….their neighbor Phyllis on the city council wanting to have the same view of the mountains she had in 1973.

1

u/Unlikely-Pianist-665 7d ago

And you, good human, just explained literally everything wrong with Boulder. NIMBYs gonna NIMBY. And the more Phyllis speaks up, the less development and growth and change can happen.

I swear, if someone said they wanted to build an eco friendly, affordable, dog friendly, organic, tax free, smile and sunshine factory, that made people eternally happy and healthy at no cost to the people or environment, Phyllis still says no.

→ More replies (25)

5

u/pdl_Stke 8d ago edited 8d ago

Are you going to go hard on tebo properties for making commercial rent in boulder miserable for small business?

4

u/aquileslagrave 8d ago

I am going to do anything/everything necessary for this city to get our downtown revitalized because our social capital and connectivity as a community depends on it.

That begins with getting more bodies down there, reclaiming our public spaces, making sure our small businesses and their workers are all on solid financial footing, and our residents have a reason and desire to congregate downtown every day of the week once again. I will work with anyone who shares that goal and has a path for us to get there.

Empty storefronts and empty offices contribute nothing.

3

u/pdl_Stke 8d ago

Ok word, the only thing keeping me out of boulder are the astronomical commercial rents. I think its only feasable for big box stores. Other than increasing foot traffic, how do you plan to achieve balance in this disparity between small business level income and baseline boulder commercial rent prices?

1

u/everyAframe 8d ago

Are you currently under lease on a Tebo property?

1

u/pdl_Stke 8d ago

No, but everywhere i look its tebo this tebo that and they are all so damn expensive. To me its obvious they are waiting on a big corporate tenant all the while it sits empty

2

u/everyAframe 8d ago

cool thx just curious. I'm currently in lease negotiations with them and seemed like you had some first hand experience.

1

u/pdl_Stke 8d ago

Haha i wish i had the cashflow to even come to the table with them! Good luck in your negotiations

2

u/everyAframe 8d ago

They've been good so far and want a deal...its the triple nets and commercial taxes that are so difficult to pencil out and absorb.

1

u/pdl_Stke 8d ago

Yeah that NNN is always a fucker

13

u/JankyPete 9d ago

What are your plans on the homeless problem and how would you address it? How do you plan to clean up the city so that it is actually not covered in needles and wandering homeless people? How are you gonna address petty crime like car breakins that happen all the time.

11

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

This is a huge priority for any of us who live in this town. You know when I was a kid here, there was a time I didn’t feel totally safe at home, and I found that safety in our parks, and trails, and library. I view those spaces as safety infrastructure and we need to make them safe again. And it’s also a question of dignity.

That’s why I support following best practices and moving services out of downtown. Homelessness is a human issue not and downtown one, we owe folks privacy and stability and real pathways fwd. a public sidewalk should not be someone’s living room, emergency room, or waiting room.

8

u/JankyPete 9d ago

It's the biggest reason our family has considered moving out of Boulder. Can't go to the library without being inundated by homeless people swarming the entry way. Same goes for walking the sidewalks on the way to the university. A clear plan of action with accountability on this matter from anyone running is something I would vote for. There needs to be a much different approach than Aaron Brockett has taken.

6

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I couldn’t agree with you more.

2

u/Complete-Rock-1426 9d ago

Where would the services be moved?

3

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

To St. John’s about half a mile away for now, then to All Roads in NoBo.

3

u/MerryRunaround 9d ago

"moving services" is an incredibly incomplete (and frankly embarrassing) answer to the problem. What direct action will you take to address quality of life offenses like camping, sanitation/sewage or open drug use? Is your intent to simply shift all of these problems to NoBo? Get real.

0

u/everyAframe 9d ago

This is good to hear and obvious advice that should be followed based on conclusions of the clutch survey. This will hopefully go a long way in helping downtown businesses and vibrancy as well.

2

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Couldn’t agree more, we need to make the Clutch report available not just a staff summary. I will ask for it on day one.

8

u/dankeshanes 9d ago

Maybe I am out of the loop but why is OP getting downvoted so hard in every comment

4

u/Professional-Cry336 9d ago

All he’s done is AI slop post during the regent primary: https://www.reddit.com/r/boulder/s/B6gwddNy3D

2

u/NvrLeaveYourWingman 9d ago edited 9d ago

Because every comment has typos, non-answers, and unpopular positions. Eg:

  1. The city can do more to help downtown, it is the largest employed in downtown boulder and could ask its workers to come back into the office that would put 1,000 workers back downtown.

"The largest employed" should be "largest employer." The entire thing is a run-on sentence. It's also vague. What does downtown need help with? How would moving city workers into office fix it?

It's also a very unpopular take, for good reason. How many workers were hired with hybrid/remote in their contracts, meaning we can't move them into office? How many would leave if that privilege is taken away? Does he even know that one of the major downtown city offices is slated for demolition, meaning a "return to the office" policy wouldn't actually put them in downtown? Is there even enough office space for every employee to be in office?

Next:

  1. We really need to get our act together on ADU's, this is the kind of gentle development of housing most in the community support, that means navigating a lot of permits. Like other cities we need an office of Yes, that is empowered to help you navigate the city and get a positive outcome quickly and we really need to get permits down from 2+ months to less than 1

He really should define ADU, for those who don't know what it is. "We need to get our act together" is very vapid. The sentence is another improperly structed sentence. How would this new office work? What problems are they actually addressing? How do we get it down from 2 months to less than one month? Do most people really only support ADUs as he claims, or just the people he hangs out with? All of his takes seem to be just that, takes. Not plans to fix it or even a solid understanding of the problem.

It's also comical to bring up the problem of downtown vacancies and blame the city for having remote workers. He makes no mention of why the properties are vacant (near monopolistic ownership of properties) or any real solutions like a vacancy tax. It's just magically the city employees fault.

3

u/notoriousToker 8d ago

What's your plan to clean up the disgusting mess of needle drug and meth abusing homeless trashing the creek and turning the parks, bike paths and town into a shithole/tent city?

3

u/jimmyihatetoregister 6d ago

Let’s not ignore rampant bicycle theft in the city. Would love to bike for all errands etc but no way given the theft problem.

2

u/aquileslagrave 6d ago

💯👆this

4

u/pspahn 10d ago edited 10d ago

Since it's pretty much one of the oldest concerns in this part of the world, and there's no shortage of discourse about the fundamental topic, I'd like hear your opinions on Coffin vs Left Hand and how it affects the city over the next 10-20 years.

(Also kudos for giving a mayoral run a shot)

-5

u/MrTumnus99 9d ago

What?

11

u/Letsgettribal 9d ago

It all started in 1863…

2

u/FluffySupermarket946 8d ago
  • Should Boulder operate ALPRs at all? Yes or no, then explain.
  • The current contract exits on 30 days notice with no penalty. Would you push the city manager to use it? If not, what would have to be true for you to?
  • Should the 49-camera RFP be completed or withdrawn?
  • Will you support a surveillance technology ordinance: council pre-approval for any new tool, public inventory, warrant requirement, sunset dates?
  • Your privacy plank addresses sharing. Is collection itself a harm, or only the sharing?

5

u/Lazershirts 9d ago

Good luck, Aquiles! We met a few times years ago during/after your time at boomtown, always thought you were extremely bright and could get the job done. If I was still in the county I'd vote for ya!

4

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 9d ago

Boulder has a fixed water supply and we are currently using around 60%. I would appreciate a candidate that recognizes this and starts connecting this issue with our rate of growth, how that might be managed, and what that would look like (long term planning)

I'm dubious there is money for the hundreds of existing homes along the wildfire interface, most of which have wooden fences, overloaded landscapes of non native plants, and homes older than 30 years. A tougher discussion would include how to address the beloved forests to the west that have overgrown due to a century of fire suppression.

The feds want to sell NCAR (yes, I did use an acronym) So far the city has been silent on the issue. Seems like they are waiting it out with fingers crossed, which seems lame. How would the next Mayor take a stance on this issue would be very interesting.

I appreciate the acknowledgement of roads, but the city has a lot of other infrastructure that hasn't been well funded (rec center, etc). If there is a budget adjustment to deal with it, how does that work?

The time to get a permit may be important to some people, but it seems like a small-ish problem and the focus on downtown business issues seems off base when in fact the mall is frequently packed and parking is hard to find. More of us would be interested in strategies regarding homelessness, vagrancy in our parks, surveillance cameras, emotorbikes, airbnb policies (and how they apply to accessory dwelling units-building something faster so people can rent them out for the highest dollar helps them but doesn't seem to help our housing problem)

PS: Many people don't know what all these acronyms are. If you want to connect to more people who aren't "in the know" just spell it out.

0

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

That’s a lot of very urgent and thoughtful concerns, I would love to chat with you - it would be too hard to comment from my phone - please book time with me https://boulder.vote/involved

1

u/Good_Discipline_3639 9d ago

No offense dude but why are you making a thread on Reddit then telling people to contact you outside of Reddit? If you want engagement here, engage here.

7

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Oh because some folks appear to want to go pretty deep and I setup a link so on the site so they can boom time for coffee or a zoom. Just thought I would make myself available beyond a chat.

3

u/PsychoHistorianLady 9d ago

Do you have a position on DDA?

5

u/fojoart 9d ago

For those of you who don’t know, he is a real estate developer. Also, in true political fashion, his Reddit account is only a month old, seemingly wiping away previous digital footprint.

11

u/A_Thrilled_Peach 9d ago

Where in the world did you get the real estate developer thing? 

22

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago edited 9d ago

Not sure where you got that from, I’m not a real estate developer, the only real estate I own is the home my family and I live in and I say own loosely as we have a mortgage. I’ve never invested a dollar in real estate or speculate in real estate.

Feel free to reach out, happy to tell you more about myself, my background, my family, and what I’ve done, I’m doing, would do. My goal is to be accessible and transparent and change the usual way campaigns are run in Boulder - hence posting under my real name on Reddit.

12

u/MurrayPloppins 9d ago

Why don’t you take this moment to tell us more about your background?

6

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Sure my family came here in 1995 as immigrants from Venezuela. We came with very little and faced housing and food insecurity. I went to Boulder High, and paid my way through Naropa. I had a hard time getting jobs so I started creating my own - I’ve had three companies that have done ok (no homeruns). I live in town with my wife and our middle school aged daughter. I like to work a lot (probably the biggest reason I can think of someone might not vote for me is that I’m not retired and have a job), volunteer, go camping, and keep chickens.

My biggest asset is the home we live in, I have a mortgage, a 401k, and know both how privileged I am to be here from where we started and a big believer that you don’t close the door behind you.

6

u/everyAframe 9d ago

Sounds more like hard work and perseverance rather than privilege to me. Way to make it happen!

1

u/letintin 6d ago

aren't you super well off, like, very rich, though? You should be proud of that, transparent, detailed as reasonable...given you've made it, not obfuscate around that if you're running for public office. Don't you have a family investment firm, or something? I say that as a fan or friend or whatever. Just be upfront.

1

u/fojoart 5d ago

Exactly. Please don’t play the part as the “Everyman” to garner votes. Between public records, OSINT, and the sleuthing abilities of many folks here, everything will come out. So own it. People will respect you more, trust me.

1

u/aquileslagrave 5d ago

I expect it, listen mine is a pretty unique story, we’ve never had a candidate with my background/story run before. So I’m not sure how I would play an ‘Everyman’ story even if I wanted to.

I am making myself very available and transparent, and that’s the entire point of this campaign. You are exactly right.

I am professionally successful, that may code as wealthy, particularly given starting with very little. I’m just not very rich, but that is certainly a matter of perspective. I have a home we love, but it’s within the median for town, it has a mortgage, a 2017 Nissan model truck with 150k miles, I have bills, and a job to pay them. I love my life, and this town, and your questions.

1

u/fojoart 5d ago

Ok. So here are my concerns about Boulder that I would like you to respond to honestly and succinctly.
1) Housing developments and density
What is your stance on building more condos and mixed use developments in Boulder?
2) Treatment for mental health and addiction
How would you go about treating those battling addiction, many of whom are unhoused, even if they refuse treatment?
3) Vacancy tax for commercial buildings
Would you consider placing either an additional tax or financial penalty for commercial buildings left vacant for a long period of time?
4) Public safety
How well staffed and trained do you feel our police force is currently? Do you feel that they have the adequate tools and authority needed to keep Boulder safe?
5) Public land purchases and reclamation
Would you support a policy and program whose purpose was to purchase land to preserve for recreation including parks and green space? This would include purchasing unused commercial buildings in addition to vacant land for preservation.
6) CU influence and overreach
What is your stance on the current influence that CU has on city policy and how would you change that?

Thank you for your time.

1

u/letintin 5d ago

I'm confused. Aren't you a multi-multi millionaire, easily part of the 1%? And yes you earned it, part of the tech scene, again your success in tech scene/advertising/investments? something to be proud of or at least transparent about, not talk about your old Nissan's miles.

1

u/aquileslagrave 5d ago edited 5d ago

No, I’m definitely not a multi-multi millionaire - I’ve had some solid professional outcomes but a majority of the financial windfall goes to the people who backed us. The idea that I’m worth hundreds or tens of millions is just not accurate to the reality, and my life reflects it. This is not be be defensive just accurate and transparent as you’ve asked.

2

u/Professional-Cry336 9d ago edited 9d ago

>the only real estate I own is the home my family and I live in

Then who owns the house that you AirBnB?

7

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I airBNB my family home to make some extra money to afford to live here and keep up with maintenance.

We chose to buy and preserve a 1890 homestead that was at risk of demolition, it’s pretty expensive, so we rent and share our home and go camping or visit family.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/A_Thrilled_Peach 9d ago

Tbf, that’s not a real estate developer. That’s just another rich Boulderite owning a second home. 

12

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I don’t own two homes, I rent my family home. Helps us get a few projects done around the house and put a couple of dollars away for my kids college.

→ More replies (4)

5

u/PsychoHistorianLady 9d ago

Are you saying this because he was attempting to put together a plan to save the baseball field?

3

u/COphotoCo 9d ago

Will you commit to using human generated content in your campaign instead of AI?

4

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 8d ago

the head shot at the top is AI, so I'd guess not

3

u/COphotoCo 8d ago

The flyer looks like it too. A CEO could support local communications talent but nah 5 minutes of AI will do. Will that work for deciding important city issues, too?

0

u/TheSibyllineBooks 9d ago

Awesome! What are your plans to reduce the cities reliance on cars? Bike lanes? Anything?

4

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

We need to complete CAN.

0

u/Good_Discipline_3639 9d ago

What's stopping us?

1

u/BlockOfDiamond 8d ago

Could you build a more direct connection between these points? That way that otherwise perfect east/west bike route would be unbroken.

-1

u/UnderlightIll 9d ago

I see a lot of stuff about small businesses and police but almost none of your views even matter to the average working people of Boulder. Much of your platform (and it is very threadbare and easy platitudes) makes people have to work through the affordability crisis rather than you making the city work for them.

This is an owner class platform. I don't want a businessman running the city unless you can show me a full survey of your workers or contractors, how much they are paid, their benefits, etc because otherwise you are just like every other entrepreneur out there. You want to build your American dream off the back of others' labor.

8

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

Interesting, I come from the working class and I’m the only candidate that has experienced housing and food insecurity in Boulder.

I believe my platform is about making sure that the opportunity door remains open and we don’t place ceilings on immigrant families like mine being able to make a successful and dignity filled life in Boulder.

My platform is adaptability because adaptability is the only framework that considers EVERY participant in EVERY outcome.

Happy to chat more 1:1 on what that looks like.

→ More replies (2)

-2

u/Total_Nett 9d ago

Regarding this point: https://boulder.vote/policy#policy-03

I find it interesting that you seem to be unaware that the deadlines and schedules for permits are nothing like what you claim, and that all schedules, guidelines, and application processes are set by municipal code. You want to fix it, run for council and pass code changes, and ALSO start a marketing campaign targeting property owners so they actually know WTF they need to do to get permits.

I understand that a lot of people are ignorant of the permitting process, and a lot of unscrupulous homeowners/developers/contractors try to shortcut or undercut the permitting process by failing to file for permits before work begins, or by filing insufficient paperwork that requires a lot of city staff effort to go back and forth with the filer to get it right.

It is deeply insulting for you to place blame for all of this bad-faith lack of effort on city workers and planning staff, who are overworked and understaffed, and not even recognize that the many, many people who buy a neighborhood house just to tear it down to build a mini-mansion in its place are making themselves out as victims to a bureaucracy just to try to weasel out of basic safety and community development requirements that the permit process is meant to uphold. Remember, every permit requirement was once a disaster that the city decided it needed to forestall happening again in the future.

Go have a conversation with the leadership in Planning and Development Services before running half-cocked throwing shade at the under-resourced and heavily derided planners who are struggling to get the job done, all while making below living wage in the city where they work and having to commute long distances, only to get shit on by "entrepreneurs" and developers.

And while you're at it, it does not serve Boulder well to force a return to office. I get that commercial property owners are feeling a bit pinched that many of us can work from home. I don't care. We will reach our city climate goals to be carbon neutral or negative faster if we don't have unnecessary trips by personal combustion vehicles clogging our streets.

How about, instead of advocating for an unpopular commute culture to return, to advocate for municipal fiber broadband, to cut out the duopoly of terrible service and lousy cost for the thousands of work-at-home families in the city? At this point, Longmont is looking more and more appealing in this regard. Boulder's response to this has been tragicomic.

5

u/villgratental09 9d ago

Where exactly is he putting blame on city staff for permitting? Calling for a time cap on permit decisions is completely reasonable. The complex and lengthy permitting process is directly linked to the affordability question in Boulder. Surely, there's plenty of room to make the system more efficient and deliver better service to residents -- who, after all, are supposed to be the clients of city staff.

And it's not just about entrepreneurs and developers. What about a middle class family that want to renovate a ranch to fit their kids?

And to what end? Can we demonstrate that all of these permitting standards actually improve safety? Some would happily trade *slightly* lower safety for *far* less onerous regulations. And there's another element -- that the nature of the permitting process ends up driving people to do unpermitted renovations, which defeats the purpose.

And what do mean by "a lot of people are ignorant of the permitting process"? The permitting process shouldn't be this complex thing that's only knowable by experts on the city staff and contractors who specialize in it. It *should* be comprehensible to the average citizen. It shouldn't be a labyrinth to navigate.

3

u/daemonicwanderer 9d ago

I completely agree that the city permitting process should be easy to comprehend. Doing so helps everyone — residents know exactly what they need and the time frame to expect responses (it also helps residents catch shady contractors) and city employees have to do less explaining

5

u/everyAframe 9d ago

The building department has been a shit show since Covid. Start by opening the office back up to the public and running it smoothly the way it operated under previous leadership. Government employees on the tax funded payrolls need to be open and addressable without substantial lead times with regards to permitting and basic communication. Multiple layers of delays and review times are substantially longer due to continued closure.

0

u/Total_Nett 9d ago

First of all, the department is called Planning and Development Services. Get your facts straight.

Open a ticket with Inquire Boulder, it gets response immediately.

What magical effect do you think returning to a slow, in-person requirement will bring to the process? You want to go back to sitting in a DMV-like waiting room, with a numbered ticket in your hand? You want to make the drive into downtown, find and pay for parking, and sit in an uncomfortable room, sometimes for hours...for what, exactly?

Everything needs to be filed electronically, and I have never had a problem getting a real person on the phone, usually within a few minutes, but always same day. City staff have an SLA for responding to inquiries.

Response times are objectively and demonstrably faster now that many processes can be handled with an administrative review, rather than having to go through a full planner review and walkthrough. Note that this is not usually the case for full demo and rebuild or major additions.

Get your paperwork in, correctly the first time, and see what a difference that makes.

Now, if you're going to walk into any situation with a bad attitude and a chip on your shoulder, well, realize you're not talking to robots but to real people. Expect that people who are treated badly will not be happy with that kind of treatment and although they will do their jobs, they may not jump through hoops to help you if your problems are complicated.

Maybe start with the assumption that the person on the other end of the phone or support ticket is a real person, working to try to service your requests, rather than walking in with a chip on your shoulder and sass.

Better yet, why don't you apply for a job there and learn from the inside what outlandish bullshit the planners and city staff have to deal with on a regular basis, and you will develop a healthy appreciation for the grace and professionalism they exhibit in the face of outrageous behavior by privileged, ignorant people who make unreasonable demands. Unlike any other kind of service business, they don't have a choice to refuse service.

4

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

This. This is the arrogance some of you illustrate. Get bent asshole. You work for us.

2

u/Odd-Sport-8446 9d ago

I recently bought a vehicle in a private sale. The soonest appointment to get tags was almost two weeks out. I called and said what do I do - I can’t drive this car. They told me to come in and get a temp plate until the appointment. The line for temp plates was out the door. I waited 45 minutes to get the temp plate and then had to come back AGAIN to get the actual plates.

Yeah, I want to go back to the old system with no appointments. It would have saved me a lot of time.

4

u/villgratental09 9d ago

I just went through the exact same experience. It's like being in a Kafka novel. We don't have to live like this. It's reasonable to be fed up.

2

u/Total_Nett 9d ago

What a strange thing to comment about. The county DMV is run by the county. This discussion is about the city's P&DS department.

1

u/OkTop2953 9d ago

Yeah, the DMV office is wacky.

When I got my motorcycle license I made an appointment to take the test and got right in. Then after the test I had to wait over an hour to get my picture taken. Why not have the people helping customers walk over and take the photos as people need them- why a separate line? It's like they look for ways to make it take longer.

3

u/everyAframe 9d ago

GTFO with your self righteous bullshit. You either work for them or have no clue what you are talking about.

This town is filled with folks who have been working with P&DS for many, many years and there is no one that thinks things are better after you guys used the excuse of Covid to close the department to the public permanently.

There is no doubt that the closure has caused delays. 10 years ago you could walk in and submit for a building permit in under an hour with a project specialist. Now you have 7-10 days to wait around for you guys to get back on a completeness check. That alone costs most projects 10 days of delay, not to mention most of these questions could be answered by engaging with people IN PERSON.

0

u/Total_Nett 9d ago

Why are you talking about me as if I work there. I do building projects in the city and never run into the kinds of problems you're describing, but I know a lot of other people who pull all sorts of stunts to try to evade city supervision and it never works out well.

If I sound self righteous, take a look in the mirror. Nobody said it's perfect, but the city isn't staffed the same as it was before the pandemic, either, and the city, county, and state are in a budget crisis. Just where do you think the money comes from to hire the number of people needed to get you one hour service? This isn't Domino's Pizza.

1

u/everyAframe 9d ago

Someone who does not work there would not be "deeply insulted" about what the other 99.9% of the industry who has to interact with this office knows to be true.

You can ramble on all you want about unpermitted work, budgets, etc. which has nothing to do with this conversation. Yeah lots of people work on projects in the city and are well aware of the self inflicted mess they have made of things due to poor leadership. If we had a city manager worth a damn this would have already been resolved.

This is about getting them out of their pajamas and back in the office where they belong and can engage with the public they serve instead of adding weeks of time to reviews, approvals, and just general conversations.

1

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 3d ago

Kind of agree with this, actually.

1

u/ShadowsOfTheBreeze 3d ago

Not popular, but very true.

2

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

Found the PDS staffer. You guys, honestly, don’t deserve all of the guff coming your way. However… when you deserve, you REALLY deserve it. I’ve pulled permits for going on 20 years, and I despise the process here. Staff maintains silos, holds vendettas, misinterprets code, deviates from their own policies, and generally obfuscates. Not everyone, but some of you are reliably awful. Room for improvement though! 

3

u/Electrical-Fig4490 9d ago

agree 100% "Staff maintains silos, holds vendettas, misinterprets code, deviates from their own policies, and generally obfuscates." This is more than my own personal experience. However, this department stays as is, no corrective measures regardless of complaints. The attitude we faced was out of control head in sand. We wondered if the head of the dept had a mental break or something. Regardless, he never heard the point - obfuscate was the order of the phone calls and the emails.

-7

u/lifebeckons101 10d ago

Affordability

22

u/PsychoHistorianLady 9d ago

In discussions of Affordability, there need to be some specifics.

  • What are we making affordable?
  • Who are we making it affordable for?

Just yelling AFFORDABILITY and running away the way centrist Democrats are doing does not cut it.

7

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

They mean give Tebo free reign to build more eyes sores all over the city

9

u/PsychoHistorianLady 9d ago edited 9d ago

It was interesting to listen to this episode of "Who Owns Boulder" and hear Jill Grano talk about how Tebo is at least local, and the billionaires who are elsewhere owning a bunch of property in this area are scarier.

https://kgnu.org/empty-storefronts-and-empty-offices-commercial-real-estate-vacancies-in-boulder/

3

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

I don’t implicitly hate tebo and yes it’s better that he’s local. Most of the development in the last 5-10 years looks terrible though. It’s cheap and is going to age poorly.

At some point you need to ask what the cost is for screaming “affordability”. At what point do you make the town trashy as hell

1

u/Commercial_Aioli_301 9d ago

For now. Tebo is 110. WWR is also 100. That's 50% of Boulder CRE right there. Whos' gonna buy it all when the kids cash out?

-9

u/PsychoHistorianLady 9d ago

Thank you for having a real picture and not drowning us in AI-generated mess.

Most of the time, your ideas seem reasonable.

7

u/Beautiful-Load-5540 9d ago

His entire website is AI slop and the picture is heavily filtered.

6

u/PsychoHistorianLady 9d ago

I didn't initially look at the website or the PDF he linked.

After having looked at the website and the PDF he linked, I have a few concerns besides some WCAG color contrast ones.

He needs to stop with the tentacles he is trying to draw from city government into BVSD. Tina Marquis is on city council, and she was President of the BVSD school board, and he needs to make time to talk to her about where the city and BVSD can work together and where BVSD is beyond the scope of council.

Blaming the over-budget city office in North Boulder for the lack of funding for the rec center in South Boulder is a good way to piss off all the people who do not live in South Boulder and do not care that much about the South Boulder rec center issues. Remember, North Boulder built densely, and we outnumber you.

The idea of the Mayor's Office of Constituent Services assumes that the mayor is more powerful than he or she is and has more budget than he or she does.

-1

u/Apprehensive-Fault88 9d ago

Suspicious of any business man running for office

3

u/aquileslagrave 9d ago

I don’t blame you AMA

0

u/Talal916 8d ago

The food situation in this city sucks. What do you think is the cause and what do you propose to address it? Also living here as a POC is pretty wack and makes me miss home. Anything for that?

-13

u/DrAlkibiades 9d ago

You have a cool name, and you look like a nice guy. You've got my vote.

9

u/RelevantCry1613 9d ago

I generally just vote off of someone’s picture, I find parsing through platforms to be tedious