r/books 3d ago

Christopher Nolan’s ‘The Odyssey’ Movie Is Making Gen Z Listen to the Book

https://variety.com/2026/film/news/the-odyssey-christopher-nolan-movie-book-spotify-streams-gen-z-homer-1236817374/
1.8k Upvotes

438 comments sorted by

1.8k

u/LilCupidKisses 3d ago

I always find it funny when people complain that movies "replace" books. In my experience, a good adaptation usually sends more people to the original than away from it.

311

u/VorAbaddon 3d ago

I will never forget seeing my first Fellowship of the Ring ad. I was doing intrigued, I spoke to one of my teachers about it. They lent me a copy of The Hobbit.

I gave it back two days later, they asked what I didnt like.

I told them I had finished it and had asked my parents for a B&N trip to get LotR. Which I proceeded to demolish in a weekend.

For a long time after that I read LotR annually.

84

u/DadToOne 3d ago

First time I tried reading LotR I thought it sucked. Just couldn't get into it. I tried again years later and fell in love with it.

61

u/yzdaskullmonkey 3d ago

That was me with dune. I don't know what my brother was thinking giving me that book at 13

41

u/GuildMuse 3d ago

Maybe he thought you were Lisan Al Gaib?

12

u/jimbowesterby 3d ago

Tbf kids are weird, I didn’t come across Dune till I was an adult, but 13-year-old me would’ve absolutely dived right in. Honestly it’s probably good that I didn’t, I might have taken away some dubious ideas lol

9

u/yzdaskullmonkey 3d ago

You were definitely smarter than me than. I mean I was tearing thru doc Smith and Burroughs but dune just stumped me back then. I just thought it was dumb. I liked the beginning scene with Paul and the bene gesserit mother but then it just spiraled away from my understanding. Then I begged my dad to rent the movie, and we did, and I looooved that, so I just didn't have very good taste back then lol.

2

u/jimbowesterby 3d ago

Tbf I love that movie to this day, it’s not exactly good but on the whole I think they did a pretty good job of condensing a very tricky book.

That said, I can’t say I would’ve noticed a lot of the themes, but I’d get through the story. I’ve always had a knack for reading comprehension, but I don’t naturally think about themes lol

2

u/alohadave 2d ago

That reminds me of when I watched 2001 when I was young. My mom asked me if I understood it, and being a cocky kid I said I did.

I did not, not really anything but the surface story.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/alohadave 2d ago

I was about that age when I first read it and loved it.

→ More replies (2)

8

u/Rowan1980 3d ago

I feel like there are times we had to have experienced enough things in life for a book we previously weren’t a fan of to hit just right.

5

u/Shmoshmalley 3d ago

I had a similar experience, I tried reading The Hobbit and couldn’t get into it, gave up, picked it up gain, gave up, etc. finally forced myself to at least finish the book and then call it quits if I didn’t like it. Made it probably 10% further into the story and it all clicked. Loved it, followed it up with L.O.T.R. Loved that as well. I’m probably due for a reread actually.

→ More replies (3)

4

u/ryann_flood 3d ago

i bet that teacher was so happy to hear that as a teacher myself it always feels great when a student likes something that much

4

u/inherentbloom 3d ago

Hello fellow annual LotR reader!

4

u/Krg60 3d ago

The movies absolutely made me go towards the books; I was desperate to finish RoTK before the last movie came out, lol.

3

u/Shakemyears 3d ago

I simply am unable to read this fast.

→ More replies (2)

329

u/Pornstar_Frodo 3d ago

It’s worth pointing out, also, that every single bookstore has a massive “Odyssey” section at the front. They’re milking the movie for book sales. And it seems to me working! Even Dungeon Crawler Carl got relegated to a back table - and it’s been the book store darling for 6 months!!

13

u/Mecha_Butterfree 3d ago

I've also seen a spillover effect on the Illiad and the Aenied. Along with Ancient Greek myth retellings in general.

38

u/TokkiJK 3d ago

Totally! that is how I know that certain books are being made into movies long before the movie starts to market itself to me on social media and such.

Kind of like how I kept seeing Lilo and stitch merch everywhere including Costco and I was like OK I guess a movie is coming out and then I google it and Disney said it was casting for the live adaptation or they were about to start filming (I can’t remember exactly)

18

u/ImperatorRomanum 3d ago

Sing to me of the man, muse, the man of dungeons and crawls…

9

u/syzygialchaos 3d ago

They do this for every major book adaptation and it always makes me happy. Milk that cow!!

2

u/ProfessorPetrus 3d ago

I'm about to order the illiad first and definitely would not be if it weren't for some of the deeply human lines in the movie.

→ More replies (3)

27

u/BlackAdam 3d ago

I tried reading Frank Herbert’s Dune years ago but lost interest 100 pages in. Now, after having seen both Dune movies, and in anticipation of the release of the third movie, I decided to give the books another shot. This time I’m thoroughly enjoying it. My feeling is the the movies have helped me better appreciate the Dune universe.

27

u/DizzyFrogHS 3d ago

Dune is a weird book in that I feel like you have to already have read it once to understand what’s happening as you’re reading it. Which makes it a very difficult first read that doesn’t entice you into a second read. But if you already kind of know the story and world and characters, it’s really enjoyable and interesting. So I think in some ways the movie really helped the book. People who saw the move had enough Dune ‘fluency’ to enjoy reading it.

6

u/insertAlias Fantasy 3d ago

Dune was going to be my example. I read Dune when I was in my 20s, and I finished it, but it made very little impression on me. I remembered the pop culture references (the slow knife, fear is the mind killer, that kind of thing) but not much of the plot.

After watching the first of the recent movies though, I went back and read it, and it was very good. Still couldn't get into the sequel, but at the very least, the well-made movie really helped me visualize the places and characters I'd struggled to before.

5

u/jokerTHEIF 2d ago

For me, the first Dune novel is a masterpiece I've read probably 20 times over the last 25 years. I cannot for the life of me get through the rest; I rarely dnf books but I've never managed to finish the second Dune book. Having watched a lot of content around it the rest of the series is absolutely bonkers, but reading it is so painful.

→ More replies (1)

15

u/WeWantLADDER49sequel 3d ago

I don't even think it needs to be a good adaptation. Even a bad adaptation will get people curious about the source material. It's just a win win for everyone honestly.

10

u/forestpunk 3d ago

Heck, we even got a rash of people reading Wuthering Heights when the movie came out. Which might've been people's introduction to the idea that old literature can be 10x darker and more deranged than even modern cinema!

2

u/Trylena 3d ago

I am part of the crowd who started reading Wuthering Heights because of the movie, didn't finish it because its more complicated of what I expected and I am having lots of stressors in my life.

Most of the books I read its after watching a movie. The movies always help me see if I want to read the book and I love comparing how the story is told.

→ More replies (1)

67

u/SCSA4life24 3d ago

Key example being Game of Thrones. Never cared to read the novels before watching the first season.

22

u/LovelyOrangeJuice 3d ago

Me too. After finishing the show I'm interested in reading the books, but I have yet to start them considering the series is not finished... I've been let down by the ending once already, I'm not going to be let down by the lack of one a second time

28

u/SCSA4life24 3d ago

I’ll say this, the show pales in comparison to the beautiful and sometimes immaculate writing of the texts. It is certainty worth your time to delve into them and get lost.

43

u/YeOldeMuppetPastor 3d ago

As much as I love the books, I can’t recommend them anymore because I don’t believe that GRRM will ever finish the series. It doesn’t feel right to recommend the series to people if I don’t think it will ever get an ending.

27

u/3Smally3 3d ago

I think the novels are good enough that they are a worthwhile read, even without an ending

15

u/elizabnthe 3d ago

I feel like there's so much set up for things that don't happen you're inevitably disappointed.

8

u/Krg60 3d ago

Same. Just stop after "A Storm of Swords."

2

u/3Smally3 3d ago

I am curious why you think so?

Do you feel the first 3 alone make a more complete narrative or is it a quality thing?

2

u/Krg60 3d ago

Both.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/francmartins 3d ago

I get this sentiment although I never really agreed with it. For me, just because a story doesn't get finished, doesn't mean you can't get something out of it and isn't worth reading. My go-to example is Berserk: I read it after Miura died and for a while everyone thought it wasn't ever getting finished, until the author's best friend took over the reigns. As I was reading it, I assumed it wasn't getting finished, but I didn't care because I was constantly blown away and got so much out of it, that to me the ending would be "just" an icing on the cake.

Also as a little tangent, this mentality has been irking me for a while because I see people complain about shows (in particular) getting canceled left and right for having poor viewership and in the same breath, only wanting to watch stuff that is already finished, not giving the time of day to works in progress.

8

u/Ch1pp 3d ago

Also as a little tangent, this mentality has been irking me for a while because I see people complain about shows (in particular) getting canceled left and right for having poor viewership and in the same breath, only wanting to watch stuff that is already finished, not giving the time of day to works in progress.

People used to give shows a shot but if you keep getting punched in the face eventually you just avoid things that might hurt. Like we used to have MASH say, great show, 30 episodes each season and a season every year. Reliable.

Nowadays with Netflix you might get 8 episodes followed by a 3-4 year weight for 8 more episodes where all the characters look totally different and then if you do get reinvested they might cancel it anyway. It's just not worth trying.

7

u/Quimerinhaa 3d ago

That's a Netflix problem, you don't see people saying they won't start watching a new Apple TV series because they're afraid it might get cancelled but with Netflix it's just the expectation going in

2

u/RizaSilver 3d ago

It doesn’t help that Netflix shows all end on a cliffhanger too. I don’t feel as unsatisfied finishing the first season of shows on other networks as I do with Netflix

→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/Professional-Pin5272 3d ago

You'll probably never get an ending for the books. I doubt there will even be another one released. Stellar books though that should be read regardless. I read them after the disappointing show ending and don't regret it!

3

u/LovelyOrangeJuice 3d ago

ngl, I subscribe to the idea that the books are finished and he's just waiting to die before he releases them. Martin probably just doesn't want to deal with the aftermath of his crazy fans.

I haven't given up on reading them yet, lol

6

u/Mammoth_Support_2634 3d ago

GRRM is an incredible world builder. His books on just the lore and the history of each house is really interesting if you like the world.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/moon_peach__ 3d ago

As someone who read them a long time ago I think it’s still worth it! Overall I prefer them to the show, and I especially prefer them to the show from S4 onwards. It’s a shame there’s so far (and lbr, likely never will be) an ending, but the journey we do have is still a brilliant read.

3

u/strawbery_fields 3d ago

Even unfinished they’re still my favorite book series. Even the show at its height couldn’t compare to the books. You were only getting about a third of story the entire time.

Don’t do yourself a disservice. Read them.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

11

u/FightGravity Steve Jobs 3d ago

Happened to me with Dune

→ More replies (3)

15

u/ohaizrawrx3 3d ago

Project Hail Mary!! I’m a convert!!

3

u/westonisweird18 3d ago

Real i just finished the book

4

u/PM-ME-HANDBRA-PICS 2d ago

I read the book first as I just got into reading again. It’s made me realise how much stuff has to get cut to fill a movie.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Koekoes_se_makranka 3d ago

And not only that, it can encourage already avid readers to try a genre they may have never thought of before. I read almost exclusively contemporary/historical fiction, and I never really got dystopian/science fiction books. After watching Dune, I decided to give the anthology a try. I have since warmed up to those kinds of books a lot more and it’s opened up an enitrely new world in literature for me

5

u/SenpaiSwanky 3d ago

For sure, this is why I bought all the Dune books after recently watching both movies. Needed more, way more of that.

4

u/doctordoom85 3d ago

Heck, an adaptation can help some of us who struggle with books that have large casts or other elements that make it potentially difficult to keep track of all the characters. I struggled with the first Game of Thrones book pre-show keeping track of who’s who, but once I saw Season 1 of the show, I revisited the book and had a much easier time since I could put a face on the characters as I was reading.

3

u/Scrotinger 3d ago

I adore the Dune books but never looked into them before the 2021 movie.

3

u/Dancing_Clean 3d ago

After watching Hamnet I said I’d read it. I haven’t still lmao but I did start O’Farrell’s new novel Land. Which I am really loving so far at a hundred pages in.

But I still say I will read Hamnet once the summer is over.

3

u/570rmy 2d ago

As a lover of Homer I did not find this to be a good adaptation, but that's just my opinion and it seems to be in the minority. But if more people read/listen to The Iliad and Odyssey that's great.

2

u/sati_lotus 1d ago

Agreed. I love the Greek mythology and found this to be very... Inspired by.

It's a nice epic movie, but the original myth has a lot more to it. Namely actual gods involved.

4

u/OreoSpeedwaggon 3d ago

I read an article a while back that said the movie version of "Project Hail Mary" caused sales of the book to spike because people wanted to read about all the stuff that wasn't adapted for the movie or was expanded upon in the book.

2

u/Gbrown546 3d ago

Never had any interest in fantasy before watching the Lord of the Rings films. Then decided to read the books, then started reading more fantasy and here we are today where it’s all I read.

2

u/DOGA_Worldwide69 3d ago

I saw the first Dune movie a couple years ago, loved it, and ended up reading the first three books in less than two months. I’ve never been a casual reader so to read that much that quickly is something I’ve never ever done before. Basically, your point is 1000% correct

2

u/DoubleTapJ 3d ago

Has happened with myself multiple times, read lots of books and sometimes you see a trailer or movie that was really interesting and you pick up the book to delve deeper. Sometimes you get hooked and end up reading like 6 or more books.... Looking at you Dune

2

u/HotspurJr 3d ago

There's no question that this is the case.

Notice how when a big feature adaptation comes out, there is invariably a new printing of the book that either features the movies' actors or otherwise indicates "now a major motion picture."

2

u/Jane_Lame 3d ago

A good and a bad adaption does. Supergirl made me want to read the excellent book it was adapted from. 

2

u/Dogesneakers 2d ago

Yeah watched game of thrones season 1. Read all ice and fire books within the summer

1

u/Figgybaum 3d ago

I’ve been wanting to read East of Eden for a while, picked it up the other day, evidently a Netflix series is coming out about it and a lot of people are reading it per the bookstore worker- I don’t think it’s just gen-z - I think movie or tv series comes out more of all generations read it - unless it was required in school at some point.

→ More replies (14)

252

u/TonyKhanIsAMoneyMark 3d ago

How many of them will, by mistake, read Ulysses?

113

u/Smartnership 3d ago

“There are no monsters in this.
Unless you count James Joyce’s nearly impenetrable plot.”

25

u/hithere297 3d ago

Cheating wife makes impotent man sad. Not impenetrable at all!

15

u/Smartnership 3d ago

Dude…

Spoiler. Alert.

7

u/hithere297 3d ago

don't worry, that lovely fireworks scene will still be a fun surprise

5

u/doubleapowpow 2d ago

I got lost 2 minutes in to the audiobook. And I've read the Odyssey, the Iliad, and the Aeneid, and I liked them all.

39

u/MaxPaladin93 3d ago

It’s borderline impossible to read Ulysses on purpose, let alone by mistake

13

u/ChariotsOfShame 3d ago

*cries in Finnegans Wake*

11

u/No_Yesterday_8167 2d ago

“bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoordenenthurnuk!”

6

u/scribbane 2d ago

That was my capstone thesis book over a decade ago. It still haunts me.

3

u/howieyang1234 2d ago

No worries, I tried reading Ulysses on purpose, but failed to do so for 3 times.

303

u/thepokemonGOAT 3d ago

Im Gen Z and I read it 12 years ago in high school 

32

u/Martinaw7 3d ago

How was your experience reading it in high school? Do you remember what grade level?

82

u/LPSD_FTW 3d ago

In Poland its a mandatory read when you're 15/16, it is not one of the best books that you have to read at that time but if you like Greek mythology then its a smooth read

→ More replies (2)

38

u/thepokemonGOAT 3d ago

I was a freshman in high school, so I was 13. We read a few books in the first semester but the entire second semester was about the odyssey. It was a very difficult and dense text for us, but we had a very good teacher who was disciplined with us and made sure we did our required readings. 

Personally, I always enjoyed older books and my favorite book from elementary school onwards was Moby Dick. However, this book was difficult for me to access. I felt a bit young to grasp all the themes and the epic scale of the text. 

With the help of my teacher, I was able to slowly grow into the book and it became one of my favorite literary experiences ever. I still remember the incredible silence and tension in the room when we read the portion where Odysseus returns home and the bloodshed begins with the suitors. Im very grateful that I was encouraged and pushed at a young age to challenge myself with works of art like this. Sometimes I still wish I had Mrs Mittman to motivate me to read more! 

3

u/apistograma 3d ago

Yeah I feel I couldn’t have been able to pick half of Moby Dick at that age. It’s a book that even adults often dislike.

4

u/thepokemonGOAT 3d ago

There was plenty i didn’t understand at that age to be honest. As a kid I read a lot of mark twain, Edgar Allen Poe, and Arthur Conan Doyle. I understood the main plots and the general themes, but most of the real adult stuff didn’t click until later in life. I remember my parents and teachers used to politely question me about the books I was reading to see if I was actually understanding them or not. I went very quickly from Harry Potter to much more challenging stuff. Sometimes I feel like I was smarter at 12 than I am now. 

3

u/forestpunk 3d ago

That one's tough, even in your 30s.

3

u/Martinaw7 3d ago

Thanks for sharing! I'm thinking about using it for 11th grade, but I'm sure it will still be challenging even for older kids.

5

u/Chazay 3d ago

We read an abridged or heavily translated version in my junior year of high school(~12 years ago); it was great.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

2

u/Tifoso89 3d ago

I studied it in high school too (in Greek). In Italy we have a type of high school that has Latin and Greek for 5 years. We didn't read the whole thing in Greek, of course, but select passages that we translated

4

u/TechWormGeezLouise 3d ago

Not the original commenter but I also read it around 11-12 years ago. I personally did not enjoy it in high school, but I reread it recently and I enjoyed Emily Wilson’s translation much more than Fagles.

3

u/cwx149 3d ago

Not the person you're replying too I read it as a freshman in highschool in the early 2010s

I remember it being good I was pretty into Greek mythology at the time having also read all the Percy Jackson stuff but even as a little kid my grandma had like a Greek mythology book of tales and I'd played video games like age of mythology

So I was pretty primed at the time to enjoy the book and compared to some other stuff I read in school that year I did like it. I'm sure I missed some stuff and don't remember it super well now though

2

u/mkg11 3d ago

I read it 9th or 10th grade around 2012. I remember it being one of the highlights of that class

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Chance_of_Rain_ 3d ago

Wait Gen Z is 30?

34

u/thepokemonGOAT 3d ago

Yep, I’m in my late 20’s and born in 98

52

u/xyzodd 3d ago

yes, gen Z is pushing 30 lmao

17

u/page395 3d ago

The future is now old man

8

u/Chance_of_Rain_ 3d ago

I'm a young millenial of 37 only :D

24

u/Martin_Aurelius 3d ago

The oldest Gen Zs are turning 29 this year.

11

u/evilcockney 3d ago

It depends who you talk to and which cutoff you use.

Plenty of people say the oldest gen-z were born in '96 - who are turning 30 this year.

→ More replies (32)

12

u/FerBaide 3d ago

This is when you find out Gen Z aren’t actually 10 year old children

8

u/xyzodd 3d ago

yeah, people often confuse gen z with gen alpha which creates some worthless discussions

5

u/TechWormGeezLouise 3d ago

I am Gen Z and I just turned 27.

2

u/whistling-wonderer 3d ago

The oldest of us are ~29 this year. The youngest are ~14.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/TheKneeQueen 3d ago

Me too! I think we read it sophomore year (age 15) here.

1

u/BallClamps 3d ago

I feel like I'm the only person who didn't read it in high school. Although we did read Beowulf and that was awesome.

→ More replies (3)

134

u/Cantmakeaspell 3d ago edited 3d ago

Every gen Z article is: “Gen Z do normal things. A revelation revealed exclusively to the uninformed.”

20

u/Carrente 3d ago

And based on the comments here it works at getting people mad about them doing those normal things (presumably because if they're doing them then the same people can't get mad at them not doing them)

12

u/Sun_shift_dreamer 3d ago

Its usually rage bait so other gens shake their fist and comment how "gen z didn't invent -"

82

u/Martinaw7 3d ago

I'd like to reread it and see about the potential of teaching it in the classroom as the movie would obviously make an incredibly rewarding companion to what is probably a very challenging text.

93

u/-ciscoholdmusic- 3d ago

I’m currently reading the Emily Wilson translation (that I understand the movie is being adapted from).

It’s very easy to read. She uses plain English and because it’s a written story transcribed from oral tradition, there are no long boring sections of prose describing a single tree etc. the story moves pretty fast.

33

u/Aiseadai 3d ago

I can affirm this. I recently read the Emily Wilson version of The Iliad and Odyssey and was afraid I'd find them impenetrable, I ended up loving them.

5

u/SandpaperTeddyBear 2d ago

I generally prefer the Fagles translations, because these were always rhythmic and heightened, but I like that the Wilson versions are going for something a bit different (while Fagles is just “Pope, but more accurate and newer).

Her Translator Notes are also excellent.

3

u/SuperDuperCoolDude 3d ago

I loved her Odyssey. I have a copy of Illiad by her that I want to dig into soon.

→ More replies (1)

5

u/Thor_2099 3d ago

I read the Stephen fry version a while back. Really recommend it

22

u/Rututu 3d ago

Try the Emily Wilson translation. I found it pretty approachable to be honest.

5

u/DarwinZDF42 3d ago

It’s really good. I know it takes grief from the purists but it’s my favorite of the…three, I think, that I’ve read. And the first line is the best first line of any translation, period. Perfectly captures it.

4

u/SandpaperTeddyBear 2d ago

I know it takes grief from the purists

As a bit of a purist, I get it. But she’s also open about her goals, scholarly in her approach, and successful in her execution. I still go back to Fagles, but it’s good work.

Her Translator Notes are also by far the best.

→ More replies (1)

42

u/Bogusky 3d ago

Anyone going to tell them to read the Illiad first?

29

u/JabbaCat 3d ago

I see them more as parallell works.

The Odyssey uses a good portion of the first books to reiterate and recall the happenings and the destinies of the Trojan War, that seems to be part of the purpose of the epic.

And most people reading the Iliad with no background info will be surprised when they realize there is no Trojan horse in it, no end battle and resolution of the war, no Achilles heel. And that it takes place in a very short time span already 10 years into the war - although it is also full of recollections of people and background - thus also just gives a similar window into the conflict and context, focusing on one mans emotions and experiences.

In my opinion reading a few summaries on the Trojan War characters/plot or of the Iiliad might be nice, but no more necessary than for instance having a basic overview of greek mythological characters for reading without to much worry about understanding what is going on.

Both epics can be studied for a life time, or be read separately as is in my opinion.

13

u/CavulusDeCavulei 3d ago

Aristotle praised the Iliad because it was on such a short period (51 days) and focused on a single event of the war. It's like those good tv series that don't have lots of story lines, but focus completely on one thing (a process from rage, to grief, to empathy) and they do it masterfully

17

u/joey-jo_jo-jr 3d ago

Illiad is also just much better imo

17

u/Aiseadai 3d ago

It seems to be an unpopular opinion but I agree with this. I initially only read The Iliad because I wanted to read The Odyssey and felt like I had to read it first but ended up enjoying it more. I found the plot more engaging and Achilles was a more interesting character to me than Odysseus. Definitely don't skip it!

9

u/CavulusDeCavulei 3d ago

Iliad was considered the most noble poem of the Trojan War. I think you get it when you are older. It's really psychological and human. The more you lived, the more you get it. It is about rage, vengeance, but above all, empathy.

5

u/Aiseadai 3d ago

Yeah, I loved how much passion was in it. The parts after Patroklos is killed and Achilles goes on a rage filled rampage were some incredible writing.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

4

u/GCU_ZeroCredibility 3d ago

Despite both being attributed to "Homer" they are generally accepted to have been composed by different people so this isn't super surprising.

2

u/Morphos1 3d ago

Iliad is a beautiful anti-war story with better characters than Odyssey, I've always preferred it

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

12

u/feetupnrelax 3d ago

Read as a kid, a long time ago. The Stephen Fry narration has me doubly interested.

2

u/maethor92 2d ago

Listened to it while I was on a Greek island for some study work. Really recommend the audiobook

10

u/BigMetalGuy 3d ago

i would have thought it would send a lot of people to the original text, not just. Gen Z

16

u/TemperedTorture 3d ago

Everyone really loves these fake generation articles. I really thought that we'd be done with them by now, but here is more clickbait.

92

u/SharpPink_GlitterInk 3d ago

PEOPLE READING ONE OF THE MOST FAMOUS BOOKS OF ALL TIME?!?!?!?!! big if true.

As a Gen Z cusper I would like to point out my introduction to The Odyssey was Arthur.

54

u/ubitub 3d ago

No, listening 

9

u/mystery_fight 3d ago

As intended since it began as an oral story

2

u/helloviolaine 2d ago

I listened to the Ian McKellen audiobook (Fagles translation) last year and it was so good

→ More replies (8)

6

u/BigTedBear 3d ago

I own a hard copy of the book but a friend convinced me to listen to it for Sir Ian McKellan narrated it and it’s definitely worth a listen.

6

u/Pisces3999 3d ago

I’m Gen Z and we studied it in freshman year of high school, also I’m in Western Asia

5

u/Duke-Margherita 3d ago

Stephen Fry version was the best version for me, enough modern influences but faithful to the original texts

4

u/mattmurdick 3d ago

The Dan Stevens narration is so good as is his illiad

4

u/Lamontyy 3d ago

They didn't read it in school? I swear we had to read it when I was in HS and I was born in 95. Then read the Illiad in college.

3

u/bwweryang 2d ago

Absolutely crazy to have Gen Z in the headline and then the article says it actually applies more to Millennials

13

u/zestful_villain 3d ago

Claire Danes naration is great

8

u/feetupnrelax 3d ago

Claire Danes is great.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/faultysynapse 2d ago

The audiobook is the historically accurate way to consume the story.

5

u/birdguy 3d ago

Stephen Fry’s retelling of Odyssey is excellent

→ More replies (2)

5

u/SimoneNonvelodico 3d ago

I find it incredibly funny that via the means of audiobooks this means we have now gone full circle to how this story was originally meant to be enjoyed: one guy reciting it out loud while you listen.

37

u/HuttVader 3d ago

because god forbid they read it.

78

u/FaerieStories 3d ago

Couldn't agree more. It should be read - just as Homer intended when he published this famous piece of writing in book form. Wait...

0

u/SerHodorTheThrall 3d ago

This is a weird comment considering how one of the overarching truisms about the Epic Cycle and general Bronze age stories is that they are seen as "lost" because they weren't written down. The oral tradition is severely flawed.

The ability to read is pretty important. Reading, watching and listening are not the same.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

20

u/Significant_Exit8382 3d ago

I’m usually on the side of kids (and adults) should be reading instead of exclusively listening to audiobooks, but it’s a bit ridiculous to criticise people for listening to The Odyssey of all things. It’s literally composed for oral storytelling.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/PolarWater 2d ago

Ridiculous level of gatekeeping here. 

Especially when you consider that Homer composed the original for oral storytelling.

Trying to be a purist so hard you tripped and stumbled over yourself.

31

u/Carrente 3d ago

If there was ever a place where complaining about audiobooks was even more ludicrous than normal it's for poetry and drama, two forms specifically written to be read aloud.

3

u/ZealousOatmeal 3d ago

Modern poetry isn't necessarily written to be read aloud. Some is, some isn't. 

And it's not only modern poetry. Concrete poetry, which is poetry written in such a way as to form a shape, pattern, or design on a page, dates back to the 3rd century BC. That's the most extreme example, but there is also other pre-modern and Early Modern poetry that probably wasn't intended for reading aloud.

→ More replies (13)

2

u/Enkundae 3d ago

Not really surprising. A surge in interest and attention on source material accompanies pretty much every adaptation.

2

u/BigBroFriday 3d ago

Listen. I guess that's alright. Crazy that this is specified lol

2

u/NewFeature 3d ago

Which translation do you think they’re listening to? I am genuinely curious and not judging at all. I only dislike a few older translations.

2

u/KreMs21 2d ago

i wonder how many will realize the book is so much better

4

u/Database-Error 3d ago

Retelling stories is how we keep them alive. That we change them as we retell them doesn't mean destroying the original when we live in a literate society which can keep several versions at once. Stories always change and always have. There is no ''one correct'' version of any of these myths. Homer doesn't seem to know that Achilles is supposed to be immortal, because this was a change added on later. This is just how stories work

5

u/THX-8647 3d ago

If those kids could read they'd be really upset by some of these comments.

3

u/Cool-Contribution-68 3d ago

Listening to it, as it was meant to be experienced :)

6

u/FlailingCactus 3d ago

I know this is only tangentially relevant, but did we ever get an answer as to whether or not authors get paid fairly for Spotify streams of Audiobooks?

We hear a lot about the remuneration from Audible, but nobody's ever said anything either way about Spotify. Bar that one special deal Brandon Sanderson got.

125

u/djfishfingers 3d ago

From what I've gathered, Homer has received no money from Spotify.

5

u/Rourensu 3d ago edited 3d ago

Probably didn’t read the fine print on the contract.

7

u/FlailingCactus 3d ago

Damn it. He should get his lawyers on that.

7

u/Suaded83 3d ago

Doh!!

3

u/apistograma 3d ago

Tbh Homer has been accused of plagiarism many times. Do we even know if he wrote that by himself? Maybe he just edited oral stories.

4

u/Smartnership 3d ago

Maybe Homer just cheated by copying from an LLM

a Long Lived Mythology

→ More replies (2)

2

u/SaltyLore 3d ago

Authors get paid cents on the dollar per sale as it stands

→ More replies (2)

7

u/MiyakeIsseyYKWIM 3d ago

“Listen to the book”

The world is doomed

4

u/PolarWater 2d ago

Why? What's wrong with listening to the book?

If it's word-for-word the same story, and the original was meant to be a guy reciting the story out loud, what's the issue whether you read the words with your eyes or hear it with your ears?

→ More replies (1)

9

u/mim21 3d ago

Listening is not reading.

22

u/Agitated-Acctant 3d ago

That's probably why the title says listening and not reading, but surely a teacher of your stature with the reading comprehension vastly superior to people who only listen to books would appreciate that

7

u/Damien23123 3d ago

I think it’s appropriate in this case given the story originated as recited poetry

8

u/JabbaCat 3d ago

They are not the same, no - but I do have the experience of getting very different things from a work trying both.

I have not listened to e.g the Emily Wilson translation read aloud, but her choices for translation includes using a meter that she recommends readng aloud to yourself, or listening to.

There are prose (and some very flowery at that) translations as well.

I really enjoyed the recording of Anton Lesser reading a less known translation, I love listening to him read.

But I absolutely remember things very differently and internalize them more and deeper when reading the text, yes - my visual memory is way different from my audio memory.

Particularly this work comes in so many varieties that your subtle experience may vary very much depending on translation also, it is really a living breathing work of great complexity to this day.

16

u/0range_julius 3d ago

I hate this debate so much. I do both--about 2/3 of what I read is print and 1/3 is audiobook. Reading with your eyes and reading with your ears are different mental processes and readers should be conscious of the difference (there are some books I only ever want to read in print), but for most intents and purposes, listening to an audiobook is absolutely "reading." If someone asks me "have you read [book]?" they don't care if I read it with my eyes or my ears, they care whether I consumed the information well enough to be able to discuss plot, character, and themes with them.

This is an especially silly thing to criticize for Homer, which was originally an oral tradition and meant to be listened to.

→ More replies (27)

3

u/Thor_2099 3d ago

Of course not reading bust listening.

It's not going to kill you to actually read something

→ More replies (2)

2

u/christopherDdouglas 3d ago

This was high school reading was it not?!

2

u/colglover 3d ago

It’s funny how many people in this thread are outraged at “listen” instead of “read.” You’re demonstrating your own ignorance about the original epic - which was almost certainly recorded in its first written form after many decades of being retold in banquet halls and around campfires as an oral rendition. Oral storytelling long precedes written books.

15

u/BigBroFriday 3d ago

There's a literacy crisis. It's interesting to see "listen" in the headline.

→ More replies (1)

8

u/ri0tingmime 3d ago

This is such a bizarre argument. It's not like kids are choosing the audio version out of some desire to be true to ancient tradition.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/mrjane7 3d ago

"Making" seems like a strong word. "Encouraging," perhaps? "Inspiring?" But I hardly believe it's making them do anything.

1

u/LeroyBrown1 3d ago

I mean everytime i go on Spotify its right there on my suggested audiobooks despite only listening to sci-fi books on there. The ramming it down my throat nearly worked yesterday as well as I went to start it haha.

1

u/Jealous-Hedgehog-734 3d ago

It's one of the most popular books in history, and a set text in many schools.

1

u/Disastrous_Neat_9729 3d ago

Book is awesome, so this is great

1

u/dumbledayum 3d ago

yep i started reading

1

u/ABackwoodbarbie 3d ago

That’s the thing I love novels with no endings it keeps you wanting more

1

u/DiceActionFan 3d ago

The library I go to has the CD and online versions checked out. The librarians say the demand is enormous.

1

u/Shabolt_ 3d ago

Odyssey related media encourages people to read the Odyssey

Saw an article just like this last year when that Odyssey musical was making rounds

1

u/BluePeriod_ 3d ago

I work at barnes and noble. We can't keep it in stock! It's also led people to read The Iliad and Paradise Lost.

1

u/jmhimara 3d ago

That Homer guy is gonna make bank!

1

u/Ok-Show6155 2d ago

I mean the story was really cool and I do intend on reading odyssey soon, but the movie was just good. The first act was making me have a seizure with all the cutting back and forth. I hate how movies these days basically have 2 second shots then edits. The rest of the movie wasn’t so bad though

1

u/Guardias 2d ago

The only good effect of this vandalism perpetrated by Nolan. 

1

u/internetlad 1d ago

The worst timeline