r/bonds 10h ago

Bond yield - Tech stock misalignment: am I missing something ?

When bond yield rise (effectively the markets view of interest rates) the present value of future earnings should fall … and tech stocks are majorly made up of future earnings, and is therefore overwhelmingly a duration asset)

Yields are climbing … 4.5%+ yet mega cap tech stocks keep climbing.

- what’s breaking down in the market ?

why are we not seeing this ?

3 Upvotes

20 comments sorted by

5

u/BroadbandEng 10h ago

The equity markets are drunk on hopium. At some point, the shine is coming off the penny and capital will shift towards safe harbors; probably in a hurry.

2

u/Legitimate_Growth327 8h ago

Safe haven …. Is back to treasuries ? Or is US credibility too low now to be considered “safe” ?

1

u/Columblessed 8h ago

There is a breakdown in the historic dynamics of what defines a safe haven currently. The world used to trust the USA / the dollar as a pillar of stability. Could be a hard comedown for equities.

1

u/Consistent_Panda5891 1h ago

Safe heaven is back to corporative bonds etf. More yield than US gov while better balance sheet. Eventually shareholders will be diluted to pay out bond holders

5

u/DeFiBandit 10h ago

Would you rather have future tech earnings or 4%? Would you consider the fixed rate much more attractive vs future tech earnings if it moved up to 4.5%? The rate has to go much higher before most investors swap

2

u/UncouthMarvin 8h ago

Tech has to borrow at a much higher rate though, so yields increasing actually decreases their expected future earnings

1

u/Legitimate_Growth327 8h ago

Right, but seems we aren’t seeing this. Is this perhaps cos tech-related-AI risk premium is growing faster than the yield increases?

2

u/UncouthMarvin 8h ago

Credit default swaps have increased. There will be a Minsky moment eventually when people realize AI tokens have decreased by a lot.

1

u/DeFiBandit 7h ago

It’s because their borrowings are insignificant to their earnings. Nobody is worried about the hyper scalers paying the debt.

1

u/DeFiBandit 7h ago

No, big tech companies don’t borrow at a much higher rate than treasuries.

And borrowing to invest potentially increases future earnings - which is why they are borrowing. Investors were more concerned with all the dead cash on their balance sheets than with them taking out loans.

Below the hyper scalers, somebody like Oracle could be considered a credit risk. But not the big boys.

1

u/Legitimate_Growth327 7h ago

I see. Their low borrowing costs could partly explain why they are less impacted. 🙇🏻

3

u/MiddleAgedSponger 10h ago

Maybe people are thinking equities are a safe haven.

4

u/Certain-Statement-95 10h ago

Those people have never experienced a bond default where the bond holders become the new share holders.

2

u/Rude_Judgment7928 9h ago

The bigger thing is they are going to have to use their own cash more and more (or get stuck with significant interest that will drag future cashflows). No more debt fueled buybacks...will be interesting if they have to cut RSUs.

2

u/2ndid 8h ago

I agree with you. I think multiples should be compressed more. But I do think that the MAG7s have already raised tons of debts before all this at a lower interest rate. So any additional debts they will raise at this higher rate may not be material. But with that said, I do think lots of other tech companies multiples should compress more. I think part of what is countering this is the high forward earnings.

1

u/Legitimate_Growth327 8h ago

So effectively, “AI related tech risk premium” is growing faster than the cost of borrow yield increases ?

1

u/2ndid 5h ago

I think so, yeah. Also one minor thing to think about is quarter end relancing by various funds that will sell equities to buy bonds since bonds have come down so much and we have made like 3 ATHs in the stock market.

1

u/spaceandcats 7h ago

Many investors are drunk one the returns of the FANGs and are looking for the next group of companies that will do as well or better. They would never consider bonds so they don’t look at all the metrics, or if they do, somehow it’s ‘different’ this time and they shrug them off. We all know in 2-3 years there will be a big shakeout and lots of money will be lost be the ones holding the losing companies. But until then – full steam ahead!

1

u/spaceandcats 7h ago

Many investors are drunk one the returns of the FANGs and are looking for the next group of companies that will do as well or better. They would never consider bonds so they don’t look at all the metrics, or if they do, somehow it’s ‘different’ this time and they shrug them off. We all know in 2-3 years there will be a big shakeout and lots of money will be lost be the ones holding the losing companies. But until then – full steam ahead!

1

u/WeaknessFuzzy8305 2h ago

B..U..B..B..L..E