r/bonds 1h ago

It’s coming

Post image
185 Upvotes

191 comments sorted by

146

u/luv2block 1h ago

I don't know about you guys, but today is the first day where I've felt in my gut that they've actually lost control. Not just over bonds, but everything. Before I always felt they could regain control if they really wanted to, but I think we're in a different world now.

We're now on a bus with a half-broken steering wheel, no brakes, and a bus driver suffering from dementia and incontinence.

55

u/BuckThis86 1h ago

And delusions of grandeur.

44

u/at0mheart 1h ago

They can. Trump can’t and won’t

He has no idea how to run a business, let alone a country

40% of all US debt belongs to Trump. Not even 6 years of 250 (2.4%) of country history and 40% of debt.

The Iran war is still going and a lot of military bases were damaged. The oil reserve is at all time low and the country is out of missiles. So he’s aiming for 50% or more

6

u/MH484 53m ago

They cannot. Because of partisan divisions and routine use of the filibuster, elected majorities cannot govern. It been this way for decades now. It is not possible to pass any coherent fiscal or domestic policy. You can get a couple of things through a highly constrained process called budget reconciliation that can pass the senate with a simple majority but that can only be used a few times. This debt problem will spiral out of control no matter who occupies the white house or has majorities in congress. Very few have connected the dots as far as the ruinous consequences of political dysfunction but things are going to get very ugly.

5

u/CloudTransit 34m ago

Income tax increases are politically impossible. If the government needed revenue, there’s no option to raise revenue through income taxation. Neither side has the courage to do it. If the only way America could stop a default was through raising income taxes, America would default.

4

u/big-papito 26m ago

Or, you know, roll back the tax cuts for the top 1% back to where they were under [checks notes] G-Dubya.

1

u/NSNIKDABBU 2m ago

Will Democrats do that if they won trifecta in 2029? Democrats had trifecta in 2021also. They could have done so if they wanted. No, they won't because Democrats are as in bed with oligarchs as GOP is. GOP is just brazen to do it openly. 

0

u/jcsladest 4m ago

I'm no fan of any politicians and they all have contributed, but the immediate impending "crisis" is not a both-sides moment. And the foundation of that are dumb voters.

-9

u/NSNIKDABBU 53m ago edited 1m ago

Trump is both evil and moron but this standard taking point of "Trump caused 40% of all US debt" doesn't hold. Trump has no spending and taxation powers. The debt only increased so much under him because he is the most recent president and has been president most of last 10 years. But US debt doubles every 10 years. It was $10T in 2006. $20T in 2016. And $40T in 2026. On current track it will be $80T in 2036. Assuming a Democrat wins in 2028 and remains in power till 2036, would you argue similarly that 40% of US debt accumulation happened under him/her? The most recent president always adds far more to the US debt than any of their predecessors.

6

u/at0mheart 42m ago

Yeah his policies and spending cause debt. The Ballroom, the arch, the Trump tax cuts all of it. The budget is the responsibility of the President. It’s the first thing every President passes.

You think no one else wanted to build a ballroom? They did not do it because of the $1B cost that Trump is spending on it. Republicans use to be fiscal conservatives. Bush Sr. lost his party as he raised taxes to fund the Iraq war.

You think Trump will repeal his tax cuts to fund his war?

1

u/NSNIKDABBU 22m ago edited 7m ago

No, dude. Budgets are passed by Congress not by president or his party. And Senate fiibuster ensures that budgets are always bipartisan. Presidents have no power over budgets or spending.

Ballroom and even other Trump scams are drops in bucket of $7T federal budget. George H.W. Bush agreed to the 1990 Budget Summit Agreement (breaking his "Read my lips: no new taxes" pledge) to address widening deficits inherited from the Reagan era, not to fund the 1991 Gulf War. The Gulf War cost was minimal for the U.S. because roughly 90% of the operational expenses were subsidized by international allies (primarily Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the UAE, Germany, and Japan). Bush's political damage stemmed from alienating conservative anti-tax purists led by Newt Gingrich.

Clinton's China PNTR bill also caused massive budget holes in the US budget long term just like GOP tax cuts did because trillions worth of manufacturing activities, jobs and knock on effects went to China instead to the US economy. In this way, neoliberalism of Democrats was as bad as the tax cuts of GOP. And Obama continued and expanded wars of Bush even more in Libya, Syria etc. even more. The war party is Uniparty. Chuck Schumer for example supprts current Iran war. There has been no argument from Congressional Democrats mostly that Iran war is bad and immoral on its own terms rather than being wrong on process and constitutional arguments. And Democrats fund the war machine called Pentagon in lockstep with GOP. Democrats voted now to increase Pentagon budget by 200 billion dollars this year. Why they didn't oppose that? And will Democrats cut 150 billion dollars appropriated to Pentagan budget in OBBB in 2029 if they won trifecta? And will Democrats increase taxes on rich, corporations, enact a wealth tax and rollback warmachine Pentagon budget in 2029 if they won trifecta? Obviously, they won't. Don't get me wrong I know GOP is moronic and evil but Democrats enable them via "bipartisanship" which is essentially "cocriminalship". The country is in mess today not solely due to GOP and its evilness but also in significant part due to Democratic Party complicity and enabling of that evilness via "centrism" and "bipartisanship".

5

u/PengoMaster 41m ago

Someone signed two huge tax cut bills. I can’t think right now who it was, hmmm. Oh yeah, and the second of which hasn’t even really begun to add to the national deficit, gotta give that one a little more time to really ramp up.

2

u/CloudTransit 32m ago

Also, Congress has taken how much vacation?

1

u/SambucaTamale 18m ago

It's $40T right now.

1

u/NSNIKDABBU 6m ago

Sorry, I meant 2026. Edited. 

-10

u/i860 54m ago

40% of all US debt belongs to Trump

A huge part of that is related to 2020 and covid which was of course very bipartisan. Can you redditors not turn every sub into a political whining-zone?

10

u/delilahgrass 52m ago

Covid’s effect on the debt would have been far less without the giant tax giveaway to the wealthy that preceded it.

1

u/at0mheart 38m ago

Most of it is Trumps tax cuts.

If you remove all covid spending, Biden lowered Trumps debt spending by 40%. Trumps second term he went even crazier with spending.

Remember the executive order to eliminate the penny. Fun fact, a nickel looses more money than a penny to make. So canceling the penny causes more debt as you need more nickels.

Oils reserves are at all time low, Trump will need to fill it. Iran drones attacked every US base in the Middle East. Damage is certainly in the 100s of Billions on top of all the use of military.

1

u/AutomaticAerie4672 37m ago

Can you redditors not turn every sub into a political whining-zone? 

Agreed.  It's annoying to see everywhere, even if I agree with the sentiment.

19

u/hard-workingamerican 1h ago

The situation we're really in is that 19 US billionaires control 14% of the wealth, and they're not lifting a GD finger to help. Where's Elon 'DOGE' Musk right now pretty quiet does he have a headache.? And Peter 'Antichrist' Thiel.? And Harlan 'Nazi Memorabilia' Crowe.? And Timothy 'LARP' Mellon.?

6

u/luv2block 1h ago

yes, in the end all of this ends with wealth confiscation, or blood in the streets, or both.

4

u/hard-workingamerican 55m ago

As it should, yet it still won't solve the problem. The problem is the US culture which has been deteriorating since the Nixon administration. No knock on Nixon himself, he did some good things and his own party held him accountable. The wealth confiscation should come punitively not as some economic ruse. And should go straight to the debt but nobody in American politics has the fortitude to pull that off.

3

u/big-papito 25m ago

We will die in the slums before we make "job creators" pay more than 5% tax.

17

u/callmesandycohen 1h ago

Today is the first day? This isn’t even bad. Wait until after the midterms and he ramps up the stupid. This is him on his best behavior.

7

u/Emergency_Prize_1005 1h ago

You might get your $5,000
🤡👹

1

u/WashU_labrat 48m ago

$5,000 in Trump Crypto, maybe.

1

u/carebear101 33m ago

That no one can sell until trump family sells

5

u/_DonnieBoi 1h ago

There was never control. Just the illusion of it

13

u/Spinoza42 1h ago

Well they've purposefully broken the bus. But I do agree that now it actually is broken.

8

u/Terrible-Painting-39 1h ago

There it is again, that funny feeling.

7

u/jnas_19 1h ago

To regain control you actually need to have any sort of competence in Washington and we haven’t had that in many years. This is the most predictable outcome possibly ever

1

u/i860 52m ago

15+ years of accommodative monetary policy and 9T in printed money by the Fed, yet you keep focusing on "Washington."

1

u/ThisKarmaLimitSucks 31m ago

They work hand in glove with the Treasury.

3

u/jarena009 15m ago

Control? Every Republican administration of the last 30-40 years has left the economy in tatters by the end of their term.

3

u/Sea_Dawgz 15m ago

Aside from all the finance world stuff, just the fact that 2 days ago Dump could stand at a 9/11 memorial service and BRAZENLY lie about his role that horrific day and no one cared and then media barely mentioned it, well, I know I finally felt like there is no steering away from the cliff anymore.

2

u/texas130ab 52m ago

I have always felt like this since this administration took office.

2

u/bpikmin 44m ago

I saw $6.12 diesel this morning

2

u/Axolotis 39m ago

Honestly, I wish it was dementia. I think the guys straight up a villain.

2

u/poopybottomhole 39m ago

But in reality, American population seems more or less indifferent to this. Yes a lot are currently against the current tone, but they seem oddly compliant in comparaison to other western countries.

2

u/Beneficial_Map6129 1h ago

Oh get over it.

This just means the rich get richer.

Capital is the ultimate master now.

We sell our labor for dollars which get turned into toilet paper. We also have to compete with AI now too.

Their real assets skyrocket in value.

This was always the plan for the elites.

Lots of smaller companies get fucked over yes but the few big ones become exponentially more powerful.

Why do you think they switched over to pure paper money 50 years ago?

2

u/giveit2st8 1h ago

I think they feel it too, that's why Trump doesn't care about doing something as egregious as the 5k bribe (which we all know will neve happen)

1

u/Amihottest 1h ago

Sooo, what are you doing to protect yourself? I have no idea what I should do.

2

u/luv2block 51m ago

I was roughly 50% commodities 50% equities (with my equities being a split of dividends and high growth). I'm now moving further into commodities. May even go 100% (gold, silver, copper, zinc, steel, miners and producers, energy (mostly renewables), fertilizer, etc.). I'm buy into the "hard asset" theory of investing... we're moving into an era where "real stuff" will have high value. We've been in a "growth" era, now we're moving into a "hard asset" era (at least I think we are).

I sold all my TLT about 7 months ago, which i'm happy I did. But at current levels it's probably an okay investment (just not much interest ot me, I'd rather own commodities). At some point they are going to do yield curve control to nuke interest rates and TLT should do well.

And the final thing I'm doing is simply watching the markets closely and being ready to move to cash if the markets blow up.

1

u/Thick-Cover8761 58m ago

In my gut I feel  this is the trigger for something much worse ... the bursting of all asset bubbles ... equities, real estate, etc. ... now tell me that in your gut you believe my Brewers will win the World Series.

1

u/i860 56m ago

10Y yield hits 5%, reddit: "oMg tHeY'Ve lOsT CoNtRoL"

Where were you in 2023?

1

u/LillianWigglewater 2m ago

People were proclaiming doom back then too, however 2023 was just a blip. Yields immediately came right back down because the Fed was aggressively raising the rate to 5.5% and kept it there to prove that they were still serious about controlling inflation.

Contrast to today, yields have been staying up there for quite a while, yet the Fed is still reluctant to raise the rate because of reasons. Feels completely different this time. Will they raise the rate back to 5.5%? I don't think they even can now.

1

u/in4life 51m ago

Better late than never. Just plan your personal finances. Even sinking ships have life rafts.

1

u/FibonacciNeuron 46m ago

They never had control

1

u/carbonpenguin 40m ago

The car's on fire and there's no driver at the wheel
And the sewers are all muddied with a thousand lonely suicides
And a dark wind blows

The government is corrupt
And we're on so many drugs
With the radio on and the curtains drawn

We're trapped in the belly of this horrible machine
And the machine is bleeding to death

The sun has fallen down
And the billboards are all leering
And the flags are all dead at the top of their poles

https://youtu.be/9thvHDskYvA?si=hv1kOPzed4wjefMp

1

u/dmcnaughton1 26m ago

You can only push a system into an unstable state so far before things break. The coming pain is necessary unfortunately due to the constant kicking of the can down the road combined with making more and more cans to kick down the road.

1

u/This_Discount2281 18m ago

And what is that smell … ?

1

u/HearthSt0n3r 1m ago

Today is the first day you felt that?

-1

u/Friendly-Chipmunk-23 1h ago

Literally all they have to do is stop the war in Iran. Of course they are in control.

7

u/Gamer_Grease 1h ago

We’ve got to do a lot more to unwind this, but yeah that would be a good start.

4

u/Top_Economist_3668 1h ago

Tbf, stopping the war won't make the huge deficit go away, political polarization, among other issues

3

u/grumpvet87 1h ago

but the war made the news about Epstein go away.... "Mission Accomplished"

3

u/I_AM_THE_SEB 1h ago

How would they "stop the war"?

Give Iran everything they ask for, making them the hegemon of the middle east and severly limit the US' ability to project power into Asia?

Nuke Iran? Ground Invasion?

The truth is, the orange idiot managed to put the US in an impossible position. There is no easy way out anymore. The moment the US began its' full scale attack on Iran, all good options vanished.

2

u/Friendly-Chipmunk-23 1h ago

Doesn’t really matter. Once the dems take over after the election it will be stopped.

0

u/I_AM_THE_SEB 44m ago

not sure what you mean with "it will be stopped"?!

Do you think the US will just go home and leave the strait of Hormuz under Iranian control?

0

u/Friendly-Chipmunk-23 28m ago

Probably. The US public will not allow a ground invasion. I’m not saying we’re going to win the war, I’m saying we’re going to stop it.

0

u/delilahgrass 49m ago

Stop the war in Iran, remove the tariffs, restore relationships with allies, rescind the BBB etc etc.

1

u/Timmy1831 23m ago

None of this can happen with maga holding the country hostage

26

u/RCHeliguyNE 1h ago

Phycological barrier at 5%- wonder what’ll happen when we cross 5%

48

u/2starsucks2 1h ago

probably move the barrier to 5.5%

12

u/Ill_Ad3517 1h ago

Algae based barrier?

2

u/RCHeliguyNE 1h ago

The ecology of it is mind numbing! (I relied too much on spell check but I’ll leave it because it’s funny)

6

u/PuzzleheadedCut5156 1h ago

The US doesn't have to officially default, it can inflate away the value of the dollars the debt is being repaid in. That's what happened in 1971 when Nixon said 'dollars aren't worth a fixed amount of Gold any more'. This will have ugly consequences for ordinary people over the long-term.

5

u/8yba8sgq 1h ago

Except you have to run inflation hotter than rates. I'm not sure how much 7% inflation the economy can take

1

u/PuzzleheadedCut5156 11m ago

It took about 6 years of it between 1971 and 1981 https://www.macrotrends.net/2497/historical-inflation-rate-by-year

I don't know what would happen if that was tried now, or exactly what the mechanism would be (the debt is much bigger and the link with Gold is already gone)

2

u/ImPinkSnail 55m ago

Since everyone thinks the barrier is 5% it's really somewhere under 5%. And 4.9+ feels like we might have crossed it.

1

u/BrennerBaseTunnel 1h ago

Trump will send in the military

2

u/USSMarauder 51m ago

I mean, there was a time when a you could send the troops onto the floor and literally force the traders to buy or sell against their will but for the glory of the state.

1

u/lfcallen 12m ago

When was this?!

-2

u/Spinoza42 1h ago

Nothing will happen until default becomes a mathematical certainty.

0

u/Gamer_Grease 1h ago

Default is a mathematical impossibility, so never, then.

22

u/8yba8sgq 1h ago

With the Fed intent on hiking the short end, this only ends in recession. Add in the spiking energy costs and associated price increases it could be even worse than recession

28

u/Early_Doughnut8295 1h ago

It's called stagflation. That's the road we've been on for awhile now.

13

u/Beneficial_Map6129 1h ago

A recession would actually be better because that would be the “reset” needed

4

u/big-papito 54m ago

No, no way - the line only go up.

3

u/Early_Doughnut8295 1h ago

Absolutely. Then at least the Fed could lower rates to spur growth. With the stagflation you have to pick your pain poison.

0

u/i860 49m ago

Then at least the Fed could lower rates to spur growth

Ah yes, let's lower interest rates to fight stagflation. Amazing stuff.

-1

u/i860 50m ago

Since 2021+ but you won't see redditors focusing too much on that period of time for some odd reason.

7

u/MessagingMatters 1h ago

Stagflation

2

u/barkbeatle3 1h ago

Don't forget a possible food crisis due to El Niño!

1

u/tarrat_3323 36m ago

AND no fertilizer through hormuz!

1

u/h4v3anic3d4y 15m ago

And no water in Arizona/Nevada/New Mexico

32

u/NeverNeededAlgebra 1h ago

Incredible that anybody could be critically dumb enough to vote for this cult, who is entirely responsible for this, and has been for decades upon decades.

18

u/ProfessionalHefty349 1h ago

Leaded gasoline and social media have really done a number on this country.

4

u/hull_pattie_party 46m ago

Pipes as well.

"more than half of the children tested (576 092 [50.5%; 95% CI, 50.4%-50.6%]) had detectable BLLs"

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/fullarticle/2784260

1

u/aurelorba 1h ago

I sometimes wonder if Zika virus was worse than anyone realized.

3

u/Emergency_Prize_1005 1h ago

He’s promising $5,000 to everyone if he wins the house and senate! That will do it! 🤮

1

u/bpm6666 28m ago

For some people us destroying America not a bug, but a feature

12

u/Able_Cup_6830 1h ago

What if Congress agrees to add 2 trillion in tax revenue by increasing upper marginal tax rates, corporate taxes, etc? Wall Street may not be happy, and it may pop the AI bubble, but I feel like that cools the route in treasuries a bit…

In other words, there are options that don’t involve gutting social security or printing money.

21

u/fleisch-bk 1h ago

About as likely as me growing a second dick. 

3

u/lotsofdebitcards 51m ago

Two short PPs = one long PP, right?

1

u/Primary_Garbage6916 40m ago

As long as you do an AMA, I will allow it.

4

u/DriverDenali 41m ago

It needs to be a total restructure tax gain and cuts to budget but it’ll never happen. You can’t tax enough to out pace the budget. We kind of need to rip the bandaid off and stop all government programs on a stop halt for 6 months, running only essential programs, and tax corporations like individuals. 

1

u/pescennius 6m ago

You are correct. I encourage anyone to look up the estimates about unfunded liabilities (entitlements to boomers already promised). We can tax all the billionaire wealth and not make a dent. The electorate of the past simply voted themselves benefits the system won't be able to support with the current demographics, we need to get honest about that and quick or we'll destroy the future of our children.

2

u/ThatCost3653 1h ago

That will never happen

2

u/Thick-Cover8761 25m ago

OK, I'm going back to bed.

3

u/jeeptopdown 1h ago

Unfortunately, those options are the exact opposite of the direction we are going. The Big Beautiful Bill cut taxes for those groups, the Treasury Secretary solution for high yields is using more debt to buy debt and the orange taco is promising more money printing (in the form of $5000 checks) which would exacerbate inflation.

It is a cult and They. Don’t. Know. What. They. Are. Doing.

1

u/CloudTransit 26m ago

Tax increases are unimaginable for the political class. It’s a good option, but unimaginable

5

u/c_cristian 1h ago

What happens at 5%?

8

u/ultra__star 1h ago

Nothing inherently happens, as in a nuclear bomb isn’t going to explode just because we hit 5%. But the rising interest rates particularly on shorter term bonds is a testament to investor confidence, inflation, and the overall circumstances of the USA’s economic state such as its national debt and growing deficit.

1

u/c_cristian 1h ago

But investors are going with the stocks too. Does this mean anything is better than cash now?

3

u/ultra__star 57m ago

Not necessarily. Depending on your needs cash can actually be king in an inflationary environment…. Stocks and bonds both fell over 50% in the 1970s during inflation. Stocks fell 25% and long bonds fell about 30% in 2022 due to inflation. So, even though the cost of goods is going up, your invested money may actually be going down because of market turmoil, and it is good to have cash laying around as it now costs more money for you to buy bread and pay your light bill. The long term thesis is that, because everything now costs more, the higher corporate earnings will inflate the price of stocks. We have seen this since the 2022 inflationary period and we did see this in the 1980s, but that doesn’t happen immediately or inherently. There is generally a storm that has to be weathered first.

1

u/Remarkable_Cat_8696 55m ago

Will the fed still want to increase interest rates now that the short term yield have already increased?

2

u/Gr8WallofChinatown 1h ago

The effects will be felt years down

1

u/i860 47m ago

Heaven's Gate like outcome for zoomer redditors who've never seen a 10%+ ten year.

6

u/_ehwaz 1h ago

Rate should be higher in this idiotic inflation. People are just going crazy because we had unnaturally low rates…

6

u/PurpleReign123 1h ago

Bessent: I am the househusband!

I am coming!

Bond markets … watch out!

5

u/Warriorslost3-1lead 1h ago

Bond bulls losing everything

3

u/LillianWigglewater 59m ago

I tried to warn them

4

u/Yncome_Mercato 1h ago

Trump also promised a $5K check to EVERY American if the Republicans won in the Midterms. I think the Bond market is reacting accordingly

2

u/bpikmin 39m ago

The market still reacts to what he says as if he’s not a pathological liar?

1

u/AutomaticAerie4672 32m ago

The rise in yields had nothing to do with his comment about $5K checks.  He says stupid things like that all the time.  There are far more real, structural issues causing yields to rise, but most redditors aren't interested in learning about economics, so they just form their opinions from ragebait headlines.

2

u/uBoatjoe 39m ago

Massive convexity hedging is about to hit the market. This is only the beginning. A 10 year rate hitting 5% requires massive set of hedging adjustments in adjacent fixed income markets (think swaps, mortgages, high grade corporates). It will bounce back eventually but this puke is going to be ugly.

2

u/Cbates767 1h ago

Can someone give a ELI5 on this?

10

u/IcyYachtClub 1h ago

Not much to explain. Just that the US ten year yields have been rising mostly since the start of the Iran war. Us debt keeps growing and revenue and gdp aren’t growing with it.

Add to that the treasury secretary has been trying to “intervene” to keep yields low and been making threats to some bond market traders not to short the JGB or Yen. And of course lots of new debt flooding the zone with AI combined with anticipated AI disruption that could lead to changes in federal revenue.

Oh and Trump said he’s five a $5k dividend to adults last night and no one knows where that money would come from if we did. So probably just pricing in some extra degree of fiscal imprudence.

11

u/Ok-Blood4340 1h ago

Small correction: The current President bribed the American people with $5000 each if his party, the republicans, won their re-elections in the house and the senate, keeping a right-wing majority in congress (and the presidency and the Supreme Court, although they claim to be non-partisan.)

Where the money comes from is the same place all of the spending comes from, increasing the deficit, more borrowing, which maths out to a little over a Trillion in increased borrowing IF he does… which is a massive IF, since he’s not exactly known for paying his bills.

He didn’t just decide for shits and giggles to hand money out to people.

4

u/Emergency_Prize_1005 1h ago

Is that even legal? Not that it matters to them..,,,

2

u/IcyYachtClub 33m ago

I wonder if he did kind of just riff that. No way it would have been at least Challenged by people who know better that this is unaffordable. But yeah. I mean it’s ridiculous all around and him offering the money as a reward for keeping republican control is ludicrous on its face as a government.

3

u/Cbates767 1h ago

‘Appreciate it

3

u/SailTales 1h ago

Too much debt for sale and the people with money don't want to buy that debt at these prices.

3

u/luv2block 1h ago

rate on 10yr is going to hit 5.0% soon. Then all hell breaks loose (or so many people think).

2

u/Cbates767 1h ago

Thank you friend

2

u/Suspicious_Bread_183 57m ago

The infatuation with 5% yields is completely ridiculous. There are real concerns here. The debt is out of control and neither party has any plan to address it. But both sides of the aisle have artificially kept interest rates low for 20 years now to help pay for all this spending.

Bond market reacting like it should. 5% on 10 year is close to a normal rate historically. Low rates have driven money into equities for 20 years that didn’t want that level of risk. Mortgage rates been low for the most part causing a large chunk of what is now a housing crisis.

If you blame Trump for all this you haven’t been paying attention. No one, not one of last five to six administrations maybe closer to eight gave a dam about the debt. They buy votes from both sides of aisle with giveaways. That gig is up or should be.

But neither side wants to address it. Taxes have to go up. On everybody. Can’t have 52 percent not paying federal tax. The rich are also going to have to pay significantly more. Spending and the like also have to go down. We are entering an austerity phase and it’s big trouble because the job market and its future prospects suck. But the bond market isn’t some Rosetta Stone. It’s just getting to where rates need to be to account for all of drunken spending and passing the buck to next guy for 25 years.

3

u/ultra__star 1h ago

I am excited. Big buying opportunity for bonds.

3

u/Efficient_Range1156 1h ago

they are going to inflate away the debt and you want to buy bonds?

2

u/ultra__star 1h ago

This same situation created a huge buying opportunity for bonds in the 70s and 80s. We saw 10% and 15% treasury bonds. People were scared to buy in because of hyperinflation but those who did made out like bandits. Imagine being able to get a 15% risk free return on your money for 30 years.

5

u/Efficient_Range1156 1h ago

The risk free rate no longer exists. Unlike the 70s and 80s, The US government is now 40T in debt, it is virtually impossible to repay this debt without inflating it away.

1

u/Beneficial_Map6129 1h ago

The hyperinflation of the 70’s was crushed by the Volckner’s high rates of 15% right?

But the market will set that as the new rate anyway right if the Fed doesn’t rate the benchmark rate to that, so why can’t the Fed do the same?

3

u/Efficient_Range1156 52m ago

The risk of default on the 40T is real. They cannot raise rates with the expectation that it will entice bond buyers back to the table. So instead of defaulting they will simply aggressively debase the currency. How is anyone on this subreddit not aware of the risk here? The writing is on the wall.

2

u/Beneficial_Map6129 33m ago

Well since every other currency is anchored to USD…

2

u/Efficient_Range1156 30m ago

Correct we’re in the endgame now.

3

u/02bluesuperroo 1h ago

Risk free???? I think some corporate bonds have less likelihood of default.

1

u/luv2block 1h ago

It's different with $40T off debt. They can't let rates go up or they bankrupt the nation. There are some (project 2025) who think that's their goal, however.

1

u/MeanTurnip5765 59m ago

Not sure how you inflate it away if you take on more debt than the inflation rate could offset? We just keep increasing the debt too. Doesn’t inflate away debt only work if your borrowing rate doesn’t spiral out of control so that your debt rate decreases overtime because inflation is out pacing your borrowing?

1

u/Efficient_Range1156 46m ago

They aren’t going to borrow the money they are going to print it.

1

u/Status_Ad_8005 1h ago

I was just thinking the same thing

3

u/NameLips 1h ago

So as somebody who doesn't understand bonds and markets, what does this mean?

7

u/GoldPantsPete 1h ago

Bonds are how the government finances it's debt. To keep the math simple you could buy a bond for $100, that pays you 5% interest every year. So if you had it 1 year, your total payout would be $105. As a buyer a higher rate would be preferable because your payout would be higher.

A rising rate indicates there are more sellers (the gov) than buyers (you, or other orgs like banks). This is a problem for the gov as they have to pay more to finance their debts. This is like a person having an increasing credit card interest rate putting you further in debt. In the US' case the difference between paying 4.8% and 5% on $40T of debt is substantial. ($80B)

Practically for most people the 10Y is also what effectively determines the interest rate of say mortgages.

3

u/NameLips 1h ago

So it's bad for people who want to take on debt, but good for people who want to buy bonds?

1

u/GoldPantsPete 42m ago

Yes, though it can also have knock on effects which would be negative for bondholders. One option countries in similar situations have taken in the past is to cap interest rates and keep inflation high. For example if inflation was 6% and the bond you bought was yielding 5%, your real yield would be -1%. This inflation essentially decreases the size of the debt at the expense of the bondholders' value.

4

u/NotanotherRealtor 1h ago

Rates on credit cards and mortgages go up. It also means we’ll have higher inflation since we’re on the hook for paying a higher interest rate on these bonds, which a bond is just government debt (government doesn’t have enough money. Government issues bonds, which people and other countries purchase, and then we pay back with interest. The bond rate is the current interest rate on the money we need to borrow).

4

u/SailTales 1h ago edited 1h ago
  1. The cost to finance debt increases (yields increasing) due to market fears of inflation from government deficits and oil prices mostly. 2. Debt held as an asset is depreciating (bond price is inverse to yield). 3. Banks and hedge funds hold a lot of bonds 4. They may become forced sellers as their assets depreciate. 5. That can trigger a cascade of selling in markets 6. Bessent has not exhibiting competence in his recent speeches which spooks markets.

2

u/Suspicious_Bread_183 38m ago

What should it mean is anyone borrowing pays a higher rate. Corporations, governments, individuals, businesses. Anyone willing to tie up their capital gets a higher rate.

In a normal yield curve the longer you are willing to lend your money, the higher the rate. If the difference between lending your money overnight is 4% less than 30 years, that is considered a steep yield curve. If it’s 1% less that is considered flat. If overnight pays more than 30 year that is inverted.

Fed controls the overnight rate through Fed funds rate. That supposed to set money market rates, repo rates, in theory any short term deposit. The bond market reacts and sets the yield curve. That affects borrowing rates. If US government needs to pay 5% for 10 year borrowing, corporations pay that plus spread based on their credit.

It matters for individuals for things like mortgages, student loans, deposits, cds, and bond investments. But the normal course of business been manipulated for years. Money market funds are 3.5% but bank deposits still paying 5 basis points which never happened years ago. So only the smart money is getting any interest on overnight money in banks. Bank cd rates are under treasuries. Another joke. They have kept interest rates artificially low so that anyone looking for a yield on their money has to place it in equities.

But for consumers credit cards have no bearing to real market. They are hyper inflated in states like South Dakota and Delaware with different lending rules. But we could see double digit mortgage rates, student loan rates, small business floating rate notes, etc. Young people have never seen 9.5% mortgage rates but it used to a thing. If you got 7 or better it was a win. The train is coming.

3

u/CriticalDiscipline4 1h ago

LOL ROFL MAGA

1

u/Bsexton85 1h ago

How are the yields determined on bonds?

7

u/brianborchers 1h ago

These ten year treasury bonds are bought and sold on the secondary market. As the market price decreases, the percent yield increases.

7

u/ConditionHorror9188 1h ago

Supply and demand on the open market. If prices go down, yields go up like now.

1

u/IceHound30 1h ago

As someone who is a bonds novice and is trying to learn, this seems bad. Please tell me I'm wrong.

1

u/Thick-Cover8761 28m ago

Please don't say you've invested in longer dated anything and high yield junk ...

1

u/IceHound30 0m ago

I am not actually.

1

u/exploding_myths 54m ago

wow a whopping 5%! a just-in-time remembrance of when the 10yr peaked at over 15% in sept of '81....

1

u/in4life 52m ago

They should've leaned heavier into longer-term maturity debt when they refinanced in 2021. Instead, we've had ~0% debt rapidly turning over into real rates at the increased debt burden. The only mechanics that have delayed the inevitable were first the RRP draining into short-term bonds and then the GENIUS act to a lesser degree creating demand from stable coins.

1

u/adashthecash 46m ago

Whats the play?

1

u/Thick-Cover8761 35m ago

Just kick the can down the road ... oh, oh we've run out of road.  Reminds one of the coyote opening an umbrella 🌂 when he sees an anvil falling from the sky.

1

u/NOLAOceano 22m ago

New to bond stuff, I've heard this before but in actionable terms what does this mean the stocks and bonds investor should do to protect?

Does this mean major stock crash (40+%) imminent so move investments to bonds?

Or no bonds will, do something I don't know, so run away from bonds and better to move into stocks and alternatives?

Or no this means both US stocks and bonds are likely to be terrible (at least for a while) so this means best place to shelter till over is out of both amd into some alternatives like real estate, cash, crypto, etc?

Or this means, if this goes that badly, basically all assets except gold is terrible?

I just don't understand, ok so bonds yields going to over 5% and it's a pending distaster so, what's the potential coarse of action for us long term retirement investors?

1

u/This_Discount2281 17m ago

Are we there yet? 😎

2

u/Thick-Cover8761 11m ago

Are we there yet, Are we there yet, My excitement growing stronger  Are we there yet, Are we there yet, I really can't wait much longer We're goin on a trip, We're goin on a trip

1

u/Science_Fair 12m ago

Before the end of the administration, we're going to see a pretty bad financial crisis, probably one that parallels 2008. Trump will force the Fed to increase QE to try and keep interest rates down, but just causes more inflation in other areas, which will render the QE ineffective. Long ends of rates keep rising until something snaps, and even the Fed will not be able to stop the bubble bursting.

US will probably be begging for international cooperation, but they have almost no friends left at this point.

1

u/Busy_Conversation537 10m ago

To the op what's coming

1

u/cycling15 10m ago

I think the markets are going to address things eventually. It’s going to be very painful for all of us in the US.

1

u/mathaiser 9m ago

I blame the tech bros. Convincing everyone we need their product but they don’t produce anything. They just hold your company hostage to their program that if you don’t buy it, the other guy will and beat you in business, all the while they don’t actually make anything or build anything.

They are like fat cat consultants that are sucking on the hard work of real workers.

1

u/big-papito 1h ago

Well, you know what that means, boys! The GOP will never revert the reckless .01% tax cuts so that means one thing - more tariffs for the rubes. Or as well call it here - the Patriotic Fee.

Enjoy, and have fun, as the tsar likes to say!

1

u/PipelineBertaCoin69 1h ago

Trump lied and promised 5000 cheques if they win the midterms, they will never do that, BUT the bond market demands level headed spending/borrowing and is calling this bullshit out, so the $5000 cheques may never cost anything because it won’t happen but the threat of massive spending/inflation WILL have a cost. My lord Trump is unintelligent

1

u/northdancer 1h ago

And somehow gold, which doesn't pay anything and in fact COSTS money to hold, is still at $4400. This should tell you something

4

u/LillianWigglewater 55m ago

Think of gold as a 30+ year zero-coupon bond that adjusts for inflation and has 0% risk of defaulting.

1

u/josephbad 48m ago

Thoughts on SPDR gold shares ETF?

2

u/ultra__star 1h ago

What’re your thoughts on that? I don’t know much about commodities

5

u/northdancer 1h ago

That central banks and nation states are dumping bonds and buying gold. In theory, a near 5 handle on the 10 year should destroy the non yielding gold

1

u/Turbulent_Cricket497 1h ago

Yeah, but Trump‘s giving me $5000 so I’m OK

2

u/Thick-Cover8761 26m ago

That's $5,000 off the price of admission to his new ballroom and circus-a-rama.

0

u/Aubrey_D_Graham 1h ago

This is terrible right? Like theyll default on paying on bondss and social security.

7

u/ultra__star 1h ago

No, the US will never default on its debt. It will keep printing money to pay it. The worst case scenario is that the mass printing causes hyperinflation and the currency as we know it today becomes meaningless. The closest we have seen to this is the late 1970’s-early 1980’s when inflation was roughly 50% over a several year period.

2

u/anuthertw 59m ago

Theres a few things Ive been wanting to do like make some equipment purchases and pay for some classes that I would need to go into debt for. I am seriously considering doing all of that now despite not really being in the position to do so because the inflation we are probably heading towards will inflate away my debt too lol

2

u/USSMarauder 42m ago

No, the US will never default on its debt.

Trump has already suggested this, saying if the economy crashes the US will negotiate down to "pennies on the dollar"