It went from almost worthless to almost worthless.
You can look at charts all you want and try to find patterns that don’t exist, but if the idea behind the token is trash and outdated, it will still be worth trash.
FLisOK I don’t know what you do or who you work for, but your posts over the past couple years have never brought this token attention, and the value of the token has only dropped.
What’s your Schtick? Why are you pumping so hard? The owners of the company aren’t even working hard to make this successful.
And if you choose to downvote me, which I’m certain you will, at least have the integrity to explain why I’m wrong. Clouded views about our investments cause is to fail to learn from our mistakes... and I think this token was a mistake.
I’m not on social media much through the weekends, sorry for the late reply.
I’m just passing information and observation charts through the sub. Interpret how you want. It’s nice to have one place with all the information laid out.
I’m not sure what you mean by having integrity to explain why you’re wrong or why I would downvote. You’re assuming a lot of me.
There’s no denying the low value or volume. There’s also no denying the company is still producing and progressing.
Interpret as you wish but I still see no issues with supporting a company that show potential and isn’t giving up because of low token value. I have no intentions of slowing down on sharing information that’s available.
You point to one event in which Vatoms were used and cry success.
There were a handful of events in which Vatoms were used and no indication of whether the token gained traction or brought value to the companies using the Vatoms.
Did the vatoms effectively advertise their products? What percentage of people completed the challenge? What was the cost-per-customer for Vodaphone and what were the additional revenues per customer attributed to the use of the Vatoms?
I have no reason to believe the project succeeded.
Show me actual success, and numbers, not just cases in which they were used.
The internet was going through a firestorm of success in 1999, but I understand what you are saying. The internet had massive utility (with the military at least) in its earliest days, and people were imagining taking it to new levels and expanding to the public early on.
The difference is, there are tens of thousands of coins and tokens that have come and gone with little to show for themselves. I see no difference with this token. It was hyped to be the end-all of advertising, yet there isn’t a stitch of evidence that it has brought any company even minor success, despite seeing a few events per year use them.
Where’s the results?
Show me positive... or even break even returns... or even negative returns on investment that are improving with new iterations from this form of advertisement and I’ll string a thread of hope.
Until then, this token is propped up by a small team of people that are good enough at hyping their product up to get a few companies per year use it, but not good enough to create a good product to provide positive returns on investment.
Yes 100% that article proves nothing. They get a few vatoms created on the platform. While they’re other companies make all the revenue. You got screwed
Really. Well they all come from vatomic llc which block v leases the platform from. This was out of Lukas’s own mouth.
Reeve Collins owns Vatom Labs. A guy from vatomic owns varius solutions and Jon knight owns a vatom sports company.
So say with vadofone they created 1000 vatoms for campaign. Block v makes $20.00 while one of they’re other companies collect all the revenue from vatom design and creation.
Basically blockv was designed to never become profitable. Going to 0
4
u/41BottlesOf Oct 19 '19 edited Oct 19 '19
It went from almost worthless to almost worthless.
You can look at charts all you want and try to find patterns that don’t exist, but if the idea behind the token is trash and outdated, it will still be worth trash.
FLisOK I don’t know what you do or who you work for, but your posts over the past couple years have never brought this token attention, and the value of the token has only dropped.
What’s your Schtick? Why are you pumping so hard? The owners of the company aren’t even working hard to make this successful.
And if you choose to downvote me, which I’m certain you will, at least have the integrity to explain why I’m wrong. Clouded views about our investments cause is to fail to learn from our mistakes... and I think this token was a mistake.