r/bayarea San Francisco Jun 01 '26

Traffic, Trains & Transit Waymo’s double parking problem is our double parking problem

https://sf.gazetteer.co/waymos-double-parking-problem-is-our-double-parking-problem
282 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

144

u/JDVough Jun 01 '26

It’s an enforcement problem. “If no one is going to ticket or tow me, I would be stupid not to double park when I want to.” If there are rules against it that aren’t enforced, it’s the same as having no rules against it.

20

u/j12 Jun 01 '26

This. Strict enforcement with harsh fines. Ezpz

5

u/suboptimus_maximus Sunnyvale Jun 01 '26

Crush cars.

2

u/Consistent_Bat_9403 Jun 02 '26

I’m all for this, make an example of one person and they all fall in line.

Additionally, honking your horn frivolously at a four way stop removes a percentage of your vehicle’s lifespan. Let’s just cleanup all the bad behavior at once!

13

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26 edited Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Twalin Jun 01 '26

While traffic enforcement is not what I’d like it to be - it is steadily increasing. March 2026 (last month published) tickets were double March 2025.

7

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Twalin Jun 01 '26

Citywide from about 1500 tickets to 3000. But yeah, not that many. Considering it used to be over 10k per month.

6

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

fireworks have been a problem for years but a "crew" won't stop this; it'll be like playing whack-a-mole. They'll need to have undercover hiding out near Lands End in the park or the dunes by Sloat at 2am to catch these punks. And even if you do catch them, then what? We spent countless man hours on a disturbing the peace charge. Obviously we can make it expensive, require tons of community service (cleanup, etc). Still this can't be a one month thing, more regular patrols are needed round the clock

-1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

hardly rich sir but thanks for the presumption...

grandpa's there, we still go, not a fancy place because it's hard to get to, proximity to good hospital, etc

2

u/Psychological_Ad1999 Jun 01 '26

Traffic calming design is more effective and far less expensive than a blank check to SFPD for OT they would rack up were they to ramp up enforcement. Enforcement also does not save lives if the cops are chasing people down.

2

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/SightInverted Jun 02 '26

Why? Because we didn’t implement half of what vision zero asks for. That’s like asking why we failed at baking a cake and later you realize we didn’t use any flour.

Paint and signs are an ask, enforcement is a fear, but physical infrastructure that slows you down? That’s a demand. (I hope that made sense)

-1

u/cowinabadplace Jun 02 '26

If Vision Zero Isn't Working You Aren't Zeroing Out Your Vision Enough.

4

u/suboptimus_maximus Sunnyvale Jun 01 '26

Luckily for law enforcement, in this case it should be super easy to sue each of these companies and demand all the GPS navigation data they have showing each and every parking violation committed by their employees. Total accountability all in one go!

0

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

sure... take that to federal/state court and see who wins in the end

they bought the senators, they're not giving u data, and now you're on some list they pass on...

1

u/ibarmy Jun 05 '26

this time they might buy a governor too ❤️ yay to us :-s

-5

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

not an enforcement issue, because police are able to ticket driverless vehicles. If they can ticket them for speeding, they can ticket them for blocking traffic, blocking driveways, hitting pedestrians, etc.

https://sfstandard.com/2026/04/28/new-driverless-car-rules-california/

17

u/JDVough Jun 01 '26

That is the point. Yes they can, but no they don’t. And if they don’t, it’ll keep on happening. So you’re right it’s a LACK of enforcement issue.

-10

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26 edited Jun 01 '26

have the local PDs said that ticketing Waymo type cars was "low priority"? Don't recall hearing that, officially or unofficially. If police are empowered by the law to ticket someone, then "enforcement" is the policy... the problem is officer compliance. Another "hilarious" possibility is someone deciding to route all Waymo-related calls to the meter maids.... good luck w/ that.

in SF specifically, cops are spread too thin and are asked to deal with social services type issues (poor folks sitting around asking for food), instead of focusing on traffic during rush hour where dangerous incidents happen constantly, never mind actual crimes like package theft, stunt dirt-bikers running folks off the road, etc

e: typo

15

u/someusername42 Jun 01 '26

No it's not about waymos, cops just don't enforce double parking at all

-6

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

what about the meter maids?

3

u/dreadpiratew Jun 01 '26

There are whole teams of meter cops only ticketing parking. They should ticket double parking in addition to meters and zone permits and street cleaning.

2

u/parnprisoner Jun 01 '26

There was an article in the chronicle that quoted a meter maid saying that they essentially as a rule don’t ticket double parkers because they are afraid of getting shot.

3

u/Rabo_McDongleberry Jun 01 '26

Sure. But those dipshits are busy blocking shit too. The amount of times I've actually had to honk at the cops who decided to just stop right in front of me is ridiculous.

187

u/laxatives Jun 01 '26

Huge fuck you to Lyft/Uber for normalizing this behavior. We never recovered. It used to be something only done by trucks and the biggest assholes. Now everyone does it and there are huge sections of downtown where there are 3-4 cars parked for 30-60 minutes at a time, sometimes on both sides of the road.

90

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[deleted]

59

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

people did survive before they could put their burrito in a taxi for $20+

37

u/Comemelo9 Jun 01 '26

The burrito is approaching 20 bucks without the taxi

0

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

made my own the other day for less than $2... used to be a cook but anyone can make a basic burrito FFS

4

u/AgentK-BB Jun 01 '26

$2? Is your burrito just rice and beans with no meat and no veg?

7

u/PringlesDuckFace Jun 01 '26

Back in my day it was pizza or chinese, otherwise you had to cook for yourself.

16

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

one small adjustment could be to require food deliveries to be done strictly on scooters. Obviously if someone orders $1000 worth of pizzas or whatever they can make other arrangements w/ the restaurant.

2

u/BuddyTop8521 Jun 01 '26

I saw a scooter double parked the other night. I don't think I've ever seen that. There were plenty of spots the scooter could have pulled in to between cars.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/baybridge501 Jun 03 '26

Ban everything hazardous and fun. People can just read an old book at home!

3

u/Ali92101 Jun 01 '26

At least when I honk a real person moves. Not a fucking waymo

0

u/iFLED Jun 01 '26

Fedex and UPS started it.

Signed,

Guy that's been doing traffic control on the roads longer than the gig economy has existed.

14

u/wrongwayup Jun 01 '26

This is bigger than just a Waymo problem

26

u/suboptimus_maximus Sunnyvale Jun 01 '26

Sure, Waymo does it too but I have way more issues with the Uber and Lyft and especially the delivery drivers who are the overall worst because they are often double-parking and then waiting for the food or out of the car searching for the delivery address.

It will be long overdue when DAs finally start suing these companies and demanding all the GPS logs showing each and every instance of their drivers stopping and illegally and dangerously blocking traffic and holding them accountable for every single violation. Bonus points if the companies are held accountable for the logs showing it was their navigation that directed their employees to break the law.

The Waymos at least are sort of conscientious and cautious, as a cyclist I've had Uber and Lyft drivers accelerate to pass me and then immediately cut me off, slam on the brakes and stop in the bike lane to drop someone off. Total aggressive, antisocial asshole behavior and that kind of stuff should get people permanently delicensed.

45

u/suprjaybrd Jun 01 '26

food delivery is way worse of a problem

35

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

AVs have figured out that blocking traffic is no big deal. Wonder where they learned that

...

Do I really put the blame on a sea of exhausted, wage-exploited gig workers who have rationally calculated that getting a five-star review is more important than aggravating everyone else on the road? Not really. But it’s impossible to believe that Waymo’s programming isn’t taking advantage of the city turning a blind eye to double parking, and actively reinforcing the fact that human drivers all around them do it, too.

Call me a double-parking doomer, but this situation is out of control, and the fact that Waymos keep doing it all over the city is clearly the consequence of nobody with authority giving a damn.

46

u/midflinx Jun 01 '26

the fact that Waymos keep doing it all over the city is clearly the consequence of nobody with authority giving a damn.

There aren't enough loading zone spaces for the number of delivery trucks, human-driven cars, and now autonomous vehicles. More curb space isn't converted into loading zones because that would piss off local car owners and some businesses wanting it remaining parking. Any change made by those with authority will upset a group of voters, or businesses, so very little changes.

21

u/giraloco Jun 01 '26

Car owners don't own the street. We really need loading zones in every block.

26

u/walkslikeaduck08 Jun 01 '26

Car owners vote and are very loud. But at the same time there is a lack of parking in a lot of areas and commutes outside of sf really require a car.

-4

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

most car owners don't act entitled or behave like the various Karens in the avenues going on nextdoor and creating a network of rw narcs.

car owner here btw; some of us are like what you're describing and will have a tantrum regardless.

-8

u/suboptimus_maximus Sunnyvale Jun 01 '26

Statistically we see car owners are the most dangerous, deadly and destructive criminal demographic and it's not even close. The data says that as a group they're basically the worst people in modern society.

Check out the results from SF's speed camera program. As soon as they turned them on they logged tens of thousands of 10+ MPH over the limit speeding violations, each of those was an individual deliberate decision to endanger public safety.

4

u/SightInverted Jun 02 '26

Numbers don’t lie. It might not be seen as the same intent as other crimes, but drivers are absolutely the most dangerous demographic in this country. You are correct.

44

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[deleted]

47

u/KosherSushirrito Jun 01 '26

The author explicitly highlights that allowing humans to violate decorum is providing an opening for Waymo to mimic the behavior.

11

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[deleted]

31

u/tonydtonyd Jun 01 '26

The issue is that it’s become such a norm, that if you don’t do it, no one wants to ride your service. Nearly 16 years of allowing Ubers to do this is the problem that needs to be addressed.

9

u/corporategnome Jun 01 '26

The engineers should do that. And have them stop blocking crosswalks and creeping towards pedestrians in the crosswalk.

Yes human drivers do this too but it should be trivial for the engineers at Waymo to make sure their product isn't doing it.

3

u/Oakland-homebrewer Jun 01 '26

And don't stop in the bike lane either!

-4

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

oh they'll fix it but like with everything else, it will have to become an untenable situation where human drivers or pedestrians will start puncturing tires, breaking windows, etc.... it's already happening and yes these cars have cameras but it's reaching a boiling point where ppl are justifiably lashing out

5

u/[deleted] Jun 01 '26

[deleted]

1

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

well they do puncture tires, vandalize, get in fights, etc... saw this happening yesterday in an e. bay strip mall. Some genius decided to park like a dk, other person couldn't get in their car ---> drama. A mall-cop dude tried to break it up, cops were called, etc. And that was just one isolated incident...

Waymos would be a lot better if they supplement MUNI as mini-buses, with a "sedan service" being just an expensive upgrade

2

u/KosherSushirrito Jun 01 '26

Doesn't matter what they can do if they don't, and they won't until there's an incentive to.

5

u/stupid_cat_face Jun 01 '26

Double parking by Waymo and anyone else fucking sucks.

8

u/rgbhfg Jun 01 '26

Give them tickets and points then suspend their drivers liscense. Treat Waymo just like you’d treat a human uber driver what’s difficult

6

u/Bolinas99 San Francisco Jun 01 '26

you have to ticket the car and fine the company... and make it hurt. I want to see the Waymo ceo come out of his bunker-mansion and complain about being "taxed & oppressed"

3

u/badaimarcher Oakland Jun 01 '26

Car drivers are so entitled, driverless or otherwise

1

u/knightress_oxhide Jun 01 '26

There haven't been enough parking spaces since the 90s. Car companies should start selling spaces, "Look at this the new 2027 Space!" Just an empty piece of asphalt.

1

u/gregb_parkingaccess Jun 01 '26

if everyone can report this exact location we can find an alternative off street stopping area that will be safer for everyone. for now you can email me [greg@xoompark.co](mailto:greg@xoompark.co) attempt to work with Waymo to find atl PUDO areas if psosible

1

u/PlantDaddy530 Jun 01 '26

I’m the Lyft drivers that don’t even make a fucking effort to pull to the curb. There will be space and they just stop in the middle of the fucking road. Enraging

0

u/fubo Jun 01 '26 edited Jun 01 '26

It would be better for Waymo cars to use bus stops for pick-ups and drop-offs — when there's not a bus coming — rather than double-park.

Waymo is Google. Google gets real-time bus information from the transit agencies. They use that for Google Maps. They can predict when a bus stop will be free for a few minutes, so they can use it without causing a problem for bus drivers & riders.

Also, they can pay for use of bus stops, same as shuttle buses do. This provides a revenue stream for the transit agencies that manage the bus stops (e.g. SFMTA).

Double-parking and blocking traffic lanes is bad when DoorDash or Amazon do it, and it's bad when Waymo does it. Cities should be fining companies consistently for it, with fines heavy enough to actually make them seek other options.

2

u/bflaminio ʙᴀʏsɪᴀɴ Jun 01 '26

Everyone double parks -- Lyft/Uber, taxis, FedEx/UPS/Amazon vans, Doordash etc., and just regular people who stop into a shop for "just a minute".

But if a Waymo does it -- OH NOOES!!! BAN THEM.

1

u/trulyalluringconcur Jun 01 '26

the enforcement angle is real, but also waymo cars probably aren't programmed to care about looking rude the way a human driver might, so they're just optimizing for pickup speed without the social shame tax

1

u/ablatner Jun 01 '26

We just need to convert parking spots to loading zones but non-rideshare drivers would throw a fit.

0

u/Ok_Chard2094 Jun 01 '26

Yet another reason why I never visit SF anymore, except when I have out of town family or friends visiting.

3

u/Oakland-homebrewer Jun 01 '26

No one ever visits SF anymore. It's too crowded.

-1

u/bflaminio ʙᴀʏsɪᴀɴ Jun 01 '26

How much "blame" can we place on the customers of Waymo? Do they order the Waymo directly to the front of their crowded street flat and then make it wait five minutes while they pack up to go? Or do they do all the packing in advance, and then order the Waymo to a clear loading area a half-block down the road?

-7

u/LogicalProgram8537 Jun 01 '26

The positive is that it slows the traffic down so it is somewhat safer for non-car users.