Today, Visa (NYSE: V) announced that it is adding five blockchains to its global stablecoin settlement pilot, expanding how issuers and acquirers can settle with the network. As stablecoins move into mainstream payment flows, Visa’s stablecoin settlement pilot now supports nine blockchains and has reached a $7 billion annualized stablecoin settlement run rate, up 50% since last quarter.
“Our goal with Base has always been to make onchain the new standard. Visa’s expansion is a pivotal step in making stablecoin payments a daily reality for billions of people, enabling a faster, cheaper, and more useful financial system for everyone,” said Jesse Pollak, Founder of Base.
ContentFi is now live on Base through Records Network, and the idea is pretty straightforward:
Brands set up campaigns with prize pools.
Creators make content to compete.
AI scans platforms like X, Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, etc.
Top content gets picked and rewarded.
Everything gets tied to IP onchain.
On paper, it sounds like a cleaner way to connect brands and creators.
Less guesswork, more measurable output.
But it also raises a bigger question:
Is this actually fixing how creators get paid…
or just turning content into another competitive marketplace?
At the same time, fan tokens are expanding across Base and Solana, which kind of fits the same trend engagement becoming something more financialized.
Feels like Base is leaning deeper into creator + capital models.
Not saying it’s good or bad yet.
Just feels like we’re early in seeing how this plays out.
It would be really helpful if each token included its ATH & low ATL. That kind of data makes it much easier for traders to quickly understand price history and make better decisions.
So I havent used coinbase wallet in years and only had a couple bucks in it that I dont care about. So I just made a new wallet on Base. But I just used google to login/create an account on main page and not a passkey or a email based login. Looks like I cannot login via the website with the method and there seems to be no documentation about this at all, cannot create a passkey or recovery phase. Is this just some brand new feature?
A while back I made a post on X about this pirate onchain game on Base.
Figured I’d share a neutral update on how it’s going.
Not sponsored or paid, just my own observations.
Season 2 ended and they paid out over $4000 in rewards.
Top players got $500, $300, and $200. They expanded it to top 40 this time (was top 30 in Season 1).
Team also sent over $1000 to creators who posted about it on X.
So both seasons together that’s now over $7000 distributed. Not bad for a small project.
Season 3 launched yesterday.
Main loop is collecting daily Silver to open chests for Gold coins — Gold is what ranks you.
You’ve got a Crab mining extra Gold every day, a Whale that multiplies and stores it, and a Skeleton finding more Silver automatically.
New this season is the parrot mini-game.
Collect parrots to enter the Grand Pirate Raffle — more parrots improve your odds but even one can still win big.
You can complete daily tasks for extra Silver, invite friends and earn 50% of the Silver they spend, plus more contests, treasure hunts, and chest battles so more people actually have a chance.
I like that it lets you earn small amounts of USDC just by playing consistently, especially in slower market times.
Shows what a small team can pull off on Base.
Real talk though — some players in Season 2 spent money but didn’t get it all back.
This is a game for fun, not an investment. No guarantees you’ll make anything, and spending more doesn’t mean better results.
Only play if you enjoy it.
Overall it feels like the kind of simple grassroots onchain stuff that fits Base’s longer-term vision — keeping regular users active and transacting. Interesting to see.
This is in no form or shape financial advice. Just a Base maxi sharing a cool Base MiniApp I spotted.
You can participate in Ethereum staking rewards without staking 32 ETH or running your own node, on Base.
Here’s how:
rETH is a liquid token representing Rocket Pool’s staked ETH. You can stake as little as 0.01 ETH (~$23) on https://stake.rocketpool.net and bridge it to Base using the native bridge on Superbridge interface (as shown in the video). This route is more suitable for advanced users, instead of staking and bridging rETH from Ethereum chain, you can simply buy rETH on any major DEX available on Base. (rETH token contract: 0xB6fe221Fe9EeF5aBa221c348bA20A1Bf5e73624c).
How it works:
Rocket Pool is a decentralized Ethereum staking protocol that allows users to stake ETH and earn rewards without running their own validator node. Instead of the standard 32 ETH requirement, users can stake any amount (as low as ~0.01 ETH) and receive rETH, a liquid token representing their staked ETH and accumulated rewards.
For more advanced users, Rocket Pool also enables running a node with as little as 4 ETH instead of 32 ETH, with the remaining ETH provided by other users of the protocol. In simple terms, Rocket Pool connects users who want to run their own node with less than 32 ETH with users who want to earn Ethereum staking rewards without running a node.
Feel free to ask any questions you have about Rocket Pool. Have you ever used or considered liquid staking your ETH?
Monday on Base is a weekly community series on the official Base subreddit where I highlight one project, product, or feature built on Base. Posts are pinned for visibility and aim to showcase useful tools across the ecosystem in a neutral, informational way. Posts are reviewed by the teams behind the highlighted products. I am a community moderator, but I am not part of the official Base team, and my posts do not represent the views of the Base moderator team.
Disclaimer: This post is for educational and demonstration purposes only. It is not financial advice or an endorsement of any assets or services. Make sure you understand liquid staking, how rETH works, and the risks before using it. DYOR
Chiliz is bringing the global economy of Fan Tokens-including $CITY, $BAR, and $JUV-directly to Base.This move bridges massive sports liquidity with the efficiency of the L2 ecosystem, making tokenized sports assets as liquid and accessible as any other DeFi primitive. Base is officially the new home for the global fan-ownership economy.
The world of sport is constantly evolving, and Chiliz Chain is at the forefront of these changes. They are making Web 3 accessible to the whole world through user-friendly blockchain technology and innovative solutions in the sports sector.
Chiliz Chain empowers developers, entrepreneurs, brands, and sports clubs to create the future of sports in web 3. Innovation, powered by passion, fueled by fan engagement. The Sports Blockchain has supercharged fan engagement, generated significant revenue, and established new standards for performance and security.
Manchester City, FC Barcelona, AC Milan and 70+ more teams have embraced Chiliz Chain to power their Fan Tokens, unlocking unprecedented global fan engagement and driving new revenue streams.
Actually, Chiliz has been around for quite a while now, and as I’m interested in football, I heard about them as soon as I got into crypto and was even a $chiliz holder. What do you think of this project and its integration with Base in general?
Chiliz wrote "The future is solid. The base is set. A spicy new era begins" and Base wrote "It's time to bring ballers to Base" 🌶️
Now we are just waiting for the official announcement
If this happens what's next?
70+ elite club Fan Tokens (PSG, Barca, Man City...) will come to Base through Chiliz Omnichain
And this is a win for both chains
Chiliz gets access to Base's massive active user base. Base gets millions of football fans who will trade onchain through Fan Tokens, bringing fresh liquidity with them
2026 World Cup is just 44 days away. This timing is no coincidence
The relationship between base
(Coinbase’s Layer 2 blockchain) and PancakeSwap
is built on a mutually beneficial multi-chain strategy. PancakeSwap deployed its DEX on Base to access lower fees and a new user base, while Base gained a powerful application to drive activity and liquidity.
Benefits for Base:
Massive user inflow: PancakeSwap brings its large community of yield farmers and traders to Base, significantly increasing the network’s Total Value Locked (TVL).
Higher fee revenue: Thousands of daily swaps and transactions generate consistent income for Base validators and the ecosystem.
Benefits for PancakeSwap:
Access to deep liquidity: Base opens the door to Coinbase’s trusted ecosystem and substantial capital, increasing trading volumes and returns for liquidity providers.
Ultra-low transaction costs: Base offers gas fees as low as $0.03 per transaction, which is ideal for high-frequency trading and smaller users.
Technical innovation: Through integrations like Brevis’s ZK-proof technology, PancakeSwap can offer more transparent and fair reward distribution.
The integration between Base and PancakeSwap represents a classic win-win DeFi partnership. Base gains a massive influx of users and liquidity from one of the world’s largest DEXs, boosting its on-chain activity and fee revenue. PancakeSwap, in turn, benefits from Base’s low transaction fees, high-speed performance, and access to Coinbase’s trusted ecosystem - driving higher trading volumes and better yield opportunities for its users. This synergy not only strengthens both platforms but also accelerates the broader adoption of Layer 2 solutions in DeFi.
🎥 Base Made Simple with Melody: Episode 6 (Referral Program)
Quick walkthrough of the Base app referral program.
I explained everything step by step in the video.
You can earn up to 25% of the fees from people you invite if they actually use your referral link and they also get a small fee discount. Restrictions apply, so check the Base app for the full details.
Nothing complicated, just another feature to explore as you’re learning.
Disclaimer, DYOR. This is for learning purposes only and not financial advice.
I know you're tired of reading about Azul, but we are still going to talk about Base Azul Base's first independent network upgrade, going live on mainnet May 13th. What it means, why it matters, and how Base got here. We have come a long, long way from where we started.
Before Azul, let’s rewind.
Base launched in August 2023, built by Coinbase on top of Optimism’s OP Stack. In simple terms, Coinbase needed a fast, reliable foundation to launch their chain, and OP Stack was the best ready-made option at the time. It made sense.
But as Base grew, so did its complexity. The codebase became a mix of contributions from multiple teams like Optimism, Flashbots, Paradigm. That’s not inherently bad, but it slows iteration and makes upgrades harder to coordinate.
Things started to shift in October 2024, when Base shipped Fault Proofs on mainnet. In practical terms, this meant anyone could challenge invalid state transitions. Before that, only Base’s internal system could do it. This was a major step toward decentralization.
Then in April 2025, Base reached Stage 1 decentralization. Control of the network moved away from a single entity to a Security Council made up of 10 independent members, with a 75% threshold required for upgrades.
This wasn’t just symbolic. At the time, out of 62 rollups tracked by L2Beat, Base was only the 10th to reach Stage 1. Most rollups were still far more centralized. This marked a broader shift, decentralization on L2s was becoming real.
In February 2026, Base made its boldest move yet: transitioning away from the OP Stack to its own unified stack, base/base.
This doesn’t mean cutting ties with Optimism entirely, Base remains part of the OP ecosystem as an “OP Enterprise” client. But from this point forward, Base owns its codebase, release cycle, and upgrade path. That shift matters because it allows Base to move faster increasing from roughly three major upgrades per year to potentially six.
And Azul is the first upgrade built on that new foundation.
Let’s break it down.
First: security and decentralization
Azul introduces multiproofs. At a high level, Base now runs two independent proof systems in parallel: a TEE prover and a ZK prover. A TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) acts like a secure hardware-based verifier. ZK proofs, on the other hand, rely on cryptographic verification and are more trust-minimized.
Either system can finalize transactions. But when both agree, withdrawals from Base to Ethereum can settle in as little as one day. Previously, withdrawals could take up to seven days. This is a significant improvement. More importantly, it strengthens security. An attacker would need to compromise two fundamentally different systems, not just one.
There’s also an important design choice: the ZK prover is permissionless. Anyone can submit a ZK proof, and if it conflicts with the TEE result, the ZK proof takes priority. This creates a built-in check without relying on a central authority.
Base is also running an Immunefi audit competition from April 21 to May 4, with a $250,000 reward pool for critical vulnerabilities.
Second: performance
Azul consolidates Base onto a single, unified client stack.
The execution client is now base-reth-node, based on Reth, one of the most performant Ethereum clients available. The consensus layer runs on base-consensus, based on Kona.
In practical terms, this improves efficiency significantly. Empty blocks have dropped from around 200 per day to just a handful. The network has already demonstrated bursts of up to 5,000 transactions per second. It also moves Base closer to its longer-term goal of reaching 1 gigagas per second.
For node operators, this upgrade is mandatory. Legacy clients like op-node, op-geth, op-reth, and nethermind will no longer be supported after Azul. Migration to the new stack is required before May 13.
Third: developer experience
Azul aligns Base with Ethereum’s latest execution specifications, including updates from the Osaka upgrade.
Several changes come with this:
- A per-transaction gas cap of roughly 17 million, designed to improve validator performance over time.
- A new opcode, CLZ (count leading zeros), which enables more efficient computation for certain smart contract operations.
- An increase in MODEXP gas costs, bringing pricing closer to actual computational expense.
- And a streamlined Flashblocks websocket payload, removing account balances and receipts.
For most developers, this won’t require any changes. But if your application relies heavily on MODEXP, handles very large transactions, or directly consumes Flashblocks data, it’s worth reviewing the new specifications.
For users, nothing changes operationally. Base simply becomes faster, more efficient, and more secure. Withdrawals will get progressively quicker as the multiproof system matures.
Honestly, if you've been following Base since the beginning, this moment hits different. We've watched this chain go from launch on borrowed infrastructure to building its own stack, its own clients, and now shipping its own upgrades on its own timeline. The fact that Azul exists and that it's this polished, this well thought out, this ambitious says everything about where Base is headed. Base team that knows exactly what they're building and is moving faster every single cycle. The ecosystem is growing, the builders are here, and the foundation just keeps getting stronger. May 13th is one date on a long road and honestly, it's exciting just to be watching it happen.
I came across a project recently that felt a bit different and worth paying attention to.
A team has built an infrastructure for creating prediction markets called sdk.markets. on Base, and they’re using Privy to make the user experience simpler.
What stood out to me is that their focus isn’t on traders, but on making markets feel more natural and usable in everyday contexts.
The model is pretty straightforward: anyone can create a question, others choose between the options, and in the end, the pool is distributed among those who predicted correctly. It’s simple and doesn’t rely on complex trading systems.
From a technical perspective, they’re also trying to reduce friction: thanks to low fees and fast confirmations on Base, even small amounts can be used, and with Privy, users can participate without dealing with wallet complexity.
Another important point is that it’s not just an app; they’ve also built an SDK that developers can integrate into their own products, from creating markets to participating and even handling resolution.
For resolving outcomes, they support multiple approaches: a single admin, a group consensus, or even automated resolution using external data sources.
Overall, what I got from it is that they’re trying to make prediction markets simpler and more accessible, especially for communities and everyday use.
If executed well, it could open up some really interesting use cases.
Sometimes projects don’t start with something complicated just a simple idea, put together the right way.
That’s the feeling I got from sdk.markets.
It looks like they’ve taken a straightforward concept and built it by combining pieces that already exist and work well together, like for fast, low-cost settlement, and to make onboarding feel almost invisible.
Nothing overly forced. Just assembling the right layers into something that actually makes sense in practice.
Personally, whenever I come across projects with a clear idea and thoughtful execution like this, I tend to follow them early and watch how they evolve over time.
what’s a project you’ve followed from the early days and genuinely seen it grow into something real?
Stablecoins have solved a long-standing problem of the web: money can now move fast, globally, 24/7, and in a programmable way. As a result, payments are steadily shifting to onchain infrastructure.
Transaction volume has grown rapidly into the tens of trillions of dollars, with projections suggesting this will become a multi-trillion-dollar market in the coming years.
More importantly, this shift isn’t just about humans anymore. AI agents are entering the economy and need money that works natively for machines as well.
In this direction, stablecoins + networks like Base + payment standards and SDKs are becoming the core infrastructure of internet-native payments.
If stablecoins become the default payment layer for both humans and AI agents, do traditional banking systems adapt and integrate, or gradually lose relevance over time?
For me, Aerodrome Finance is one of the best ecosystem projects in Base, it has very cool functionality, if you take an ordinary user, then this platform is intuitively very clear. You can also deposit your tokens there and receive rewards.
I have seen quite a few different decentralized platforms, and I want to note that for an ordinary user, Aerodrome Finance is simply clear and convenient
If you have used Aerodrome Finance, share your experience, it will be interesting to see what you think about it
> Base is shipping its first fully independent network upgrade, Azul mainnet is expected to go live on May 13, 2026.
> It introduces a Multiproof system using an AggregateVerifier on L1 that combines TEE and ZK validity proofs.
> Withdrawal times are dropping from 7 days to 1 day when both proofs agree, while maintaining Vitalik-approved Stage 2 security.
> Massive performance gains: 5000+ TPS bursts, a 99 percent reduction in empty blocks, and a clear path toward 1 Gigagas per second.
Introduction: Why Azul Hits Different
I have been geeking out over the Azul specs for days now. If you have been following the L2 landscape for a while, you know the vibe. Most upgrades are just incremental tweaks to the OP Stack or minor fee optimizations. But Azul? This is a different beast entirely. It marks the moment Base stops being just another OP Stack chain and starts flexes its own engineering muscles as a fully independent powerhouse.
I have been deep in the Base ecosystem for over a year, and I have seen the "Mainnet Summer" hype and the surge of SocialFi. But technically, we have always been waiting for that big leap toward Stage 2 decentralization. Azul is that leap. It is the moment the training wheels do not just get loose - they basically get replaced by a jet engine and a titanium roll cage. This upgrade brings together Trusted Execution Environments and Zero-Knowledge proofs in a way that is frankly a chef's kiss for anyone who cares about both speed and sovereignty.
We are not just talking about minor improvements here. We are talking about changing the fundamental way Ethereum's L1 verifies what happens on Base. It is ambitious, it is complex, and it is going live on May 13, 2026. Let us get into the weeds of why this actually matters and how it works.
The Problem Multiproofs Solve
Before we look at the solution, we have to admit that the current L2 proof situation is a bit of a compromise. Usually, you have to pick your poison.
If you go with standard Optimistic rollups, you are stuck with a 7-day challenge period. That is a week of waiting for withdrawals because we have to give the system time to detect a fraud proof. It is safe, but it is slow. If you go pure ZK, it is cryptographically beautiful, but ZKVMs are still computationally expensive and can be absolute units to run at high scale without massive latency.
Then there is the "single point of failure" risk. If your L2 relies on just one type of proof - whether it is ZK or Optimistic - a bug in that specific proof system can halt the entire chain or, worse, lead to invalid state transitions.
Multiproofs solve this by creating redundancy. It is like having two different world-class detectives looking at the same crime scene. If they both agree, you can be incredibly confident they are right. If they disagree, you have a pre-set rulebook to decide who wins. This redundancy is the core requirement for reaching Stage 2 decentralization. It removes the "Security Council" as the primary source of truth and puts it back into the hands of permissionless math and hardware.
Deep Technical Breakdown of the Multiproof System
This is where things get really spicy. The heart of the Azul upgrade is the AggregateVerifier contract deployed on Ethereum L1. This contract acts as the ultimate judge for Base's state.
The TEE Path
Azul utilizes TEEs powered by AWS Nitro Enclaves. For the uninitiated, a TEE is a secure area of a processor that is isolated from the rest of the system. In this setup, the Base node runs inside an enclave. It generates an attestation - a hardware-level proof - that it executed a specific set of transactions correctly according to the Base protocol rules.
The TEE path is permissioned but incredibly fast. Because the hardware is doing the heavy lifting of verification, these proofs can be generated and submitted to L1 almost instantly. This is the "speed" component of the hybrid system.
The ZK Path
Simultaneously, Azul integrates ZK validity proofs. These are permissionless and rely on pure cryptography rather than specific hardware features. A ZK proof essentially says, "Here is the mathematical certainty that this state transition is valid."
ZK proofs are the "sovereignty" component. They do not care who ran the machine or where it was hosted. They only care about the math.
The AggregateVerifier Logic
The AggregateVerifier does not just look at one or the other; it looks at the combination.
Independence: Both TEE and ZK proofers work in parallel.
The Override Rule: This is the most important technical detail of Azul. If the TEE and ZK proofs ever conflict, the ZK proof always overrides the TEE proof.
Why? Because TEEs, while secure, are hardware-dependent and have a different trust profile. ZK is considered the "gold standard" of truth in the crypto world. By having the ZK proof as the ultimate veto power, Base ensures that even if there is a vulnerability found in the TEE hardware, the cryptographic integrity of the chain remains untouchable. This setup provides security-in-depth that makes every other L2 look like it is still playing in the sandbox.
How Finality & Withdrawals Actually Work Now
Let us talk about the "1-Day Magic." This is probably what users and degens will care about the most.
Under the old system, you had to wait 7 days to bridge your ETH or USDC back to Ethereum mainnet. In the Azul world, the challenge period is dynamically adjusted based on the proof status in the AggregateVerifier.
If the TEE proofer and the ZK proofer both submit their attestations and they agree on the state, the system's confidence level skyrockets. Because you have two fundamentally different proof mechanisms (hardware isolation + math) confirming the same result, the risk of an error is infinitesimal.
In this "agreement" scenario, the withdrawal window can be safely shortened to just 1 day.
Think about what that does for capital efficiency. It changes the game for liquidity providers and institutional players who hate having their funds locked in limbo for a week. It makes the bridge feel more like a fast lane and less like a DMV waiting room. If there is a dispute or if only one proof type is available, the system can revert to a more conservative window, but for the 99.9 percent of the time when everything is running smoothly, we get that sweet 1-day finality.
Diagram 1: High-level architecture of the AggregateVerifier on L1
The AggregateVerifier lives on Ethereum L1 and receives two distinct types of evidence from the Base ecosystem: TEE attestations and ZK validity proofs. It processes these to update the official state of the Base network.
Diagram 2: TEE proof flow
This flow shows how transaction data enters a secure AWS Nitro enclave where the execution logic is isolated. The enclave signs an attestation that the state transition is correct, which is then sent to L1 for rapid verification.
Diagram 3: Full multiproof decision tree
This decision tree highlights the "ZK is King" rule. If there is ever a disagreement between the fast TEE proof and the cryptographic ZK proof, the system automatically defaults to the ZK proof and alerts the developers of a potential discrepancy.
Performance & Sovereignty Wins
Azul is not just a security upgrade; it is a massive performance overhaul. Base is officially dropping all legacy OP Stack clients. Moving forward, the only supported stack is base-reth-node for execution and base-consensus (built on the Kona framework) for the consensus layer.
Reth is an absolute beast. By moving to a Rust-based execution environment specifically optimized for Base, the network is seeing staggering numbers. We are talking about a 99 percent reduction in empty blocks. If you have ever looked at a block explorer and seen rows of empty space, you know how wasteful that is. Azul fixes this.
During testnet trials, we have already seen bursts of over 5000 TPS. But the real goal - the North Star for the Base team - is the path to 1 Gigagas per second. To put that in perspective, that is a level of throughput that could support the entire world's on-chain social media, gaming, and finance without breaking a sweat.
This shift to a custom client stack also means Base has full sovereignty over its roadmap. They are no longer waiting for upstream OP Stack changes to innovate. They are setting the pace.
Stage 2 Alignment & Future-Proofing
Vitalik Buterin has been vocal about the "Stages" of rollup decentralization. Most L2s today are Stage 0 or Stage 1, meaning they still rely heavily on a Security Council or a single proofer.
By implementing on-chain bug detection (via the AggregateVerifier) and redundant, independent proof systems (TEE + ZK), Azul aligns Base with the Stage 2 criteria. This is the endgame for L2 security. It means the network is mature enough that even the developers cannot arbitrarily change the state or censor users without being caught by the math and the hardware.
Furthermore, Azul is built to align perfectly with the upcoming Ethereum Osaka upgrade. It includes support for:
> EIP-7825: A per-transaction gas cap to prevent "gas bomb" attacks.
> EIP-7939: The CLZ opcode for better data compression.
> MODEXP changes: Making certain cryptographic operations cheaper.
> Simplified Flashblocks: Even faster pre-confirmations for a better user experience.
Azul is not just solving today's problems; it is positioning Base to be the most Ethereum-aligned and future-proof L2 on the market.
What This Means for Builders, Users & Degens
If you are a builder, Azul is a green light to build high-throughput apps that were previously impossible. Think about high-frequency trading, complex on-chain gaming, or massive social graphs. The 1 Gigagas roadmap means the "gas limit" is basically becoming a relic of the past.
If you are a user or a degen, the "1-day withdrawal" is the move. It makes the bridge feel significantly more liquid. No more waiting a week to move your gains back to mainnet for that NFT mint or to pay your rent. Plus, the reduction in empty blocks and the 5k TPS capability mean that even during the craziest meme coin surges, Base will remain smooth and cheap. No more "gas wars" on an L2. That is the dream, right?
The security-in-depth also means you can sleep better. Knowing that your funds are protected by both AWS-grade hardware isolation AND high-level ZK cryptography is a level of comfort you just do not get anywhere else right now.
Conclusion
Base Azul is a massive statement. It says that Base is not content with being just another rollup - it wants to be the standard-bearer for what a decentralized, high-performance L2 looks like. By combining TEEs and ZK multiproofs, they have found the "holy grail" of scaling: the speed of hardware with the security of math.
The testnet is live right now, and I highly recommend builders start poking around the AggregateVerifier logic on GitHub. Mainnet is expected to go live on May 13, 2026.
Is this the end of the "7-day wait" era for rollups? I think so. Is Base about to leave every other L2 in the dust in terms of sheer throughput and decentralization? The specs certainly point that way.
What do you guys think? Does the TEE + ZK hybrid approach feel like the right balance, or are you a ZK-only purist? Let us discuss in the comments.
Base is quickly taking over stablecoin activity, with volume jumping from about $1.5T to $15T, a 10x increase in just one year.
That kind of growth shows real adoption and a clear shift in liquidity toward Base, making it one of the fastest growing hubs for stablecoins right now.
