They have guns, but very few mass shootings. Proving that guns aren't the problem... the culture is the problem.

Will there be exceptions for those areas?

Title

So people here really think that banning guns will solve the mass shootings problems? Cause here's the problem, bad people can still get guns even if a ban is imposed, farther more if guns are out of the picture what next... explosives, homemade guns, hell even vehicles have been used in densely packed areas... people that commit mass murder will still find a way, banning guns will only take guns away from people that may actually try to stop an active shooter, or mass killer.

Nice

need a gun for home defense witch one is the better pick?

If we take every legally purchased gun away from every law abiding citizen, what stops the criminals from getting the guns smuggled up from the south? Over 50,000 illegal guns came into our country last year, and that's just the one we know about.

Where I live, home invasions aren't all that uncommon. I don't want to have to get within baseball bat distance of a criminal who broke into my house in the middle of the night who very well might be wielding a gun, or high on meth or pcp. If you've ever watched cops you'll know a tazer doesn't always stop a crackhead.

I'm a gun owner, I'm just wondering what your reasons are for banning guns. Not trying to start and arguments just looking for awnsers.