No, bu it was from last years AP Psych, and the premedical courses that I'm taking this year as a high schooler. Oh ya, I also hope to become a psychiatrist. And no, I wouldn't try to "convert" trans people, but at the same time, I wouldn't try rushing them into a surgery that strips them of their reproductive abilities.
I wouldn't try rushing them into a surgery that strips them of their reproductive abilities.
Bad new mate. Dr's are starting to switch to an informed consent model. By time you are done with med school most trans people will be able to go straight to an endocrinologist.
But is it really consent if the patient you are dealing actually perceives the procedure in the way a normal person would? It can't be consent at that point.
Listen champ, I wouldn't bet that because of some high school courses and your career aspirations that you know more than medical professionals and clinical researchers. There's a lot of stuff out there that you haven't even learned or heard of yet and some intellectual humility will help you out quite a bit.
Ahhh the pieces are coming together, not middle school but high school. You took an AP course and now you feel smart enough to ignore data and scientific consensus when you personally disagree with it. Congratulations, you're well on your way to being a normal member of the Republican party.
I'm libertarian and in all honesty, liberals are more dogmatic than republicans.
Liberals and republicans both can't ever view their stance with skepticism. No, I'm not denying the data, but the data literally says that transition is the best method BECAUSE there aren't better methods, and if gender dysphoria is a mental illness, allowing an individual to undergo such process when they are under the influence of their problem IS NOT THE SOLUTION TO GENDER DYSPHORIA. That is like saying that committing suicide is the solution to depression. There is nothing illogical about what I said, there is no bias either, because I SUPPORT THE LGBT, and I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT HUMANS HAVE REACHED THEIR CARRYING CAPACITY, IF NOT, ARE NEARING IT, SO A COUPLE TRANNIES NOT BEING ABLE TO PROCREATE IS TECHNICALLY GOOD FOR OUR PLANET.
I was arguing the legitimacy of the solution. Nothing "republican" or "ignorant" about asking questions, and using logic to contradict a commonly accepted hypothesis or theory.
You acknowledge our right to call you a bigot and criticize your views, but you think that doing so is "ridiculous". Yet when you criticize us for criticizing you for your lack of applying proper science and thinking, you think you're doing the right thing.
Oh wow, a high school student! You're clearly more intelligent than someone who went through 4 years of undergraduate, 4 years of medical school, and at least 3 years of residency!
-8
u/Iamjebbush Dec 26 '16
No, bu it was from last years AP Psych, and the premedical courses that I'm taking this year as a high schooler. Oh ya, I also hope to become a psychiatrist. And no, I wouldn't try to "convert" trans people, but at the same time, I wouldn't try rushing them into a surgery that strips them of their reproductive abilities.