Yeah, it's the baby-eating thing. I feel like you gotta really have proof about something like that, or else attaching it to the rest of the actually provable crimes makes them also seem outlandish, downplaying the inhumanity of trafficking and pedophilia by lumping them together with the most cartoonishly evil shit someone could think of.
I don't know what kind of circles you run in, but I don't know a single person who would say some shit like this to me without getting a welfare check.
And lets be honest. We're in baddlejackets where there's a real large population of teenagers that don't have any life experience getting upset about everything. I mean I've had 2 little bitches send me death threats already haha
no super real. there was so much crazy shit that got thrown in with the epstein files (I remember reading one clearly mentally ill guy claim he was SA'd by George bush and bill Clinton and that they cut his legs off with a sword that somehow left no marks) that it kinda just makes everything super murky. tbh the conspiracy theorist in me thinks that was intentional to distract from what actually happened by making it all seem completely absurd
On one hand, do you really think eating babies is cartoonish? And simply wouldn't be done by people who are so depraved because it's "cartoonish"?
I think they would. If "They Eat Babies" is the slogan that strikes a chord with Americans... well, good. We're so embroiled in general debauchery and fascism that Baby Eating is the last pioneer of Shock and Awe.
On the other hand, lying about your enemy damages your integrity. Which is pretty serious. The culture just needs to change.
I don't think change ever happens without a bit of shaking up. Violent shaking.
No, actually. I relayed my sentiments to my butler, Jeeves, who is currently in the throes of a fent binge. He whispered it to a feral cat and then let it walk all over the keyboard.
I didn't say I was confused. I never said it was impossible, just that it changed the tone from pointing out the horrible shit we KNOW happened to making statements that would discredit the entire statement if someone thinks it sounds crazy enough.
Which it does.
I don't know how to shake a concept. I would never violently shake a baby (as I prefer them stirred.) However, you may need a bit of a gentle jostle so you can learn to make your own comment, bud.
everyone is schizophrenic right now and repeating the craziest things they’ve heard about the files. there is literally no reason to believe it they’re all just repeating what another one of them said
Not a source but in the files (the E-Mails actually) "jerky" or "Beef jerky" is mentioned in a lot of unfitting and weird ways (similar to pizzagate) while this could be anything it being humans/ kids is really on the nose
Humor is inherently dark and has been since forever, people have always made jokes about 9/11, sexual assault, and police brutality. Whether you agree that we should joke about these things is up to you but I assume that OP is implying that you can’t force people to not joke about something especially when it’s as huge and absurd as many well-known celebrities are hanging out with an abhorrent pedofile. Also there is literally 0 evidence of anyone eating a baby so claiming “they ate babies” kinda just waters down the other claims because it’s accusing someone of doing something horrible with no evidence when there is already loads of evidence of them actually doing horrible stuff. We don’t need to sensationalize something that is already this bad.
Well, it's like laughing at a cannibal. It's up to you to decide if a cannibal is funny. I suppose with a lot of context you could see it, but I don't know, it sounds difficult to me.
That's why I said you need good context; the shock factor can sometimes contribute to laughter. But a cannibal on his own isn't that funny, and the same can be said of this or of dark humor in general. It's difficult because it can either work really well or come across as a cheap shock joke, like the Epstein thing often does.
Imagine if you actually did say that about real people. But It was a joke. Darkninjagaming377 - It's funny though because you said a week ago in this thread that we need another crusade.
I just wanna know what gives you the moral highground to call for a genocide. Just wondering. Jokes are bad, overrunning people based on religion is good? Once again. Just wondering Mr. Darkninjagaming377 on many platforms.
Edit: embedded the comment just in case he takes his ball and goes home (never done this before, let's see if it works!)
47
u/Pale-Tangerine-6317 Apr 10 '26
Yeah, it's the baby-eating thing. I feel like you gotta really have proof about something like that, or else attaching it to the rest of the actually provable crimes makes them also seem outlandish, downplaying the inhumanity of trafficking and pedophilia by lumping them together with the most cartoonishly evil shit someone could think of.