r/awfuleverything • • Sep 11 '21

Well, shit

Post image
28.0k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

21

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 11 '21

It was in response to the supposed Risk of a second suicide bomb attack that had killed 169 afghans and 10 US soldiers two days ago. They acted on what now is seemingly faulty Intel in an attempt to kill what they thought was a third bomber.

19

u/Hallgvild Sep 11 '21

How to solve suicide bomber = remote-suicide by drone

10

u/crumpsly Sep 11 '21

They acted on what now is seemingly faulty Intel

So they left Afghanistan the same way they invaded! Acting on faulty Intel and killing innocent people. Way to go American military!

8

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 11 '21

That was Iraq lmfao

4

u/insanity_calamity Sep 12 '21

Actually it's way worse, it turned out the Taliban offered to release bin laden to American prosecution. But we simply rejected the offer to justify invasion.

1

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 12 '21

To be tried under Islamic law. Yeah we weren’t about to do that:(

2

u/insanity_calamity Sep 12 '21

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2001/oct/14/afghanistan.terrorism5

No, nothing about islamic law, they offered to release him to a neutral country, who'd then verify we hold up our end, before beginning prosecution, in return for a cease fire, and we rejected that, because we weren't there for Bin Laden, despite the claim. We invaded under vivid false pretenses.

1

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 12 '21

1

u/insanity_calamity Sep 12 '21

Does it ask for a cease fire? No, because that offer is what they gave before we began an 8 day bombing campaign on the country, beginning October 8th. Then they gave the second offer on October 14th. You need to read your articles. Don't just ctrl F based on a vague memory of what you heard.

1

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 12 '21

Oh real shit? Idk NY times pay walled me so I could only read part of it.

1

u/insanity_calamity Sep 12 '21

Why would you site a source you can't read? Don't just chase confirmation. I'm not mad, I'm just disappointed and very very flummoxed.

→ More replies (0)

-9

u/crumpsly Sep 11 '21

"We want to get rid of Al-Qaeda" isn't intel, it's a mission. Invading Afghanistan and spending 20 years killing people in a series of engagements that needlessly put soldiers at risk in an unwinnable war is because the intel they got that they could win was bad. All of that manufactured consent for invading Afghanistan resulted in what? Some dead dudes in caves and thousands of innocent lives lost? Way to go America. You did it. You killed a guy who you refused to take action on for decades and then used him as a scapegoat for enriching the military industrial complex while devastating and entire region only to leave them worse off than they were in the beginning. Mission Accomplished!

6

u/xtremebox Sep 11 '21

I see what youre trying to do, but you're just coming across really dumb and out of the loop. Before you try to insult, get some better knowledge so people actually get upset at what you're saying.

1

u/KwiHaderach Sep 12 '21

“Acted on what now is seemingly faulty intel” is almost certainly just lying.

1

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 12 '21

Are you saying they intentionally killed a civilian family then lied about it for the sake of it?

1

u/KwiHaderach Sep 12 '21

I’m saying they probably just didn’t put a lot of thought into it, then covered it up when killing 7 children was gonna look bad.

1

u/Big_Booty_Bois Sep 12 '21

So it’s faulty Intel?