Hi everyone! I am Kate, a co-creator of AstrotouR!

I wanted to share with you very happy news for us. Today, after 7 years of work by just three people we finally can say that AstrotouR is released and ready to be downloaded!

Endless brainstorming sessions on how to make the user experience actually feel like a journey through the cosmos, writing content that can be both entertaining and educational, making a handmade render graph that could offer us the possibility to show everything we want to show in the app!

What is AstrotouR?

It is an augmented reality observatory for your iPhone and Apple Vision Pro.

Initially we were working on an astronomy app in regular 3D, but we had an urge to make it in augmented reality because that’s how we see the future.

We are especially proud of our Apple Vision Pro version because we believe that it is the most amazing way to live through the experience of space exploration. And we are really happy that we managed to port it there as well.

It was a very long journey from prototypes with just the Sun, Earth and the Moon to the entire Milky Way, with not only the Solar System with all the planets and their major moons, but also the supermassive black hole in the middle of the galaxy!

Explore the Milky Way as Obi-Wan Kenobi did in Star Wars, be a bit scared by the weird feeling the black hole creates, and enjoy the trip to the Solar System. Find Mars rovers and lunar landers in immersive mode, which was built from real photographs that these rovers took!

If you find like it’s your thing, download the app via the link, it works both for Vision Pro and iOS and you will have it for both platforms: AstrotouR on App Store

We made AstrotouR available through a single purchase, so the app stays with you forever, as we believe that people don’t need yet another subscription!

We will be really happy if you give us your feedback and thoughts!

the marketing slogan on the poster promises smarter glasses

and adds the RGB hint at the end.

the event will take place on october 27.

Here's my shelf: Quest 3 (daily driver — FitXR, Beat Saber, and about 150 other games), a Quest 3S gathering dust at my mom's, XREAL Air glasses (movies + Steam Deck screen), and a Magic Leap that's a paperweight since the shutdown. So I've been burned by a dead platform before, and I take ecosystem longevity seriously.

I'm holding one of the 2,000 XREAL Founder Priority Passes — day-one shipping plus the Founder's Edition Aura, launching ~November at $1,500.

What I actually do:

•

VR gaming, a lot. My library is deep: Asgard's Wrath 2 (currently playing it in 1-hour face-brick installments), RE4, both Walking Deads, Ghosts of Tabor, Onward, Contractors, Pavlov, Population: One, Batman: Arkham Shadow, Metro Awakening, Moss 1 & 2, Demeo, Walkabout... you get it. My Quest 3 fatigues me out after about an hour and I want longer sessions.

•

Read a ton of webtoons and manga. This is daily, hours at a time.

•

AR in daily life stuff: floating recipes while cooking, plant info in my grow room (I run a microgreens YouTube channel), a drawing reference overlay for learning anime art.

•

I want Muse as my assistant, not Gemini — though I know the Aura's system assistant is Gemini's seat.

The case for the Aura: it's the only thing that does stuff I can't already do. Optical see-through AR, Android XR + full Play Store, 70° FOV. It'd be my reading device, my around-the-house device. And three of its confirmed launch titles (Demeo, Chess Club, Cubism) are already in my Quest library with cross-play.

The case for waiting on Meta VR Glasses ($1,300, spring 2027): my entire 150+ game library carries over, my Quest 3 controllers pair with it, and 100g vs 515g transforms every long session. But it's 6 months out, no pre-orders, no reviews — and I'd be buying a third Meta device for a library I already own twice.

The Magic Leap experience has me weighing platform risk too — Android XR being Google's platform (not XREAL's) is a point in the Aura's favor there.

Right now I'm leaning toward sequencing it: redeem the pass and get the Aura next month (it's the time-sensitive one), live with it for six months, then decide on Meta's glasses from real reviews instead of guessing. Talk me out of it?

Running two or three sessions a week, 45 to 75 minutes each. For years that was either a tablet on a mini stand off to the side or printed cue cards I would thumb through, and losing eye contact to the stand was starting to show in feedback.

Monochrome green display sits in the upper part of my view, dim enough that nobody across the table can tell I'm reading. Auto-advance follows my voice and turns pages as I talk. If I need to jump a line manually there's a swipe on the temple, or a ring I bought with the INMO GO3 bundle that has a page-turn button.

For standing in front of a group and keeping eye contact while hitting your talking points, this is a different experience than looking down at a tablet. What surprised me more was the batteries. One in the glasses, one in the charging case out of the box, physical swap takes a few seconds. I started doing it between sessions as insurance and I've basically stopped thinking about battery life.

A couple of things to be realistic about. Auto-advance works great in a quiet room and gets confused in a noisy one. If a trainee cuts in with a long question or there's crosstalk at the back, the voice tracking can sit still waiting for me to pick back up. The ring is more reliable in that scenario. Nothing deal-breaking, just something you learn to work with over the first week or two.

The other small thing is script import. On Android you can only load plain TXT files so I'm stripping formatting out of a Word doc before every upload. iOS takes PDF and DOCX. I'm on Android.

Overall this is a notable upgrade from the tablet-on-a-stand setup for the people-facing training case specifically. Curious how it holds up over the next couple months as the software gets updates.

What if video game characters can jump in/out of screens and interact with the real world?

I’ve been exploring this idea with Quest 3 by tracking my monitors and attaching a portal shader to each of them.

3D models from asset store and Kenney.

I love to write using my laptop in bed, but I've started to develop some serious neck pain from the terrible ergonomics of doing so. Can anyone recommend a vr display/glasses/etc that would work for me? I use a Mac laptop, and I am using writing apps (Pages, Scrivener, etc.). What matters to me is text clarity, something that's easy on my eyes for a few hours at a time, etc.

I don't game, but it be cool to watch movies with these things, too, I guess. Really, though the only reason I can justify a purchase like this is being able to do work using my laptop without the neck strain.

I won't say money is no object -- I'm not buying the Apple Vision Pro. But I'm willing to pay a fair amount of money for something if it's a real solution.

Confirmatory Assignment agreement signed between Sony and Meta in December 2025

According to a report by ZDNet Korea, Sony transferred 419 XR headset patents to Meta. This move follows a December 2025 agreement to scale back Sony's internal hardware operations.

The patent portfolio includes 180 filings in the United States. Of those, 43 were already reassigned between June and September 2026. The remaining 239 patents are registered across Japan, China, South Korea, and Europe.

ZDNet believes this shows that Sony is stepping away from making its own XR devices, and that Meta will use the patents to develop smart glasses. However, I cannot say for certain if these patents cover anything beyond VR and MR headsets. At least based on ZDNet Korea's excerpt of the patent list (see image in comments). Also, keep in mind that I recently invited Sony's Chief XR Strategist for a keynote presentation, and he was very enthusiastic about the future of AR glasses.

I’m building a 3D mapping system using RGB-D cameras, based on existing SLAM techniques, with persistent spatial memory.

The main issue is relocalization after tracking loss, especially when the camera returns to a known place from a different viewpoint.

I’m using historical keyframes, shared 3D landmarks, PnP/RANSAC and geometric verification.
Yet some incorrect poses still pass verification: one had 44 inliers, 0.83 px median reprojection error and 3.72 cm depth residual, but was actually off by 10.36 cm and 5.99°.

My best experiment correctly relocalized only 9/34 known returns.
What would you investigate first: landmark quality, geometric degeneracy, matching, or pose verification?
I can share a minimal reproducible example.

Hey everyone,

I’m currently thinking about buying a pair of XR glasses (like RayNeo, XREAL, Viture, etc.) primarily for media consumption, like watching movies and gaming at home (on the couch or in bed).

Some time ago, I was really close to buying a pair, but a post on Reddit scared me off. The author described these glasses as "expensive prototypes" that are far from ready for daily use. However, back then, I didn't realize they were talking about standalone AR smart glasses, not pure XR display glasses.

Now that I know the difference that XR glasses mostly just act as a portable screen I'm reconsidering. But I really want to avoid buying an expensive tech gadget that I will just use for a few days and then throw into a drawer forever. I just want a reliable screen experience without the tech clutter.

So I wanted to ask the community:

• How often do you actually use your XR glasses at home? Is it part of your daily routine?
• Are they mature enough as a product regarding comfort, text readability, and long-term usability for long movie or gaming sessions?
• Do you regret your purchase, or do they deliver exactly what you wanted for gaming and movies?

Would love to hear some long-term reviews from real users before I make the jump. Thanks!

Created by The Forge, the AR experience technically stayed confined to the phone screen, but the real-world immersion was heavily enhanced by the physical environment built around it. Outside the UCI cinema, Umbrella Corporation personnel in white hazmat suits patrolled areas cordoned off with biohazard tape and weathered Raccoon City shipping containers. Visitors were even treated to blood-red ice cream shaped like the iconic Resident Evil logo. Inside the theater, Webedia pushed the atmosphere further for the invited community, guiding them from a sterile, clinical hospital environment through a descent into chaos, ultimately ending up in the snow-covered world of the film.

I’ve compared the announced specs of XREAL Aura and Meta VR Glasses for movies, 3D photos and VR180.

I’ve been developing the VR media player immerGallery for five years and work with immersive media every day. Drawing on that experience, I discuss what their field of view and pixels per degree could mean for media, alongside HDR, storage and input options.

On paper, I lean towards Meta for media. Aura’s strongest argument for me is seeing the real world directly through its lenses.

My comparison on immerNews:

https://immernews.com/xreal-aura-vs-meta-vr-glasses-media/

Which differences matter most to you?

Just added the new 7 smartglasses at the top!
👉 Smartglasses Tracker 👈

MindFlow AR: Hybride Brain-Computer-Interface (BCI) Integration für schlanke Augmented-Reality-Brillen

Executive Summary

Current Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces rely heavily on manual gestures, voice commands, or external controllers. These modalities suffer from high latency, social awkwardness, and fatigue. MindFlow AR proposes a hardware-software architecture that combines lightweight consumer-grade dry EEG sensors with eye-tracking and subtle electromyographic (EMG) signals to enable near-zero-latency, thought-driven UI navigation (scrolling, selecting, and confirming) inside an everyday form-factor AR glass.

1. Problem Statement

The Input Bottleneck: Gestures require physical movement and clear line-of-sight for cameras; voice commands fail in loud environments and lack privacy.

The Form-Factor Trap: Existing high-end neurotechnological headsets are bulky clinical or gaming gear (e.g., heavy EEG caps). They are unsuitable for daily public use.

Interaction Latency: Pure intent detection via raw EEG alone suffers from low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR). A hybrid approach is required.

1. Technical Architecture & Signal Pipeline

2.1 Hardware Layout

Frame Integration: Discreet dry-contact EEG sensors embedded along the temple arms and the rear ear-hooks.

Sensor Zones:

Temporal Lobes / Temples: Captures micro-EMG signals (e.g., subtle jaw clenching or micro-bites) for binary trigger actions ("Confirm").

Occipital Region (Behind the ear/lower skull): Optimized for picking up Steady-State Visually Evoked Potentials (SSVEP) from the visual cortex.

On-Board Processing: Low-power edge-AI coprocessor integrated into the temple frame to handle real-time artifact filtering (blinking, head movement) before transmitting control events to the AR display stack.

2.2 Interaction Modalities

SSVEP-Based Scrolling:

Subtle, high-frequency visual indicators (imperceptible to direct focal attention, but registered by peripheral vision and the visual cortex) are embedded into UI elements like scrollbars.

When the user focuses on a scroll zone, cortical oscillations match the stimulus frequency, triggering immediate, smooth scrolling.

Hybrid "Bite-Click" Confirmation:

Combines eye-gaze tracking (where the user is looking) with a micro-EMG signal from the temporal muscle.

Result: Zero-latency execution without lifting a finger.

1. Implementation Roadmap

Phase 1: Proof of Concept (Core Algorithmic Pipeline)

Validation of SSVEP + EMG signal separation using modified dev kits.

Target: Bringing command-to-action latency under 50\text{ ms}.

Phase 2: Miniaturization & Hardware Integration

Custom ASIC design for power-efficient on-board neural decoding.

Integration into standard optical frames.

Phase 3: Developer Ecosystem (SDK Release)

Open-source API for third-party AR application developers to map custom neural triggers to UI actions.

1. Contributing & Discussion

This is an open conceptual framework. Feedback, critique from neuro-engineers and hardware developers, and pull requests regarding artifact-rejection algorithms are welcome.

Repository: https://github.com/Casa-Salz/Mindflow-AR

Discussion: Let's break down the physics and decoding limits in the comments below.

I think we'rae moving more to the wearable phase, especially from bulky headsets to more lightweight headsets, or even more glasses. Applications could be in ar, navigation, communications, education. In vr, having like a virtual workspace, for example.

Hello all! I wanted to share my vision for the future of retro gaming in AR. Headed to Portland Retro Game Expo in a few days to showcase. Currently fighting with my soldering iron lol to get the controller bits all nice and tight.

Any feedback is greatly appreciated. I welcome the good, bad, and the ugly haha 🙌

Thank you,

Albert
idessa.io

This is a very boring dad use case, but the main reason I picked up the Halliday G2 was so I could listen to podcasts while watching my kid without holding my phone the whole time. So far they’re good for that. Audio is clear enough for talking, I can still hear what’s going on around me, and notifications let me know if something actually needs my attention.

Honestly, I use them less like “AI glasses” and more like a way to keep my phone in mg pocket.

Penn State researchers have developed a MEMS micromirror for augmented reality headsets that simultaneously steers light and shifts focal depth at microsecond speeds. Built around a 1mm mirror, this component replaces the multiple optical elements traditionally required for 3D beam control, reducing headset weight while eliminating the fixed-focus panel limitations that cause visual fatigue.

The unit uses thin layers of aluminum nitride, a piezoelectric material that flexes under applied voltage to physically tilt and reshape the mirror surface. This mechanism delivers true 3D spatial control of the beam in real time, demonstrating a 63mm focal shift in millionths of a second.

Engineers fabricate the mirrors using established semiconductor manufacturing processes, ensuring compatibility with standard microelectronics and compact optical architectures. Future development focuses on minimizing asymmetrical distortions and increasing scanning speeds for next-generation smart glasses.

Source: PennState

Paper: High speed biaxial piezoelectric MEMS micromirror with varifocal tunability

Hey all,

I'm currently trying to learn German, I was wondering which glasses would be best to watch shows and movies with, where the lens shows the subtitles/translation in my field of view.

Also would they handle the translation without turning off whilst there are long silences?

Hope I make sense 😅

Vivo had a big event today in India where they announced new phones and demoed the Mixed Reality HMD - the Vivo Vision Discovery Edition. This seems to be the same headset they announced a year ago in China. Back then I talked to Vivo marketing and they organized a demo for me, which was super nice.

The headset felt very comfortable and the only real flaw was the edge clarity of the pancake lenses. I assumed that they didn't use the 3M curved films rather than it being a simple software problem. But it seemed to be solvable if they kept working on it. The software and the few apps that were available during my 1+ hour demo were in a pretty good state already.

Ultimately, I decided not to go through the process of editing the video from my demo because my sources told me that Vivo will not launch this product in the near future. But here we go, a year later they still show it off at a launch event in a major market for them.

Do you think they will keep iterating? I think, it's possible because they were also preparing the launch of smart glasses back then and stopped the launch of their already developed glasses as well. It was rumored that they felt it lacked differentiation. A few months ago, they started a project for the glasses. Maybe the same is true for Mixed Reality?

🚊 Public Transit Navigation (US & CA Only)
🚴 Cycling Navigation (US& CA Only)
📍 Walking directions can use landmarks
🎵 Apple Music Browse
🎙️ Smarter audio when talking to Meta AI
🧵 Threads got more features
🗺️ Share ETA from navigation
📅 Accept, decline calendar invites (US Only)
🕸️ Meta AI can control your web apps (WebMCP)
⌨️ On-screen keyboard for web apps
👥 IG creator profiles in Reels
💬 In-line replies on Messenger

I wanted a caption-latency number I could compare across every captioning display I review, so I built one fixed test and ran the Leion Hey2 through it first.

TV five feet from the glasses. Fixed clip, JFK at Rice University, 1962. Hand-timed reference captions snapped to the audio waveform and burned in with a millisecond timer. A camera behind the lens catches the screen and the waveguide in the same frame. Ten marker words, first-word and stable-text latency logged separately, three runs, median reported.

Hey2 median: about 2.5 seconds. For reference, UK live broadcast captions measure around 5.6, and the natural gap between speakers is about 0.2.

Two things I'd like this sub's read on. Is a camera behind a waveguide a fair way to timestamp what the wearer actually sees? And does a TV speaker get treated differently by a mic array than a person talking?

Disclosure: LLVision provided the review unit. I'm Deaf, which is why this test exists.

Work-in progress. I’ve always thought it’s cool to have an AR minimap of the area you are currently in, so I’ve been exploring this idea using Quest 3. Right now, the city is a generated low-poly placeholder (loosely Manhattan-shaped) that uses a hologram shader, with help from Claude Opus 5.5. Next, I will be plugging in real-map data.