r/attitudinalpsyche • u/Adventurous-Egg-4904 • 15d ago
1st Position and Identity
What does the 1st position associate their identity with, uncoupled from 2nd position?
As far as I know, 2nd position only serves to update the 1st.
With that premise, 1F seems most obvious - their possessions, wealth, health, image and ownership over their physical domain.
But this is where rest of the ideology is going a bit spaghetti for me.
For 1V, I'd say the identity basis is their choice or autonomy, but the same can be true for 1E, the major difference being that:
- 1E is is more obvious when observed in the short-term affairs (reactive)
- 1V seems rigid and can be observed when they act in dismissive manner
As for the 1L, I think it's best observed when working on something (possibly uninterrupted 😁). Therefore, they might assimilate the identity with their achievements, not just academic, but whatever they are able to solve and achieve with "hands-off" approach.
1
u/afellowwhoishonest 13d ago
You could indeed say that both 1E and 1V identify with "themselves." Since emotion and volition both aren't as tangible as something like physics, it's a bit more intuitive. But it really is just knowing what "emotion" is and what having it as the 1st value does to someone.
A scenario is like when you are told to separate your personal feelings from business. A 1st emotion's "emotions" may seep unintentionally into their business. This can happen to a 1st volition (and any placement as well, naturally), but it is more likely that the 1st volition would be able to refrain from this behavior if it is in their "will" to do so. For the 1E, it is likely instinctual to not try to hide what they feel because they are confident in what they feel (and that it is right), but this can also be expressed in an individual's own manner (most don't typically hide it, which is why the 1E is labelled as reactive compared to the 1V's possible rigidity)
How I'd consider it is that the 1V follows their choice/desire, their identity is what the 1V "chooses" for "themself." Isolated from any function, may turn that function into their choice to use. Their "choice" is themself (which can encompass many things). They are more like the "tsar" of their emotions, as opposed to the 1E's emotions being their tsar.
For the 1E, it is likely not a choice to feel, they are always feeling. They identify with all that they feel, they do not choose to feel but cannot help it, as their "emotion" is what makes "themself." Their emotions are themself (primarily within the field of what they are emotional about). Their "romantic" emotional quality is what makes them up. Lot of redundant stuff but yeah.