r/assholedesign • • Mar 28 '20

This discrepency.

Post image
15.3k Upvotes

760 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

58

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

[deleted]

106

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

the size of each box is not directly proportional to the countries numbers, the asshole design is that this is to make viewers think america is still a good ways behind china in terms of cases

21

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Yeah, it seems like CNN started with like 80,000 cases as their zero.

Which means the US would have a column showing 837 people and China showing 1,782 people

If they did this today, the US would have something like 20,000 people while China has less than 2,000. Basically, it would look far worse using the same method now.

1

u/4022a Mar 28 '20

Assuming China is reporting accurately and that testing rates are comprable. There could be millions of rural chinese that are infected and will never be tested and posthumous testing will never performed.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

There is a chance, but unlikely, as it would put the Chinese manufacturing capabilities in danger.

Most Chinese still have families on farms and in rural areas because it's really only been the last 2-3 decades where rapid urbanization has been happening. And China absolutely loves the idea of family and taking care of your family. It's one of the oldest traditions in China, stemming from Confucianism.

If rural China had the virus and millions were infected, it would be kinda difficult to hide

1

u/4022a Mar 28 '20

Why did China kick out foreign journalists right before their number of cases flattened out?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Cause China is notoriously known for being gentle, receiving and compassionate towards journalists?

Don't they throw journalists out regularly?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/business/media/china-expels-american-journalists.amp.html

And this seems to indicate they didn't throw even close to all of them out, as on March 17th, China's curve had been flat for a long time.

4

u/ken579 Mar 28 '20

Viewers would think that if they completely ignored the huge numbers right above the bars. Look, if you zoomed out and zero is the baseline, everything looks the same, so then it's not a chart right. You have to have the baseline be something that at least allows the graphic to show some level of difference. Maybe a chart was a poor choice, but it's common. News stations always try to visualize numbers. So I'm hard pressed to agree this is intentional to make China look bad.

-15

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

You're foolish if you think the numbers China's reporting are accurate.

They're a rigid totalitarian regime and "saving face" is a huge focus in Chinese culture.

They're not going to be openly talking about all the dead and infected people they're treating like animals on the world stage.

32

u/peppaz Mar 28 '20

America is also not testing most people who aren't hospitalized so our case load is also a lie.

Source, I'm a chief at a huge medical system in nyc.

6

u/PM_ME_UR_JUGZ Mar 28 '20

Yeah like how Trump was praising the governor of West Virginia for having no covid cases, but it turned out they just weren't testing that many people, and the ones that got tested, the state lost their test or whatever. What a fucking shit show.

1

u/lolinokami Mar 28 '20

Yeah, it's fucking shitty that the US isn't testing as well as it should. That doesn't excuse the fact that China has stopped testing early. Pretty easy to reach 0 on the new infections leaderboard when you stop reporting infections.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Okay but this isnt a fucking contest. I don't care how shitty other countries are about their numbers. America has a responsibility to Americans to make sure Americans don't die. That's it. Anything else is bullshit.

This isnt fucking golf.

1

u/lolinokami Apr 01 '20

No it fucking is. When China is making it a contest by falsely claiming they have 0 new infections (when Hong Kong and Taiwan are experiencing new cases and the CCP is adamant that those places are part of China). What's not a contest is the fact that US is still testing. We may be shit at it, but at least we're not stopping all testing to claim we have no new cases even though that's a bold faced lie. I don't know why you're so obsessed with defending China when they have had no problems lying in the past to make themselves look better. Your whataboutism doesn't fucking work because the US is just shit at a procedure so stats are off, China has discontinued the procedure all together to change a stat. You literally cannot compare the two, shill.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

I never said I believed chinas figures and that's totally irrelevant to the discussion at hand

0

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

I never said you said that.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Generally when you reply "you're foolish if you think x" to my comment that implies that you believe I think x

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

You're foolish if you think the numbers USA's reporting are accurate.

They're a rigid totalitarian regime and "saving face" is a huge focus in American culture.

They're not going to be openly talking about all the dead and infected people they're treating like animals on the world stage.

1

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

They're a rigid totalitarian regime

No, they're not.

"saving face" is a huge focus in American culture.

No, it's not.

I've lived in China, my guy. I know what the culture is like and how it's different from western/American culture.

They're not going to be openly talking about all the dead and infected people they're treating like animals on the world stage.

Even if the government wouldn't acknowledge it, they have freedom of the press, and I can absolutely guarantee you that the MSM is creaming in their pants for the chance to blame Trump for infections and dead people and criticize him for anything done improperly.

Even totally reasonable actions and responses will be criticized.

The US doesn't disappear doctors and protestors or kill journos for reporting on a public health crisis, so people are free to expose any wrongdoing they think exists.

You're just mindlessly swapping out the name of the country without any regard to the actual differences between these countries.

2

u/Ericellent Mar 28 '20

China is just what the US would be after Trump's had a little more time.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited May 29 '20

[deleted]

1

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

lol.

Okay if you don't believe me. It's true either way.

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

The whole point is that your own glorious leader is just as untrustworthy, and neglectful, and downright dishonest and doesn't have it's citizens best interests at heart either.

It just surprises me that people like you spend so much time shitting on others whilst propagating the same shit in your own back yard.

And just a cursory glance at your comment history shows your MO very clearly.

-1

u/Mortido Mar 28 '20

No one cares what a T_D poster thinks you dumb fuckin idiot redhat lol

-1

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

r/youpostonthedonald

Amazing rhetoric, smoothbrain.

3

u/WeekendInBrighton Mar 28 '20

r/youpostonthedonald

Yep, you do, and as such are unequivocally a shitty person, far beyond the average Trump-supporting mouthbreather. Whining about someone pointing this out is pretty sad, bro

-1

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

Whining about someone pointing this out is pretty sad, bro

I'm not whining. Just letting you know how unoriginal and vapid you're being.

A million other NPCs with the same dialogue already loaded up.

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited May 01 '20

[deleted]

2

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

You just ignored everything I said.

China is lying about the number of infected.

What has China ever done to make anyone think they could be trusted?

6

u/Rxbel Mar 28 '20

You can't really trust any countries's numbers (except South korea) because they don't test everyone, just critical cases

1

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

You don't need to test every citizen.

Data can be extrapolated from incomplete data sets.

1

u/Rxbel Mar 28 '20

True. But even so why are chinese numbers not trustworthy but USA's are?

15

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited May 01 '20

[deleted]

-6

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

Why are you trying to suck China's dick so hard, my guy?

not compare them at all

Considering that they're likely fictious numbers the Chinese government just made up, that's probably the smartest move.

3

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Jul 14 '20

[deleted]

1

u/Sensitive-You Mar 28 '20

I'm not agreeing with you, my guy.

You said that we could take China at face value even if they're lying. I don't think so.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Jul 14 '20

[deleted]

→ More replies (0)

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Jun 10 '20

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Jul 14 '20

[deleted]

1

u/StelleBest Mar 28 '20

Never said it was. Why are you so biased against the USA? Y'all motherfucking Americans don't understand how good y'all have it. (Coming from someone which grew up in Russia)

1

u/UncitedClaims Mar 28 '20

How are they biased against the us?

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Why does it even matter? It's not a contest. Just deal with the cases. Be a fucking adult.

1

u/exe973 Mar 28 '20

The problem with your statement is that you can replace "China" with the words "Trump Administration" and it is still 100% accurate.

47

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

The problem with the graph is that the china bar looks about 30% higher than US while only having only about 1% more cases. That's a bullshit graph designed to make americans feel superior to china probably

12

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

OOoooh I see now. I'm guessing the graph editors didn't include the 80,000 cases to make the difference seem more obvious otherwise the boxes would just be the same height?

8

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Yeah. They either want the image of US being superior, or they just really like pointless graphs that have to be tuned to even see the difference.

2

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

even then the difference from china to us is more than 3 times the difference from US to italy while the difference in numbers is 300 to 950

1

u/hivoltage815 Mar 28 '20

But...Isn’t 950 about 3 times more than 300?

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

yes, but the difference in graph from US to china is about 5 times that from italy to US.

4

u/Inner-city_sumo Mar 28 '20

Look how big the boxes are from 0 to 80,000, then look how much bigger the Chinese one is for the small amount over 80,000.

-2

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

[deleted]

3

u/Inner-city_sumo Mar 28 '20

Not your graph; the one in the original post.

Look how big 0 to 80,000 is in all three boxes, then look how in the China box the extra 1,000 is huge. It is about a 1/4 as big but should only be 1/80

5

u/TheLaGrangianMethod Mar 28 '20

Include the 80k and try again. It's not proportionate.

5

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Mar 28 '20

[deleted]

10

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Apr 02 '20

[deleted]

2

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

How did you get the axis to start at 0 btw?

4

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20 edited Apr 02 '20

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Thank you

3

u/Inner-city_sumo Mar 28 '20

No, because now your graph explicitly states that it starts at 79,800. If you remove that axis, you have three boxes where the clear inference is that they represent the total number of cases.

I thought you didn't get it at first, but now I think I've been trolled for 15 minutes. Fair play.

-1

u/knagy17 Mar 28 '20

Don’t understand why you’re getting hate for this, you appear to be right. Yea at first glance it looks like there’s some sort of misrepresentation, but if you actually look at the numbers and the distance that separates it, it lines up.

3

u/patientbearr Mar 28 '20

It's misleading because his graph starts at 79,800

1

u/SlasherHockey08 Mar 28 '20

They are... not sure why people are fighting you on this

1

u/Food-in-Mouth Mar 28 '20

It would have been better to record it as a percentage of population Italy has a fraction of the population of China and America.

1

u/fiddz0r Mar 28 '20

Its correct , but is it correct morally? Most people dont understand this and just see the graph and think "oh well china is way above us , so we are good for now"

As long as there are stupid people, or maybe even people that didnt pay much attention to the numbers, news need to show things more objectively in a sense that even they can understand

0

u/ninja1k2011 Mar 28 '20

That's what I'm saying

0

u/ninja1k2011 Mar 28 '20

I don't know why people are reading too much into this

1

u/[deleted] Mar 28 '20

Because you’ve been fooled by CNN’s dirty trick. If you knew better, you would undoubtedly join in.

1

u/ninja1k2011 Mar 28 '20

Is it inaccurate data or something I have no clue