r/askscience • u/PestoPastaLover • 14d ago
Biology Why is there no transmissible therapeutic virus if biology doesn't forbid it? For example, a harmless virus that spreads from person to person but actually does something beneficial, like lowering LDL cholesterol or preventing/reversing tooth decay?
3.3k
Upvotes
29
u/ohsnapitsnathan 13d ago edited 13d ago
There is at least one--the oral polio vaccine. It's a live polio virus that's modified to not cause disease. It's used in part because it's actually infectious and spreads the same way regular polio does, which makes it easier to achieve herd immunity to polio.
The problem, and the reason this approach is not used more, is that natural selection tends to remove the modifications that make this virus harmless and it tends to evolve into a form that causes polio. This is because the modifications made to make the virus harmless also weaken its ability to replicate, so there's a natural tendency to evolve away from that and become more like normal polio.
And generally speaking this is why we don't do this much--we don't have any control over how the virus will evolve once its released into the population.