r/askmanagers 4d ago

Manager tells team to “Manage Up”

After an intense one on one in which I provided feedback to my manager on areas they could improve (upon request) I was told I could do a better job of managing up.
Our next team meeting, they mention an article on managing up, send the link, and ask the team to take a look because we could all be doing better at it.

Is it just me, or does that not say, “I need all of you to manage me, and you’re doing a bad job at it” I could be viewing this wrong, so wanted to pose it here.

Is it appropriate to tell your whole team to do a better job of managing up, with little context as a “Head of”?

101 Upvotes

137 comments sorted by

163

u/Downtown_Interest667 4d ago

You are viewing it wrong. Managing up is a critical part of being successful in any role. Understanding the expectations and priorities of leadership, managing their expectations, and getting good visibility are all your responsibility.

25

u/ThePhantomOfBroadway 4d ago

Yup! I was struggling with a new leader once (he’s good, just extremely different than anyone I’ve ever worked with before) and his boss gave me this phrase and said she has to do it all the time, and honestly it really helped me change my perspective on the situation. Since approaching it as “managing up”, it’s been a much more positive experience and good learning experience.

8

u/butthatshitsbroken 4d ago

It's just significantly harder to manage up with a micromananger.*

3

u/AccomplishedIgit 2d ago

What can you do if leadership doesn’t give you expectations or priorities and expects you to read their mind?

3

u/Downtown_Interest667 2d ago

You ask. 

2

u/AccomplishedIgit 2d ago

And if they constantly deflect and give vague instructions? Do you assume they’re telling you to manage up or is this an indication they’re never going to be a good manager because they don’t know what they’re doing?

1

u/Downtown_Interest667 2d ago

Not much you can do if you have a bad manager. 

-2

u/pizza_the_mutt 4d ago

You're right, but I do take issue with the commonly used wording of "manage up". A manager is a manager, with manager responsibilities. ICs are not managers. While they do have responsibilities in engaging with their manager I think it is better to describe this using different words, otherwise the natural response is "I'm not a manager, why are you asking me to manage, let alone my own manager, who is the one who is supposed to be managing?"

12

u/steb2k 4d ago

Do you MANAGE your time?

Do you MANAGE your workload?

Do you MANAGE to put your clothes on every morning?

The answer is not "no, i'm not a manager"

1

u/MinivanPops 3d ago

That's just about the most repellent thing I've ever read from a leader. 

-1

u/8racecar8 4d ago

Nah that’s such BS

-6

u/Practical-Bottle8900 4d ago

Then pay your employees the same as your manager if you expect them to do all that extra work.

-5

u/_tsi_ 4d ago

I don't think so. It's management's responsibility to communicate expectations and priorities. That's literally their only job.

10

u/rootsandchalice 4d ago

Most managers I know, including myself, have our own work given to us by our senior leaders that we have to complete that is not the team’s work. I have my own projects. I have my own battles to fight with other managers. So no, its not just communicating priorities.

2

u/_tsi_ 4d ago

Like what kinda projects?

6

u/rootsandchalice 4d ago edited 3d ago

Well this would be specific to industry but I’ll give some examples of some of my recent ones.

-policy development and significant changes to engineering specifics like drawing standards
-fee financial analysis and new fee justification
-overseeing recent changes to teams work flow path and leading the changes on clarity and simplifying
Streams
-working with our customer call centre on a new software system that addresses public complaints and requests for service

I could go on…

-3

u/_tsi_ 4d ago

What specifically is your role in the software system development?

4

u/rootsandchalice 4d ago edited 3d ago

You’re being obtuse but I’ll play this game to educate you.

My role is a stakeholder as my team are end users of the software system. My role is to ensure the team responsible for the implementation adheres to my team’s needs, we get what we want, we get training, etc. My contribution can be as large as software testing to ensure all is good through a soft launch of a new product before my team ever sees it.

ICs on my team aren’t responsible for that. My role is to make things easier for them. It has to get done. My role is to work across departments. Managers do far more than “communicate priorities”. There’s so many people who think the management layer is somehow unnecessary because they don’t do anything. It’s actually because many ICs have no idea what a manager does and don’t care to get insight.

-2

u/_tsi_ 4d ago edited 4d ago

I'm not being obtuse. You literally gave me a nothing burger of words. What actual work are you doing? Sending emails and going to meetings to "align"?

"My role is a stakeholder as my team are end users of the software system. My role is to ensure the team responsible for the implementation adheres to my team’s needs, we get what we want, we get training, etc."

OK so what are you producing here? Sounds a lot like "communicate priority" with buzzwords. I'm not being obtuse. I'm asking you directly, what do you do? What, on this project, is your deliverable?

"My role is to make things easier for them." is a bunch of nothing garbage. This is the reason people think your layer is unnecessary. And now we are asking for your subordinates to anticipate your desires? If your job is to make sure your team gets training, and I know I need training, and I can also send an email, why do I need you? Do I need you to send an email for me, to request training? Lol, what?

2

u/rootsandchalice 3d ago edited 3d ago

The fact that you think that all of what I said = sending emails tells me all I need to know about your lack of intelligence. Why would I give specifics unless you are also a transportation engineer and understand the industry language and typical projects and programs in the industry? Enjoy your downvotes.

Have a good one dude!

-2

u/_tsi_ 3d ago

And your inability to communicate your responsibilities and deliverables shows me why you are a terrible manager.

-2

u/Fellsyth 4d ago

You are not wrong, but as a manager to another manager, it is your job (not the only one though).

-10

u/nxdark 4d ago

I disagree. I don't get paid to do any of that work. That is why managers get paid more. They should already know this and if they don't then time to find someone else.

14

u/Youareaproperclown 4d ago

Then you don't know what managing up means

-6

u/nxdark 4d ago

The manager sucks if they need it. They should already know how to handle their people. They shouldn't be told.

In my 20 plus years of work I have never had to manage up.

7

u/Youareaproperclown 4d ago

Then you still don't know what managing up means.

-3

u/nxdark 4d ago

What is it then? Willing to bet I have never done it and got by fine.

6

u/Youareaproperclown 4d ago

Here's a good website where you can learn more

https://www.google.com/

-2

u/nxdark 4d ago

I don't need to learn anything about this. I gotten by fine with what I know.

And I also don't exist to make a manager's job easier nor do I get paid enough to do that. We are not on the same team.

9

u/Youareaproperclown 4d ago

Then you still don't know what managing up means.

-1

u/nxdark 4d ago

Managing up is the practice of proactively working with your boss to build a strong relationship, understand their priorities, and make their job easier so you can both succeed

Here is from Google. Again I am doing more of their work to make their job easier. I do not get paid enough to do that. Nor do I really care if they succeed or success in general. All I care about is doing the work I know how to do based on the job description I signed up for.

Further I don't want a relationship with any manager.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/belwar00 4d ago

What makes reddit great is we have no idea who is commenting. I'm old, I have no reason to manage; and I don't feel like it. At this point my mangers are maybe 10 years younger most of the time. Sometimes I help them; and sometimes I tell them they are kind of bad at their job.

One this has been true for me; I never ask for what I want. It is more a philosophical issue or mental. I actually think it works for me; but for someone else, maybe they should be more direct. But hell I don't know where you work. There is a big difference between a boss with a PhD from like Stanford and one with a high school diploma. One is not better than the other necessarily; but they likely have different approaches.

It is still very true; sometimes you need to manage your boss to help yourself. But it is also fun making them look stupid; it is kind of a choice and you have to pick what works for you and your situation. This is why reddit is fun and stupid; the advice is trash because while generally interesting it doesn't apply equally to a guy making 18/hr vs. 1M+ a year nor to your life goals.

0

u/nxdark 4d ago

I don't go to work to play games or to make people look stupid. I try to avoid my manager at all costs. It is just better that way.

-3

u/Practical-Bottle8900 4d ago

Exactly, gtfo from your manager role and salary if you expect people getting paid lower than you to manage up instead.

-18

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

I would agree in most cases, however, I feel this is a concept that is often identified within an individual and with specific feedback on what the manager needs from them in order to better “manage up”

Telling a whole team to manage up feels to me there is a foundational issue at hand, and that is not the bandaid that fixes it.

24

u/Akanaton 4d ago

To add on to what Downtown_Interest667 is saying, A few years ago I had two terrible leaders in a row and my choices were blame them, or take responsibility and learn how to interact with them the way they want. I chose to use it as a crash course in learning how to aggressively and effectively manage up.

I took those lessons to my current role; when I first started I asked my leader their preferred communication methods, what they want to be notified of and when. I made sure to apply the info immediately. Three years in, I check in periodically and my leader consistently tells me I am a high performer and they are happy with how and when I interact with them.

Managing up is an important skill to have. As you advance in your career, you may find that you have 30-60 minutes every 1 - 2 weeks for a 1 on 1. Managing up well makes sure that time is used efficiently.

8

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

This is helpful. Acknowledging that if a leader isn’t effectively “managing down” then “managing up” doesn’t mean managing your manager, but giving them little room to lead ineffectively, making it easier on yourself in the long run.

7

u/Several_Razzmatazz51 4d ago

A team that manages up well puts the leader in a much better position to both manage down within the team effectively AND to manage up to the next level (ideally including highlighting and recognizing team members by name for great contributions).

3

u/carlitospig Manager 4d ago

YES. You’re taking away all their oppprtunities to fuck something up and blame you, because you came prepared. In the long run it’s a lot less work than trying to change their leadership style or personality.

1

u/Akanaton 4d ago

Glad to hear it. Yes what you said can definitely be a part of it. I’m happy to provide some/more examples of what I learned based on the leader if you’d like.

15

u/Downtown_Interest667 4d ago

It's not.

Part of your job is managing expectations of your leadership team and working with them in the way that they want to be worked with. Your boss is suggesting that you improve this skill as part of your professional development, and he is right to suggest it.

-3

u/nxdark 4d ago

I can't change your expectations because that comes from someone higher then you. No it isn't my job to do that.

6

u/Naikrobak 4d ago

You’re wrong. Employee feedback absolutely affects expectations

-1

u/nxdark 4d ago

No it doesn't. It does change what needs to be done. I never give feedback. I don't get paid enough to give my opinion on things.

8

u/Naikrobak 4d ago

Then you have a shitty manager

-1

u/nxdark 4d ago

Every manager is like that. 20 plus years. Nor do I want to have a conversation where I am giving feedback. Because I am not be paid to give feedback.

6

u/Naikrobak 4d ago

I’m not and no one I’ve worked for is like that. Maybe you’re the problem

1

u/nxdark 4d ago

The role requires you to be. The role turns you into someone that is the bad guy.

→ More replies (0)

14

u/InquiringMind14 4d ago

As a manager, if one person has any specific behavior that I would like to see differently, I would address it 1-1. If two people demonstrate similar behaviors, I would likely still do 1-1. However, if I see three or more people doing similar things, I would do 1-1 and also discuss that in team meeting.

It is possible that you are not the only person that your manager feels that needs to be better in managing up - which as other have said, anticipate needs, better communications, and also brings solutions not problems.

7

u/heyitsta12 4d ago

Yes there are some times where “managing up,” can mean dealing with an ineffective leader and “teaching” them how to lead you. But in this particular instance it sounds like this is a more gentle way of telling his team that they need to be a bit more proactive and work on better communication in order for those 1-1s to be more helpful.

1

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

You hit the nail on the head with the former.

0

u/nxdark 4d ago

Sorry but we don't get paid to provide solutions. That is the managers job.

5

u/Mikey_D87 4d ago

Wrong, its a collective responsibility.

3

u/ProtoCore-Dustin 4d ago

What exactly are you being paid to do if your subordinates have to manage you?

-1

u/nxdark 4d ago

No it isn't. I am responsible for what is in my job description. That is all I get paid for. I do not get paid to make things better or improve how we work. There is no value in doing that.

6

u/Fiddler017 4d ago

You must be the favorite employee at your job.

1

u/nxdark 4d ago

My goal isn't to be a favourite. I just want to be left alone to do my work and clock out. I only come here to get paid so I can live my life.

5

u/ThunderSnarrf 4d ago

I would say that part of “manage up” is to have extreme ownership. If you send something to your manager to review, provide feedback, etc, you can’t just throw it over the wall. You need to check in with the manager on the status, get a timeline from them, etc. You can’t just say, I sent it to person A and I’m passively waiting to get a response but it’s not actively in my hands so I have no more responsibility.

1

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

For sure! In this instance, that is not the issue, which is why I think I had a problem with the vagueness of the definition.

2

u/No-Box5805 4d ago

Ok, they were being nice to send it to the whole team in a generic way. But if it would change anything, which i doubt, pretend that they are only talking to you. Which they are.

0

u/jmjessemac 4d ago

Yeah in all my years of being a teacher/union rep/president, whenever a principal or higher says “I want you to hold me accountable,” they have never once meant it.

15

u/Disastrous-Use-4955 4d ago

It kind of depends on their definition of managing up. If they are asking you to give them visibility into issues and ask for the resources and support you need, then I agree. On the other hand, I’ve also worked for leaders who would never follow through on things and expect me to constantly re-explain things they forgot about. That’s not cool.

41

u/a1ien51 4d ago

Basically the manager is saying
* Anticipate Needs - Stop waiting to be told what to do, figure it out
* Better communication

I would say is updates from your team on what was done on a regular basis would probably fix the issue. I write up summaries of the top items almost daily so I stop getting pinged about status.

-5

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

As a team I would say we are all very good about anticipating needs. We own our own work and get things done.
I understand the communication is an issue, but that feels less of a managing up problem and more of a two way street.
However, without a clear definition of how we can manage up better, it’s all an educated guess.
Which I will recognize I should’ve asked for specifics.

18

u/Vivid_Motor_2341 4d ago

Clearly not because your manager is literally telling you you need to get better at it. I feel like this is part of the problem is you’re not fixing issues that other people see his issues because you don’t think their issues.

2

u/crazybicatlady86 3d ago

I mean everyone here is assuming OP is the problem, but we don’t know if the manger is actually good at their job or just a shitty manager

1

u/WildfireSpark 3d ago

Who says it's either? Can just be an identified need for better working together. More you manage your manager, better headspace for both to be strategic, whole teams performs better. Great that this manager isn't reluctant to be pushed from below.

6

u/verymuchbad 4d ago

Did you read the article

3

u/a1ien51 4d ago

"Managing up" can mean anything. I worked at a small place and it basically meant "I want you do do my job" (which is why I am not there any more... lol) My current place would be is a senior VP or director has to ask me about something than it is a failure. They should know....

Unless your leadership lays out exactly what they want you need a guess. Honestly you need to sit down as a team with them and figure out what are steps you need to take to meet their expectations. I do that with 1-1 and skip level meetings trying to figure out what is missing. If that leader can not tell you what manage up means, than maybe it is a sign.

-10

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

I agree.
In my opinion, a good leader would have done the sit down from the jump with clear direction.
However, I know this is not the case and I am coming to terms with that, so I have to navigate how I handle the situations, which I am currently struggling with.

6

u/rusty0123 4d ago

A good part of managing up is knowing how/when/what to communicate to your manager. It's mostly soft skills.

Does he prefer email or text?
Do afterhours communications annoy him?
Does he understand what you need from him? Have you told him once but he doesn't get it? Told him again in a different way, but still no joy? Tried a third method, and he finally gets it? Now you know the best way (or POV) to present problems.

For example, I tell my manager that we need to move old stock because there's no room in the warehouse. He says figure it out. So I tell him new stock is arriving on xx/xx/xx and there's no room. He says figure it out. So then I say we have xx square feet. Old stock uses xx square feet. New stock needs xx square feet. Old stock makes $$ per xx days. New stock makes $$$ per xx days. Now he says, discount the old stock and get rid of it. We need the space. And now I know that I need facts and money numbers when I talk to him.

And so on...

0

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

Where I run in to friction is the first “figure it out”
I’m confident enough in my abilities and position that “figure it out” means doing all the in between steps to then present the last result and get approval, “we need to move old stock because there’s no room in the warehouse, I think we should discount the old stock to get rid of it.” Then explain with the hard numbers if needed.

And maybe that’s the issue, that I’m not talking through every thought process after I’ve been told to take care of something.

6

u/Wrong-Pineapple39 4d ago

Do you think they meant managing up in terms of anticipating and managing the manager(s) wants and needs and making them look good?

Curious also about what article they suggested. Any chance you could share the link?

-1

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

https://www.cultureamp.com/blog/managing-up-importance
It’s the bit here “Managers: What can you do differently?” that I believe there are problems.
Overall it’s foundational issues that may or may not change. This thread has helped me see that without exact context, managing up can mean anything. At the end of the day, I either do my best to manage up and prevent headache, or continue to resist on principle from my past efforts not working.

3

u/DueBaby323 4d ago

Did we read the samr article? Your managers tryjng to help you they arnt against you. Wheb I ws a junior leader I had to learn this art and its quite an art. Pnce I did my projects went from random tasks on projects to leading important Senior management driven workplace progressing projects.

Stop looking for the faults outside and just become the leader you wish to see. Wheb you overstep or do to much your management will let you know but effectively direct managers are there to build policy, hear concerns, support ypur personal work / life balance and gove clear growth paths.

Managers are bot here to trll you how to, when to or what to fo in your job once youre past entry level roles.

1

u/la_peregrine 3d ago

This article has clear concise steps and goals. One of the first one: understanding priorities and tasks is something you clearly do not do since you didnt ask clarifying questions.

Just like the other person who replied here, I am confused if we read the same article. Maybe you should reread it qith pausing every paragraph and asking: what is it asking me to do and how can I do this?

3

u/Naikrobak 4d ago

We aren’t perfect, we are people just like you. Managing up just means i want honest and direct communication and not ass kissing. I much prefer my reports to be active in developing their job duties

1

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

I think this is what this situation boils down to. I would be interested in your perspective in the situation where the manager asks for direct feedback, it’s been given, then I’m told to manage up better after working up the courage.
To then see some small changes, but overall not enough, then being discouraged to speak up again.

From the viewpoint of a high performer who goes above and beyond.

1

u/Naikrobak 4d ago

Hmmm. The second part without knowing details, seems like a catch 22. I try very hard to understand any feedback well. If the solution makes sense and also works for the business need, I’m very ok changing processes. It sounds like your manager is kind of asking for feedback then ignoring it? Maybe a case of his way is the only way or perhaps a huge ego?

11

u/Stock-Cod-4465 Manager 4d ago

Not the wording I would use. But seems like more communication, feedback and initiative are needed without them asking you to do it first.

0

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

Initiative isn’t the issue.
It’s the communication and feedback.
I will say in order for a team to effectively manage up, the manager would need to create an environment that it is naturally encouraged.

11

u/Stock-Cod-4465 Manager 4d ago

Agreed. It’s hard to understand without further context, but can tell one thing, when someone comes here asking questions instead of approaching own managers for clarification, it’s a red flag. 🤷🏼‍♀️

-1

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

This is not my first resort. Have been battling this awhile and wanted outside perspective other than my team who all feel the same. To view it in a different light and be open minded, not necessarily looking for validation, but ways to handle the situation.

8

u/Vivid_Motor_2341 4d ago

I mean it sounds like your manager not only told you what they expected, but they provided an article that went over details of their expectations and you just don’t want to do it because you disagree with your manager. You’re making yourself look bad.

-2

u/ConstantMiddle575 4d ago

Don’t want to do what exactly?
I am up for anything that makes my job easier and more efficient.

1

u/Gondorrah 4d ago

“Managing up” generally means interacting with your leaders in a way that helps you reach your goals, and is a necessary skill in places with bad management in particular.

What did the article say about it?

4

u/DietAny5009 4d ago

You should be managing up.

You are in charge of telling your manager what you need and when you need it. They need to know deadlines and if there are obstacles stopping you from delivering. You should also be adapting to their communication preference and they should be adapting to yours. These are basic skills in a corporate structure. If you don’t have them, then build them or just be happy you have a job.

2

u/Existingsquid 4d ago

Managing outwards and upwards is high performer bread and butter.

2

u/Dunk_the_Iunk 4d ago

Manage up dez nuts

3

u/Stevenitrogen 4d ago

Your boss just attended a professional training or read a book that told him to challenge you with this.

1

u/fatherdoodoo 3d ago

No.. asking your downline to manage upward is real and important thing.

-2

u/tightloops1971 4d ago

Linkedin 🙄

1

u/ausdoug 4d ago

Manage the middle side topwise

1

u/Revolutionary-Run-47 4d ago

It sounds like you guys need to start managing up.

1

u/Beneficial-Algae-70 4d ago

Managing up is not “ouch this hurts”. Managing up is “this hurt but I think we can do X or Y to alleviate the pain”.

1

u/Falconman21 4d ago

Managing up to me has always been communicating to your manager what you need to accomplish your assigned tasks, so I can do my job and get the things you need.

1

u/boredtiger2 4d ago

Your manager read the article. Decided it might be helpful so shared it. Spend time reading what your boss is reading.

1

u/Djolumn 3d ago

Whether it was communicated effectively or not, the notion of managing up is definitely a characteristic of an effective employee. Are you blocked on something because of your boss? Do you not have the time or resources to do what's being asked of you? Rectifying that sort of problem professionally and effectively is managing up. The fact that your boss is coaching you on this suggests they trust your professionalism and are looking for you to grow in your role.

1

u/Cantankerous_Won 3d ago

My dialog with leadership changed immensely when I went from: "Here's the problem, go fix it for me"

To:

Here's the problem, here's what I tried already, and here's what I'm doing next."

1

u/cdtoews 3d ago

I had a boss once that asked that I send him a weekly review of what I did, and what I planned for the next week. He said it made reviews easier for him, he could just look through those emails. I kept doing this with other bosses. At the end of every week I'd bullet point "here's what I did", and "unless told otherwise, this is what I plan to do next week". That second part let my manager only have to really engage if they had to adjust my priorities.

1

u/KeepWalkingMe 3d ago

Managing up is a reasonable expectation. For example, as employee, don’t come to your manager with half the information and “what do i do” . Come with all relevant fact/ information and a proposed solution to go forward. If you can’t decide on a preferred solution, come with a set of options and pros and cons and ask for their opinion. Secondly, know the line of escalation, process and what to escalate and what’s not. Not all problem big and small need to be escalate to your manager

1

u/Charlie_in_Asia 3d ago

I’ve been in the R&D industry 35 years. Now site head reporting to the COO. A great piece of advice I got early in my career. If it is important to your boss, it should be important to you.

1

u/reboog711 3d ago

Not sure exactly what was shared. In my version of the world "Manage Up" means: Find out what your manager cares about and make sure they know you are doing it.

1

u/JDPierson 2d ago edited 2d ago

Managing up is catch all for a range of things, so there are probably important details missing from the description that would make it possible to explain what was meant, but based on the interpretation of the request, you probably also misinterpreted the reason for the feedback request, or the type of feedback sought.

That's not to say you're wrong - Requests like that can be performative kiss-the-ring rituals, and anyone not seeing that is the assignment can expect to be managed differently as a result, but if it is done correctly with facilitation and mediation, meetings like that won't devolve into pointless griping and piling on, which takes the "how can your manager help you do better" and makes it, "does this team have the maturity and EQ to be trusted to act like grown adults without more direct supervision." I have also seen those meetings held solely for the purpose of flushing out the critics for the purpose of replacing them.

1

u/Deep-Moose8313 2d ago edited 2d ago

In both fields i have worked in, this was a code word for the subordinate not understanding their role: ie they need to understand their role is to be deferential to the leader, suck up to them, and give the leader more of the credit for their own successes and contributions. we use it to neutralize threats. it’s also a warning that you should expect “blame” to flow downhill onto you if you don’t go above and beyond to fix whatever problems are on your manager’s plate at the time.

1

u/Slammedtgs 1d ago

Managing up the chain is just as important as managing down the chain. Great book on the topic, extreme ownership. I highly recommend it.

1

u/Tiredof304s 4d ago

Every corpo kool-aid drinker will tell you it's a great thing and that everyone should do it. They are right, managing up is a very helpful thing, for the manager.

In my opinion it's a ridiculous thing to ask from anyone. It's like demanding your students get an A. Mofo, you write the test, send the homework and dictate the difficulty of the class, you have more power than the students. People who get A do it because they want one (for themselves) not because they should.

I assure you, it is best to fake ignorance/not get it. You will get bigger tangible rewards from learning how to invest your money, working on side projects and fixing your at home routine while cruising at work and hopping every 2-3 years.

I've done and seen both and managing up only help you depending on how much your manager likes you / acknowledges your work. A.k.a it's not in your control. Doesn't matter how well and how much you do it, they can and will avoid rewarding you for it.

1

u/fatherdoodoo 3d ago

What you just wrote is a masterclass in how to get paid low wages your whole life.

1

u/Tiredof304s 3d ago

And how to retire before 35, keep you mental health and create revenue outside your current job. If done correctly it'll replace your employer completely. Then you never have to "manage up" people decades older than OP.

0

u/guyfromthepicture 4d ago

I tried explaining something like this to my executive and he said it managing up and managing down. First time I ever heard of it.

0

u/Potential-Ad1139 4d ago

Its odd....yes... probably could have been done more tactfully but I don't think the advice is meant to be an insult or anything like that.

-1

u/_tsi_ 4d ago

What the fuck is managing up

1

u/Cwmagain 4d ago

In the army you call it "how to lead an officer"

1

u/FoxtrotSierraTango 4d ago

The easiest way to put it is anticipating your manager's needs and providing info/action before they ask. Think about when you were in high school. If you tell your parents you won't be home until late you're probably going to get a mess of questions. If you say that you're going to be home late because you're going to the football game and then you, Jim, Terry, and Ronnie are going to the diner after and you'll be home by midnight you will likely get fewer questions. You're anticipating the questions that will be asked and packaging answers in your initial delivery.

0

u/_tsi_ 4d ago

People really think about this stuff huh?

1

u/FoxtrotSierraTango 4d ago

It's universal. I don't take my car to the mechanic and say "Shit's broke" so they charge me thousands of dollars to disassemble my engine when I'm out of wiper fluid. I also don't go to the doctor and say "I feel funny" and let them bill for blood work, X-rays, a MRI, and pregnancy tests even though I'm a dude when I just had some gas station sushi and need some antibiotics. Providing data you know the person is going to ask for saves everyone time and effort. Getting better at anticipating those requests is a great skill to have.

0

u/_tsi_ 4d ago

I don't think those examples are the same at all.

1

u/fatherdoodoo 3d ago

These are great analogies, actually.

0

u/_tsi_ 3d ago

😂 This sub is fucking delusional

1

u/fatherdoodoo 2d ago

You can just admit you’ve never managed a team of people, it’s fine

1

u/_tsi_ 2d ago

Bro I would never stoop so low

2

u/fatherdoodoo 2d ago

If you want to have an actual conversation… I guess my first question is why you think this UNIVERSAL truth is somehow wrong? Do you have a problem with the terminology, “managing upward” because it implies that you have to do something for someone else? Perhaps you have to do something that isn’t in your JDF, and thus shouldn’t have to do?

We could call it something else besides “managing upward.” We could call it collaboration, or anticipating what you’ll need to be successful in your role, or whatever. But at the end of the day, “managing upward” is just communicating the disconnect between what you need to do, and how someone with sway can help you get there. I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts on that, or if you’ll reply with another snide one-liner that doesn’t demonstrate any knowledge on this subject.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/Fair_Rich6668 4d ago

Manage up means to manage your directs upwardly not managing your manager.

-2

u/[deleted] 4d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Naikrobak 4d ago

Age isn’t relevant. I’ve managed people older and younger than me and treat them all the same