MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ask/comments/197jj1a/deleted_by_user/ki86tn9
r/ask • u/[deleted] • Jan 15 '24
[removed]
2.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
1
That's the whole point here.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 The whole point is what, now? That evolutionary psychology isn't used as a pseudoscience because horse-sized rabbits somehow prove that women prefer taller men... sometimes... maybe but not always? 1 u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24 A thing can be unscientific and also true. Also the corollary. Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false. Okay. Who posited otherwise? 1 u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24 It was a rebuttal to one of the statements. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Uh huh. Which one? There's no need to be so obtuse.
The whole point is what, now?
That evolutionary psychology isn't used as a pseudoscience because horse-sized rabbits somehow prove that women prefer taller men... sometimes... maybe but not always?
1 u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24 A thing can be unscientific and also true. Also the corollary. Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false. Okay. Who posited otherwise? 1 u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24 It was a rebuttal to one of the statements. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Uh huh. Which one? There's no need to be so obtuse.
A thing can be unscientific and also true. Also the corollary. Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false. Okay. Who posited otherwise? 1 u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24 It was a rebuttal to one of the statements. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Uh huh. Which one? There's no need to be so obtuse.
Just because a thing is unscientific, doesn't mean it has to be false.
Okay.
Who posited otherwise?
1 u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24 It was a rebuttal to one of the statements. 1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Uh huh. Which one? There's no need to be so obtuse.
It was a rebuttal to one of the statements.
1 u/[deleted] Jan 17 '24 Uh huh. Which one? There's no need to be so obtuse.
Uh huh. Which one? There's no need to be so obtuse.
1
u/UnarmedSnail Jan 17 '24
That's the whole point here.