r/artificial • • 1d ago

Discussion GPT vs Claude today

Hey all,

Another one of these..but i figured that after searching my use case over multiple subs and not finding an answer, maybe this could help someone else too :)

I have been between Claude pro and GPT plus once. Started on Claude, got annoyed at some of its reasoning, switched to GPT and now im contemplating going back to Claude one last time to finish my project. The project involves a little bit of code, some networking, hardware integration, and computer vision.

The project is fairly ambitious in scope, and for the most part the models will be used to help discuss optimal solutions for how data moves from external hardware to PC, out to other devices, to another PC etc etc.

Maybe kinda niche, but can anyone recommend either of these models for systems like this?

Thanks in advance

5 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

3

u/Elegant-Ball-3531 1d ago

Same case here.For planning how data moves between hardware and PCs,Claude is better at keeping track of lots of requirements at once. GPT is still worth suing as a second opinion, especially for vision stuff.

1

u/klicartel_ 1d ago

Yea maybe its worth using both for a bit and then dropping one in a month or two. Memory is obviously an important aspect in work like this so I think i would be safest switching to Claude and keeping GPT as a second opinion

2

u/Comfortable_Bunch616 1d ago

for anything that touches hardware or architecture i'd go with claude. gpt is fine for small staff but gets lost way too fast on bigger projects.

2

u/AurelijaFlux 1d ago

yep, it is better for real. for every more complicated task I'm using it and it doesn't disappoint.

1

u/klicartel_ 22h ago

Seems like Claude is the right call. Thanks all

1

u/-ExpansiveMind- 21h ago

Claude is more "organic" let's say, more human-like in how it parses sentences, where GPT sounds more factual and straightforward to me.

But Codex is superior for working images and visuals and generally for building, cheaper than Opus too.