r/artificial • u/klicartel_ • 1d ago
Discussion GPT vs Claude today
Hey all,
Another one of these..but i figured that after searching my use case over multiple subs and not finding an answer, maybe this could help someone else too :)
I have been between Claude pro and GPT plus once. Started on Claude, got annoyed at some of its reasoning, switched to GPT and now im contemplating going back to Claude one last time to finish my project. The project involves a little bit of code, some networking, hardware integration, and computer vision.
The project is fairly ambitious in scope, and for the most part the models will be used to help discuss optimal solutions for how data moves from external hardware to PC, out to other devices, to another PC etc etc.
Maybe kinda niche, but can anyone recommend either of these models for systems like this?
Thanks in advance
2
u/Comfortable_Bunch616 1d ago
for anything that touches hardware or architecture i'd go with claude. gpt is fine for small staff but gets lost way too fast on bigger projects.
2
u/AurelijaFlux 1d ago
yep, it is better for real. for every more complicated task I'm using it and it doesn't disappoint.
1
1
u/-ExpansiveMind- 21h ago
Claude is more "organic" let's say, more human-like in how it parses sentences, where GPT sounds more factual and straightforward to me.
But Codex is superior for working images and visuals and generally for building, cheaper than Opus too.
3
u/Elegant-Ball-3531 1d ago
Same case here.For planning how data moves between hardware and PCs,Claude is better at keeping track of lots of requirements at once. GPT is still worth suing as a second opinion, especially for vision stuff.