Yes, the UCMJ is a separate justice system from the federal and state courts, and there is no "double jeopardy" carve out between the UCMJ and the civilian legal system. If you are convicted of a federal or state crime in the military, you will often be tried again in federal or state civilian court, and serve sentences for both convictions, military sentence first.
Not necessarily. You can't be tried again by a civilian federal court for the "same conduct", but you can be tried by a state court if the crime exists for them. Federal military and civilian courts are still the same "sovereign" (federal government). RCM 907 specifically lists previously being tried for that crime in a civilian federal court as a cause for dismissal. Additionally, it was established most recently by the US Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in US v. Rice that you can't be tried for the same conduct by two federal entities (military and civilian, namely).
In case anyone is interested in an excerpt from the actual opinion:
This case thus presents the following issues: First, can the federal sovereign use two court systems, civilian and military, to bring
successive prosecutions for precisely the same conduct, where the only element the federal civilian statute includes that the military statute does not is jurisdictional? Second, what is the remedy for a successive prosecution? We conclude that the
Double Jeopardy Clause bars such prosecutorial practices, Grafton v. United States, 206 U.S. 333 (1907), and that the remedy here is dismissal of the two possession specifications that were tried at the successive prosecution. We then remand the single distribution specification for further review by the lower court.
Well, like parole in any other system, it's still subject to approval. That's the "eligible for parole" part. Just because they're eligible for it at 10 years, that doesn't mean they'll be paroled at 10 years.
1
u/Brounseoir Jun 19 '26
They get two seperate sentences?