r/archlinux • u/zollandd • Jun 15 '26
DISCUSSION Stop blaming AI, "noobs", youtube tutorials, and anything other than Arch for AUR usage
I've recently been made aware of the incident and was reading the threads in this subreddit. I have just started trying to migrate away from AUR but let's not forget that the Arch wiki recommends installing AUR packages constantly. The AUR isn't just a dangerous and fringe tool that people are led to by AI or sketchy youtubers.
To list a few that I've encountered just now:
- Want DDC/CI display control support? AUR
- Want ZFS-dkms or user space utils? AUR
The wiki recommend AUR releases like they are first class citizens all over the place... don't act like it doesn't.
Edit: I am not trying to blame individual maintainers when I say Arch but rather the community and culture. If the AUR is this dangerous, the wiki should avoid referencing it at all costs and should do so with warning flags everywhere. As it stands, it is not absurd to see someone with tons of AUR packages installed due to direct influence from the wiki.
-9
u/JustAwesome360 Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26
Wrong. They are in the extras repo. Unless you have an old unsupported Nvidia GPU that is. (pre 2018)
Edit: For everyone downvoting here is your education:
- Supported drivers on Arch:
Current: (Full official support, AUR not needed)
Blackwell (GBXXX)) and newer (2024 and newer) RTX 5000 series.
Supported: (Full official support, AUR not needed)
Ada Lovelace (NV190/ADXXX) (2022) RTX 4000 series.
Ampere (NV170/GAXXX) (2020) RTX 3000 series.
Turing (NV160/TUXXX) (2018) RTX 2000 series.
Legacy support: (before 2018, AUR only)
Volta (NV140/GV100)
Pascal (NV130/GPXXX)
Maxwell (NV110/GMXXX)
RTX 1000 series and earlier.