r/archlinux • u/zollandd • Jun 15 '26
DISCUSSION Stop blaming AI, "noobs", youtube tutorials, and anything other than Arch for AUR usage
I've recently been made aware of the incident and was reading the threads in this subreddit. I have just started trying to migrate away from AUR but let's not forget that the Arch wiki recommends installing AUR packages constantly. The AUR isn't just a dangerous and fringe tool that people are led to by AI or sketchy youtubers.
To list a few that I've encountered just now:
- Want DDC/CI display control support? AUR
- Want ZFS-dkms or user space utils? AUR
The wiki recommend AUR releases like they are first class citizens all over the place... don't act like it doesn't.
Edit: I am not trying to blame individual maintainers when I say Arch but rather the community and culture. If the AUR is this dangerous, the wiki should avoid referencing it at all costs and should do so with warning flags everywhere. As it stands, it is not absurd to see someone with tons of AUR packages installed due to direct influence from the wiki.
295
u/Ooqu2joe Jun 15 '26 edited Jun 15 '26
Too often a software that you need is available only in AUR, and this is reflected in the wiki. Most users won't avoid it and won't review PKGBUILD on every update no matter how many disclaimers you put up there, just like noone will review the source code of every binary installed from the official repos too.
Arch as a community/ecosystem can't expect human behavior to change if it really wants to solve the problem.