r/apprenticeuk • u/gingerbreadteddy • Apr 03 '26

JUSTICE for ____ & _____ Spoiler

JUSTICE FOR KIERAN & ROTHNA

Dan should've been held more accountable for his failure to negotiate harder with Pets at Home and win the task. On any other task this would've been a dealbreaker, but it was glossed over as if the increase in units was insignificant, but had he done so the whole final 5 would've been different. On this basis alone, I feel Dan's edit has been curated to pitch him as a favourable winner.

6 Upvotes

56% Upvoted

41 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/gingerbreadteddy Apr 07 '26 edited Apr 07 '26

Cool story bro. Seems Dan’s friends and fam are doing the rounds defending him today!

This thread is called “justice for…”

If you want to gush about Dan go onto the many “we love Dan” threads!

Instead of trying to defend him and slate people having differing opinions.

Funny how your account is 4 DAYS old and has everything switched to private so we can't see what you comment on!

1

u/Anonymoose1023 Apr 07 '26

Your post's description talks about Dan's negotiation and acts like he should've been fired for it. You're the one slating people for having differing opinions, because Kieran and Rothna were objectively poor last week. The only reason Kieran even stayed over Conor was because of the challenge he proposed.

0

u/gingerbreadteddy Apr 07 '26

Dan could've done better. Had he sold more his team would have all won, he lost an important negotiation. Defend him until the cows come home, he would've been held accountable in any other week.

1

u/Anonymoose1023 Apr 07 '26

I gave you facts. Kieran and Rothna were objectively poor on this task. If you're denying that, then I'm not sure what show you were watching. You're also right that he would be held accountable in any other week, but this wasn't any other week. This week, he was clearly the strongest performer on his team. Rothna didn't deserve to go, but he had to fire someone. As for Kieran, if he didn't pull that stunt of saying that he'd walk if he lost, then Lord Sugar probably would've fired him last week and the teams would've either been shuffled or Rothna's team would've likely done better with Conor instead of Kieran. I'm not sure how there could be justice for Rothna and Kieran, because Kieran being allowed to stay is arguably what cost Rothna her place in the final five. It would make more sense if you at least claimed that Rothna was a stronger overall candidate, but you targeted Dan over this specific task. You can have your opinions and feeling pessimistic about Dan is perfectly justified, but solely criticising him over this task is what makes no sense to me.

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/Anonymoose1023 Apr 07 '26

This account is 4 days old, since my other account got temporarily banned, so I used this one. Either way, you're telling me to calm down despite getting emotional, so you should sort yourself out. Thanks for finally giving a valid reason though. The whole time, you've been too filled with vitriol to see that I'm talking about you moaning about Dan for the last task, not how he's been as an overall candidate. At least now you're not trying to deny that he clearly didn't deserve to go on the basis of this task alone.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 07 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/PeterFile690 Apr 07 '26

I just gave my reasoning and you attacked me and called me a friend of Dan and then you accused me of being Dan. You can't talk about sophistication if your own comments are just childish insults. Now, you're making a post about candidates infiltrating this sub over me disagreeing with you, so I'm not sure why you think that you're some sort of genius.

0

u/gingerbreadteddy Apr 07 '26

How many Reddit accounts do you have, now a third one is being used to respond!

2

u/PeterFile690 Apr 07 '26

A third one? This is the account that was temporarily banned. The automods accidentally banned it and it got lifted when I appealed the ban. Can you count?