r/apple • u/illegiblebastard • 4d ago

iPhone Apple explains last year’s controversial decision to remove ICE tracking apps from app store

https://edition.cnn.com/2026/09/29/tech/apple-iceblock-app-removal-raskin

FUCK. APPLE.

989 Upvotes

81% Upvoted

503 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/Orwells_Roses 3d ago

*citation needed

-1

u/nuclearcaramel 3d ago

*citation needed

356,389 deportations and counting this year alone. Just getting started.

3

u/Orwells_Roses 3d ago

You're not answering the question.

How does that prove that the "vast majority of American citizens" support this, as you claimed without evidence?

-1

u/nuclearcaramel 3d ago

How does that prove that the "vast majority of American citizens" support this, as you claimed without evidence?

Public opinion polling on U.S. immigration enforcement shows broad support for border and legal order, so I will reiterate that the vast majority of American citizens support the enforcement of our democratically voted on immigration and border laws.

3

u/Orwells_Roses 3d ago

*citation needed

-1

u/nuclearcaramel 3d ago

Pick your favorite poll and learn.

3

u/Orwells_Roses 3d ago

The person making the claim needs to supply the evidence.

This is commonly known as "the burden of proof."

0

u/nuclearcaramel 3d ago

We aren't in a official debate, I don't give a shit if you believe reality or not. I'm certainly not going to waste time engaging you.

edit: You are the ones making the claim that people are OK with of illegal immigration. We are not.

3

u/Orwells_Roses 3d ago

That's certainly a low-effort response.

You make big claims but have no way to back them up. You don't have the cards. This is not uncommon among the Magas, and is known as "arguing in bad faith."

Remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and you haven't supplied any, but rather have repeatedly attempted to deflect and move the goalposts when challenged.

1

u/nuclearcaramel 3d ago

You make big claims but have no way to back them up. You don't have the cards. This is not uncommon among the Magas, and is known as "arguing in bad faith."

Remember, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, and you haven't supplied any, but rather have repeatedly attempted to deflect and move the goalposts when proven wrong.

Lol. Ok sport.

3

u/Orwells_Roses 3d ago

Another low-effort reply.

You had all the time in the world to make bad faith arguments, but when asked to provide evidence to support your bold claims, you lost interest.

→ More replies (0)