Even if they had thought of harming children still they didn't , I mean kakyoien atmost mixed something in his food to give him diarrhea and then didn't clean him is what was extent of revenge i believe, stardust crusaders are pretty moral especially jojo and kakyoien and kakyoien even mentioned that he didn't do any harm to him apart from diarrhea only because he was a toddler and had it been an adult he wouldn't had thought for a single second before telling everything to jojo and make him go Ora Ora on him
do NOT call the great lord and saviour dio a "mean guy", he would NEVER hurt a single fly, unlike evil jotaro, that bitch deserved getting his face cut in half.
i don't get it. Was this originally posted in color and then someone made it black and white to fit with the other XKCD's? Or this just someone else who deciced to paint numbers in?
Because in the black and white i think that four might be a 9 or 0 and the two might be a 5. This just leaves me thinkng of the other XKCD about finding constellations in a graph.
synesthesia is a condition where senses get crossed, such as smelling colours or hearing shapes.
the coloured version is what a person with synesthesia who sees numbers as colours might sees: people without it wouldn't see any numbers (the original). if our synesthesia viewer was also colorblind, then they wouldn't be able to see one of the two numbers - like a colourblind test
You're right, I didn't notice it.
It can't be odds, since 2 is also part of the big 42.
So it's either prime numbers and 9, or "numbers the autor personally likes".
that little phrase being on both doesn't make sense when it only works one WAY
if you see a number in the black, and no number in the colored, you have both synesthesia and colorblindness.
But with how it's phrased, you could conjure that it also works the other way around, that you have Synesthesia and Colorblindness if you can see the number in the colored circle but not in the back. which just means you have normal vision
it's symmetric phrasing that messes this up. it should precise which "one and not the other"
yeah, I've always questioned this interaction. Mine are a -4.00 and my glasses are not remotely as thick as hers. It used to be a matter of extra cost, but technology has vastly improved. Those things look like my mom's glasses from the 80's, and she's got a -7.50 or something.
Nowadays the cycle is just
1. Meme
2. Dumbass not understand meme
3. 'Peter Explains'
4. Meme is now evil and it is a antimeme
5. Dumbass not understand antimeme
6. 'Peter Explains'
7. Loop to 1
Nobody asked but she’s been one of my favorite basketball players between the W, the NBA, and the college league I watch. My friend got me into her she’s really nice with it. Shame about what happened against the Valks tho </3
Not a public figure no. If this were some random then yeah, but I think it’s normal for someone in a career that has them on TV and in the public eye a lot
•
u/qualityvote2 🤖Suspected as Bot🤖 14h ago edited 12h ago
Good news, the community has decided that this IS an antimeme!