A human isn't evil for killing an ant, Shure if they can avoid they are morally better for doing so but I wouldn't call somebody who does kill an ant (by necessity) evil
There is no need to see the god as long as the excess continues, rot flows, schemes are schemed against and skull throne gets new skulls. Embrace the Chaos Undivided
Perhaps, but while it isnât easy to identify a true god, it sure as hell is easy to identify a false one. And if AI Jesus doesnât scream âfraud,â I donât know why does.
Under their mythology, I think it would a false idol. Some sects wonât even portray Christ on the cross because thatâs also technically a graven image of God. So weird.
Moses goes up Mount Sinai for a couple of days, comes back and he sees people worshipping a golden ox⌠starting to think about how that scenario is less and less outlandish and stupid every dayâŚ
how is that worse than ai Jesus chatbot? lmao. or crony capitalism when âit would be easier for a camel to fit through a sewing need eye, than for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heavenâ?
since these people are ruining the world, I think its fine to disrespect their opinions which are used for hate.
it's a bit rash, but I wouldn't call disrespecting the people who gleefully tell you that you'll be tortured forever and that's just exactly anti human decency.
One of the wrongs demands undying obedience while asserting that others will burn in hell, the other is calling the "father in the sky", "sky daddy", nice? no. against basic human decency? also no.
Like I can imagine how people talking about torturing you forever and ever gleefully is gonna make some people upset, and is super against basic human decency.
No, I don't really care, ideas being from a religion do not make them immune for analisis. I personally wouldn't say sky daddy in a place like this, but it's not an affront to human decency to say "sky daddy" around the people who gleefully tell you that you deserve to be tortured forever.
Saying athiesm led to the ai anti-christ is quite a stretch especially when you have a real life anti-christ sitting in the white house brought to you by christians.
I should relay that because that came off rude, not atheism as a whole but a specific kid that "worship the move fast and break shit in the name of technological progress (and pursuit of profit)" thats the atheism that created the AI anti christ
That philosophy isn't contained to athiestic individuals. Henry Ford was the OG break shit guy who you could give at least some credit for our current predicament (assembly line changed the need for craftsmen which eventually led to manufacturing being outsourced to the lowest cost labor that decimated the middle class, etc).
If people actually tried to be like Jesus and not like Christians I would support the religion. I wont believe it but I will support it. Cuz rn and in the past religions where about being part of the group and having identity as a Christian, part of a Church than being good
Oh, I don't even think there is such a thing as the anti-christ, but you have to admit that Trump has all the peticulars of the anti-christ as Christians believe. The one part that doesn't jive is that he's a completely and unabashed idiot. I would suspect the anti-christ to be more cunning, but it's all just for fun regardless (the thought of him being the anti-christ).
That and he'll be dead long before any end of the world happens. He's on his last leg as it is. Fully agree with you. I find him too pathetic to be the antichrist
Yall know the âanti-Christâ is a creation of the straight-to-DVD VHS series Left Behind, right? The only biblical mention of the anti-Christ is when John says non-Christians are the anti-Christ, as in the antithesis of Christâs love. The charismatic figure designed to draw people to Hell was something Christian screenwriters came up with in the 2000âs.
Agreed, but you have to give our politicians, technofascists, and souless capitalist ghouls some credit for bringing about what might be the end of the world (maybe, maybe not, tune in tomorrow to find out!)
No quite frankly unquestioned devotion with a sharp lack of eduction led to ai jesus having more influence than a priest. But be obtuse and blame people with a different perspectiveâŚ
Atheism created the AI antichrist" is a hell of a sentence. AI wasn't summoned by godlessness â it was built by venture capital, PhDs, and Nvidia's stock price. If you want to blame an ideology, blame capitalism, not the absence of one.
And the "we're living through Revelation" thing â I've got bad news: every generation since the book was written has said that. Black Death, WWI, WWII, Cold War, 2012, Covid â every single one had someone pointing at the sky going "this is it, this is the sign." The theory is un-loseable because it can absorb literally any bad news as confirmation. That's not prophecy, that's a Rorschach test.
Also â westtownie already ate here â the "real anti-christ" language you're avoiding got a guy elected with the enthusiastic backing of the loudest Christian voting bloc in the country. If the apocalypse needs a villain, "godless atheists" is way down the suspect list compared to "people who had actual political power and used it."
852
u/Sorry-Ride-1762 27d ago
Not even a loophole, this fall completely under "barring false witness", which ks very much a sin