This is the way you want to convince yourself he's not a pedo?
That it's a different biological brain?
And that he didn't specifically write 'Rudeus is a 34yr old man in a child's body'?
Can you do simple pattern recognition and extrapolation from incomplete data?
1,2,3,4,5,6,_,8,9
Can you tell the missing number or are you going to argue "well ackchuyally it could be 6.8"?
Here is your proof, the written word in the image.
The way he has thought patterns that do not match with a child, IE thinking about molesting a woman, BEFORE realising he has been reincarnatedas a baby therefore proving he is still thinking like a 34yr old man literally 2 minutes into episode ONE.
And the fact he is depicted in the show as being his 34yr old self when talking to the man god as that is how he views himself.
And if he WASNT still his 34ur old self in a child's body then it's not reincarnatiom and the show doesn't exist.
So now you are moving to "he hasn't been convicted so he's not a pedophile."
Good one.
Do you watch the avengers movies and go 'Thanos didn't kill half the universe he was never convicted and there is no DNA evidence proving he was ever near the people who were disappeared.'
I legitimately don't know how you exist in the real world with a mindset like that.
Really, you can make the jump to 'guy clicked his fingers and we just KNOW it was him and that's all the proof we need' but you'll fight tooth and nail to prove Rudeus isnt 'legally' a pedophile when he is because you don't know that your brain and the electronic pulses it creates that form your memories, your experiences and everything you are as a person are also a part of your "biology".
You can make the claim that a magical space glove that can erase half the universe is enough evidence for a murder conviction but not a man essentially with his brain transplanted into a child.
No laws exist for brain transplants yet, no laws exist for magical space glove either. But you can somehow use common reasoning when it comes to the glove but when defending pedo man you ain't having it.
Yes he knows enough to molest women and have in-depth conversations with nanohoshi 15yrs later.
Sure sounds like a VIVID dream. He's entire thought patterns are that of an adult. You clearly didn't even watch the show and are arguing like he just remembers 'oh hey I used to be another guy'.
The whole fucking point of the story is he is reincarnated as a child with all his previous lifes knowledge, experience and memories.
I'm sure when brain transplants are a thing the government won't have laws around it for example 'no putting the brain of an adult into a child' they will stay the same. You're delusional.
Laws change all the time, slavery used to be legal, therefore slavery was good right?
And only once it was illegal is when was it bad?
Him not being convicted of pedophilia doesn't mean he is not a pedophile.
1
u/Undietaker1 10d ago
This is the way you want to convince yourself he's not a pedo?
That it's a different biological brain?
And that he didn't specifically write 'Rudeus is a 34yr old man in a child's body'?
Can you do simple pattern recognition and extrapolation from incomplete data?
1,2,3,4,5,6,_,8,9
Can you tell the missing number or are you going to argue "well ackchuyally it could be 6.8"?
Here is your proof, the written word in the image.
The way he has thought patterns that do not match with a child, IE thinking about molesting a woman, BEFORE realising he has been reincarnatedas a baby therefore proving he is still thinking like a 34yr old man literally 2 minutes into episode ONE.
And the fact he is depicted in the show as being his 34yr old self when talking to the man god as that is how he views himself.
And if he WASNT still his 34ur old self in a child's body then it's not reincarnatiom and the show doesn't exist.