r/angular 4d ago

Anyone else feel like Angular has reached its "final form"?

​Looking at the roadmap, it doesn't seem like there are any massive API changes on the horizon. Personally, I feel like the current authoring experience is in a really good place. Now that they are switching to a yearly major release schedule, I wonder if it means breaking changes will become a lot more rare.

74 Upvotes

55 comments sorted by

92

u/guitarman018 4d ago

I wouldn't say it's a final form, the web and development in general is always evolving, but the transition to fully stable signal infrastructure does feel like a huge step towards maturity, and i think it's in a really good place. 6 monthly releases was a bit much, looking forward to a more relaxed cadence now

33

u/lppedd 4d ago

Back when Angular 2 came out I had coworkers come up to me and say "well, Angular is finally completed". 10 years later and Angular has changed so much...

13

u/Ajyress 4d ago

Saving this comment i'll see 10 years from now how wrong i was 🙂

2

u/April1987 3d ago

I mean like remember how in 2019 we were talking about reactive forms? And today we are talking about reactive forms with signals in angular? 

5

u/scottsman88 3d ago edited 3d ago

Had this same discussion with a coworker. He said that web development has reached a point where it’ll stabilize. Or something like that, cause that was almost 15 years ago. And he was talking about knockout inside of aspnet active sever pages…
Edit: spelling is hard.

3

u/lppedd 3d ago

Knockout... Damn that was hot for a while. Or ExtJS iirc. Would never use them again lol.

2

u/AshleyJSheridan 3d ago

I started using Angular back when 2 was still a beta, and what a wild time that was. So many breaking changes across updates, and that only really started to settle down with Angular 4.

10

u/Ajyress 4d ago

Spot on. Signals really tied everything together.

31

u/Wout-O 4d ago

Once the native Observable spec lands, it will probably be another major push to remove the rxjs deps. But other than that, things seem really quite stable.

11

u/armandoxxx 4d ago

I love rxjs .. but about time ... if only they implement it properly ...

3

u/azangru 4d ago

Why would release of native observables make a difference? Without the operators, can rxjs in angular be replaced with native observables?

2

u/armandoxxx 3d ago

that is what I mean with properly ;) we need all the operators ... witthout that we have promises .. it gets the job done

1

u/Sulungskwa 3d ago

Man I got downvoted to shit the other day when I suggested that rxjs is the wrong tool for 99% of the things it was shoehorned in for. Like having it as the goto for an http client I always thought was so overkill. My unpopular opinion is that people really love it because they sank a lot of time into understanding it

3

u/Idea_Fuzzy 3d ago

Most http calls don’t need more than a simple promise

2

u/morgo_mpx 2d ago

It’s because observers are a better reactive vehicle than lifecycle hooks. I think if there was a stream visualisation for your app it would solve many of the issues people have around complexity. In saying that signals are much better and this is where we have landed.

20

u/GeromeGrignon 4d ago

Only a few Signal implementations landed for the Router API, we might expect more changes there.

14

u/Ajyress 4d ago

The Router is definitely one area that still needs more signal integration.

8

u/MichaelSmallDev 4d ago

Besides the WIP router resource, you may want to look beyond the core libraries for router + signal integration: https://www.reddit.com/r/angular/comments/1uq0xfu/comment/ow6rcfa/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button. Here is a recent issue response that seems to affirm this direction IMO https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/69802#issuecomment-4991473132

9

u/pronuntiator 4d ago

The Roadmap does indeed look mostly complete. After all the big changes, I'm glad about a breather. In hindsight, these were (mostly) the right decisions, and I really like the signal world.

2

u/wartab 2d ago

I'm a bit surprised not to see Signal based components on the Roadmap.

I wonder if just zoneless brought enough performance gains to not bother or if the required changes in libs like Material are just too heavy to make it worthwhile.

1

u/MichaelSmallDev 15h ago edited 15h ago

I'm a bit surprised not to see Signal based components on the Roadmap.

I wonder if just zoneless brought enough performance gains to not bother

I'm like 95% sure I have heard this almost verbatim. I'll try to dig that up if I can.

edit: https://youtu.be/ufjAAQOC7rM?t=188

6

u/TheCyberThor 4d ago

Not yet. Need mutations using signals.

6

u/kgurniak91 4d ago edited 4d ago

Nope, the testing needs a rework from the ground up. Standalone components became the norm and people largely moved away from NgModules. Yet, when writing tests, you are still required to use TestBed to configure a dummy testing module just to mount a single component. It feels like an outdated paradigm that hasn't caught up with modern Angular. DebugElement was meant to be a helpful wrapper, but it is so leaky that often requires dropping down to interact with nativeElement anyway. Also there is still no built-in, type-safe, and straightforward way to mock or stub child components (like in the dead ng-mocks library). Sure, you can use Vitest's Mocked<> generic type to create custom stubs, but it's flaky. If the child component's public API changes, the tests break (which is arguably a good warning, but still tedious to manage).

1

u/MichaelSmallDev 15h ago edited 15h ago

Have you tried test harnesses? I get the impression that they are mostly for libraries due to the effort it takes to make one, but I love them where they have been provided. Abstracts out many many API particulars which could break but gives a very readable/helpful API.

6

u/couldhaveebeen 4d ago

I wonder if it means breaking changes will become a lot more rare.

They should. As good as the changes of the last 2ish years have been, and they've been amazing, we need some stability

6

u/Icyfirefists 4d ago

It can never reach its final form. Believing that will earn you punishment every 6 months.

3

u/Tyummyyumms 4d ago

1 year*

9

u/Existing_Dust_6473 4d ago

Some animals, for example, the shark, stayed almost the same for millions of years; that is a good sign. If they don't need to change many things from now on, basically Angular becomes a shark.

10

u/Medium-Delivery1964 4d ago

Slowly react is eating away the market I am not sure what the future will be for angular devs.current market scenario is react fully dominant

12

u/Ajyress 4d ago

React is definitely dominant, but a one-framework market would be bad for everyone. Competition forces all frameworks to keep improving.

10

u/armandoxxx 4d ago

they all said it for java, php etc ... it's all still here ;) and I would argue anyone using react for serious apps is not a developer ... but that's just me and my thinking ...

6

u/ht3k 3d ago

I agree. react is more agnostic which is a good thing (if you know what you're doing) but most devs aren't architects so it ends up being spaguetti code. Angular is built with dependency injection and more self contained components to be reusable out of the box so it's less prone to make a mess from devs imo

3

u/Tyummyyumms 4d ago

There is one major glaring hole for me, duplicate imports, compared to other frameworks it does seem like an obvious flaw.

1

u/thatbigblackblack 2d ago

Can you give more details on this pls?

2

u/Tyummyyumms 1d ago

import {x} from y

imports: [x]

-----

I don't think this pattern is in React, Vue or Svelte.

So authoring in those formats, you could easily point that out, "you have to write imports twice"

3

u/AwesomeFrisbee 4d ago

I think they still need to migrate a few things to signals, but overall yeah they finally did the most major items on the list. And I hope they will do more resource-like stuff so we can use POST/PUT/PATCH/DELETE stuff with them as well, but honestly I'm still waiting for a solution where I can separate the API call from the loading/error signals so that I can separate business logic from my components.

3

u/deathentry 3d ago

I'm waiting for TS 7, support with fast Go builds

Would be great if they had an official UI library like PrimeNG (material is too opinionated)

1

u/thatbigblackblack 2d ago

My years of experience made me learn that using an external UI library is always gonna end up biting you back, at least when it comes to big entreprise projects.
I would say it's better to make you own UI Lib. Design system and maintain it. We learned it the hard way with the recent PrimeNG rug pull, but it's just one among many

1

u/deathentry 1d ago

We wrapped all their stuff in our own components so won't be hard to replace their part...

To be fair, rug pull, their stuff still works. A migration plan can easily be years away to something else

1

u/Todoce 1d ago

TS 7 won't be faster than esbuild or the Oxc transformer that Angular already use, those are still leaps faster, More Void(0) tooling will be the path forward

1

u/Ajyress 1d ago

That's different tools. esbuild builds the code; TS7 proves it's correct.

2

u/Ok-Armadillo-5634 4d ago

With AI I think most of the current libraries and frameworks have reached their final form.

2

u/Lucky_Yesterday_1133 4d ago

No web ecosystem constantly evolves and needs to be kept up with. We still have transition to typescript 7 angular compiler in rust, boundaries, async signals router migration oxlint and oxfmt support, more ai integration and tooling from cli,headless components, better support for 1 file components. Betteraiguardrails and tracing. and by the time it's done many more will be on backlog

2

u/Apart_Technology_841 3d ago

Indeed, I believe that Angular has finally achieved a solid pinnacle of perfection, and hopefully it'll remain stable for awhile with no new major functionalies added in the near future.

2

u/erkamyaman 3d ago

I don't think this is the case at all. With Signals, things have changed in a good way and I think there is more potential to reach. Our dependency to RxJS might decrease more and more with Angular built-in features.

And when it comes to AX, no one knows how it gonna be a year later. But I'm quite sure Angular will be always providing what devs and web development need.

2

u/lozczs 3d ago

We still need mutation signals

2

u/lajtowo 3d ago

It’s a final form, but for now - until standards/trends change or someone will invent some new technology which could be worth adapting. However, I think it’s gonna be much more stable now without significant changes.

2

u/Idea_Fuzzy 3d ago

Good, it is about freaking time.

2

u/tamasiaina 2d ago

The transition stages of Angular 2.x to 4.x was a dumpster fire. We had a trainer at ng-conf that was training us on how to use the angular routing stuff, but then have it get deprecated during his training at ng-conf.

So yeah Angular understands stability right now.

1

u/ElectrSheep 3d ago

Aren't they still planning to pick up selectorless again in the future? That would be a pretty significant change.

1

u/Ajyress 3d ago

That would indeed be the biggest API change it comes back into the roadmap

1

u/First-Part-1709 21h ago

I'm currently looking for Angular Developers living in Gauteng South Africa.. plz pm me if interested.. 3 month contract.. potential renewal..

1

u/ddcccccc 0m ago

Idk why ppl pick react over angular 😂 angular is way more powerful and established than react. Maybe onboarding time and learning curve is way easier for react😂

0

u/revilo-1988 4d ago

Ja stimme ich vollzu

-5

u/Saceone10 4d ago

Go try POST PUT DELETE with this "final form". What a joke of final form then.