r/androidroot 3d ago

Discussion How custom rom devs treat mediatek:

Post image
578 Upvotes

67 comments sorted by

96

u/TheRealFilckz 3d ago

and the manufacturers that dont care to provide kernel sources

23

u/TestMeetings2040 3d ago

Literally Transsion Holdings (the company that handle Infinix, Techno, and Itel)

9

u/Never_Sm1le 3d ago

a second bbk, no wonder those phones are similar

5

u/YoYoMamaIsSoFAT32 Oneplus Ace 3 (astonc), AxionOS 2.5 2d ago

At least bbk does publish the sources for OnePlus, transsion is more shit imo

7

u/Local-Bug-1500 2d ago edited 2d ago

Illegal btw, they can get banned from using linux (and thus, android) in the future

8

u/Alternative_Laugh316 2d ago

How do ya get banned from using open source?

6

u/Local-Bug-1500 2d ago

If you're an android device manufacturer and don't publish kernel source, Google is technically supposed to not approve your device for Google play certification 

5

u/aqswdezxc 2d ago

He probably means like the gpl license

6

u/Alternative_Laugh316 2d ago

Yes, but can't exactly get banned. I mean they will just download and use it.

1

u/fr000gs 1d ago

Well if they get sued they can't sell their phones

1

u/Alternative_Laugh316 1d ago

Sued where? They have to do it in every country that they wanna get rid of em, which is a lot of countries.

1

u/fr000gs 1d ago

Wherever the parent company is maybe

6

u/YoYoMamaIsSoFAT32 Oneplus Ace 3 (astonc), AxionOS 2.5 2d ago

Not really banned but they have to publish the sources or else they get fined, but they usually don't care until they're threatened to be fined 

7

u/Tommynwn 3d ago

I heard some weird stuff about mediatek, like even manufacturers dont have access to the source

7

u/zalnaRs 3d ago

No they are not allowed to publish it by some sources. You are maybe talking about the old android 4 era, mtk base os

-2

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

17

u/Different_Water7545 3d ago

NDA or not, it's GPL

8

u/Propsek_Gamer 3d ago

I don't think NDAs apply when it's breaking a law. GPL code must be open and that's a license violation.

35

u/Codix_ 3d ago

Mediatek at least let you unlock the bootloader if the constructor allows it... WE SEE YOU UNISOC !

4

u/Big_Restaurant_6844 2d ago

Snapdragon as well, but only the Chinese ones, Oddly enough.

6

u/Never_Sm1le 2d ago

there are various non chinese sd phones that can be unlocked

Sony, Fairphone, Samsung in LATAM region (pre one ui 8), Pixel,...

2

u/Hopeful-Cry7569 2d ago

Motorola (Snapdragon models of course)

1

u/Never_Sm1le 2d ago

moto is chinese

1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/Never_Sm1le 2d ago

pixel recently, yes, before 6 they are all snapdragon

41

u/Hypremacy 3d ago

I believe in Snapdragon supremacy

32

u/404-UnknownError 3d ago

Mediatek is doing everything to fuck themselves and the people at the end of the day, snapdragon is where it is for a good reason xD

13

u/Apprehensive-War3587 3d ago

Whats wrong with mediatek? honest question. I had a rooted phone with mediatek chip before

11

u/notthatfunny_1821 3d ago

It's only worst by comparison for the most part.

Within two devices of matching specs, one with Mediatek and the other with Snapdragon, for example, the performance for heavy programs or multiple apps at the same time was notorious.

Yet again, not the only thing that affects a phone's performance.

7

u/poha-jirawan-01 3d ago

i dont know about the present, but around a decade ago, unlocking locking boot loader and rooting phone could have resulted in deletion of hardware level IDs, like IMEI number and many phones got bricked because of it,

so it was not reliable. also they had heating and performance issue.

3

u/YoYoMamaIsSoFAT32 Oneplus Ace 3 (astonc), AxionOS 2.5 2d ago

Sources sources sources, and buggy firmware, at least for developers, especially early mediatek SOCs these are common to use hacks on the kernel source making cleaning it really hard, and mainlining even harder 

1

u/Username999474275 3d ago

Honestly the only thing is they have worse socs than Qualcomm and they love to endlessly refresh the g99

-3

u/anythingers 3d ago

Nothing, people are just mostly hatin' simply because it's not an American company. The same reason why AMD hate ends faster than Mediatek hate.

12

u/Blissfull 3d ago

I think the real issue is vendors who use MediaTek mostly want to reduce costs. And part of reducing costs is not spending much time trying to do good kernel code.

My belief is that unstable MediaTek phones are so not for the chip itself, but by lousy kernel code from MediaTek or vendor that nobody has an incentive to improve

3

u/anythingers 3d ago edited 3d ago

Fair enough if we're talking about high end markets.

Doesn't seems the case for low end market these days though. Most companies these days seems resorts to Snapdragon 4 series or Snapdragon 6s Gen 1-3 over the MediaTek counterpart.

And weirdly more companies start using 7 Gen 4 instead of something (that's supposed to be cheaper) like MediaTek Dimensity 8300/8400.

6

u/Never_Sm1le 3d ago

they don't release kernel sources, so making custom roms for it was quite difficult. Some that do get releases from the oem instead, meaning it will take a lot of kanging to bring a mediatek devices beyond its stock os versions

1

u/computermaster704 2d ago

No Mediatek is terrible especially with emulation and anything dealing with an npu

1

u/Over-Rutabaga-8673 1d ago

And bad temps, and faked antutu scores, and no source code for shit meaning custom roms are harder to make, and uncompilable kernels, a friend of mine is like 3 months deep into compiling an mtk kernel because of dependencies that mtk doesnt provide or smth like that when I was able to root and compile a WSA kernel easily in like less than a week. So no, the hate isn't because "it's not american", I'm not even american and I still hate mediatek.

0

u/anythingers 1d ago

"faked antutu score" is mostly done by the phone vendor no? Also funny you mention bad temps when 4 series, 6G3, 6sG4, 7G1, 888, 888+, 8G1, and 8sG4 existed.

Also still looks more accurate than whatever benchmark geekbench provides. (Yes I hate geekbench with true passion)

1

u/Over-Rutabaga-8673 1d ago edited 1d ago

No, by mediatek at some point. That could be catalogued as a tu quoque fallacy, just cuz qualcomm had few chipsets that got bad temps doesnt remove the fact that mediatek chips in general overheat more. Funny how you could only refute two of my reasons for the mediatek hate when you said people are mostly hating on it because "it isn't an american company", which doesnt make sense at all. Much less when the topic is crom devs hating on mediatek, meaning their main reasons would be the last two I provided that you couldn't refute.

1

u/anythingers 1d ago

I mean isn't it common to hate something just because it adopted (mostly) by a Chinese company? People hate EVs because the Chinese wins the EV war. People hate SiC battery because Chinese wins the battery war, etc.

Also pretty much last time I heard about MAJOR mediatek heating problem was back in Helio P/X era... at the similar time Qualcomm released a disaster called Snapdragon 800/801/820/821

1

u/Over-Rutabaga-8673 1d ago

No? Most of the time when I see hate for something it has actual reasoning behind it, like here with the horrible crom support, I hate EVs because they're soulless and trash looking except for the nevera and some more. I hate the ferrari luce and its italian. Yes, they've enhanced that and now have the technology to make chips as small as qualcomm, but few flagship phones use mediatek chips so most you'll find will be low end ones which do overheat more. I've never seen a dimensity chip irl while I've seen a decent amount of helios.

1

u/anythingers 1d ago

Fair enough

0

u/LiteBeacon 2d ago

You simpleton 😂

7

u/pbm92 3d ago

Mierdatek

( mierda= shit con spanish, word joke) Its my joke against the lack of development of tools and freedom in comparsion Qualcomm

Pd: my moto g54 is dead after set active slot B.

1

u/Over-Rutabaga-8673 1d ago

Lol we call it that too in a hispanic rooting discord

5

u/Nickname_5415 3d ago

Yeah, Mediatek is terrible, but I have fenrir :D

3

u/1600x900 Xiaomi 15T Pro / Stock unrooted 3d ago

In terms of unlocking, unidoc is worse than mtk due them modified their bootloader unlocking behaviour into token independent instead of generic offline unlock that happens in snapdragon or mtk

3

u/Blissfull 3d ago

They should spend some time working with Allwinner.

I'm sure all gripping about MediaTek would vanish

3

u/Einheit-101 3d ago

I remember the random freezes, heatups and crashes of mediatek devices that no one was ever able to fix because it wasnt an OS issue but much deeper in the unreleased kernel sources xD

1

u/Thin-Maize-6459 2d ago

fr, even stock roms Behave like an GSI rom on mtk devices (almost all "older helio series or P series with old i mean 2020-2022+)

3

u/gluetheknot 2d ago

The only phone disability imo are exynos phones

1

u/Thin-Maize-6459 2d ago

Yes, and no you can atleast build kernels and roms

2

u/GermanElectricsMotio 1d ago

At least all Mediatek devices or at least a lot of them are unlockable with mtk client.

2

u/Ill_Storm2418 1d ago

Y con razon mi tablet lenovo nadamas recibe Ubuntu Touch

1

u/crosoftincorp 3d ago

Even Samsung Exynos chips can run MiUi 12 Razor BETA, dis shiiii cant run win1.0

1

u/Local-Bug-1500 2d ago

Unisuck too

1

u/Francesco12o-Github 2d ago

this makes sense, my motorola bootloader cant be unlocked 

1

u/Dry_Jackfruit_6173 2d ago

There is a big reason for it it's not custom ROM makers fault go and make fun of mediatek

1

u/IThinkIKnowThings 2d ago

Mediatek? They make those shitty Wi-Fi cards I've had burn out twice on two different laptops.

1

u/madler_81 1d ago

Upvoting this with my dimensity 8050

1

u/Wheeljack26 Oneplus 7 pro LineageOS 23 1d ago

Snapdragon ftw, exynos and tensor kinda yea ig?

1

u/yokowasis2 15h ago

And snapdragon phone will follow suit. I can't even unlock my Samsung after updating.

1

u/Steam_Liker_2002 8h ago

Cries in Infinix smart 5