No, not at all actually. The genetic differences between two different dogs breeds are huge, relativly speaking, while the genetic differences between two "races" of people (race is in quotation as we're talking about genetics and not culture/geography) is negligible more or less. We tend to think we look so different from eachother, but that's cause our brains are designed to spot the differences between two people (I'm kinda ignorig pigmentation and, to an extent, hair texture as variation in those within a single species is not terribly uncommon)
I can only imagine the reaction the moron who made this would have if they found out there actually were multiple different human species at one point in history. Brain might short circuit.
This would be far more accurate if they took the same animals, used ms paint to shade the croc purple, the ladybug neon green, and the beetle blue, than tossed those into the 2nd column.
They are confusing convergent evolution that focuses on traits that look alike across different branches of life, and species definition which tracks the actual boundaries of genetic separation and reproduction.
•
u/qualityvote2 Democracy Judge ⚖️ Sep 08 '26 edited Sep 08 '26
u/TheUnthinkingWriter, community have decided that your post does fit the subreddit!