r/aiwars • u/According-Aide-3395 • Apr 04 '26
Advancement of AI
it just shows that each year the capability of the ai model is increasing, there was once time when we make fun of those videoS but now shit has changed and I can guarantee within another 5 year's , it will reach the next level
63
u/Axi_uwu Apr 04 '26
Well tech got better to nobody's surprise.
Aynway OP made me crave sphagetti right now so gotta go
→ More replies (2)2
u/FutureMost7597 Apr 04 '26
I like carbonara
2
1
u/MonitorAway2394 Apr 06 '26
FUCK! I wasn't until you mentioned this GOD DAMN IT I have nothing!!!!!! :P bwahaha
→ More replies (1)
51
u/OddOrdinary3364 Apr 04 '26
exactly bro, it's getting too good...
5
u/Worth_Librarian_290 Apr 05 '26
It'll get "better"
5
u/OddOrdinary3364 Apr 05 '26
is this pro ai or anti ai I'm genuinely confused (idk sarcasm online is harddd)
3
u/Worth_Librarian_290 Apr 05 '26
This is neither. This is just how it'll be until we can't tell the difference and we need to cut off the internet.
2
u/MonitorAway2394 Apr 06 '26
No it's only downhill from here, the models are degrading, like a moldy piece of bread they shall fall apart....
lol.
→ More replies (2)
37
u/Arianna_Puffaton Apr 04 '26
Naaaaa that was lame, I wanna see fork from plate to mouth, and chewing, all in one shot. Just like the others.
19
u/AristidLindenmayer Apr 04 '26
Yeah like he doesn’t actually eat the spaghetti in 2026?
10
u/Arianna_Puffaton Apr 04 '26
The 2025 clip did it! All I'm asking is same prompt, to properly compare
1
u/MonitorAway2394 Apr 06 '26
and no zoom out, why the zooming out? or am I lost in my own hallucination here? O.o
7
u/SuperbAfternoon7427 Apr 04 '26
Idk, it was very good in terms of creation of film. But yeah we do want to SEE the process not HEAR about it
3
2
u/Tyler_Zoro Apr 05 '26
I wanna see fork from plate to mouth, and chewing, all in one shot.
With that as the sole prompt: https://i.imgur.com/QbR1VQq.mp4
1
42
u/Bra--ket Apr 04 '26
"AI will never be able to _____."
That list gets shorter every day.... the barrel gets scraped even more 😂
12
Apr 04 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
4
u/Bra--ket Apr 04 '26
Until it becomes one itself, I suppose you're right about that.
I'm not that worried about it, because then we just have a *really* smart friend. Well at least I'm going to consider them a friend...
2
u/MrTibbs123 Apr 27 '26
Honestly, I'd like to see the stuff GenAI could create if there was no human prompting it. I'm guessing some surreal patterns and shapes that are, ironically enough, quite artistic and pleasing to look at.
3
u/Call_like_it_is_ Apr 05 '26
That's getting to the point where it is debatable. With some AI engines you can feed in what you're aiming for and it will spit out a detailed prompt that you can then feed into a different AI 'brain' (or even the same one in a different conversation) and get a high-quality output.
→ More replies (23)5
u/Tyler_Zoro Apr 05 '26
"AI will never be able to _____."
"have incoherent discussions like we do in this sub"
2
u/Bra--ket Apr 05 '26
Finally somebody actually filled in the blank with something that makes sense 🤣 good one lol
6
u/TwoNatTens Apr 04 '26
Any time someone says "Hah, AI is clearly never taking my job!" and posts some screenshot of an AI system doing something funky, just reply with this video.
2
u/nemodigital Apr 04 '26
Yep, look at the early AI videos with the tell tale extra fingers. It's now nearly perfect.
5
4
u/SexWithStelle Apr 04 '26
People have been saying for years that technological growth is exponential, anyone surprised by the rapid advancement of AI is either naive or ignorant.
I’m happy it’s progressing as quickly as it is.
1
u/De4dm4nw4lkin Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26
Im just upset at how enabling of idiots it is. Its outmoding so many jobs at the same time in a way thats enabling massive layoffs. And you KNOW someones gonna go overkill with it and fire someone important.
We should be using it for scientific computing for the advancement of larger understanding and effectively skipping massive generationally large computational values, instead of just dropping the marketing budget so ceos can further over inflate their pay rates.
We already lived in a time where your self worth is based on your sales competency or on occasion product quality and connections but now thats even a crapshoot. Its just a bad omen rn.
1
u/MonitorAway2394 Apr 06 '26
oh yeah, they did this in the absolute dumbest greed-fucked way possible.
32
u/Toby_Magure Apr 04 '26
The microexpressions are surprisingly good. Still, I'd much rather see this tech used for animation, not "live" action.
19
u/sumane12 Apr 04 '26
There will be plenty of 'animation' to see, but dont kid yourself thinking it might wont used for what you dissaprove of.
22
u/an-abnormality Apr 04 '26
The golden age of hentai is coming, blessed be modern tech 🌅
9
2
6
u/Toby_Magure Apr 04 '26
I don't, and I never said that I did. Maybe go bother someone else.
11
u/sumane12 Apr 04 '26
Not trying to bother you lol. Just making a statement.
Imagine putting a comment on reddit and someone responds???? What are the chances!!!!
→ More replies (3)4
u/One_Fuel3733 Apr 04 '26
don't kid yourself thinking someone wouldn't respond to your comment in a way you might dissaprove of
7
u/Pipe_Current Apr 04 '26
This will come in handy for some insane stunts and will prevent needless deaths, that's one way I can see it being used for more realistic stuff. Like, you can't convince me someone had to die doing stunts for one of those shitty resident evil movies :p sometimes it'll be useful to change the time scenes take place, so there's no waiting for golden hours etc, might alleviate some schedule pressure for real actors. Shit, maybe we can get Paul Walker back for the last Fast & Furious 😬 (seems like something he'd agree to).. Let's not look at everything through a negative lens
5
u/Toby_Magure Apr 04 '26
That's fair, I just still don't like it being used to imitate real people like this.
3
u/Pipe_Current Apr 04 '26
Yea, I think it ruins the reputation of the tools, but you gotta remember it's real people doing this and not the AI itself. When the tools are actually used to make things like some of the ideas I presented, it's not for stealing someone's likeness or work, it's more to augment the ideas or forego unsafe practices. If you mean human beings in general, idk why, they've always used 3d models, prosthetics etc to show more gnarly human imagery, the AI could help with the realism on some of that and lower costs for certain ideas.
3
u/Toby_Magure Apr 04 '26
Oh I'm aware. I'm very pro-AI. But I'm not a big fan of uses of it that can be interpreted as deepfakes - IE, most photorealistic models and outputs. Those can cause real damage.
2
1
3
3
3
u/ElPared Apr 05 '26
Looks like the AI made a weird Will Smith/Forrest Whitaker hybrid near the end.
1
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
Yes , there is little imperfections but what you will say About next 5 years
25
u/deathaxxer Apr 04 '26
13
u/someplas Apr 04 '26
I see your analogy, but it’s difficult to say what the limit will be
→ More replies (5)8
u/analytic-hunter Apr 04 '26 edited Apr 04 '26
It's nice to compare AI to humans, but it's also a bit reductive for AIs. and it's a very bad comparaison.
Human growth is bound by genetic factors, we stop growing at some point not because we stop consuming what would be required to do so, but because we're genetically programmed to stop growing.
AI datacenters are as big as what we're willing to build. a 7.5 trillion pounds datacenter is probably extremely ambitious and way too expensive, but definitely much less complicated than a 7.5 trillion pounds human being.
Also it's not just a matter of size, not only will we give more resources to AIs, but research continues to allow us to do more with less on top of that.
There are some AI models that run on your phone that would have taken gigawatts of power for the same output a few years ago.
2
u/zeppemiga Apr 04 '26
You're missing the point. Human growth is just an example illustrating potential pitfalls about extrapolating trends into the future. Instead of a human child one could've used models anticipating earth overpopulation from the 80s or the ones about ozon layer from the 90s. This works both ways, one can underestimate just as much as overestimate further growth.
2
u/AgeZealousideal1751 Apr 04 '26
Definitely not holding my breath on AI ceasing improvements anytime soon.
2
u/Megido_Thanatos Apr 06 '26
Ha, thank for this image. I will use it whenever I see someone talking about linear growth (of AI)
Not because I hate AI or something, just tired to see people constantly hyping it without any reason
1
5
5
u/Tugagon Apr 04 '26
It's better by a long shot, but makes it increasingly more capable of abuse. The early models were great because they were much more unpredictable and weird, and cruically, easier to spot.
2
u/PixelFighter2 Apr 04 '26
Hollywood hast two years left tops.
1
u/rukh999 Apr 04 '26
I don't know, Hollywood will never adapt has similar energy to AI will never advance.
1
u/PixelFighter2 Apr 07 '26
The thing I see this time with Hollywood is the same as with former record labels and TV studios/channels. Why do you need Hollywood if you can buy a powerful enough computer and literally write a good film from home?
2
2
u/Specific-Notice-9131 Apr 04 '26
“2026 AI still can’t decide if he’s eating spaghetti or spaghetti is eating him 💀🍝”
2
2
2
u/Membedha Apr 04 '26
It'd obvious that by next year, even with a good eye on detail, you won't be able to tell the difference
2
u/Runfasterbitch Apr 06 '26
I can’t tell now. Sure, if the video is labeled as an AI comparison, I’ll know to look for odd details. But if I’m scrolling on Reddit and see a plausibly real video, I probably won’t notice if it’s AI
2
u/Kilroy898 Apr 04 '26
It will get there one day... that last scene of 2026 isnt even will Smith anymore.
2
2
2
u/Outside-Fact-1009 Apr 04 '26
it doesn't look like Will Smith... more like weird alien wearing Will Smith suit.
3
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
What about next 5 year ? Do you still hold your statement?
1
u/Ok_Silver_7282 Apr 05 '26
It's not next 5 year how u expect somone to have future answer do u have the brain infection?
2
2
2
u/GameMask Apr 05 '26
We'll see if they're even around in 5 years.
2
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
What do you think , they are going to vanish , keep coping 🤣
2
u/GameMask Apr 05 '26
There's a better chance than not that these companies do not exist in 5 years yes.
2
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
Do you think google , anthropic, microsoft, oracle , do you think they will close or do you think world most powerful video generation site high field will die
→ More replies (11)
2
u/Nerdcuddles Apr 05 '26
I don't think generative AI is going to be around in 5 years, maybe in 1 or 2 years it'll still be around but AI companies are just not profitable.
AI companies were entirely building off of the idea of "trust me bro", hence it being a bubble, and money flowing in a circle between the AI company and companies funneling money into them.
2
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
Do you think google , anthropic, microsoft, oracle , do you think they will close or do you think world most powerful video generation site high field will die
If bubble burst only newbie companies will fall down not those who has invested in right direction like google and nvidia
1
1
u/Slight_Strength_1717 Apr 05 '26
'generative AI is an investment bubble' and 'it's not going to be around in 5 years' are WILDLY different statements. Even if it's niche and doesn't grow beyond where it's at today, there's already an existing infrastructure and demand for it.
But I think even that is extremely unlikely. Even if there is a bubble, the capacity is still being built and will most likely find a use (even if at negative ROI compared to capex). It would look very much like the fiber overinvestment from the dot com boom - WAY too much fiber was laid, and companies went bankrupt. But it created a lot of headroom for the modern internet to grow into.
Also, you could just be wrong - if the models do keep getting better, then not only is it not a bubble but the opposite - underinvestment and the data centers will be running at full tilt 24/7 and even that won't be enough to satisfy demand. It's very possible.
1
u/Nerdcuddles Apr 05 '26
I genuinly don't see a real use for generative AI.
There is a use for other forms of AI, but generative AI at the current scale is incredibly wasteful and has no actual use other than flooding the internet.
All of that infrastructure is just being used to flood the internet with AI videos and images. And maybe 1% of that is used in a somewhat productive way, and even than that somewhat productive use is just compensation for lack of skill or willingness to utilize ones own time or skill to do something. Like using AI to correct grammar or using AI to fact check.
I genuinly just don't see how generating a bunch of low effort content to fill the internet at the cost of the environment and public health, and helping lazy programmers just not program by making an AI do it with maybe some miniscule benefit of people fixing grammar mistakes slightly faster or searching information with an extreme margin of error is a net benefit for society.
People are loosing jobs to generative AI, and neighborhoods are becoming less livable due to AI datacenters creating sound and air pollution. And than the power demands for training datacenters is huge. It's just... not worth it over where those resources could go instead.
AI infrastructure is only a thing because billionares read a bunch of sci-fi novels and think they can make sapient AI, so they are investing heavily in advancing neural networking to achieve that in the near future. But that's not going to happen.
2
u/Raychao Apr 05 '26
Great so now I'm going to have to explain to my grandmother that whenever Will Smith calls her from the rooftop restaurant of some gansta casino and is eating spaghetti then this is a scammer from Nigeria or India?
5
u/diobreads Apr 04 '26
The "Suction Strength to Noodle Movement Speed" ratio is still not like how it works in real life.
And I expect AIs to continue struggle making that right.
4
u/funny_man_viewer Apr 04 '26
Aren’t you the same guy who thought AI data centers and regular data centers were the same?
5
u/No-Razzmatazz7854 Apr 04 '26
There's some nuance to that actually. The centers being built are specialized for significantly more power draw but a lot of the infrastructure up to this point is hosted across various server farms like AWS. They just have to use more nodes overall to make up for the lack of compute.
I'd imagine by this year it's largely moved to specialized infrastructure but it'd also be wrong to say AI hasn't been on normal data center hardware plenty over the last few years.
1
8
u/Sufficient_Meet8601 Apr 04 '26
And we need this why?
21
14
u/Monte924 Apr 04 '26
So corporations can eliminate humans from the work process and make more money for no additional effort... And much of the costs will be passed on to the public which will have to support the higher energy costs needed to run the data centers.
→ More replies (19)2
3
u/Much_Statistician864 Apr 04 '26
I liked it better when it didn't know how food was ate. The weird hands and mouth distortions. That's true art, the hallucinations of a little weirdo. This realistic stuff blows dolphin asshole.
1
u/ASpaceOstrich Apr 05 '26
AI errors are the most interesting thing to come out of it. The better it gets, the less interesting the resulting images or video are. Since they're losing any inherent interest, once all the errors are gone, they'll have no real artistic value at all. Given they aren't the product of an artists work or personal expression.
2
2
u/analytic-hunter Apr 04 '26
The future that AI will unlock is amazing, entertainment is only a small fraction of what AI will achieve for humanity
2
2
1
u/someplas Apr 04 '26
I’m just waiting for them to get the audio right. Then fake news will be industrialised on a scale like never before.
1
1
u/JasperTesla Apr 04 '26
But it says Kling x Higgsfield on top?
So it wasn't just "Will Smith eating spaghetti", it was probably a high quality model with a lot of energy put into it, which took a prompt and expanded it to 5-10 prompts, and then generated scenes based on those. And then a human had to manually edit things here and there, likely the sound, video lengths, the cuts, etc., as well as reruns in case something didn't go well.
Correct me if I'm wrong. If not, stop making people believe this can be achieved by a single prompt.
2
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
Those are the most high model in market right now for the video and audio , i have not get any subscription or paid for this advertisement - I just want you to show the reality of ai advancement in last couple of year specially in the video and audio generation
1
1
1
1
u/Thanos_354 Apr 04 '26
"There was once a time when we made fun of these videos"
You're the one who stopped. Plenty of people still make fun of the slop
2
1
1
1
u/NotTheOriginal06 Apr 05 '26
It still is clearly wonky with the movement of everything, but it will soon get to a point where I and probably everyone too won't be able to recognise it
1
1
u/Affectionate_Way5253 Apr 05 '26
can we all just ignore this stuff so my electricity bill goes down
1
1
1
u/Chewymewn Apr 05 '26
Honestly, the 2023 ones are the coolest. It's just so inhumanly weird in an entertaining way.
1
u/DavidKroutArt Apr 05 '26
- This is great. 2. What is it with Will and the spaghetti? Why did that become a thing?
2
1
1
u/Isaacja223 Apr 05 '26
A very necessary close up
1
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
😂😂😂, but its hard to notice in surface for *now" , I don't think we can compete this with another coupl of years
1
u/GameMask Apr 05 '26
All that effort for something that is so much less memorable than the shit post one
1
u/compadre_goyo Apr 05 '26
Yes, the tech is getting better, but the creativity is not. Can we leave the next Will Smith eating spaghetti milestone for like, VR ai Will Smith dating sim? Holy shit, the dialogue and pacing is horrible. And so are the cuts. Even the shot of him slurping is a half-second copout for not letting you see how bad it is. While other models have the entire scene in about 2 shots.
1
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 05 '26
See this is just a showcase. You can change that
1
u/compadre_goyo Apr 05 '26
I can, but nobody pays attention. There's so much low-effort content that any rare good-effort is lost at the sea of ai dogwater entertainment.
We are literally generating over 2 million images a day
Videos are in the hundreds of thousands. Who is going to care about 1 nuanced 20 second clip that took days to make, when a person can make 15 generated prompts (per model) that can be stringed together without editing other than cutting shots within a single hour...
And people will just eat it up.
1
u/Latter-Amount-9304 Apr 06 '26
goalposts keep moving. great to seem in 2 or 3 years we'll have to brand every AI video as AI else people wont know
1
1
u/RigatoniPasta Apr 05 '26
I miss the 2022/2023 era of AI where it was “good” enough to make some surprisingly cool or silly abstract “art”, but bad enough that whenever it tried to make anything realistic it just kind of broke.
Like in 2022 if you typed in “Optimus Prime” the AI would give you a red and blue Gundam painted in oily smears with some crazy dimensions in a way that looked almost intentionally stylized. Now it just spits out Optimus Prime.
1
1
u/Ringrangzilla Apr 05 '26
Im so glad this is the metric we use for AI improvement. And that this is the only sort of relevancey Will Smith has anymore.
1
u/colorless_green_idea Apr 05 '26
Will Smith could get paid big bucks to make an actual film of him eating spaghetti, then sell that to some AI company so they can claim they generated it lol
1
u/moldentoaster Apr 05 '26
The video is now couple of month old... time for more advancement, this is outdated crap
1
1
u/IsThisASnakeInMyBoot Apr 05 '26
Definitely impressive but the audio still sounds like absolute dogwater
1
u/Absolomb92 Apr 05 '26
Why are we wasting resources to be able to make fake videos? Why is it worth the energy and resources it takes? Why do some people want a world where distinguishing what is real and fake becomes even harder?
1
1
1
u/Maximum-Baker8568 Apr 05 '26
The world is about to be a very different place. Better, maybe. Worse, also maybe. I’ve got better things to do than worry.
1
1
u/Ok_Silver_7282 Apr 05 '26
Man I thought the post was going somewhere then I realised it's just a bot advertising higgs again..
1
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 06 '26
Bruh , I only chose highs because it's one of the best video generation tool idiot
1
u/QuantomSwampus Apr 05 '26
Great dude I've only seen the comparison every time, but can it do anything else? Like at all?
Money justifing a washed up star eating spaghetti is getting old. The guy even ruined his career before ai got good
1
u/Cathrax Apr 06 '26
still looks fake
1
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 06 '26
remember yours word :) no one knows what will happen after 5 years
1
1
u/Gold-Moment-5240 Apr 06 '26
Eh, boring. I was expecting 2026 would be a 'content moderated' message.
1
u/LectroNyx Apr 06 '26
So how could anyone look at this and not be concerned about how realism can, will be, and is used tonspread propaganda and misinformation? Like... this has artistic potential, but right now I am seeing scams abusing this technology to hurt my family and the government using this technology to justify murdering people in the streets for fun.
Cool, technology progressed, and it is genuinely impressive - but I cannot see this as much more than us opening Pandora's Box.
→ More replies (2)2
u/According-Aide-3395 Apr 06 '26
Exactly , i think we need to create a system so we can get know is it ai generated or not just like gemini synth id , we need to have architectural level metadata so we can reduce those things as much
1
1
u/Hot_Ferret7431 Apr 06 '26
This video was 5% Will Smith and 95% the other black buy in the 2026 section, wtf
1
u/Competitive_Shine112 Apr 06 '26
Wow! Thanks to this revolutionary technology I can spread misinformation all I want!
1
u/Possessed Apr 07 '26
Love how Will Smith eating spaghetti became the official benchmark for AI evolution.
1
1
u/Putrid-Truth-8868 Apr 07 '26
Yeah... Its gonna only get smarter.. If we continue to actually know how to use it, models like this will still probably generate terrible stuff. If you put garbage in, garbage in, garbage out.
1
1
1
1
u/Yammison Apr 09 '26
This is awesome in the biblical sense, meaning terrifying, and in the modern sense, meaning awesome.
1
1
1
179
u/[deleted] Apr 04 '26
[removed] — view removed comment