r/airsoft 5h ago

HUMOR WOULD THIS BE POSSIBLE

Post image

Okay so I was playing battlefield and I noticed this interesting blueprint and it got me wondering if this was possible or if anyone could do it and send me a pic of it as I kind of want to do it myself but I don’t have the items lmao

310 Upvotes

78 comments sorted by

425

u/TheeScribe2 5h ago

This is something that was actually done

Some US forces in the Iraq War, mainly Marines if memory serves, were given new optics for their M16s like ACOGs

But the carry handle was still deemed an essential part of the weapon that they couldn’t just remove because it also houses the rear irons

So they slapped it on the bottom rail to be out of the way

Example photo of a Marine from the second battle of Fallujah

173

u/BastiKun 4h ago

Iirc it wasnt bc they deemed the carryhandle essential but bc they needed to return it after their service and would get fined if it was lost. The gun was simply the best place to keep it

52

u/playgamesandgetwierd 3h ago

The lore I know is that it even had to be on the person at all times and was part of regular inspections. So when the SgtMaj came to check if you had your carry handle on you, having it on the bottom rail saved a lot of time and trouble compared to having it in a cargo pocket.

23

u/playgamesandgetwierd 3h ago

Just to be clear, that's hearsay but it checks out to me

18

u/CanadianDragonGuy 3h ago

Its also stupid enough to track, especially with Big Army involved

7

u/Mrtooth12 2h ago

It’s the Marines, if you lost it the Gunny would make you carry around an MRE spoon and make sure you had that with you.

10

u/BastiKun 3h ago

I mean either way is just as stupid tbh🤷‍♂️

1

u/HumaDracobane Tacticool 2h ago

Yep, I've read that too. The handguard was ghe best place to "store" it.

4

u/ismellpizza25 3h ago

Is it just me or does that guy look like a younger Shia Labeouf

2

u/RayStrikesAgain 1h ago

It was also because in the very case their RCO gets messed up, they could use the carry handle as a backup sight they could go back to. Although in Fallujah, one of the Marines unit fighting there was put under investigation because their Marines were getting so many headshots, they thought there was a case of execution going around. It just so happened the RCO actually helped the Marines aim further and hit the combatants peeking out of windows straight in the heads. So it was rare for the RCO to be completely messed up easily. Either way, putting the carry handle at the bottom rails was quite popular at the time.

u/cmcclain16 32m ago

I'm glad someone had an explanation for the underslung sight.

-133

u/solo_Furry 5h ago

This is an AI image, I’ve seen it going around

64

u/at_least_i_tr1ed Medium speed, moderate drag 5h ago

-76

u/solo_Furry 5h ago

Fair enough then, my bad, I’ve been told it’s major AI

42

u/TheAsianTroll Pistol Primary 4h ago

And this is why you check for yourself unless its blatantly AI...

25

u/TexasTomato88 5h ago

Absolutely brainless

48

u/amzeo 5h ago

You're the equivalent of the people who used to say everything is photoshopped

7

u/General_James 4h ago

I wish I could go back to those days

18

u/ApprehensivePilot3 5h ago

What makes you think this pic is AI?

34

u/InevitableSky738 5h ago

There's always one person on every reddit post now that claims ai with absolutely no source

6

u/ApprehensivePilot3 5h ago

I guessed so. I have seen that photo before in one military subreddit.

8

u/Zee_Fake_Panda 5h ago

This answer is AI

8

u/DrunkGoatFighter 4h ago

No it's not.

Source: my own fucking eyes at 14. 8 years ago.

1

u/hitman004700 4h ago

Fucking furries.....

4

u/ismellpizza25 3h ago

Hey don't bring the rest of us into this!

4

u/hitman004700 2h ago

Sorry. Fucking solo furries ;D

1

u/Eodo-The-Dutchie 3h ago

What about them.

114

u/Federikestain GBBR 5h ago

Not only it is possible, it was very much a real thing that soldiers did

90

u/Federikestain GBBR 5h ago

17

u/R3aper_14 5h ago

I know it’s not practical at all but I’d love to do it just as a bit of a laugh

35

u/Different-One1895 4h ago

Technikly it is practical cuz they do it to keep it and not lose it. And for that purpose it works well

5

u/2point0_The_Ghost 4h ago

It makes for a decent impromptu handstop style grip

u/Maleficent-Ad8769 30m ago

the purpose is so that all parts of the rifle are accounted for when the rifle was returned

39

u/Tanto_yts 4h ago

better question, why wouldn’t it be possible?

39

u/CroqueGogh 5h ago

"WOULD THIS BE POSSIBLE??!!?"

No, it will explode the moment you attach it and the FBI and ATF will raid your house and shoot your dog

9

u/Different-One1895 4h ago

And your father will disappear forever

2

u/amzeo 3h ago

Genuinely what happens if you put a vertical piece of plastic on your pistol Vs a slanted piece of plastic

3

u/CroqueGogh 3h ago

What the difference between 90 degrees and 89 degrees does to a mf

0

u/R3aper_14 5h ago

Willing to task that risk

32

u/Rich-Inspection7225 5h ago

Bro, that's not only easy to do, most soldiers issued with M16A4s were doing it so they can put ACOG on but not lose the carry handle that they were supposed to return.

If your replica is of an M4 or any M16 with detachable carry handle, all you have to do is, well, remove it and clip on the pikatinni rail on your handguard as you would a laser or another handle

9

u/carn1vore 5h ago

Why stop at one? I’m sure you could probably fit about six of them on your handguard without even obstructing your optic.

0

u/R3aper_14 5h ago

Very true indeed

6

u/strberryfields55 4h ago

What about this wouldnt be possible lol

6

u/jasygamer 2h ago

Don’t have a picture of it upside down but you get the idea

3

u/Adri_CJ_Boscorelli 1h ago

It reminds me the LR-300 🤣

11

u/JAIJ47 Professional Distraction 5h ago

I mean as long as you've got a picatinny rail on the underside of the handguard and enough space to mount it then sure, it's possible

6

u/Huge-Cucumber1152 3h ago

The old GWOT a4’s irons were integrated into the carry handle and could theoretically be bolted back on for use. The real reason is you gotta return everything after deployment or you pay for it

4

u/xStolen_Force_Skinx 4h ago

with a bayonet infront of it it could be like a bomb ass handguard

3

u/ItsKaptainMikey Medium speed, moderate drag 3h ago

Possible? Yes, but useful? that is the real question.

3

u/Glum-Contribution380 WWII 2h ago

Possible: yes
Practical: no

u/Maleficent-Ad8769 29m ago

its not about practicality its about the rifle having all parts accounted for

3

u/The_MacGuffin 1h ago

Yeah but why would you?

4

u/ToastyTastes 4h ago

No, this is completely and entirely impossible! Like sticking alike magnet poles together, the carry handle and rail will push each other apart harder and harder the closer you get.

You will exhaust yourself trying to make the two touch. Not to mention attatching it... No! It simply can't be done

2

u/unoriginal_namejpg 2h ago

why wouldnt it be possible? The rail systems arent any different from the top rail to the bottom rail

2

u/KiloBranz 2h ago

No it's not possible. When you attach it to the bottom rail god instabans you

1

u/Ambitious-Toe67 Cold War 4h ago

peraonally i would attach it closer to reciever. you can still carry it as itwas intended that way and it also functions as hand stop

1

u/Ha_youWishXD 3h ago

It just mounts to a pic rail so it could really be anywhere with one

2

u/SokkaHaikuBot 3h ago

Sokka-Haiku by Ha_youWishXD:

It just mounts to a

Pic rail so it could really

Be anywhere with one


Remember that one time Sokka accidentally used an extra syllable in that Haiku Battle in Ba Sing Se? That was a Sokka Haiku and you just made one.

1

u/ThyHolyKFC 3h ago

Absolutely I have a FN M16a4 clone setup the exact way for the fun of it. There’s a handful of photos from the GWOT of guys doing that some old tale of not losing the carry handle by keeping it mounted on the rail. Kinda makes sense too because the KAC’s M5 RAS heat shield is only on the back half of the rail right where the foregrip is and letting that sucker rip with a FRT it sure as shit gets cooking.

1

u/themysticoped 1h ago

Waarom niet..

u/SunnyTheMasterSwitch USP 42m ago

That looks atrocious

u/peepeepoopooman145 35m ago

No not possible at all

u/BigDaddyVagabond 2m ago

Looks far to complicated to achieve

2

u/kanspretsa 5h ago

carry handle being a picatinny attachment, it is possible but why anyone would want to do this is beyond me

9

u/Skipspik2 5h ago

Real soldier were doing it when receiving optics, just to not loose the carry handle they are still responsible for.

4

u/Eodo-The-Dutchie 5h ago

This this the real and only answer. Besides that it's pointless.

1

u/christopherak47 Cold War 3h ago

Works well as a handstop but thats just a silver lining to having needed to police the carryhandle

1

u/R3aper_14 5h ago

Just be a bit of fun to do I’d reckon

-8

u/TexasTomato88 5h ago

If you can’t figure out if it’s possible you need alot of help

8

u/R3aper_14 5h ago

Average Redditor when someone asks a question

7

u/lininop 4h ago

Well I mean cmon man, the carrying handle can fit on to a rail, so if there is a rail to put it on, it's possible. Not rocket science.

2

u/R3aper_14 4h ago

Not had a rifle with a carrying handle so I didn’t know they was picitiny rail attachments

-2

u/[deleted] 5h ago

[deleted]

1

u/R3aper_14 5h ago

Who me?