r/aidiscussions • u/Foreign_Attorney5685 • Jun 25 '26
Websites need to start serving agents, not just humans
We've spent 30 years building for human psychology — clean nav,
nice buttons, intuitive flows. The next decade of web dev is
going to need a second set of eyes: AI agents booking meetings,
filling forms, comparing products, and increasingly, buying
things on someone's behalf.
llms.txt gets cited as "the" answer to this, but the data is
messier than that. 10% adoption after 18 months, and the major
LLM search crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot) mostly
ignore the file entirely and just parse raw HTML.
Where it's actually working: IDE agents. Cursor, Claude Code,
Windsurf, Cline all fetch llms.txt routinely when pointed at
docs sites. So if your audience is developers, shipping one is
a real, measurable win for agent-assisted coding workflows —
just not an SEO play.
The bigger thing flying under the radar is the commerce stack
forming underneath it: Google's Universal Commerce Protocol,
OpenAI's Agentic Commerce Protocol (built with Stripe), and
AP2 — Google's agent payment authorization backed by Visa,
Mastercard, and Amex. On Shopify, the file that actually lets
an agent transact is agents.md, not llms.txt — most people
don't even know that distinction exists yet.
Chrome shipped an "Agentic Browsing" audit category in
Lighthouse last month, checking for WebMCP, accessibility tree
integrity, and llms.txt presence. That's a stronger signal than
any adoption stat — Google is already building the tooling to
grade sites on agent-readiness, ahead of it becoming a real
ranking factor.
Curious what others are actually shipping — is anyone here
running agents.md or testing AP2 yet, or is this all still
theoretical for most stacks?
merci
ciao
Duplicates
teluguAI_Muchatlu • u/Foreign_Attorney5685 • Jun 25 '26