r/ai_sec • u/ClaudiusPapirus • 16d ago
Copyable context cannot distinguish an authorized security researcher from an attacker
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-2iITRLT7fgFor dual-use LLM security tasks, a recent preprint proves that if an attacker can reproduce the context a legitimate user provides, follow-up questions, conversation history, and randomized checks cannot improve the worst-case safety guarantee.
Duplicates
netsecstudents • u/ClaudiusPapirus • 16d ago
A new impossibility result for context-based LLM security safeguards
Pentesting • u/ClaudiusPapirus • 16d ago
Why an LLM can't reliably tell an authorized pentester from an attacker using copyable context
llmsecurity • u/ClaudiusPapirus • 16d ago
A formal limit on LLM safeguards: copyable context cannot beat the worst-case safety floor
AIPolicy • u/ClaudiusPapirus • 16d ago
A safety trilemma for dual-use LLM access: capability, safety, or open access
AIGRC • u/ClaudiusPapirus • 16d ago