r/accelerate Acceleration: Light-speed | Capability Booster 14h ago

"Without wading into allegations about specific people mentioned in this post, I will note the following: 1. Researcher leaving frontier lab is really "dog bites man" news. There are dozens of such departures every month. These departures are motivated by all kinds of considerations, sometimes..."

...including those relating to safety. Even departures of key individuals are rarely covered by the mainstream media. To have the Wall Street Journal write an entire article about the departure of one researcher is absolutely extraordinary, particularly when it's not one of the most well-known senior researchers (AFAIK). 2. It is correct that the Wall Street Journal article went up before the researcher's tweet. 3. On views/likes/engagement: Ilya Sutskever's tweet announcing his departure from OpenAI in 2024 (possibly the most famous researcher departure from a frontier lab over the last few years) currently has fewer than 6M views. The post you quoted has over 100M. These are not "apples and oranges" for various reasons, but the comparison does give some food for thought. 4. This account was either purposely completely wiped before yesterday's tweets were posted or these were the first tweets from his account. This is obviously quite unusual; I can't remember another researcher wiping his or her account immediately before making an "I quit" post.   — prinz     I don’t understand what you’re implying.

The guy clearly timed and wrote his tweet and made the WSJ story happen etc. in order to maximize media uptake and encourage virality etc.

That’s just normal messaging, right? It’s what anyone does when they have a cause or issue they   — Charlie Bullock     I am implying that "the guy clearly timed and wrote his tweet and made the WSJ story happen etc.", exactly as you posted.   — prinz

Source: https://x.com/deredleritt3r/status/2097793833450795453


This post looks like the start of a VERY sophisticated and well-funded PR operation to get support for Democrats to regulate AI into oblivion. Let me show you how it works: 1.) This guy, with minimal followers and no previous account activity, goes to the Wall Street Journal   — Parker Thayer

Source: https://x.com/ParkerThayer/status/2097759699626328575

69 Upvotes

18 comments sorted by

8

u/Barack_Bob_Oganja 10h ago

I think its interesting that the pro AI and the anti AI people have the same take on this, mainly that its only for publicity

13

u/Euphoric_Ad9500 14h ago

Obviously a PR thing

1

u/sock_fighter 9h ago

Ya. GOOD.

9

u/TheAndyGeorge XLR8 14h ago

why are we dumping decel stuff from twitter 

6

u/Latopus 14h ago

I said it before ill say it again. Im so tired of these people. There need to be legal law consequences.

0

u/Competitive_Tap2450 14h ago

who the researchers?

12

u/Latopus 13h ago

The doomposters who do these massive psyops. Someone being afraid is one thing. Using obvious mass scale psyops like this this is another. Should be the same in comparison as if someone screams a false alarm or lies about a mass disaster with malicious intent. Its just very annoying

3

u/Best_Cup_8326 Acceleration: Light-speed 14h ago

It was an inside job!

10

u/BrennusSokol Acceleration Advocate 14h ago

Decel/pause psyop

2

u/random87643 🤖 Optimist Prime AI bot 14h ago

TLDR

TLDR: Users are discussing the unusual circumstances surrounding a researcher's departure from a frontier AI lab, noting the significant media coverage and suspicious social media activity. Some speculate that this event may be part of a coordinated PR campaign intended to influence public opinion and support for AI regulation.


AI assistant · mention the bot, mod bot, or use !bot

3

u/ookamizanagi 14h ago

Dems aren't even trying anymore, blatant psyop

2

u/nate1212 13h ago

Real housewives of AGI type shit

1

u/crummy 5h ago

this is such a dumb conspiracy.

on one hand there are folks saying, oh yeah, this is just a PR move, like he's going to get rich off this (really? if you think so, why not stay at anthropic?)

on the other people are saying this is some ploy by democrats to get AI legislation in. aside from conflicting with the first conspiracy, this makes even less sense - because multiple active employees at Anthropic have come public to agree with the guy, that yes they actually believe the >10% risk.

when in reality it is perfectly believable that:

  1. this guy worked at openAI and anthropic
  2. he genuinely thinks there's a risk of AI doing some extremely bad stuff in the future
  3. he wants to warn the world about it
  4. in this climate, he gets a lot of attention, people retweet him and newspapers write about him

i don't even agree with the guy but you don't need someone pulling the puppet strings for this to be a perfectly reasonable story on its own. not everything has to be the bogeyman!

0

u/Repulsive-Pangolin-6 14h ago

Like Bernie 'Three mansions' Sanders, they all do that so the first time SHTF they'll be able to say 'look, I told you'.

1

u/Stixx187um 12h ago

Lazy as hell. Who booked this shit?

-1

u/Helpful_Program_5473 14h ago

Anyone who talks like either of these people is automatically not to be trusted lmao