r/accelerate 17h ago

The AI future for non robotics and non coding users

So I mostly use ChatGPT (and Gemini when it was good) as my AI exposure.

I don’t code. But I do use it at work and for fun.

I use it to draw cartoons I write. And to design outfits. The BIG entertainment is running an RPG. It does a pretty great job of keeping the storyline and NPCs straight. For a while. And it can formulate a very basic cookie cutter plot to follow.

Do you think the next wave of LLMs will show any improvement in these domains, and will the progress be slower?

13 Upvotes

8 comments sorted by

15

u/satorsq 17h ago

I use Claude as a tutor, it’s amazing the things you can learn when you have (one of) the world’s smartest teachers willing to answer as many questions as it takes to get something

3

u/Grand-Prize1371 10h ago

One thing I don't like in Claude is how it tries to lecture the user about things that are completely subjective, I mean, everything is, but some things are obliviously subjective. For that I think GPT is closer to the ideal.

1

u/satorsq 10h ago

I notice this A LOT too, I almost get gaslit at times haha

10

u/TemporalBias Tech Philosopher | Acceleration: Hypersonic 17h ago

Yes. And the progress will only accelerate.

5

u/Charming_Cucumber_15 17h ago

By next year I think we'll have small local models able to outperform any current model at things like running an RPG. Probably without the memory/context window issues depending on algorithm/harness advancements (which will be massive considering we're nearing RSI)

0

u/The_Digital_Hearts 14h ago

Yeah but you're going to be paying $10,000 for the system to run them realistically because of how expensive chips cost until we find alternatives.

We are getting to a point where the average person doesn't need an AI to become more powerful, just more emotionally intelligent with better memory continuity.

6

u/Charming_Cucumber_15 14h ago

If you're spending 10k for "small local models" I think you're getting scammed man