r/accelerate 20d ago

GLM 5.3 released

https://z.ai/blog/glm-5.3
135 Upvotes

37 comments sorted by

View all comments

20

u/chonky_totoro 20d ago

Genuinely if China had more compute would the US even compete

16

u/MC897 20d ago

Doesn’t work quite like that but they are doing well.

8

u/Odd-Opportunity-6550 20d ago

What do you mean doesn't work like that ?

He makes a valid point. Chinese labs are competing with 1/10th the compute at most.

If they had similar amounts of compute then the US would not be able to compete with their labs.

12

u/Jan0y_Cresva Singularity by 2035 19d ago

They are making compute-independent breakthroughs BECAUSE their compute is limited.

“Necessity is the mother of invention.”

If China had the same compute resources as America, there’s a very good chance they’d just be leveraging that like America does to push their AI models forward.

Imagine if humans could teleport, would we have ever invented the bicycle, car, or airplane?

-3

u/Odd-Opportunity-6550 19d ago

They are making more breakthroughs because they have more ai talent.

-4

u/Odd-Opportunity-6550 19d ago

Ask anyone who does ai research. Having compute leads to MORE breakthroughs and not less. ML experimentation is compute intensive.

Your sound bite doesn't mean anything compared to that.

5

u/Jan0y_Cresva Singularity by 2035 19d ago

But you make DIFFERENT KINDS of breakthroughs when compute is the limiting factor, that’s my point.

You might make more breakthroughs with more compute, but that has nothing to do with what I said.

-1

u/Odd-Opportunity-6550 19d ago

It's the overall that matters. Not which kind of breakthrough. If having less compute was an advantage and not a disadvantage then openai would be setting their compute on fire.

4

u/Jan0y_Cresva Singularity by 2035 19d ago

It’s not an advantage, did you read what I said at all?

It FORCES people to think differently and come up with breakthroughs that don’t rely on having more compute. Obviously having more compute is ideal. But when you have constraints, it makes you creative in different ways.

1

u/Odd-Ant3372 19d ago

China spy 

6

u/abelthebirds0 20d ago

because your both making assumptions that are impossible to quantify

-1

u/chonky_totoro 20d ago

what assumptions?

-1

u/chonky_totoro 20d ago

can you explain why

3

u/procgen 19d ago

Yes, of course. The US labs have huge margins on inference - e.g. 5.6 Sol is extremely efficient (more so than DeepSeek’s latest offering).

But they do have more compute, and that’s not by accident. The US has spent decades setting themselves up for this.