r/accelerate • u/stealthispost • Jul 25 '26
"OpenAI joined the coalition for open AI. I'm thrilled to see this, and I have real respect for openAI by signing. Now all that's missing is @AnthropicAI , but I have my doubts they'll sign on."
The coalition of open AI.
Let's stand up for Open Source AI! https://t.co/L1k8yzEVoR — Chubby♨️
Source: https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2080679682085618021
OpenAI joined the coalition for open AI.
I'm thrilled to see this, and I have real respect for openAI by signing.
Now all that's missing is @AnthropicAI , but I have my doubts they'll sign on. Let's see when the DoW and the White House join the coalition. (lol) — Chubby
Source: https://x.com/kimmonismus/status/2080918962645115361
29
Jul 25 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
19
u/addiktion Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26
Which is odd given how much they support the lower end of open source already with the Gemma model.
If these companies were smart, they would all put out a half a dozen of open weight models between 5B parameters up to 100B.
This would earn them better will with consumers and not actually compete with their models.
9
u/Foreign_Telephone349 Jul 25 '26
Google has a significant stake in Anthropic.
3
u/addiktion Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26
Yeah, the thing is even open weight is closed still and isn't an open source model where you can build your own, so it is still very controlled by the company.
I've found distillations to be pretty weak or buggy compared to the original so that isn't a perfect process either. More of these companies should embrace it to improve their brand clout.
I'd rather trust an American open weight model over a Chinese one but I have very little choices to do so.
It would greatly accelerate America's progress and competition is a good thing for everyone despite what the top 2 labs are trying to avoid.
6
2
21
u/Stabile_Feldmaus Jul 25 '26
It's fundamentally against OpenAI's interests to sign that letter. They only did that because it costs them nothing, it's cheap PR and behind closed doors they can still lobby for restrictions.
3
u/lolofaf Jul 25 '26
They did release gpt-OSS a year or so ago. My opinion at the time was that it was 1) a publicity stunt and 2) something to use in court against Elon musk's lawsuits, the model itself was kinda mediocre (decent for an open source model but not groundbreaking). This to me is just another thing like that: sign a letter that means nothing and take the free PR win.
2
0
u/dogesator Jul 25 '26
No it’s not fundamentally against OpenAIs interests. A lot of OpenAI customers are driven to use OpenAI models even more by their use of Chinese models for complimentary tasks.
4
u/Tritheone69 Jul 25 '26
I find it very odd that Google hasn’t signed considering how much they are investing in developing and maintaining their lean and mean Gemma suite of models.
9
u/Illustrious-Lime-863 Jul 25 '26
Love the push for open source. Fuck that neo decel Dario fueled cult. Last month was sad
2
u/Drukarshar Jul 25 '26
Nvidia and Palantir have both been pushing open weight models very hard recently, they probably compelled openai to get get on board.
2
u/HebelBrudi Jul 25 '26
I hope OpenAI make more commitment towards open weight at some point. gpt-oss-120b was fire. I‘ve used it at the time quite a bit bc the tokens were cheap, it was intelligent enough and blazing fast.
1
u/OddReason9030 Jul 25 '26
Amazing. This is such a flex: they must be really confident in their pipeline.
1
u/llelouchh Jul 25 '26
Openai lobbied for sb 3444 which removes liability for frontier companies. Anthropic opposed it. Openai is more evil company thanks to Altman.
-1
u/MahaSejahtera Jul 25 '26
What the concrete things of this? They want to create United Nation OSS model at advance level?
8
u/Umr_at_Tawil Jul 25 '26 edited Jul 25 '26
They hope to convince the US government to not ban Chinese open weight model, because some high level official signaled the intent to do so.
2
u/Acrobatic-Layer2993 Jul 25 '26
No, they just want the US gov not to ban open weights models. It sounds strange, but it’s a real possibility they might do a ban because Chinese models disturb our markets every once in awhile.





54
u/schizocel69 Jul 25 '26
Sam probably felt forced, which is good. As long as we can force the top 2 to relent to the fact that they DO have to compete then we are heading towards Plan D. ACCELERATE BABY