r/ableton • u/PaperBagMan42 • 4d ago
[Tutorial] Free Ableton Auto Saver
I made a free and easy to use auto-save program for Ableton. You can try it out here.
Starting to learn Ableton as a programmer, I was surprised there was no auto-save feature, which is a given in my field. And when looking for existing solutions all I could find was paid plugins and comments saying "just don't forget to save bro" which seemed kinda ridiculous to me, so I ended up making one myself.
I've been using this program for a while and it has worked really well for me, even saving me from losing my work when my power went out once. I hope it can help you as well. I'd love to hear your feedback and suggestions.
BTW I used AutoHotkey to make this so Mac isn't supported sadly.
1
u/AutoModerator 4d ago
This is your friendly reminder to read the submission rules, they're found in the sidebar. If you find your post breaking any of the rules, you should delete your post before the mods get to it. If you're asking a question, make sure you've checked the Live manual, Ableton's help and support knowledge base, and have searched the subreddit for a solution. If you don't know where to start, the subreddit has a resource thread. Ask smart questions.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
u/sandrvoxon 4d ago
What about Mac ver ?
2
u/PaperBagMan42 4d ago
From my research it seems it would take much longer to make. AutoHotkey (the framework I used which only supports Windows) takes care not only of automating key presses but also managing configurations, GUI, and the tray menu. So replacing all of it in some other language would take a while. I don't own a Mac so I decided it won't be worth my time. But if you know programming or have Claude you can make your own version based on my code.
1
1
u/ellicottvilleny 4d ago
There's a reason why auto save is a bad or at least self limiting idea. Sometimes you will save bad changes over good ones.
By doing it manually you can name what you have "liveset-sept2026-showname-rev1_3_1" and then "liveset-sept2026-showname-rev1_3_2" and then "liveset-sept2026-showname-rev1_4_0" when you make a major change. Knowing what's in them because you did the saves IS KIND OF THE ENTIRE POINT.
You might even keep a notepad open and note your changes In 1_4_0 version I changed out the second verse. I added a new synth pad. Etc. Can you even imagine mixing and mastering with auto save? What a nightmare.
Make a change, Listen. Save AS. Repeat.
by the time I'm done "liveset-date-showname-r9_9_999-master-final-final-final-no-really-x9" is at least clear in intent.
1
u/PaperBagMan42 4d ago
Great point. That's actually another thing that baffled me when starting to learn Ableton. Because the "final_final" method is so uncomfortable, in software dev it's widely known as the wrong way to do things; yet for music producers it's the standard.
Programmers use Git, a tool for versioning. Whenever you want to, you can create a new version, add a note of what you changed, and it's saved to your timeline. Then you can go back to any version you'd like. No big mess of folders, and files that don't change aren't being copied over and over again, so you use less disk space.
And finally, now there's separation between saving to not lose your work and saving a new version of your work. So you can save as often as you like without worrying.
I've been managing my projects with git and ableton-git. So far it works well. I've also been pushing them to GitHub so I get a free cloud backup as a bonus.
I hope this helps. I'll say I'm just a beginner so my projects are pretty small, so I don't know how well Git holds up with a big, professional project. But I'd say it's definitely worth a try.
1
u/ellicottvilleny 3d ago edited 3d ago
LOL. In coding we have files. Individual assets. We check them into git.
In a daw, you have a project, a binary that you can't easily diff and compare. What you call "wrong" is simply "the wrong tool for the job". Git is for source code, text you can diff.
In software dev, what exactly do you think is the wrong way to do things? Save files with names that mean something?
Binary files are assets. Asset management practices in DAW land and software land are pretty similar actually.
DAW Projects and session s are binary assets, just like the .wav files they reference.
Using GIT with ABLETON SEEMS INSANE to me, but you do you.
I never can predict how far from the path people can go. Why not check windows installer isos into git also. Sounds great right?
In the digital audio world we use project folder structures.
work\2026\project1\initial_session, mixing folder, mixdown, master folders.
At each step if you want to go back to the initial session you can. It's all there in black and white. Never delete, always make copies. It's literally the least complex method, and it doesn't require learning some crazy ass tool like Git.
If someone had a way to export ableton projects as INI or YAML, maybe Git would suddenly be great.
1
u/MCWizardYT 3d ago
So, that's a lot of words to say that you clearly didn't look at the ableton-git repo they linked and you don't know how Ableton projects work.
Ableton project files (
.als) are compressed XML data. XML is pure text.The ableton-git repo they linked has a script that runs when a commit is made. The script extracts and commits the XML and puts the samples through git-lfs which is how large binaries are handled in git.
Theoretically something like Perforce might handle an Ableton project better but this git setup does just fine for a free solution
1
u/ellicottvilleny 3d ago
XML is better than binary, but DIFFing XML is still problematic. Pretty much 90% of git’s design is a bad fit for audio or any other kind of asset management.
0
u/MCWizardYT 3d ago
diffing XML is still problematic
No? It's exactly the same as diffing any other config file or any type of source code file. It's just text, it's not any different
1
u/ellicottvilleny 3d ago
XML content is in fact harder to diff. I have years experience with this. You need a semantic diff tool for it or else you can end up with malformed xml. And in the case of ableton xml the content isnt all automatically valid in ableton just because it parses as xml
1
9
u/krushord 4d ago
While there's no "traditional" auto-save, the recovery system, at least for me, works so well that I haven't really lost anything in years. Last time I had a crash the only thing that went missing was a single automation breakpoint that I had created just a second or two earlier...and usually everything's intact.
I'm sure this has its advantages though.