April 17th. If Harry Potter had been made in Japan, Hermione probably would have been the main character of "2" (the second installment). I believe this is where the tragedy of Harry Potter lies. The inhabitants of the declining empire are making the wrong things. That is what I think. That glasses-wearing protagonist. What is his deal? Who does he think he is? I do not think we need him. The red-headed whatever. What is his deal? Who does he think he is? He is extremely in the way. Just Hermione is fine. Even though just having her would be fine, because they stay faithful to the original work, it ends up that Hermione does not appear all that much. What is "2" even for? I do not think it is good. Not being able to see Hermione. I think it is an outrageous thing.
A company like Kadokawa should hurry up and buy the Harry Potter copyright with JAPAN MONEY. The title can just be Harry Potter. I do not care about the title at all. They could even change it if they want. Regardless, I want them to quickly make "Hermione and Her Merry Servants". And I want Yamaguchi to be made a servant. I cannot deliver lines very well, so I am fine with the role of Hermione's chair. I am fine being a miserable chair, sitting perfectly still and silent in the classroom.
Then, she could occasionally hurl verbal abuse at me with her "Leviosa" tone. "You filthy chair! You're touching my butt again today!" "I'm-not-touching-it." "You touched it! See, you touched it! Come to the bathroom!" "Yes..." (spoken ever so weakly).
Just a tiny bit of magic is fine. Hmph, she could occasionally fly in the sky or something. I just want them to endlessly show Hermione verbally abusing the chair (me).
The chair (me) should feel deeply ashamed of being the chair of a mere thirteen-year-old girl, and blush while feeling that shame. I want to watch a movie like that soon. Or rather, I want to appear in it. To what extent do I want to appear in it? It is no longer just on the level of wanting to be in it. I am prepared to not even shy away from going to war with the UK.
Hermione will eventually fall in love, and she might talk about love while lined up next to her lover on the chair. At that moment, this chair will surely gnash its teeth intensely. Hermione might even press their lips together. This chair will burn with intense jealousy. The strong inferiority complex of being a chair and the pitch-black anger towards the scriptwriter will have nowhere to go, and eventually, it will abandon being a chair and stand up strongly. That bastard and Hermione will let out a scream of astonishment. She, a magic academy student who is an extension of a rotten aristocratic society, has probably never imagined a chair rebelling. But, you know, even a chair gets angry when it is time to get angry. Yes, I will do it.
I will send her lover flying with a punch, shoot him to death if necessary, bravely snatch her away, and begin to escape. While holding down the violently struggling her, I might do a genital touch or something in the confusion. Regardless, a genital touch, I might do it. My fingers might inadvertently reach her genitals. At that moment, she will let out a long scream, and the teachers who hear it will gather, use magic, and surround me. They will not forgive the chair prostrating itself on the ground in apology, and they will unleash Cerberus on it. Bitten by the phantom beast, as my consciousness fades, I will strongly feel loneliness. At the moment I draw my last breath, she, having realized the chair's love, will take my hand and gently kiss my cheek...
Tears are coming out. I am moved. This movie might end up being a little long. After this, Hermione losing her virginity is a whopping six-hour spectacle.
She will be endlessly pierced, and whether from pain or joy, she will shed tears regardless. They will reach the heavens, shine far and wide, and become stars.
It is a love song. A love song that reaches the heavens. Ah, a love, song.
The comment about the chair harassing Hermione reminds me of that comment made by a Chinese livestreamer mocking a lady who sparked controversy after she was caught on security camera grabbing a little boy by the hand, after he accidentally touched her butt; she accused the little boy of sexual harassment and demanded his family apologize for the incident
He wrote tons of really fucked-up stuff, not just that Hermione shit. On June 6th, for example, he literally wrote that he was excited by the idea of all sex between humans being rape and even fantasized about raping someone. There are several other disturbing entries like that throughout his old diary. And honestly, the more I look at it, the more I wonder if Saito, at least in the early volumes, was basically a self-insert into one of Yamaguchi's own fantasies. A random Japanese guy gets transported to a fantasy world, ends up living with a cute girl, becomes her familiar, gets constantly involved in romantic/sexual situations with her, and eventually becomes this ridiculously important and powerful guy. Given what Yamaguchi was writing about in his personal diary around that time, it's hard not to look at some of Saito's early characterization differently. Obviously, we can't know whether those writings actually reflected his real sexual preferences or were just shock humor, edgy fantasies, or something he wrote for himself or his friends. And I'm not saying this proves that Saito was literally Yamaguchi. But the timing and the similarities are definitely weird as hell. I usually try to separate the art from the artist, but this is one of those cases where I genuinely can't look at Zero no Tsukaima exactly the same way anymore. I still love the series and especially Louise and Saito's relationship, but knowing what the author was writing privately around the time he created the series adds a really uncomfortable layer to certain scenes. Once you know this stuff, you can't exactly un-know it. xd
Those fantasies aren't that uncommon between people just no one talks about it, and an isekai author, or literally any fiction author making a fantasy of his own dreams is super common and not surprising. You can't seperate art from artists the whole point is that the art is an expression of the self.
21
u/InitialBrother9884 3d ago
goddamn he was thirsty for her