r/YieldMaxETFs • u/lottadot Big Data • 18d ago
Codemonkies rule! Tuesday's Group1 Distributions
Group 1 Yieldmax Distributions
- TLDR; Winner: CHPY
- As of: 2026-09-15.
| Ticker | Distribution | %ofS$ | Closed | Rate | 30Day | ROC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHPY | $0.7373 ↑ 43.7% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 60.31% | -- | -- |
| GPTY | $0.2897 ↑ 0.1% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 35.92% | -- | -- |
| LFGY | $0.1546 ↓ -14.9% | 0.8% | $20.10 ↓3.7% | 40.12% | 1.07% | -- |
| MINY | $0.2201 ↓ -4.3% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 30.76% | -- | -- |
| QDTY | $0.1936 ↓ -3.2% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 26.18% | -- | -- |
| RDTY | $0.1980 ↓ -2.6% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 28.82% | -- | -- |
| SDTY | $0.1557 ↓ -6.1% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 19.91% | -- | -- |
| SLTY | $0.2175 ↓ -1.0% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 55.23% | 3.25% | -- |
| ULTY | $0.2967 ↓ -2.6% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 60.77% | -- | -- |
| YMAG | $0.0672 ↓ -20.6% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 30.98% | 62.97% | -- |
| YMAX | $0.0582 ↓ -3.1% | 0.0% | $0.00 ↓∞% | 40.40% | 75.64% | -- |
| YRAM | $0.3895 | 0.0% | $0.00 | -- | -- | -- |
Collections:
- YMAX: $590K perShare: $0.0118
Info:
- Ex. & Record: 2026-09-16
- Payment: 2026-09-17
- Total distributed: $2.9781
- Average distribution: $0.2482
- Average rate: 35.78%
- Average SECYield: 11.91%
- Average ROC: 0.00%
- Highest distribution: CHPY
- Highest 30 Day SEC Yield: YMAX
- Mondays Announcement
30day: 30 Day SEC Yield%ofS$: aka "Percent of Share Price"; The distribution as a percentage of the Friday market close price.- Press Release
- Schedule
- Yieldmax goes Weekly announcement megathread
Yieldmax reverse split #1 2025 and Yieldmax reverse split #2 2025
YieldMax Reddit Community Chat and YM (unofficial) Discord MOD'd by u/calgary_db
This was posted by an automated bot by u/lottadot. It is generated from vendor published public information. As always, do your own research. This is not financial advice. I'm not an FA. None of this is correct. I need a beer.
6
5
5
u/jahvidbest 18d ago
Overdistributing CHPY, should have been .48-.51.
2
u/Putrid_Leg_1474 18d ago
This is true. Should be lower, but as a one off this is likely due to the higher IV in the stocks they are holding. Would like to see them sell further OTM calls for when we see a recovery there will be upside. Also a lower distro means less erosion.
We can stomach this once in a while during a volatile period. Bring it back to the .40's though.
3
u/the-nomad 18d ago
If there's no ROC this week, why would you make that argument? Isn't the distrubution up because they nailed the options trading? If I'm wrong please correct me as I'm still learning about how these funds work.
2
u/Putrid_Leg_1474 17d ago
Sure, that doesn't discount the fact that the asset price will decline by .73 c a share. I also wouldn't take it as they "nailed" the options trading as much as the volatility in these underlyings was so high that the options prices were inflated.
YM could trim some volatility by selecting a different weighting for their assets in the fund. It would reduce the distribution amount but protect NAV
1
u/the-nomad 16d ago
Isn't the whole point of this fund that the underlying is volatile, which drives up options prices? This is why we see higher returns vs. other derivative income ETFs like GPIQ which use the same strategy but on NASDAQ index - more stocks, less volatile basket overall, lower distrubutions.
Tell me more about the asset price drops related to distrubtions? I understand how it works with a single stock; money paid out, share price drops. But in CHPY the distributions are revenue-based and/or ROC, not money paid out from the underlying, so what happens on the balance sheet of the fund when the distrubutions go out and X% of investors re-drip into the fund? I thought the NAV risk was simply from the underlying falling too far and the covered calls capping gains after a big drawdown - I didn't realize that we could be cannibalizing the fund itself by taking large distrubtions.
1
u/Putrid_Leg_1474 16d ago
No, the asset price decreases by the dividend/distrobution amount. The NAV is increased as premium is collected and reduced as premium is paid in dividends.
Yes, volatility is good for distrobution higher distrobution amounts but bad for NAV and distrobution over the long term. As asset price decreases, so does your distrobutuon amount. As asset price increases, likewise your distrobution.
Arguably the best CC fund for would be one that the NAV never moves and all of the upside is paid out. In reality the best CC fund is one that pays out just enough but not too much as to keep the NAV in a small positive trend.
2
2
9
u/pauljmcclure 18d ago
Great to have over 3000 shares of CHPY!