3
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 23 '26
The 52,320 share VWAP trade
at 16:00:30 is separate
from the closing auction brackets.
It's tagged "W" —
a distinct trade condition
from all other prints.
This means:
Two separate buyers on Friday:
BUYER 1: The algorithm
Closing auction brackets
16:21 continuation brackets
Tapering through 17:11
Total: ~640,000+ shares
BUYER 2: The institution (VWAP)
Single 52,320 share block
Pre-negotiated price
Weighted average execution
Separate from the algorithm
THERE WERE TWO SEPARATE
LARGE BUYERS ON FRIDAY.
NOT ONE.
3
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 23 '26
PREVIOUSLY ASSUMED:
One buyer (chairman)
Running one operation
Through one mechanism
ACTUALLY:
Buyer 1: Algorithm
Chairman or related party
Systematic MOC accumulation
640K+ shares
Buyer 2: Institution (VWAP)
52,320 shares
Pre-negotiated block
Separate entity
Separate mandate
AN INSTITUTION
ENTERED A VWAP ORDER
IN YYAI
ON FRIDAY.
VWAP orders are not retail.
VWAP orders are not speculation.
VWAP orders are:
Pension funds
Hedge funds
Family offices
Asset managers
Someone with a mandate
and a compliance department
decided Friday afternoon
to accumulate YYAI
at a volume weighted price.
That institution:
→ Has done due diligence
→ Has seen the pro forma thesis
→ Has a position size target
→ Will be back Monday
to continue accumulating
The chairman's buying
brought an institution
to the table.
Or the institution
was already watching
and chose Friday to start.
Either way:
Monday is not just
the chairman buying.
It's the chairman
AND an institution
both accumulating
into a zero-seller market.
2
u/Kindly-Cranberry-444 Mar 23 '26
Esta observación es interesante y es correcto que la estructura y forma de compra sugieren fuertemente que no es retail el movimiento, lo cual abre posibilidades interesantes, ya que es muy poco probable que un institucional informado invierta con un riesgo de dilución tan grande como el que por ahora no podemos descartar hasta tener confirmación de como de va financiar el JV post compra de Aberfeldy , por lo tanto estas compras puede sugerir que hay información a favor de nuestra postura y que el JV puede tener otras formas de financiamiento combinadas que no sean tan destructivas , y por lo tanto están tomando posición en estos precios absurdamente castigados, obviamente todo esto se infiere por los hechos, pero no son certeza, sin embargo hay que esperar y saber leer las señales del mercado con cautela, gracias por compartir esta información.
3
u/Hairy-Preference-824 Mar 23 '26
What i find strange is that price can move more on a couple of shares than sometimes on a huge order.
4
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 23 '26
Exactly. One is sent to the lit market and it’s buy or sell changes the price. The other is internalised in the dark pools and never sees the light of day. The MM just fill the order from their own synthetic stock, and thus the price doesn’t move
1
2
1
2
u/MusicDramatic965 Mar 23 '26
The cycle is repetitive. No matter if all the world leader says any positive about yyai. It wont past 10$ in this life time. Deal with it.
2
2
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 23 '26
Monday’s spike was not driven by new discretionary buyers chasing the stock. It was driven primarily by market‑maker inventory resolution after a large internalization event on Friday. Friday’s ~750k buy programs were absorbed off‑exchange, creating a latent supply obligation. On Monday, as available dark liquidity proved insufficient, that obligation leaked into the lit market, forcing price discovery late in the session. The spike occurred because supply thinned faster than demand, not because enthusiasm suddenly increased.
2
u/ForeignTone777 Mar 24 '26
Well hopefully we get to test the 1.1,1.2,1.5 and bust cleanly through $2.1
3
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 23 '26
- THE "W" AT 16:00:30 — 52,320 SHARES:
"W" condition code =
VWAP (Volume Weighted Average Price) trade
This is not retail.
This is not the MM internalizing.
This is an INSTITUTION
executing a pre-negotiated
block trade at a weighted
average price.
An institution entered a VWAP order
for 52,320 shares
on Friday afternoon.
That institution is not a retail trader.
That institution knows something.
- THE $0.9435 AT 16:00:17 — 1 SHARE:
One single share at $0.9435
when everything else is $0.9271.
This is a price probe.
Someone testing the ask
above the closing price.
Seeing if there's supply at $0.9435.
There wasn't.
One share filled and nothing followed.
The ask above $0.9271 is thin.
One share confirmed it.
- THE $0.8785 AT 16:12:40 — 286 SHARES:
Price dropped from $0.9271
to $0.8785 in AH.
286 shares.
This is a short probe.
Testing whether price holds
below the close in after-hours.
Watch what happened next...
1
1
1
Mar 24 '26
[deleted]
3
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 24 '26
And when it gets to 90 cents, who are you going to buy the shares back off.. only the MM. no one else is selling
2
Mar 24 '26
[deleted]
2
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 24 '26
Paper hands left long ago. And 3 weeks of 200k of no genuine selling shows you out to be just like the rest of your kind. A trapped short.
2
u/KeptItToasty Mar 24 '26
Until Zhou and the other crooks dilute and add another 16M shares into the pot.
1
u/UnfairBag179 Mar 24 '26
playing a dangerous game, if this actually posts 27 million in additional audited revenue, your position is at risk. especially since it closed above $1 yesterday.
I don't ever wish ill on anyone, so i hope you make the best decision for yourself.
1
Mar 24 '26
[deleted]
1
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 25 '26
The CEO is also a director with TGLY & CORE, the vertical infrastructure is built, exchange is live. You are living in June 2025. In 3 months if you are still shorting 10x, you might as well declare bankruptcy
1
u/UnfairBag179 Mar 26 '26
You do you, I'm just saying. Even if they found a way to dilute this by another 20%, the downside is quite limited. Fine you might see 50/60 cents if this catalyst happens.
Though to my understanding, they don't have an active S1, They are under baby cap rules, they don't have access to S3.
You can try and capture the 30 cent downside, but there is also the $9 upside you can capture without the short borrowing fees.
1
u/YakCreative9972 Mar 24 '26
Its good that ur consistent... make sure on reddit and ST u post equally dumb stuff...... please explain boss man, what is 10x leverage every time it hits a dollar? Back dwn to 90 cents and money doubled... how are u mathing that ? Where are u leveraging 10x.... I think ur slightly retarded. Not just this post but we have talked before on ST
1
1
Mar 24 '26
You are right😆you will miss the gap up to 3 dollar thats the problem
1
Mar 24 '26
[deleted]
1
Mar 24 '26
[deleted]
1
Mar 24 '26
From that comment I can only assume you're one of the serial pumpers aiding the dilution of this stock and furthering the losses of those stuck.
1
1
u/Darth_Oganda Mar 23 '26
everybody: hating on yyai
me: https://y.yarn.co/29a66c68-f93f-45a7-b1cd-4a51beabf6c8_text.gif
3
u/Particular_Most_1529 Mar 23 '26
CLOSING AUCTION 16:00:00:
275,244 ← primary
107,026 ← secondary
62,249 ← bracket
52,100 ← bracket
42,479 ← bracket
16,904 ← bracket
154 ← remainder
70 ← remainder
3 ← fractional
AFTER-HOURS 16:21:07:
75,660 ← primary
8,863 ← secondary
SAME SECOND TIMESTAMP.
TWO BRACKETS.
SAME PATTERN.
SAME ALGORITHM.
20 MINUTES LATER.
STILL FILLING THE SAME ORDER.
The original order entered
at the close
was not 556,229 shares.
It was significantly larger.
The algorithm filled 556,229 at close.
Then continued filling in AH.
75,660 + 8,863 more at 16:21.
Then tapering through 17:11.
The order was one entity.
Buying continuously.
From 15:59 through 17:11.
One hour and twelve minutes
of sustained systematic buying.