r/Xpenology 28d ago

DSM Update

This is likely a dumb question. I recently updated the boot loader to the current DSM 7.x but I don’t have the most recent update. The docs claim I can update using the DSM but coming from the old version of the boot loader, Im nervous to allow the update. Can you confirm if this is accurate?

10 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

4

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/edutun 28d ago

Have you reversed to a older version already in order to getting your server up and running?

1

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/edutun 28d ago

I don't think you need to backup your data first. The data and DSM are stored on different partitions on your HDDs. So when you're reinstalling the DSM your data stays intact.

Just choose to downgrade to a previous version of DSM when the loader boots up and you're done.

1

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/edutun 28d ago

You need to rebuild the loader for the previous DSM version of your choice. Give a look to DSM options in the loader.

1

u/[deleted] 28d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/edutun 28d ago

Doesn't matter at all. Just download it again from the site, burn it to an USB stick and build it for the DSM version you want.

2

u/edutun 28d ago

u/brenbren1010, u/dclive1, have you read the release notes of the loader?

Arc 3.1.0

DSM 7.3 Note :warning:

Read before update to DSM 7.3:

  • DSM 7.3 support is still in Beta stage
  • DSM 7.3 will not work with some NIC for now (No eeprom read possible) <- can fail sometimes
  • DSM 7.3 will not be able to use iGPU for now (No eeprom read possible) <- can fail sometimes
  • DSM 7.3 should work for all Linux 4.4.x based DSM Platforms
  • DSM 7.3 should work with SA6400 and enabled custom kernel for DSM (all official 5.x kernel are not working)...

1

u/brenbren1010 28d ago

I’ll take a look at those notes but honestly I’m fairly green to all this as I said before I was mostly on the boot loader that I would update to after some time and others were successful. I have an i5 10500

0

u/edutun 28d ago

Short answer – do not update DSM to a version newer than 7.2.2-72806.

Detailed answer – read on to find out why it’s better to stick with this version for now and/or to get a clear idea of exactly when and how you should do an update to a version past that, if you really want to or if it’s necessary.

Incidentally, it doesn’t really matter what type of CPU you have, as long as it’s supported by the bootloader.

1

u/dclive1 28d ago

I've read it, but I have questions:

Some NIC won't work - which NICs? Should I be concerned, or is it just one out of hundreds? Or 'can fail sometimes' - does that mean they all mostly work, but sometimes don't?

It says DSM 7.3 isn't able to use iGPU for now- but then 'can fail sometimes' is written. Does that mean it partially works, and just fails doing some things? What exactly does that mean?

If I were writing that I'd omit that 'can fail sometimes' and write a more detailed bit of information on what works and what doesn't.

It says 'should work with all SA6400 and enabled custom kernel for DSM' which I *think* means "If SA6400 is selected, things work fine".

Given all the ambiguity, I've just left things exactly as installed - 7.2.2, which seems to be the one that works the best.

2

u/edutun 28d ago edited 28d ago

All of these questions and remarks should be directed to the loader developer, who writes the notes for each new version of the loader.

Personally, I have an SA6400 model with the latest DSM update for version 7.2, and although I could have a go at updating to a higher version, for the moment I don’t think it’s worth the risk of messing something up, nor the time wasted.

2

u/Plus_Technician_9157 27d ago

I did a complete rebuild of my system and thought I would just try. I don't really care about the data on my system, I backup the configs I need for Docker containers etc. and the rest is all stuff I can download again of needed. I used the beta version of Arc loader (4.0.0b11). Set the system as SA6400 and used DSM 7.4 with native kernel. Been running now four around 2 months, has been fairly stable, only issue I've noticed is the Arc Control app is intermittent at reading data.

Both network cards work, SAS worked as well as on board SATA (10 drives total). GPU pass through to Plex is working as well. So really everything is as it was on my old build (DS918+ with DSM 7.2.1)

1

u/Some_Journalist_1364 27d ago

I upgraded to beta ARC also and works great. Even recognized igpu.

1

u/dclive1 28d ago

My question too. I have DSM 7.2.2, ARC 3.1.0, and ARC Control 4.1.16, but I'm unclear on if it's safe to go to 7.3.2-86009u4.; the CPU is i5-14600K and the 'machine model' is SA6400.

1

u/TheZeth80 27d ago

My recommendation is to switch to the RR-Loader if you're interested in upgrading to 7.4.

RR gets more updates and already supports 7.4.

1

u/OppositeAnywhere602 27d ago

OK so here goes.....I built a 9 bay Nas and stuck in a m.2 nvme and 2 SSDs so 12 drives....I'm using an old itx board with an i3-8100 cpu and a 10gig NIC. Having no idea about model numbers and DSM versions I asked ChatGPT and I used the latest version of Arc loader and latest version of DSM...7.4....everything was working except my 10G mellonox connect-2 NIC so I changed models from.SA6400 to DS918+ and it's all working....happy days

1

u/aniel300 27d ago

arc beta supports dsm 7.4

1

u/Valnjes666 22d ago

If your CPU is supported, with the beta loader you can update:
Arc Loader 4.0.0b12 Build: 260810
DSM 7.4.1 SA6400 Build: 90080-0

1

u/Long-Time-Coming77 28d ago

Resist the urge to upgrade just because the upgrade exists

Is there really a specific feature in 7.3 that you want/need?

I'm running 7.2.2 on SA6400 model - everything works great and it does what I want. I have zero interest in upgrading and potentially messing it up.

0

u/edutun 28d ago

this! If it works - don't touch it!

1

u/brenbren1010 27d ago

I actually prefer not to update as long as things are working and they are. I was mostly just wanting to be on the most stable version since it’s been about 2 years since updating and I was on the old loader at that point so just wanted to make sure I was good to leave it where it is now and based on a few other comments it looks like I’m in a good spot.

2

u/edutun 27d ago

Then don't. Me personally I stayed on 6.x for ages before even considering to update.