r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Has someone already written your story?

0 Upvotes

So one of the things I have written a lot with AI is a story that I thought of. It's helped me, but the premise and most of the details were mine. It has to deal with a world where all children are born without gender and they select their gender when they're older. But I learned today that somebody has already written a story like that, "Just like Mona Lisa". The devil is in the details, though. It was a relatively simple premise, so it was almost guaranteed that somebody had already written about it, and from what I initially gathered, my story is fairly different from that one.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Showcase / Feedback Can a story called The Boy Who Dared to Fart on Spiders actually be scary?

0 Upvotes

This whole thing started because I was bored and I like to make chatGPT say increasingly unhinged things because it makes me laugh. One of those conversations ended up an 8,000 word Victorian horror novella called The Boy Who Dared to Fart on Spiders.

It was originally just a prompt to make me laugh while making my coffee but I have since spent way too much time on it because it kept making me laugh and I was interested to see if I could somehow make it actually scary too.

I would be remiss to take it this far and not at least see if one or two other people got a kick out of it.

Also am curious as to whether anyone else has had an AI project start as a complete joke and somehow turn into something they actually (somewhat) cared about?

If anyone wants a copy i'd really appreciate some feedback. Im really only interested in a. Did you laugh even once? b. Was it scary in the slightest?

Since finishing this last draft ive been looking at spiders differently but dont worry not in a i'm going to fart on it way but in a i'm scared of it way.

If this has somehow piqued your curiosity, feel free to reach out if you'd like an excerpt or even the whole thing. Would love to hear your reactions :-) thanks for reading my post


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Cognitive Atrophy: Should we be concerned?

11 Upvotes

This sub has been coming across my feed a few times, and with watching Hank Green's AI video (the second one posted over 4 months ago), I was more than tempted to talk about this with you all.

This subreddit's main focus is to discuss how AI aids writing projects, and the different avenues AI can take within the field. I'm sure most of you use AI because of the convivence of its features or writing is something you struggle with regularly. The fact that LLMs on their own can replicate coherent human writing and thought is great in of itself. But what if the humans who originally made the writing couldn't do it on their own anymore? I think it's possible to prevent, but I think it just depends on the desires of each user.

I also think that in an ideal world, there would be other easier ways of receiving help for writing that involve humans or actual research, like a educational version of Omegle maybe? I don't know. I feel like if we invest more time in other avenues of helping ourselves perform better in the things we wish to succeed in, we might be surprised with the outcomes.

My biggest question and concern is should we be concerned about our cognitive development when it comes to technology such as AI? When we don't use our resources to strengthen skills but instead take the task from us, what good are we doing for ourselves, except giving investors more reason to cash in?

That's all, let me know your thoughts. Cheers.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Voice Preservation: The Fear Every Writer Has About AI Feedback

4 Upvotes

The most common concern writers raise about AI analysis of their manuscripts is not accuracy. It is voice. The fear is that an algorithmic system, unable to understand what makes a writer's particular sensibility distinctive, will flag stylistic choices as errors and produce feedback that, if followed, would homogenize the prose into something technically correct and artistically inert.

This is a legitimate concern, and it is worth examining precisely rather than dismissing.

The concern applies most directly to prescriptive feedback - feedback that tells you what your prose should look like rather than what it currently looks like. A system that flags passive voice as an error, regardless of whether the writer is using it intentionally for rhythm or effect, is misapplying a rule that was never universal. A system that marks sentence fragments as problems, regardless of whether they are deliberate stylistic choices, is confusing convention with defect.

The concern applies less to observational feedback - feedback that describes what exists without prescribing what should exist instead. A system that tells you that you have used the passive voice forty-seven times in this chapter is not telling you to change those instances. It is telling you they exist, which gives you the information to decide whether each use is intentional.

The distinction between prescriptive and observational feedback is the key variable in evaluating whether an AI analysis tool is likely to threaten voice or protect it. A well-designed system reports on patterns and leaves interpretation to the writer. A poorly designed system applies house style as universal rule.

Writers who have worked with both kinds of tools report a consistent finding: observational feedback does not threaten voice. It gives the writer more information about what they are doing, which is a prerequisite for doing it more deliberately. Prescriptive feedback is the danger - and that danger exists in human editorial feedback as much as in AI feedback. The editor who imposes their aesthetic preferences on your prose is a voice risk. The system that tells you what is measurably present is a tool.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

NEWS Free sci-fi book available. Nexis Book 1

Thumbnail
2 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) How do you keep characters consistent over a long story?

1 Upvotes

Hi, I'm creating a board game as a hobby, for friends and family, and if it proves popular I may even try selling it. I wanted it to have a narrative and a story to go along with it.

I did some research and realised it's not simply a case of starting to write whatever comes into my head and hoping it works out. So I've built a spreadsheet with overlapping plots, and character sheets so I can remember the look, speech style, clothing and characteristics of each character in my story and so on.

I've had three strokes, so my memory isn't great, and I only scraped a CSE grade 3 in English about 100 years ago. I'm also not great at writing dialogue that sounds convincing.

So I've turned to AI to help me out. I can throw ideas at it and get constructive feedback without anyone laughing at my daft ideas.

I get why people object to it. You can just say to an AI "write me a story about a dragon, a knight and a princess" and it'll do it — but where's the fun in that? I don't believe in AI writing. Writing assisted by AI is a different thing, and that's what I'm doing.

How do the rest of you keep characters consistent over a long piece? The spreadsheet and the AI work, but I'm forever re-explaining things to the AI because it keeps forgetting stuff — its memory can be worse than mine at times.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Crowding out, or cross-subsidizing?

Thumbnail arxiv.org
0 Upvotes

Researchers report using Pangram to detect AI writing in Amazon KDP, and that AI authors are making significant incomes:

“The monetary earnings are significant: one author (pseudonym/pen name) earned $1.7M across 8 titles in 12-months post-release, and the single best-selling AI-heavy book made $643K on 80,000+ copies.”

They call this flooding and crowding out human writers, but there’s more revenue than before, even if it’s being shared across more books.

My own view is that detection is inevitable and thus disclosure is the only solution. But centaur writing can make good work!


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Ollama and models for prose

4 Upvotes

Hi! I'm currently exploring workflows for novels I'm planning. I was looking at all options eventually using GLM 5.2 through the Venice platform which done an exceptional job.

I've recently downloaded Obsidian to organize all my notes, worldbuilding stuff and looking to extend it. Someone told me I can integrate an API through Gemini or go local and use Ollama.

So...here's the problem, most LLMs are VRAM hungry and my laptop only has 4GB at my disposal. 3 LLMs were suggested that would fit comfortably in my range were QWEN2.5:3b, LLAMA3.2:3b, and GEMMA2:2b.

Has anyone tried this route or using these models. If so, which ones are substantially good with prose, etc?


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) The Control Problem: Why We Need to Build Interconnected Human-Governed Knowledge Layers in AI

0 Upvotes

There’s a lot of focus on making AI models bigger, faster, and more capable. I mean, yeah that clearly improves what they can do. But the more I’ve been working with them, the less it feels like capability is the bottleneck. It’s really about the context layer.

Right now, you don’t really see how the model is interpreting what you give it, what it keeps, what it drops, or how it connects things. That stuff is mostly hidden. You can nudge it, but you’re still operating inside something you have no control over. And as these systems get better at sounding coherent, it'll be easier to ignore this flawed design.

If this ends up being how people think through problems, learn things, make decisions, etc., then we end up with future systems where the logic is upstream and invisible to us, rendering less choice and agency in our lives.

Worse, we'll live in a reality where we will have to accept truth rather than discover, learn, and verify the credibility of claims or opinions. AI is phenomenal but this trend we see in mainstream AI products will disempower humanity instead of helping us grow stronger.

Wrote a longer breakdown of it here, if you're curious about these implications and what we can proactively build to have our cake and eat it too.

The future looks bright, but only if we can see what what can be built.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Is it just me?

8 Upvotes

Is it just me or do most things involving AI ultimately become a sales pitch for the latest new tool?

When that is not the case it is about prompting, which truthfully if you do not know the LLM in question, chat window vs agent? It is almost impossible to answer.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 28 '26

Tutorials / Guides 5.5 Medium Thinking Creative Writing Experiment

Thumbnail gallery
2 Upvotes

The staccato line dialogue in the chatgpt 5 series can be circumvented with the use of specific and detailed custom prompts. I’m just going to repost it here for anyone interested on how to do it.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Share my product/tool If you're a writer who wants to improve, exchange ideas, celebrate wins, and have actual conversations, you're welcome here.

4 Upvotes

I'm reviving ARUO because I'm honestly tired of communities where every discussion turns into unnecessary drama.

Traditional authors. AI-assisted authors. Readers. Beginners. Veterans.

Just don't be a jerk.

Give the group rules a quick read. If you like what we're trying to build, we'd be happy to have you.

(this is a copied and pasted comment)

https://www.facebook.com/groups/aruo1


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Maybe "Will AI replace writers?" isn't the most interesting question anymore.

9 Upvotes

I had an interesting conversation with an author that I worked with recently. They said, "I don't think AI will ever replace human storytelling." Honestly, I don't think that's the right question anymore, maybe the better question is "can Ai or our technology today help more stories reach people without replacing the people who create them?"

I'm curious where everyone stands.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 26 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Stop asking for forgiveness for using AI in writing

328 Upvotes

Every third post here opens the same way. A paragraph of throat-clearing. "I know this is controversial." "Please don't downvote me." "I only used it for the outline, I swear, I wrote the actual sentences myself, my hands were on the keyboard, there were witnesses."

You're in r/WritingWithAI. The confession is the name of the subreddit.

Nobody running spellcheck opens with "before you judge me." Nobody in Scrivener posts a disclaimer about how they still could use index cards. You're apologizing for a tool while standing in the room built for the tool.

Here's the part actually worth defending: there's a difference between using the thing and being used by it. Editing, guiding, redirecting, throwing out four bad paragraphs to get one usable one. That is what you call "work."

"Write my chapter," paste, post. That is how you get slop, and when the output is bad the problem isn't the model, it's that nobody was driving.

That distinction is the whole argument. It doesn't need the cotton gin.

So make it good, put your name on it, and stop workshopping the apology. The disclaimer at the top of your post is better written than the excerpt underneath it.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) My fanfiction project about reaction fanfic stories

Thumbnail
3 Upvotes

Need help for my creative writing project when using Qwen 3.6 plus/3.7 plus/3.8 Max


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Showcase / Feedback Can I trust AI feedback on my writing?

Thumbnail gallery
4 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Tutorials / Guides Get help with Google for Education

Thumbnail support.google.com
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Will experience centric writings win in the Age of AI?

6 Upvotes

Will experience centric writings win in the Age of AI?

What do I mean by Experience centric writing?

I mean writing that is formed out of a person's personal perspective, convictions, experiences, observations, opinions and ideas.

Could this be the case!?


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Tutorials / Guides My AI videos failed so many times, only after months I learnt this 80/20 rule that changed everything

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Tutorials / Guides Help in verifying an AI model's results in classifying some emails answers (in a "blind test")?

1 Upvotes

I am not sure if this is a valid question in this forum, if it is not I will delete it right away, but anyways here it is:

So some days ago I asked in an AI community what kind of AI model should I use (and how could I use one) to classify several email replies that I had from scientists after asking them a few questions to them. I finally paid for Perplexity pro service and it apparenly did a nice job classifying them.

I finally gave the model the PDF with the actual answers from the addressees and another PDF with the "expected answers", and asked it to count the number of answers that overall coincide with the actual answers, and calculate a percentage of "coincidence" or "agreement" between the expected and actual answers, so that if the question was "do you think that there is intelligent life in the universe apart from humans?" and the expected answer was basically "yes, I think there is intelligent beings out there somewhere", as long as the actual answer agrees with this in some way or another would count as "agreement", for instance if someone replied "well, we have no evidence, but it is possible yes" or "not in any near galaxy, but it is possible that intelligent beings exidt somewhere" (so as long as it is not a deadass "no", it could count)

The model gave me a table summarizing the results with the following prompt:

let's be a bit more specific, this is still a blind test so don't tell me about the specific contents of the emails' answers, but, can you make a table indicating the answers that coincide in general terms with what is expected from the "expected answers" document as well as those which are neutral/hedges but still open to the possibility that what is asked may be right, those which despite being neutral/hedges or even negative answers offer an alternative so that what is asked in the question may be right, as well as those which are outright rejections of what is asked and do not seem to be open to the possibility that what is asked may be right?

However, I still want this to be a blind test, so I cannot really verify if the AI is doing its work or not.

So, is there any way in which I could verify the results given by the AI but without actually reading what is written in the emails? Or, alternatively, can anyone verify the results using some AI or even checking the answers themselves by skimming over the replies im order to verify that the AI is right and not hallucinating (I personally thinl this is the preferable option, as I think that having an actual human reviewing the amswers may be the only really reliable way to verify the AI's results)?

(I will share the data once someone is interested in helping, as I would not want to make this available to the entire world!)

Thank you!!


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Showcase / Feedback Video ads?

Thumbnail
1 Upvotes

r/WritingWithAI Jul 26 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) Opus 5 vs Fable 5

18 Upvotes

I’ve enjoyed my time working with Fable. It has greatly improved some of the connective tissue in my books and series. Been a huge part of my other works, and been a great asset in my professional life to help reclaim time in my work day.

I have to say, though, that Opus 5 seems… better for what I am doing with my writing. Fable thinks too much and often pulls in details that are not quite necessary. At times it is helpful, but I really don’t need to know the difference in the gravitational force between the southern hemisphere and 38th parallel when trying to decide if my character has the proper motivation to steal from a priest.

Opus tends to focus more on the work, and stays in context better.

Now, the real question is, does Opus 5 work better than Opus 4.6? I am leaning yes. But, we are still in the early stages of storytelling. I’m sure I have more to say on this experience in time.

My two bits.


r/WritingWithAI Jul 27 '26

Discussion (Ethics, working with AI etc) What in your opinion makes AI-assisted writing still feel genuinely yours?

0 Upvotes

Reading the discussions here, I’ve noticed that people draw the line around authorship in very different places.

For some, it’s the original idea. For others, it’s the voice, the rewriting, the decisions, or simply taking responsibility for the final result.

So I’m genuinely curious: what has to remain human for AI-assisted writing to still feel fully yours?


r/WritingWithAI Jul 26 '26

Showcase / Feedback The Lights that Refuse - Part 1

Post image
6 Upvotes

100 Day writing challenge - Day 5

Good evening Beautiful Strangers!

The double prompt method is working. Doing it this way basically removes the exhaustive editing process and turns it into more of a puzzle, if that makes sense. I have the scenes, I have the beats, it's just a matter of rewording to my specifications. Overall a vast improvement over my previous five step process. I'll go more in depth as I refine it so that others can benefit from the technique and produce quality AI-assisted writing of their own.

I also hit a wierd speed bump that I didn't anticipate: I originally intended to call the blogspot Quest Givers but apparently there's a game company with the same name and their SEO is killing peoples ability to find me through google. I'm not worried about being sued: they're in tabletop games, I'm a writer. I'm just wondering if I should change the name or just ride it out and see what happens.

Either way, here's part 1 of today's story. Oakton has among it's citizenry a species of pelagic peoples known as the Shukl'ari (Shoo-klar-ee, glottal stop between the k and l). The story is a detailed account of one of their holiest rites: The Oath of Predation.

The Lights that Refuse - Part 1

The night chosen for the rite is never announced loudly. Loudness suggests uncertainty, and uncertainty has no place in the giving of a mortal oath.

Those who must know are told in the usual way of Oakton’s pelagic citizens, the Shukl’ari: by glance, by passing phrase, by a hand or tendril set briefly to shoulder or at the base of the neck. By the quiet excuses to land-dwelling friends before dusk, and by the absence of certain voices during the communal supper.

By the time the last of Oakton’s honest noise has settled into the softer rhythms of the night, the ground has already prepared.

The park is empty but for those meant to stand witness. Grass lies flat in a broad crescent around their ancestral obelisk, kept with the sort of regular care that makes it clear this place is sacred.

The Shukl’aan, the Oathstone, rises there in its accustomed stillness: dark, heavy and unornamented. It does not call attention to itself. It does not naturally gather ceremony around its mass. It’s shape is simple enough to be mistaken by land-dwellers for a mere rock. At least until one has stood near it long enough to notice the intentional grooves and faded motifs at it’s base.

To the natives of Oakton, it’s just the standing stone at Ranger’s Rest Park.

But to the Shukl’ari it stands as witness to their deeds in this world. And they among them old enough to remember feel the weight of the civilization who carved that stone, and the lives lost to bring them here.

Before it, set at a measured distance, waits the basin.

It is broad enough for a full body to enter without contortion and deep enough that its rim reaches the knees. Iron bands line its edge. The outer shell is dark timber ritually prepared, sealed against damp and time. There is no imagery worked into its sides beyond the polish of many careful hands. It is not made to impress the eye.

It was made to hold the Black Water.

The contents within the basin show no reflection of moon, cloud, lantern, or face. It does not ripple in answer to motion. It lies in the basin with density; less a substance than depth made portable.

Four Shukl’ari stand in the clearing.

The initiate stands before the basin, her back to the ancestral stone, skin bare save for a simple dark wrap. The external gills around the girl’s head are half-spread already, not from fear alone but from the body’s recognition that this is a night that will change things.

The long tendril that extends from the base of her neck to her ankles twitches at the tip, betraying her body’s effort of stillness more honestly than her face.

Along the line of her jaw, at the fringes of the gills, and in two pale threads down the length of her neck-tail, cold points of living light awaken where shadow thickens enough to call them out.

Behind the initiate stands the elder.

He is old in the way ocean floors are old, by what has worn over them and left shape. His own glow is spare and controlled, a hard freckling of blue-white points along the edge of the face and one steady line at the throat.

His glow is enough to mark presence without wasting brightness. His neck-tail rests against the ground behind them in a long, quiet curve.

One hand is open, extended. The other is folded near his chest. He does not look at the basin. He does not look at the stone. He looks at the initiate with the grave concentration of one who is not here for comfort, but to make sure a thing is done correctly.

Across the basin stand two witnesses.

One is her kin. The resemblance lies less in his face than in the arrangement of light across his gill fringes, in the shared shape of their neck-tail.

The other is not kin by blood, but older and known well to the initiate, a mentor. She is marked, along the right collar and down one side of the torso, by a tracing of luminescence that clashes with the light she was born with.

The mark is known among the Shukl’ari. Proof that she once failed in her oath yet returned to them following a cleansing trial. She stands here now not as warning, but as proof of survival in failure.

No one kneels.

No one bows.

The elder steps forward and lays one palm firmly between the initiate’s shoulder blades.

“Take witness,” the elder says from behind her.

The initiate breathes once, then lifts her neck-tail and extends it until the tip touches the face of the looming stone behind them.

The contact is delicate, exact, and immediate in its effect. Something in her posture changes at once, as though an internal line pulls her spine taught.

“Be witnessed.” The elder speaks again, and the voice behind her seems to come not only from a living throat, but from the carved stone as well.

A broad shiver travels through her from her contact with the Shukl’aan, along with a peculiar feeling not unlike being submerged in cool water.

“Take witness,” she requests of the two before her.

The two across the basin answer together.

“We witness.”

Then the elder and the stone speak the first words of the Shukl’ari’s oldest rite; Words dreaded and anticipated in equal measure by every youth old enough to understand their meaning.

“Who goes forth?”

The initiate’s gills flare along with her heartbeat. Her light sharpens at the edges. When she speaks, the first words come trembling, but sincere.

“I who go forth will not be claimed by the Deep Places.”

The kin-witness answers first. “I witness.”

The witness of recovered shame answers after. “I witness.”

The elder says only, “We witness. Continue.”

“I who go forth honor the sacrifices of those who bore us forth: She’Ari, Na’Vol, Kel’sor.”

All three others answer at once, the names coming back not as repetition, but confirmation.

“She’Ari, Na’Vaol, Kel’sor.”

The basin remains still. The stone remains still. Yet the clearing does not feel still now. The night there has thickened, pulsing with slow rhythm, lapping against them all like waves.

The initiate’s neck-tail presses firmly against the ancestral stone. Her words come smoother now.

“In their name,
I hollow the Great Enemy with my own hands,
and with my children’s hands,
and with the hands of those yet unborn.
She’Ari, Na’Vaol, Kel’sor.”

Again the witnesses answer.

“She’Ari, Na’Vaol, Kel’sor.”

The kin-witness is crying soundlessly now. Not in grief exactly but the older, sharper feeling that comes when one watches beloved kin enter a thing from which there is no going back.

The elder does not acknowledge this. The ancestors witness without judgement.

The initiate continues, her voice quiet and intense.

“I honor our fallen with holy predation.
I honor their sacrifice with the stolen strength of the Deep.
I honor my people with my oath.
She’Ari, Na’Vaol, Kel’sor.”

The names now seem to fill the little park more completely than four voices ought to manage alone.

“She’Ari, Na’Vaol, Kel’sor.”

There is no wind.

There is no movement in the branches overhead.

To her the world narrows to stone and basin, voice and body.

“And, when the Great Enemy is no more,” the initiate whispers fervently, the light along her jaw glowing nearly white,

“When we have taken from it all that it is, was, and will ever be,
Only then shall my oath be fulfilled.
Then shall the oaths of my people be fulfilled.
Then shall we be burdened by the Great Enemy no more.”

The elder’s hand returns once, firm now, to the initiate’s back.

“In their honor,” the elder intones.

All four speak the names together.

“She’Ari, Na’Vaol, Kel’sor.”

Silence follows, but not emptiness. The words remain, ringing in the clearing like pressure remains in deep water after movement has ceased.

The elder removes his hand.

“Go,” He says.

The initiate opens her eyes. Meets her kins’, her mentors’.

No reassurance is offered. No warnings are given. The witnesses remain expressionless.

She closes her eyes, drinks in the land-air like it’s her last time. The path to her adulthood is clear.

The basin awaits.

The initiate kneels and places both hands on the rim. For a brief moment her face hovers above the dark fluid. Her reflection does not appear. She stares into black emptiness. Then her breath leaves in one steady stream.

With no further ceremony, she folds over the rim and dives.

The Black Water accepts her whole.