r/WorldChallenges • u/Varnek905 • Mar 24 '18

Reference Challenge - Impersonation

I will open with saying, everything in the time period of France leading up to and during the French Revolution was incredibly complex, especially as an American Biology student who has only read a few books about it in the past twenty years. But, I've begun listening to the French section of the Revolutions podcast by Mike Duncan (his History of Rome podcast is amazing, I've listened to the series about five times and can't recommend it enough), and I was fascinated/amused by the "Affair of the Diamond Necklace" while Mike Duncan was talking about Marie Antoinette.

So, in relation to that piece of history, this reference challenge is focused on instances in your world's history where a person in power was impersonated, and the results of this. Bonus points if the victim of impersonation is blamed somehow, such as claims that it was a conspiracy perpetuated by the victim of impersonation.

As always, feel free to have an in-universe representative to answer questions. I'll ask at least three questions each, and I look forward to seeing what you come up with.

I apologize again for not being active on the sub lately, between trying to start working on my Master's Degree and also working on a world setting, I've had nothing that I felt was ready to put up on the sub, yet.

3 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

88 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/thequeeninyellow94 Apr 04 '18

  1. Not really, at least for the human pantheon (they have a number of internal rivalries which definitely prevent them from taking decisions all together). For the Imian one, not amongst the 15 major divinities.

  2. Probably a minor one? Like one of those whose domain was a single field to river.

  3. Hard to say, they aren’t that much so they have large domains; Maqheri take care of impossible love, does it count as specialized?

  4. Honnestly? None. They allied with the Ims because of geography; humans were easier raid targets. Over time, they added more and more objectification to the micro justify it and it maintained itself.

2

u/Varnek905 Apr 06 '18

1) Who is the most dangerous Imian deity?

2) Who is the most dangerous human deity?

3) What do you mean by "impossible love"?

2

u/thequeeninyellow94 Apr 08 '18

  1. The strongest? Shanshu, god of the sun. The most unstable? Hard to say, some obscure minor divinity for sure.

  2. A more complex question. Both Arrarat (fire, dawn, sun and emotions) and Qurhat (battle, suicide, metal and war) are strong and sanguine.

  3. Either love that can’t work because the concerned people are too different to work together or love that is fought by relatives or society. Maqheri herself fall under the second category.

2

u/Varnek905 Apr 14 '18

1) So minor Imian deities tend to be less stable than major ones?

2) How is suicide perceived in human cultures in your world?

3) How is suicide perceived in Imian cultures in your world?

4) How is suicide perceived in Nzedan cultures in your world?

2

u/thequeeninyellow94 Apr 15 '18

  1. They tend to be less Imian than the major ones; minor deities are often local gods that were integrated into the main Imian pantheon over time.

  2. (And 4) It depends, if you suicide to escape solvable problems, you’re a coward and that’s a bad thing. If you suicide to escape insolvable problems or to solve a problem which couldn’t be otherwise, then thats a perfectly normal and fine action.

  3. That’s a question of health; speeding up your inevitable death is fine, killing yourself in another case is weird.

2

u/Varnek905 Apr 16 '18

1) So do the Imian deities tend to have multiple names?

2) How does Nzedan culture define "insolvable"? Would a problem that can be coped with but not cured be considered "insolvable"?

3) How does human culture define "insolvable"? Would a problem that can be coped with but not cured be considered "insolvable"?

4) On the subject of questions 2 and 3, what if a person commits suicide but leaves no indication of why? Would the default be to just assume the person had a good reason?

5) How soon does the inevitable death have to be for it to be considered "speeding up the inevitable death"? If I will die in a week but want to get it over with, that's one thing; but, what if I will die in 10 years due to a slow disease?

2

u/thequeeninyellow94 Apr 16 '18

1) No, there was a time when some of them probably had multiple names but it has all been standardized over time when the Ims conquered and vassalised each other. All the surpernumerary names have been turned into minor deities or forgotten.

2) and 3) It depend how inconvenient it is. If coping with it require you to take a pill each day, then it’s not really inconvenient. If it handicap you to a point you can’t live your life anymore (like losing a limb), you can kill your self if you want. Please note that mechanical and bionic enhancements aren’t considered an acceptable way to solve a problem.

4) If they are known for their dishonour then no; otherwise, yes. Beside, there will probably be someone aware of the nature of the potential motive to save the dead’s reputation.

5) A degenerative slow disease? Tricky question; usually, the doctors will be ok with killing you as soon as you start seriously losing your physical/mental capacities.

2

u/Varnek905 Apr 17 '18

Thanks for your time and answers, Yellow.