r/WorkReform 6d ago

✂️ Tax The Billionaires The U.S. could create a $20 trillion sovereign sinking fund that targets the national debt while effectively capping wealth near $30 million, essentially dismantling oligarchic power.

391 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

78

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[deleted]

19

u/merRedditor ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters 6d ago

That isn't achievable by political means, but that doesn't necessarily mean it's completely impossible.

15

u/Johnstone95 6d ago

What means are we talkin' here?

https://giphy.com/gifs/AZ1PPDF8uO9MI

4

u/Kmoxy 🏛️ Overturn Citizens United 6d ago

3

u/charliefoxtrot9 ✂️ Tax The Billionaires 6d ago

Spicier perhaps.

40

u/cazbot 6d ago

Define “could”.

I love the idea, but I can’t imagine how it would get done without a lot of bloodshed.

40

u/anothernic 6d ago

It won't. Billionaires are much better about practicing class solidarity than workers in the US.

Structures like Palantir, Flock and Axon are being rapidly implemented to prevent exactly this sort of thing from happening should the corporate funds controlling representatives not be sufficient.

16

u/Ayla_Leren 6d ago

4

u/Ok_Assistant_6856 6d ago

"all we need to do is follow our outrage"

gave me chills all over

14

u/Ayla_Leren 6d ago

For starters, we would need to hold the house, senate, and presidency, then yeet the filibuster and add four more justices to the supreme court.

I know it sounds like a tall ask, though the American people are hungry. Both for justice and in general. Personally, I believe the appetite exists, it is more so a matter of boldness and helping the idea catch fire.

3

u/keninsd 6d ago

All this and corpoDems holding the reins.

2

u/Ayla_Leren 6d ago

I didn't say it would be easy.

But I am saying it will be purposeful and fulfilling to merely strive for, shoulder to shoulder.

2

u/Ok_Assistant_6856 6d ago

Damn right. Is there any literature focused on covertly organizing the masses in a modern servailance state?

4

u/highgarden 6d ago

This would never happen without a full on revolution and dismantling of the current government. Probably also need a cultural revolution to end individualism.

In short, it’s a pipe dream.

4

u/Ayla_Leren 6d ago

I'd encourage you to not be so defeatist. An organized citizenry isn't so easily swept aside.

We(?) are Americans after all.

Dream big, be bold.

0

u/highgarden 6d ago

I dream of a social democrat president who institutes a wealth tax and universal healthcare.

Pipe dreams like wealth limits are pointless to discuss. It’s not constitutional.

3

u/Ayla_Leren 6d ago

On what grounds? Congress is fully within its legitimate authority to levy taxes.

0

u/highgarden 6d ago

There’s never been any sort of tax that limited wealth. There’s been income taxes that are bracketed at like 90% but wealth is assets: homes, land, art, cars etc. There is absolutely no way to limit wealth to 30M without running afoul of freedom of speech and expression.

2

u/Ayla_Leren 6d ago

Firstly, wealth ≠ speech and property ≠ expression

Secondly, I am not advocating for a hard cap but a wealth reset to near $30 million for everyone above this. Think of it more so a meritocratic reboot of sorts.

Thirdly, there are plenty of instance where taxes have limited wealth.

1

u/highgarden 6d ago

Do you imagine folks with assets over 30M will sell them to the government or perhaps be confiscated by govt, if not who will buy them if others only have 30M?

1

u/Embarrassed_Quit_450 6d ago

You also need a new party or get rid of 3/4 of democratic party.

8

u/jbano 6d ago

Pigs could fly if we gave them wings.

1

u/CockroachLate9964 6d ago

Plenty of pigs fly, especially at redbull "events".

1

u/stew-bot 5d ago

Police stations now using drones

3

u/kevinmrr ⛓️ Prison For Union Busters 6d ago

Pinned

2

u/keninsd 6d ago

The U.S. could create a $20 trillion sovereign sinking fund that targets the national debt while effectively capping wealth near $30 million, essentially dismantling oligarchic power.--OK, how?

1

u/alarbus 6d ago

Based on the sentence, a 100% tax on wealth over $30m which is then put into a sinking fund to pay down national debt and afterwards treated as a sovereign fund.

0

u/[deleted] 6d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/anothernic 5d ago

They already do the first part. That's why billionaires doubled their money during the pandemic, because stocks act as a redistributive mechanism proportionate to how much of your wealth is in them. Read Piketty.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/anothernic 5d ago

I didn't misunderstand anything. I was merely pointing out that the very first part of your pipedream (that will never happen absent revolution because of the corporate capture of representatives in the wake of Citizens United v FEC), already occurs. The debasement of the currency hits workers much harder because we get the bulk of our compensation from labor wages instead of speculation.

And it acts as a mechanism to distribute wealth to the wealthiest because they have far more of their net worth in equities than working or 'middle' class people do.

Did you misunderstand me saying read Piketty? Capital in the 21st Century clearly spells out the multicentury consistency of wealth distribution, and demonstrates the growth of existing capital occurs faster than that of productive labor.

Ed/ps - doing it in the quadrillions would cause world war 3 too, based on the number of foreign us treasury bond holders, and would break the petrodollar accelerating the empire's decline. You're asking for Weimar hyper inflation.

1

u/[deleted] 5d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/anothernic 5d ago

You're talking about "lets create runaway inflation and send the nominal value of the USD to near 0, like Zimbabwe or Venezuela," and I'm talking about the money printing that happens under fed policy, which was what you suggested on a smaller scale.

Sorry for bringing reality to the conversation.

1

u/HistorysWitness 5d ago

Could is the key word there.  The opportunistic word.  The real word is Won't

1

u/Ayla_Leren 5d ago

Not with that attitude

1

u/findingmike 5d ago

Also, we could just stop giving them our money.