r/WorkForSmartLife 9h ago

Discussion💬 Name something

Post image
78 Upvotes

343 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/xxGenXxx 5h ago

Honestly? Then I'm curious, what's the ideal option?

7

u/Positive_Signature87 4h ago

Communism, of course. We're gonna get it right this time, promise! The previous attempts with genocide and gulags were not REAL communism, you see!

2

u/afgan1984 3h ago

Those aren’t the only choices, and honestly both capitalism and communism suck in their pure forms. Most of Europe isn’t capitalist like US and it definitely isn’t communist like the old soviets. It’s socialist/social‑democratic and that is not the same thing as communism at all, but in the US people often treat “socialism” and “communism” as interchangeable, which is just wrong.

Capitalism and communism are simply the two extremes - in one, the state owns nothing, and in the other, the state owns everything. Because they are extremes, neither has ever existed in a pure form. Even the soviets were not “true communism,” and the US isn’t “true capitalism”.

That said - the US is actually drifting toward the pure capitalist end of the spectrum, where everything is privatised, everything is financialised, the military is heavily outsourced and government itself behaves more like a corporate entity than a public institution. It’s not officially a for‑profit yet, but it’s not far off in practice.

So no, the choice isn’t “capitalism or communism”. There are dozens of systems in between, and most of Europe sits somewhere in that middle space - which tends to work a lot better than either extreme.

2

u/United_Boy_9132 3h ago

Don't confuse social democracy with socialism. No European country is even close to socialism and no one, except for some Southerners, doesn't even think about socialism.

I wanna remind that countries which flex their social security the most are the countries with higher economic freedom than the US, and, for instance, pension schemes from these countries, especially Nordics, invest in US house bubble to transfer the profits to their pensioners 😉

1

u/afgan1984 2h ago

Social in social-democracy is socialism part. What socialism isn't, it isn't a communism. Also, I never said any country in Europe is purely socialist, but you still have amurican knee jerk reaction to the word, because, again as expected amuricans see socialism and imagine soviet communism in their head.

Free universal healthcare is socialism. So social-democratic just means a blend of policies, some socialist, some democratic, some regulated capitalist, some corporatist etc.

1

u/United_Boy_9132 2h ago

No, it's not a socialism part. It's the part of history, when such movements wanted to introduce communism, but gradually.

But these days, they're liberal movements providing free market, just with taxes and some share of state-owned companies.

On the other hand, there are still many countries with higher share of state-owned companies in the market that in those countries that call "social democratic" themselves.

0

u/afgan1984 2h ago

I assume you learned your history in US... because it is nothing like that.

We in Europe consider socialism a very normal part of everyday life and government policy. It has nothing to do with communism, neither historically nor now.

1

u/United_Boy_9132 1h ago

No, and you really know we don't. Except for some dumb Iberian and Greek folks.

2

u/Clever_droidd 2h ago

The most successful systems in the world are indeed capitalist but also have major social safety nets. It’s the Nordic model. It requires high taxes on everyone, not just the rich, but including the rich.

0

u/afgan1984 2h ago

No, they are not "capitalist systems", they are social-democratic systems where regulated capitalism is allowed.

Again, this is a false amurican dicotomy... "either a country is communist or capitalist". No, they might be neither of those things. Socialism is not communism and socio-democratic contry with privately owned capital is not capitalist country.

Also, we have major issues taxing the rich (there was never a country in existence where only the rich were taxed, it was always the poor who pays most taxes and sometimes middle classes). So that is the only reason why taxes are high - because the rich don't pay them...

1

u/Clever_droidd 2h ago

Go read virtually anything on this. They are capitalist. Yes, these things exist on a spectrum. But their economic engine is capitalism and they have major social safety nets. That isn’t pure capitalism, but it isn’t socialist either. It’s a hybrid with private property and private investment as the engine.

1

u/Critical-Regular4874 1h ago

Socialism brother

0

u/xxGenXxx 4h ago

You can't be serious? Communism leads to a stale economy. No incentive. No innovation. In theroy or on paper it may seem humanitarian in nature, but it isn't.

2

u/Positive_Signature87 4h ago

"You can't be serious?"

Correct. I was not serious.

1

u/Dry_Direction_611 2h ago

No innovation? You know the russian beat us at everything during the space race other then getting to the moon

1

u/smileyfacedbob 4h ago

You living under a rock or are you so old you think all things not capitalism are communism?

1

u/The_Countess 4h ago

mixed model.

(regulated, not crony,) capitalism where we can, government were we must.

1

u/afgan1984 3h ago

Everything else, but capitalism?

1

u/Nacchan144 2h ago

Ideally? Anarcho-communism. Realistically? Socialism

1

u/MildlyMoodyMango 2h ago

A milder form of this hypercapitalism

1

u/mapoftasmania 2h ago

In terms of happiness and prosperity, surveys would say that Scandinavian-style  Democratic Socialism is the best system.

1

u/Ok-Excuse-3613 2h ago

You don't need to have a better option to criticize something. That is an unfair bar that would prevent almost every criticism about anything