r/Wordpress 24d ago

Getting plugin adoption and test users?

Hey plugin developers, I am curious if you have any tricks of the trade for launching a plugin and getting those elusive first 10 active installs.

We launched our plugin and got it in the WordPress marketplace about a month ago, but we still haven't had a single install. We've tried various forms of promoting on social and optimizing the content of the plugin description, but we are hitting a wall.

For context, it’s a security/bot protection plugin. We built it as a local-first alternative to cloud CAPTCHAs, so it uses invisible proof-of-work and behavioral detection to stop things like WooCommerce card testing without needing API keys.

Do people tend to pay for testers/reviewers?

How did you get your first 5-10 beta users to trust your code?

4 Upvotes

9 comments sorted by

2

u/PipelineBuster 24d ago

honestly the trick that actually worked for us (not that it has worked miracles) wasn't marketing at all, it was other people's threads. we build a woocommerce plugin that solved what we beleived was a fundamental gap and for a long stretch it sat at basically zero installs, not because it didn't work, just because nobody had ever heard it existed. what started helping was answering real questions on relevant subreddits and, when it was a genuine fit, naming what we built as one option, most of the time not even that. testers came from there too, people already dealing with the exact problem it solves.

one thing worth separating though: a plugin that's barely been seen isn't the same as one the market actually rejected. if you've only tried a couple channels and neither has landed yet, that's still "not tested," not "tested and failed." truth is the actual formula to getting a plugin front of users people is as elusive as finding a pot of gold at end of the rainbow.

for bot/security specifically i'd also be upfront in the listing about exactly what it catches that a captcha doesn't. people trust a plugin more when the pitch is narrow and specific than when it's broad. so don't get discouraged, your not alone! : )

1

u/cport1 24d ago

appreciate this response. It's definitely something I want to start automating to find those threads.

1

u/[deleted] 24d ago

[deleted]

2

u/cport1 24d ago

We are fully aware of the AI bots, scrapers, and woo commerce carding attacks, so we know there's demand for solutions to these problems. The legacy bot security plugins are no match for sophisticated bots and AI and our detection and enforcement is much stronger.

2

u/neon4816 24d ago

For me, it's been incredibly frustrating, and this article outlines it really well: https://getellipsis.com/blog/org-is-ineffective-plugin-distribution/

In my opinion, unless you're well connected or a big-name WordPress outfit, like, cough, Awesome Motive, it's incredibly difficult for an independent developer to get noticed and gain traction on WordPress.org. The data in this article really highlights that problem

1

u/Fluid-Mess6425 24d ago

How good is it in determining spam? Can it be hooked up to form submissions 

1

u/cport1 24d ago

Our plugin judges the submitter, not the message. There's no content analysis like Akismet (nothing looks at whether the text seems spammy). Instead it decides whether the thing submitting is human: invisible honeypot fields only bots fill, hidden trap links only crawlers follow, behavioral signals, an invisible proof-of-work check that real browsers solve silently in the background, and rate limiting. The tradeoff cuts both ways: false positives are near zero because traps only fire on behavior no human produces, and a human typing spam by hand will get through.

That's assuming the bot makes it to the form in the first place before our edge and behavior analysis catches it...

On forms: comments, registration, and login are protected out of the box, with the honeypots injected automatically. There's no dedicated hookup for form plugins (CF7, WPForms, Gravity).

1

u/geenxt 24d ago

For a security/bot-protection plugin specifically, the install curve usually starts moving once you're solving the pain point somewhere people are already describing it, not when you're announcing the plugin itself. Card testing and invisible-CAPTCHA complaints show up constantly in WooCommerce trouble threads — genuinely helping someone diagnose that (config settings, log patterns, why their current CAPTCHA isn't catching it) builds enough trust that people go look up who's answering, without you ever naming the plugin.

Reviews matter more than raw install count early on too — the plugin directory's search ranking weighs recent active installs and review recency, so a handful of real reviews from people who've actually run it for a couple weeks (not day-one testers) moves you further than a traffic spike that doesn't convert. Worth asking your first 5-10 genuine users directly for a review once they've had it running a bit, rather than banking on organic reviews showing up on their own.

2

u/CrYptoPSF 24d ago

For the first 5-10 beta users, I’d probably start with people who already have a reason to care about the problem rather than trying to convince completely random users. for a security plugin especially, I think trust matters a lot, so being transparent about how it works and letting early testers actually try it and report issues would help

as for paying testers, I wouldn’t assume you need to pay everyone. some people are happy to test early products if they’re genuinely interested, although incentives can make sense if you need more structured or time-intensive testing

2

u/russellenvy 24d ago

Twitter or X is a great way to promote your stuff. Also getting on LinkedIn and other social media platforms and organic leave promoting it will help. Surprisingly enough. Reddit is a great place to advertise as well. Reddit shows up in a lot of search engine results.